Omweb
Image:C_bowers.jpg listed for deletion
editAn image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:C_bowers.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Nv8200p talk 01:44, 4 August 2007 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on OmWeb Limited - Empowering Conscious Enterprise, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam as well as Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. RandomTime 13:27, 14 December 2009 (UTC)
December 2009
edit
If you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article OmWeb Limited - Empowering Conscious Enterprise, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:
- editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with;
- participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors; and
- linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam).
Please familiarize yourself with relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.
For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. RandomTime 13:28, 14 December 2009 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of User:Omweb
edit
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on User:Omweb, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:
- It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information.
- It appears to consist of writings, information, discussions, and/or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that Wikipedia is not a free Web hosting service. (See section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion.)
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. for (;;) (talk) 08:16, 23 July 2016 (UTC)
Your account name
edit
You should also read our conflict of interest guideline and be aware that promotional editing is not acceptable regardless of the username you choose.
If your username does not represent a group, organization or website, you may appeal this username block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} at the bottom of your talk page.
You may simply create a new account, but you may prefer to change your username to one that complies with our username policy, so that your past contributions are associated with your new username. If you would prefer to change your username, you may appeal this username block by adding the text {{unblock-un|new username|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} at the bottom of your talk page. Thank you.
Anna Frodesiak (talk) 08:30, 23 July 2016 (UTC)
- i repectfully object to the actions taken against this user.
in the space of ~15 minutes this user had their userpage "speedied", & then redacted, & was BLOCKED, without any discussion or warning notices, or etc.
& the rationale for the block is "promotional username"
now, this user hasn't been very active, but the account has been around since 2007; & now the user's name is "suddenly" an issue?
& it's SUCH an important issue, that you have to immediately & permanently block them? with no warning, no notice, no discussion?
& let's consider the user's name "omweb"
here is a google-search of the term:
as you can see, that's pretty generic.
IF this is the "standard" we are now using for blocking accounts for having "promotional usernames", then there are a few thousand users than need to be blocked RIGHT NOW!
because, there are a hell of a lot of wikipedia/wikimedia user's with names that are at least as "promotional" as this.
please reconsider your actions here? this certainly violates agf, & any sort of wiki love, courtesy, or kindness.
Lx 121 (talk) 09:05, 28 July 2016 (UTC)
- for that matter, the blocking admin hasn't even provided a source-link to the claimed "copyvio" that caused them to remove most of the content of this user's page? please could you provide the link for that, or some other kind of evidence of the copyright violation?
- Lx 121 (talk) 09:08, 28 July 2016 (UTC)
- Hi there, Lx 121. Let me address Omweb:
- Lx 121 (talk) 09:08, 28 July 2016 (UTC)
- I am sorry Omweb. I cannot find the copyvio at the moment and I do not know why. Maybe it has something to do with being in China while using Earwig's tool. Maybe not. I just don't know and am very frustrated about this. Maybe the search engine just showed me lots and lots of identical sentences because that content had generic phrases related to yoga. If you put some of the text into a search engine, you will know what I mean.
- Anyway, I really do stand by the block. Omweb, or better Yoga Bowers, please understand that I did not mean to offend you. I softblocked the username and not you personally. This is about using that username. Please see WP:CORPNAME. It says "...A user who both adopts a promotional username and also engages in inappropriately promotional behaviors in articles about the company, group, or product, can be blocked. In such cases, administrators should examine the user's edits to decide whether or not to allow them to create a new username...." Of course, below that, it also says that I could simply talk to you about it. I tried to use common sense. And commons sense told me to softblock. It is a gentle block with a gentle message. I did that because your username is the name of your company, which you mention at your userpage along with your lengthy biography and picture of yourself. Also, a version of your talk page promotes your organization. Plus, you created OmWeb Limited - Empowering Conscious Enterprise which was pure promotion and nothing more. Really, I did not mean to offend you. I just used my best judgement. Had you been a productive editor all this time, I certainly would have discussed it with you first. But, as your contributions show, you have made eleven constructive edits in nine and a half years while making sixteen edits about you and your company. I encourage you to put in for a name chance or simply abandon this one and help to build the encyclopedia. Again, I am sorry if I have offended you by preventing you from using this username and causing you to use another. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 09:59, 28 July 2016 (UTC)
- To Lx 121. It was "suddenly" an issue because someone speedy tagged his userpage, and I, as an admin, had to deal with it. It was tagged because Omweb just added that biography about himself to his userpage. I was not the one to add the speedy deletion tag. I saw it and and even declined to speedily delete it. Instead, I simply removed the offending text per WP:UPNOT. My actions were well within the bounds of what other admins do. I constantly seek the opinions of other admins to be sure I am acting appropriately. Plus, I have a long reputation of being overly kind. Given this same scenario again, I would do the same thing. In fact, I think most admins would. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 10:07, 28 July 2016 (UTC)
- Lx 121, I would also like to say that I did not warn Omweb about any copyright violation. I removed content at his userpage (not an admin action page delete) with the edit summary "...rm webhosting and copyvio content..." and the first part of that was completely correct per WP:UPNOT. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 13:08, 28 July 2016 (UTC)