User talk:Otr500/Archive 5
 | This is an archive of past discussions with User:Otr500. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 1 | ← | Archive 3 | Archive 4 | Archive 5 | Archive 6 | Archive 7 | → | Archive 10 |
Notability for artists
Hi. I saw your note on the Michele Zalopany talk page. If you are going to tag stubs, be sure you read and understand WP:ARTIST. Thanks. ThatMontrealIP (talk) 17:33, 4 July 2019 (UTC)
- Just a note to say I had a chance to go over the WP:PSEUDOBIOGRAPHY essay. It's good advice, but it is not an official Wikipedia policy. As the page says, "This page is not one of Wikipedia's policies or guidelines, as it has not been thoroughly vetted by the community." Short biographies are all over Wikipedia, and in my mind they serve a purpose: as the beginning of potentially good articles. There is no requirement that an article be of a certain length or contain enough content to fully describe a person's life. The pages we are writing will be around for a long time. Some will remain stubs, and some will get longer as more material becomes available, or more editors become interested. For example, here is the Article on Ellen Carey that I created on April 9th. And here it is today, wonderfully expanded by a very good editor. Thanks. ThatMontrealIP (talk) 03:06, 11 July 2019 (UTC)
- Short biographies are certainly important if they are expandable. Career stubs that can't possibly be expanded would be a pseudo biography as would one that just does not contain sufficient biographical content or sources found to allow for this. This becomes more important on a BLP that is held to higher standards. While I agree an article may be expanded as more editors become interested I only support that an article remain a stub "only" because of this. If there is insufficient souring "available" that goes toward notability and if I run into that someone may need to prove there is notability. I actually support the area you are working in so don't "plan" to be difficult.
- Just a note to say I had a chance to go over the WP:PSEUDOBIOGRAPHY essay. It's good advice, but it is not an official Wikipedia policy. As the page says, "This page is not one of Wikipedia's policies or guidelines, as it has not been thoroughly vetted by the community." Short biographies are all over Wikipedia, and in my mind they serve a purpose: as the beginning of potentially good articles. There is no requirement that an article be of a certain length or contain enough content to fully describe a person's life. The pages we are writing will be around for a long time. Some will remain stubs, and some will get longer as more material becomes available, or more editors become interested. For example, here is the Article on Ellen Carey that I created on April 9th. And here it is today, wonderfully expanded by a very good editor. Thanks. ThatMontrealIP (talk) 03:06, 11 July 2019 (UTC)
- Essays: Essays that are used on Wikipedia carry no weight over a policy or guideline but do carry weight. On Wikipedia we have "low", "medium" and "high"-impact essays. Wikipedia:Avoiding harm is included in the last one that contains WP:PSEUDO an essay on notability. High-impact essays (rated in the top 5%) are widely read, discussed, and used, often reflecting consensus of several editors, widespread norms, or a generally accepted standard, and can involve 50 or more editors reflecting consensus. Even essays elevated to "explanatory supplement" status contains "This page is not one of Wikipedia's policies or guidelines, as it has not been thoroughly vetted by the community". An essay classified as an explanatory supplement like Wikipedia:Here to build an encyclopedia carries weight. It is an "explanatory supplement (still an essay) to the content and behavioral policy and guideline pages" and contains "This page is intended to provide additional information about concepts in the page(s) it supplements. This page is not one of Wikipedia's policies or guidelines, as it has not been thoroughly vetted by the community.". WP:NOTHERE has been used to determine if an editor should be sanctioned. Wikipedia:Single-purpose account is an essay often used to note a new editor or IP that has interest in one area, subject, or occasion and may result in bans. Wikipedia:Other stuff exists is often cited at AFD to counter arguments that one article should be kept because other articles exist.
- WP:PSEUDO is often cited when sources cannot be found (on a search) to create an article, or support inclusion, that also involves notability issues. This becomes certainly relevant when there is little of no biographical content or content more related to other things such as a business. When an article is severely lacking in content or sourcing tags can call attention to this and result in improvements. That is the actual reason for maintenance tags. You added references and at least one shows that works exists but nothing substantial so I noted this.
