Oldestkshatriyas

Satyamevjayate jai HIND

don3

Blanking your talk page

Blanking your talk page, as you have done, is deemed to be acknowledgement by you that the content has been read and understood. You will recall that you were notified of the caste sanctions etc that are in place. I strongly advise you not to continue your reinstatement of old versions of the Meenas article and to engage in discussion until consensus is obtained. You cannot simply say on an article talk page that "I don't like it", and then reinstate old content. Nor are your claims that the article was well-sourced etc even remotely correct. - Sitush (talk) 15:38, 6 March 2012 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	hi Oldestkshatriyas... 2012 (UTC)

March 2012

Thank you. Rahul Mothiya ^{(Talk2Me|Contribs)} 09:13, 9 March 2012 (UTC)

Meenas

Before you start changing the edits of someone who has explained the reason for denying a recent insertion, it might pay to discuss the issue. Especially if you know that the person who refused has a fair amount of experience in the area. Please read User_talk:Omkara1188#Meenas and if you still believe that your contribution was correct then feel free to open a discussion at Talk:Meenas. - Sitush (talk) 15:01, 16 March 2012 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for persistently failing to assume good faith and making personal attacks, as you did at Talk:Meena. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 12:36, 17 March 2012 (UTC)

The Wikipedia community has permitted administrators to impose discretionary sanctions on any editor who is active on any page about social groups, explicitly including caste associations and political parties, related to India, Pakistan, Sri Lanka, Bangladesh and Nepal. Discretionary sanctions can be used against an editor who repeatedly or seriously fails to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behavior, or any normal editorial process. If you engage in further inappropriate behavior in this area, you may be placed under sanctions, which can include blocks, a revert limitation, or an article ban. The discussion leading to the imposition of these sanctions can be read here. Please familiarise yourself with the information page at Wikipedia:General sanctions.

June 2012

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed maintenance templates from Meena. When removing maintenance templates, please be sure to either resolve the problem that the template refers to, or give a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as your removal of this template has been reverted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 19:36, 16 June 2012 (UTC)

James Tod

Hi, I see that you have returned to Meenas with the usual dreadful stuff from James Tod. Please don't. I have reverted you. - Sitush (talk) 22:51, 6 March 2013 (UTC)

Edit warring at Meenas

Hello Oldestkshatriyas. You've already been warned under WP:GS/Caste, and it looks like you've restarted your edit war at Meenas which began in April. Your edit removed a citation to Encyclopedia Britannica from the article. Please be aware that any admin can ban you from this article if it does not seem you are willing to work for consensus. Use the talk page. If you make further changes to the article which are not supported by a consensus at Talk:Meenas you may be blocked or banned from the topic. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 06:03, 10 December 2013 (UTC)

December 2013

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for attempting to harass other users. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.  Dougweller (talk) 06:31, 10 December 2013 (UTC)