User talk:Octane/Archive Mar 2007
 | This is an archive of past discussions about User:Octane. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Welcome!
Hi, and welcome to the Military history WikiProject! As you may have guessed, we're a group of editors working to improve Wikipedia's coverage of topics related to military history.
A few features that you might find helpful:
- Our navigation box points to most of the useful pages within the project.
- The announcement and open task box is updated very frequently. You can watchlist it if you're interested; or, you can add it directly to your user page by including {{WPMILHIST Announcements}} there.
- Most important discussions take place on the project's main discussion page; it is highly recommended that you watchlist it.
- The project has several departments, which handle article quality assessment, detailed article and content review, and project-wide collaboration.
- We have a number of task forces that focus on specific topics, nations, periods, and conflicts.
- We've developed a variety of guidelines for article structure and content, template use, categorization, and other issues that you may find useful.
If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to ask one of the project coordinators, or any experienced member of the project, and we'll be happy to help you. Again, welcome! We look forward to seeing you around! Carom 14:14, 5 March 2007 (UTC)
I've done something!
Good news, Sean! I completed my first article in a year and a half! All it took was a few days of heavy typing and constant saving. Sorry about erasing your table of my userboxes; it didn't fit the method to my madness. By the way, if there is anything I can do for you edit-wise, just ask.--SuperWikiman 21:33, 10 March 2007 (UTC)
Welcome
Hi, and welcome to the Military history WikiProject! As you may have guessed, we're a group of editors working to improve Wikipedia's coverage of topics related to military history.
A few features that you might find helpful:
- Our navigation box points to most of the useful pages within the project.
- The announcement and open task box is updated very frequently. You can watchlist it if you're interested; or, you can add it directly to your user page by including {{WPMILHIST Announcements}} there.
- Most important discussions take place on the project's main discussion page; it is highly recommended that you watchlist it.
- The project has several departments, which handle article quality assessment, detailed article and content review, and project-wide collaboration.
- We have a number of task forces that focus on specific topics, nations, periods, and conflicts.
- We've developed a variety of guidelines for article structure and content, template use, categorization, and other issues that you may find useful.
If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to ask one of the project coordinators, or any experienced member of the project, and we'll be happy to help you. Again, welcome! We look forward to seeing you around! Wandalstouring 19:20, 5 March 2007 (UTC)
Signpost updated for March 5th, 2007.
 |
|---|
|
| ||
| Volume 3, Issue 10 | 5 March 2007 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
|
| |
| Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
| |
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 06:06, 6 March 2007 (UTC)
Signpost updated for March 12th, 2007.
| |
|---|
|
| ||
| Volume 3, Issue 11 | 12 March 2007 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
|
| |
| Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
| |
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 05:09, 13 March 2007 (UTC)
Template:CURRENTHOUR
I noticed that you created Template:CURRENTHOUR today. Per this discussion back in September, the template was deleted. Now that there is a Parser Function for the same output, this template serves no visible purpose. I have tagged it for speedy deletion. Just thought I'd let you know. ^demon[omg plz] 20:06, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
- No problem, it's always best to explain your decisions with as much detail as possible. Have a great day :-) ^demon[omg plz] 20:19, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia!
|
Signpost updated for March 20th, 2007.
| |
|---|
|
| ||
| Volume 3, Issue 12 | 20 March 2007 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
| WikiWorld comic: "Wilhelm Scream" | News and notes: Bad sin, milestones |
| Features and admins | Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News |
| The Report on Lengthy Litigation |
|
| |
| Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
| |
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 06:54, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
Your edit to the VP userbox
Hey
Just thought I'd let you know that your edit to the VP userbox by creating a redirect has probably broken a few people's user pages (like mine). Could you arrange for a bot or AWB to modify the link to the template so that it's no longer a redirect on people's userpages? Cheers. The Rambling Man 16:29, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
- The redirect list is lengthy... it's here. The Rambling Man 16:35, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
- I didn't know that it didn't just link to the template. But as I've no experience with bots, I'll just go in and do it manually. Blast 21.03.07 1959 (UTC)
- Yes, you have broken the box on the 450+ user pages that use {{User:UBX/VandalProof}} by creating a double redirect. Please be more careful next time, and you might find User:MetsBot useful. mattbr 17:13, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
- I didn't know that it didn't just link to the template. But as I've no experience with bots, I'll just go in and do it manually. Blast 21.03.07 1959 (UTC)
RPC and integration of church and state
According to the constitution of the RPCNA, your edit of Separation of Church and State was wrong. RPCNA Constitution, on page A-71 (PDF page 76), point 7. I'd recommend reading that whole section on the Civil Magistrate for details.
Please be aware that unification of church and state means structural union. Either the state rules the church (see Anglicanism, and the stuff John Knox was fighting against), or the church rules the state (see Catholicism, etc).
As I understand it, RPs are in favour of the state becoming Christian, but remaining structurally separate, at least in the RPCNA. I'm not 100% sure this is the historical position; for that, you'd need to look at eg. the Solemn League and Covenant. I'm guessing you're not going in for the historical position that much, as the historical RP position is a non-voting position (well, voting in any country that accepts the Solemn League and Covenant :) ).
(Oh, and if you think I'm right, you might want to change your userbox :) )
HTH,
-- TimNelson 14:03, 25 March 2007 (UTC)
Signpost updated for March 26th, 2007.
| |
|---|
|
| ||
| Volume 3, Issue 13 | 26 March 2007 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
|
| |
| Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
| |
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 13:37, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
The Military history WikiProject Newsletter: Issue XIII - March 2007
The March 2007 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This is an automated delivery by grafikbot 18:36, 30 March 2007 (UTC)