- The fact that an editor is actively working in this area is enough for me at this time and the reason I didn't review the tag removal to see if all the issues were resolved. I just took exception to your comments that I need to read and understand WP:ARTIST. If I was an ass like some I have seen I could simply not tagged, not carried on a discussion, and after I searched could simply have clicked to list at AFD for a more community-wide discussion. This might have resulted in an an article being deleted that possibly could be expanded, like the example you gave, and why I use tags and discussions. Many times I run across articles while in the middle of something and would have to redirect or tag for later. By-the-way, I looked at Ellen Carey and a problem I saw was it was classed wrong. If you feel my reassessment is in error you can ping me on that talk page. Have a nice day, Otr500 (talk) 06:34, 11 July 2019 (UTC)
- Thanks for that. I fixed the Carey rating.ThatMontrealIP (talk) 12:58, 11 July 2019 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue CLIX, July 2019
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 12:01, 14 July 2019 (UTC)
Administrators' newsletter – August 2019
News and updates for administrators from the past month (July 2019).
|
|
|
Guideline and policy news
- Following a request for comment, the page Wikipedia:Office actions has been changed from a policy page to an information page.
- A request for comment (permalink) is in progress regarding the administrator inactivity policy.
Arbitration
- Editors may now use the template {{Ds/aware}} to indicate that they are aware that discretionary sanctions are in force for a topic area, so it is unnecessary to alert them.
Miscellaneous
- Following a research project on masking IP addresses, the Foundation is starting a new project to improve the privacy of IP editors. The result of this project may significantly change administrative and counter-vandalism workflows. The project is in the very early stages of discussions and there is no concrete plan yet. Admins and the broader community are encouraged to leave feedback on the talk page.
- The new page reviewer right is bundled with the admin tool set. Many admins regularly help out at Special:NewPagesFeed, but they may not be aware of improvements, changes, and new tools for the Curation system. Stay up to date by subscribing here to the NPP newsletter that appears every two months, and/or putting the reviewers' talk page on your watchlist.
Since the introduction of temporary user rights, it is becoming more usual to accord the New Page Reviewer right on a probationary period of 3 to 6 months in the first instance. This avoids rights removal for inactivity at a later stage and enables a review of their work before according the right on a permanent basis.
The Bugle: Issue CLX, August 2019
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 09:41, 16 August 2019 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue CLX, August 2019
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 09:42, 16 August 2019 (UTC)
Backlog Banzai
In the month of September, Wikiproject Military history is running a project-wide edit-a-thon, Backlog Banzai. There are heaps of different areas you can work on, for which you claim points, and at the end of the month all sorts of whiz-bang awards will be handed out. Every player wins a prize! There is even a bit of friendly competition built in for those that like that sort of thing. Sign up now at Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/September 2019 Backlog Banzai to take part. For the coordinators, Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 08:18, 22 August 2019 (UTC)
Wikiproject Military history coordinator election nominations open
Nominations for the upcoming project coordinator election are now open. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 UTC on 14 September! Voting doesn't commence until 15 September. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the coord team. Cheers, Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 02:38, 1 September 2019 (UTC)
Administrators' newsletter – September 2019
News and updates for administrators from the past month (August 2019).
Administrator changes
Bradv • Chetsford • Izno
Floquenbeam • Lectonar
DESiegel • Jake Wartenberg • Rjanag • Topbanana
CheckUser changes
Oversight changes
- Callanecc • Fox • HJ Mitchell • LFaraone • There'sNoTime
Technical news
- Editors using the mobile website on Wikipedia can opt-in to new advanced features via your settings page. This will give access to more interface links, special pages, and tools.
- The advanced version of the edit review pages (recent changes, watchlist, and related changes) now includes two new filters. These filters are for "All contents" and "All discussions". They will filter the view to just those namespaces.
Arbitration
- A request for comment is open to provide an opportunity to amend the structure, rules, and procedures of the 2019 English Wikipedia Arbitration Committee election and to resolve any issues not covered by existing rules.
Miscellaneous
- A global request for comment is in progress regarding whether a user group should be created that could modify edit filters across all public Wikimedia wikis.
Community Insights Survey
Share your experience in this survey
Hi Otr500/Archive 5,
The Wikimedia Foundation is asking for your feedback in a survey about your experience with Wikipedia and Wikimedia. The purpose of this survey is to learn how well the Foundation is supporting your work on wiki and how we can change or improve things in the future. The opinions you share will directly affect the current and future work of the Wikimedia Foundation.
Please take 15 to 25 minutes to give your feedback through this survey. It is available in various languages.
This survey is hosted by a third-party and governed by this privacy statement (in English).
Find more information about this project. Email us if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey.
Sincerely,
Milhist coordinator election voting has commenced
G'day everyone, voting for the 2019 Wikiproject Military history coordinator tranche is now open. This is a simple approval vote; only "support" votes should be made. Project members should vote for any candidates they support by 23:59 (UTC) on 28 September 2018. Thanks, Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 03:37, 15 September 2019 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue CLXI, September 2019
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 09:17, 16 September 2019 (UTC)
Wikiproject Military history coordinator election half-way mark
G'day everyone, the voting for the XIX Coordinator Tranche is at the halfway mark. The candidates have answered various questions, and you can check them out to see why they are running and decide whether you support them. Project members should vote for any candidates they support by 23:59 (UTC) on 28 September 2018. Thanks, Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 07:37, 22 September 2019 (UTC)
Administrators' newsletter – October 2019
News and updates for administrators from the past month (September 2019).
|
|
|
Guideline and policy news
- Following a discussion, a new criterion for speedy category renaming was added: C2F: One eponymous article, which
applies if the category contains only an eponymous article or media file, provided that the category has not otherwise been emptied shortly before the nomination. The default outcome is an upmerge to the parent categories
.
- Following a discussion, a new criterion for speedy category renaming was added: C2F: One eponymous article, which
Technical news
- As previously noted, tighter password requirements for Administrators were put in place last year. Wikipedia should now alert you if your password is less than 10 characters long and thus too short.
Arbitration
- The 2019 CheckUser and Oversight appointment process has begun. The community consultation period will take place October 4th to 10th.
- The arbitration case regarding Fram was closed. While there will be a local RfC
focus[ing] on how harassment and private complaints should be handled in the future
, there is currently a global community consultation on partial and temporary office actions in response to the incident. It will be open until October 30th.
Miscellaneous
- The Community Tech team has been working on a system for temporarily watching pages, and welcomes feedback.
The Bugle: Issue CLXII, October 2019
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 12:40, 12 October 2019 (UTC)
Discretionary sanctions
I have recently edited Talk:Uranium One controversy and afterwards (just now) became aware it was subjected to Discretionary sanctions. Otr500 (talk) 20:28, 16 October 2019 (UTC)
2019 US Banknote Contest
.png){kind=logo}
|
US Banknote Contest | 
|
|---|---|---|
| November-December 2019 | ||
|
There are an estimated 30,000 different varieties of United States banknotes, yet only a fraction of these are represented on Wikimedia Commons in the form of 2D scans. Additionally, Colonial America, the Confederate States, the Republic of Texas, multiple states and territories, communities, and private companies have issued banknotes that are in the public domain today but are absent from Commons. In the months of November and December, WikiProject Numismatics will be running a cross-wiki upload-a-thon, the 2019 US Banknote Contest. The goal of the contest is to increase the number of US banknote images available to content creators on all Wikimedia projects. Participants will claim points for uploading and importing 2D scans of US banknotes, and at the end of the contest all will receive awards. Whether you want to claim the Gold Wiki or you just want to have fun, all are invited to participate. If you do not want to receive invitations to future US Banknote Contests, follow the instructions here | ||
Sent by ZLEA at 23:30, 19 October 2019 (UTC) via MediaWiki message delivery (talk)
Administrators' newsletter – November 2019
News and updates for administrators from the past month (October 2019).
|
|
|
Guideline and policy news
- An RfC was closed with the consensus that the resysop criteria should be made stricter.
- The follow-up RfC to develop that change is now open at Wikipedia:Requests for comment/2019 Resysop Criteria (2).
- A related RfC is seeking the community's sentiment for a binding desysop procedure.
Arbitration
- Eligible editors may now nominate themselves as candidates for the 2019 Arbitration Committee Elections. The self-nomination period will close November 12, with voting running from November 19 through December 2.
China National Hwy 106
Hello Otr500, and thank you for your message at User_talk:Vmenkov. I added some references to the article in question, expanded the image details at Wikimedia Commons, and responded in detail at Talk:China National Highway 106. -- Vmenkov (talk) 16:30, 4 November 2019 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue CLXIII, November 2019
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 21:44, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
ArbCom 2019 election voter message
| | Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
Pizzagate
It would be off topic to discuss this on this thread [ https://web.archive.org/web/20190928174848/https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Community_response_to_the_Wikimedia_Foundation%27s_ban_of_Fram&curid=61015662&diff=918410267&oldid=918406767 here], how ever your use of the adverb supposedly in regards to the debunked Pizzagate conspiracy theory, raised my eyebrows. Do you believe that there might be some truth behind the Pizzagate conspiracy theory.?
My two cents is that there are pedophiles at the level of the highest office, including the occupant of the Whitehouse. The Jeffrey Epstein affair has shed light on that uncomfortable fact,as was the raid on his island home (obviously to secure evidence that would incriminate the most prominent men in our part of the world). I am also of the opinion that this evidence is used to blackmail Senators, Congressmen, businessmen and it might explain why some have made a very obvious 180 degree change. This is my personal opinion, but I am curious as to why you have a condition on the Pizzagate conspiracy theory.Oldperson (talk) 19:07, 26 November 2019 (UTC)
- Hello, The word "supposedly" is simply because I haven't read up on the Pizzagate conspiracy theory. A theory is usually just that as apposed to facts. I do not know anything about it at this point so would inherently have to be neutral until I learn more. As far as Epstein, it created chaos of Royalty which is pretty high up the chain. Who knows where it may lead. Otr500 (talk) 00:24, 27 November 2019 (UTC)
Administrators' newsletter – December 2019
News and updates for administrators from the past month (November 2019).
Administrator changes
- EvergreenFir • ToBeFree
- Akhilleus • Athaenara • John Vandenberg • Melchoir • MichaelQSchmidt • NeilN • Youngamerican • 😂
CheckUser changes
Interface administrator changes
Guideline and policy news
- An RfC on the administrator resysop criteria was closed. 18 proposals have been summarised with a variety of supported and opposed statements. The inactivity grace period within which a new request for adminship is not required has been reduced from three years to two. Additionally, Bureaucrats are permitted to use their discretion when returning administrator rights.
- Following a proposal, the edit filter mailing list has been opened up to users with the Edit Filter Helper right.
Technical news
- Wikimedia projects can set a default block length for users via MediaWiki:ipb-default-expiry. A new page, MediaWiki:ipb-default-expiry-ip, allows the setting of a different default block length for IP editors. Neither is currently used. (T219126)
Arbitration
- Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee Elections is open to eligible editors until Monday 23:59, 2 December 2018 UTC. Please review the candidates and, if you wish to do so, submit your choices on the voting page.
Miscellaneous
- The global consultation on partial and temporary office actions that ended in October received a closing statement from staff concluding, among other things, that the WMF
will no longer use partial or temporary Office Action bans... until and unless community consensus that they are of value or Board directive
.
- The global consultation on partial and temporary office actions that ended in October received a closing statement from staff concluding, among other things, that the WMF
A brownie for you!
|
:) AssadFin (talk) 20:33, 2 December 2019 (UTC) |
Notability tags
Hi. I see you have been placing notability tags on pages. Could you please explain notability issues with pages such Dominique Rustichelli, Panayiotis Loizides (Anorthosis Famagusta), and Theofilos Chrysochos (Anorthosis Famagusta)? As far as I can tell they all have played for at least one "fully professional club at a national level of the league structure" (WP:FOOTYN). I'm particularly perplexed in Rustichelli's case. He has played for major French clubs. Also in the case of Rustichelli, how is the article lacking in sourcing? Robby.is.on (talk) 07:51, 29 November 2019 (UTC)
- Hello Robby.is.on, there is no short answer to your questions. A "presumption" of notability is not an exemption although many times presented as such. Not one of our policies and guidelines (or even essays) provide for such. From general, to basic, to the more specific areas of WP:NSPORTS, the determination of a stand-alone article follows the same criteria.
A person is presumed to be notable if they have been the subject of multiple published non-trivial secondary sources which are reliable, and independent of the subject.
- The creation of multiple hundreds of permanent stubs, more often with one source such as "Soccerway", presented as a source and sometimes an "External link" as it likely really is, usually only presents a pseudo biographical sentence or single paragraph. Now, this is not a bad thing, and stubs are meant to be the beginning of something better, however, if the end result is going to be a career stub sentence for an article then it should be considered if the subject is not better suited in another article if better sourcing is not available.
- I AM NOT suggesting merging and not exploring the possibility. I have been performing maintenance for many years and rarely make a submission to AFD although I am active there. When I run across a subject or area where there are issues I try to find a solution. A paragraph of a couple of sentences and maybe some stats needs attention. An article that was created in 2014, and tagged the same year with no improvement since, is still in need of improvement. At a point there is either available sourcing for improvement or the subject really should be covered in another article and this the reason for the tags.
- Theofilos Chrysochos apparently is still active. The article states he plays in the Cypriot First Division as a midfielder but the source seems to show he currently (2019-20) plays for Alki Oroklini (Cypriot Second Division) as a defender. I am not an expert on soccer, or even that familiar with it, but it does seem to be confusion between content and source. Playing one "fully professional club at a national level of the league structure", only passes WP:FOOTYN within the notability criteria laid out under WP:NSPORTS as shown above. If sourcing cannot be found then someone should provide them when it is questioned.
- You specifically asked concerning Dominique Rustichelli, "how is the article lacking in sourcing?" and that is really, really perplexing on my part. My stupid Dell 17.5" laptop has decided that it does not recognize my factory charger so is not charging the battery. The lights flashed shutting the computer off and losing my work (I was on the Dominique Rustichelli talk page) so I had to find it all again. I can only see what I can find. The article is sourced with one source and an "External link". A search did not produce anything to add value and this could be biased because of where I live. Google book shows Amoureux foot with passing mention as well as a "E. Rustichelli".
- You also questioned Panayiotis Loizides that is obviously Panayiotis Loizides (footballer). This has a single source and a Soccerway "External link". The source, a "Translational Announcement" simply provides "The President and the Board of Directors Our team welcome (as yet) our new Soccer Player for the 2019/2020 season Panayiotis Loizidis (Right Back) who competed in ALKI OROCLINIS last year and wishes him a good career.". Surely you are not suggesting this as significant coverage to warrant a stand-alone WP:BLP article? If not then you might agree that as presented there is reason to question the notability and seek improvements. I suppose either Semi-notability or Bare notability (merge request is active) would be applicable. Otr500 (talk) 14:34, 30 November 2019 (UTC)
- Regarding the sources tag: as far as I can tell, the content in the three articles is backed up by the, admittedly scant, sources given. My understanding of the sources tag up to now has been that it is used when the content in an article is not backed up by the sources given.
- Regarding the notability tag: a quick search found me https://www.laprovence.com/article/om/4248366/carton-contre-le-champion.html which is all about Rustichelli. I found a couple of pages like https://www.lfp.fr/ligue1/article/ligue-1-conforama-les-grands-voyageurs.htm which mention him among other players. I think you will find that if you were to look for the two Cypriot players (and other players of that calibre) you'd at the very least find match reports mentioning them. Wouldn't those be sufficient?
- I've added the two sources to the Rustichelli article and removed the tags. Let me know if you have any objections there. Robby.is.on (talk) 20:27, 5 December 2019 (UTC)
- Hello again, I am satisfied that improvements are being made. The reality is not that notability really needs to be "proven" on an article of a subject but that it exists, however, it does need to be shown when questioned. A source, like stats or a site that mainly is concerning statistics (like Football Database), is not actually objective evidence of notability for a biographical article, although it may be deemed sufficient for content. When I run into "admittedly scant, sources given" like you mentioned ("insufficient sources") I generally use Wikipedia:Notability (people)#Additional criteria:
Editors may find these criteria helpful when deciding whether to tag an article as requiring additional citations (using {{BLP sources}} for example), or to instead initiate a deletion discussion
. If there is evidence (already a career tag) Then I will go a step further and question notability.
- You mentioned "sources tag". The notability of a subject has nothing to do with the state of the article content but sourcing does need to advance notability. Playing in a professional league usually gives a presumption of notability per (WP:SPORTSPERSON) but such a presumption is still dependent on verifiable evidence sufficient for a stand-alone article. There needs to be some resemblance of a biographical article over a dictionary entry. This is why we rely on significant coverage in multiple reliable sources. My opinion, that is policy based, is that a single source providing just a bare amount of personal information (name, age, etc.,), or just enough to fill out an infobox creating a permanent stub biography with mainly career stats, means coverage may be better suited in another article. I don't ascribe to a particular timeline but at a point, a 2014 dictionary entry, becomes self-proof. Our comments have become longer than the article content of "Dominique Rustichelli (born 26 June 1934) is a French former professional footballer who played as a striker. Between 1952 and 1958 he played for Olympique de Marseille, scoring 34 goals in 138 league appearances. He then played in a number of other teams before retiring.". This is why I advocate that "sometimes" content is better covered in a parent article than a stand-alone dictionary entry that does not reflect accuracy. Just existance (Notability fallacies) is not sufficient justification for an article.
- My initial search does involve Google search, Google Books and Google news and JSTOR. If I don't find sourcing to provide biographical content I will tag or add tags to an article. A difference between my tagging and others, that may use "flyby tagging", is that I generally also use the talk page and revisit the article.
- The source you provided notes that Dominique Rustichelli is among seven individuals that has "frequented" eight clubs in a career so evidence that there should be sources to establish notability. A lack of information can create "misinformation". An example is that according to the stub article the infobox gives four pieces of information 1)- "Date of birth" and age (age 85), 2)- "Place of birth", 3)- Height, and 4)- Playing position. What seems to be an important piece of information in a biography would be place and date of death, apparently November 01, 1979, according to the source.
- I thought the subject still alive since the article reflects "age 85" and "retired". I tried to find coverage to verify the death (or still living status) of the subject, but still have not corroborated this to provide a more "full and balanced biography of that person's public life" also referred to as "a written account of that person's life".
- There is "notability" (My mention of the two articles I merged now at Wikipedia:Bare notability) but also the Wikipedia standard of notability to warrant a stand-alone article. Sometimes we have to assert that proof be shown which is the intent of the tags. However, consensus is still the actual determination so providing more than a single, not so great overall source for a biography, will likely stave off notability concerns that end up at AFD. Otr500 (talk) 15:08, 8 December 2019 (UTC)
Greetings
_anchored_off_Villefranche-sur-Mer,_France,_on_25_December_1982.jpg){kind=small}
|
Nice to meet you ~ |
| ~ thanks for your edits ~ ~mitch~ (talk) 11:53, 10 December 2019 (UTC) |
A barnstar for you!
|
The Original Barnstar |
| Thanks for bringing Frederick Alexander (cricketer) to our attention, so that we could improve it, and hopefully demonstrate that it meets Wikipedia's notability criteria. Your actions have resulted in a net positive for the encyclopedia! :) Harrias talk 09:01, 15 December 2019 (UTC) |
I was about to do the same as Harrias, so +1... Blue Square Thing (talk) 09:50, 15 December 2019 (UTC)
Wrong dash for ranges
Hi, please use a squashed EN dash, not EM dash, for year ranges.
– not —
The Bugle: Issue CLXIV, December 2019
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 12:48, 19 December 2019 (UTC)
Administrators' newsletter – January 2020
News and updates for administrators from the past month (December 2019).
|
|
|
Guideline and policy news
- A request for comment asks whether partial blocks should be enabled on the English Wikipedia. If enabled, this functionality would allow administrators to block users from editing specific pages or namespaces, rather than the entire site.
- A proposal asks whether admins who don't use their tools for a significant period of time (e.g. five years) should have the toolset procedurally removed.
- Following a successful RfC, a whitelist is now available for users whose redirects will be autopatrolled by a bot, removing them from the new pages patrol queue. Admins can add such users to Wikipedia:New pages patrol/Redirect whitelist after a discussion following the guidelines at Wikipedia talk:New pages patrol/Redirect whitelist.
Arbitration
- The fourth case on Palestine-Israel articles was closed. The case consolidated all previous remedies under one heading, which should make them easier to understand, apply, and enforce. In particular, the distinction between "primary articles" and "related content" has been clarified, with the former being
the entire set of articles whose topic relates to the Arab-Israeli conflict, broadly interpreted
rather thanreasonably construed
. - Following the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections, the following editors have been appointed to the Arbitration Committee: Beeblebrox, Bradv, Casliber, David Fuchs, DGG, KrakatoaKatie, Maxim, Newyorkbrad, SoWhy, Worm That Turned, Xeno.
- The fourth case on Palestine-Israel articles was closed. The case consolidated all previous remedies under one heading, which should make them easier to understand, apply, and enforce. In particular, the distinction between "primary articles" and "related content" has been clarified, with the former being
Miscellaneous
- This issue marks three full years of the Admin newsletter. Thanks for reading!
The Bugle: Issue CLXV, January 2020
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 12:56, 19 January 2020 (UTC)
Administrators' newsletter – February 2020
News and updates for administrators from the past month (January 2020).
|
|
|
Guideline and policy news
- Following a request for comment, partial blocks are now enabled on the English Wikipedia. This functionality allows administrators to block users from editing specific pages or namespaces rather than the entire site. A draft policy is being workshopped at Wikipedia:Partial blocks.
- The request for comment seeking the community's sentiment for a binding desysop procedure closed with
wide-spread support for an alternative desysoping procedure based on community input
. No proposed process received consensus.
Technical news
- Twinkle now supports partial blocking. There is a small checkbox that toggles the "partial" status for both blocks and templating. There is currently one template: {{uw-pblock}}.
- When trying to move a page, if the target title already exists then a warning message is shown. The warning message will now include a link to the target title. [1]
Arbitration
- Following a recent arbitration case, the Arbitration Committee reminded administrators
that checkuser and oversight blocks must not be reversed or modified without prior consultation with the checkuser or oversighter who placed the block, the respective functionary team, or the Arbitration Committee.
- Following a recent arbitration case, the Arbitration Committee reminded administrators
Miscellaneous
- Voting in the 2020 Steward elections will begin on 08 February 2020, 14:00 (UTC) and end on 28 February 2020, 13:59 (UTC). The confirmation process of current stewards is being held in parallel. You can automatically check your eligibility to vote.
- The English Wikipedia has reached six million articles. Thank you everyone for your contributions!
note re your group efforts and projects
Hi Otr500! thanks so much for your recent post at Village Pump, to support my idea and effort for a new community forum and bulletin board.
I am writing to ask for your help with this new idea. could you please draft a notice for editors to help out at the group effort that you referred to there? I think your main focus was a drive for article improvement, specifically at BLP as well as in some other areas? Feel free to add any other items, if i left anything out. This is in order to post this info at the new user:Sm8900/community forum, if that's okay? and please feel free to add any comments, thoughts, or insights, to let us know more about the great efforts that you have been considering.
I am looking for editor events and group projects that I could post to post there, in order to get things rolling., my new approach to this is to approach editors individually, and request input and items from that we can post there, in order to get things rolling, and provide some content to show what we are trying to do. could you please let me know if that sounds okay to you? I really appreciate it. thanks!! --Sm8900 (talk) 14:28, 12 February 2020 (UTC)
The Bugle: IssueICLXVI, February 2020
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 13:04, 21 February 2020 (UTC)
March Madness 2020
G'day all, March Madness 2020 is about to get underway, and there is bling aplenty for those who want to get stuck into the backlog by way of tagging, assessing, updating, adding or improving resources and creating articles. If you haven't already signed up to participate, why not? The more the merrier! Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 08:19, 29 February 2020 (UTC) for the coord team
Administrators' newsletter – March 2020
News and updates for administrators from the past month (February 2020).
|
|
|
Guideline and policy news
- Following an RfC, the blocking policy was changed to state that sysops
must not
undo or alter CheckUser or Oversight blocks, rather thanshould not
. - A request for comment confirmed that sandboxes of established but inactive editors may not be blanked due solely to inactivity.
- Following an RfC, the blocking policy was changed to state that sysops
Technical news
- Following a discussion, Twinkle's default CSD behavior will soon change, most likely this week. After the change, Twinkle will default to "tagging mode" if there is no CSD tag present, and default to "deletion mode" if there is a CSD tag present. You will be able to always default to "deletion mode" (the current behavior) using your Twinkle preferences.
Miscellaneous
- Following the 2020 Steward Elections, the following editors have been appointed as stewards: BRPever, Krd, Martin Urbanec, MusikAnimal, Sakretsu, Sotiale, and Tks4Fish. There are a total of seven editors that have been appointed as stewards, the most since 2014.
- The 2020 appointees for the Ombudsman commission are Ajraddatz and Uzoma Ozurumba; they will serve for one year.
The Bugle: Issue CLXVII, March 2020
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 01:51, 15 March 2020 (UTC)
I trimmed your addition of lengthy text added to a list that normally contains just a city or town name, per WP:UNDUE. You may want to consider creating an article about Packton, Louisiana. Cheers. Magnolia677 (talk) 22:10, 30 March 2020 (UTC)
Administrators' newsletter – April 2020
News and updates for administrators from the past month (March 2020).
|
|
|
Guideline and policy news
- There is an ongoing request for comment to streamline the source deprecation and blacklisting process.
Technical news
- There is a plan for new requirements for user signatures. You can give feedback.
Arbitration
- Following the banning of an editor by the WMF last year, the Arbitration Committee resolved to hold a
Arbcom RfC regarding on-wiki harassment
. A draft RfC has been posted at Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Anti-harassment RfC (Draft) and not open to comments from the community yet. Interested editors can comment on the RfC itself on its talk page.
- Following the banning of an editor by the WMF last year, the Arbitration Committee resolved to hold a
Miscellaneous
- The WMF has begun a pilot report of the pages most visited through various social media platforms to help with anti-vandalism and anti-disinformation efforts. The report is updated daily and will be available through the end of May.
Thank You
Thanks for the help with Luis Miguel Romero Fernández…
"Fight the Good Fight Every Moment"
Presidents of the Confederacy
Otr500, I replied to you on the President of the Confederate States of America talk page. I agree that the list of fictional Confederate Presidents being placed on the article is out of place and should probably be removed. However, I think the info regarding the list should be spun off onto a new article instead of being deleted entirely. I just want to get approval from you first. --JCC the Alternate Historian (talk) 21:30, 4 April 2020 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue CLXVIII, April 2020
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 05:21, 13 April 2020 (UTC)
Amanda Loncar
Thankyou for your wise and measured response on IMBd as a not at all workable sources and against unbacked assertions there. I would not that the discussion on Britani Bateman has shown that interpretations of what multiple significant roles and reliable sourcing look like is very broad. I would also note that when I created that article back in 2010 I recognized that IMDb would not be enough on its own, and added more sources (such as the Mormon Literature Database entry), they were later removed as coving non-notable roles, and so we ended up with a IMDb backed assertion of one role.John Pack Lambert (talk) 14:29, 26 April 2020 (UTC)
Administrators' newsletter – May 2020
News and updates for administrators from the past month (April 2020).
Administrator changes
CheckUser changes
Oversight changes
Guideline and policy news
- Discretionary sanctions have been authorized for all pages and edits related to COVID-19, to be logged at WP:GS/COVID19.
- Following a recent discussion on Meta-Wiki, the edit filter maintainer global group has been created.
- A request for comment has been proposed to create a new main page editor usergroup.
- A request for comment has been proposed to make the bureaucrat activity requirements more strict.
Technical news
- The Editing team has been working on the talk pages project. You can review the proposed design and share your thoughts on the talk page.
- Enterprisey created a script that will show a link to the proper Special:Undelete page when viewing a since-deleted revision, see User:Enterprisey/link-deleted-revs.
Miscellaneous
- A request for comment closed with consensus to create a Village Pump-style page for communication with the Wikimedia Foundation.
The Bugle: Issue CLXIX, May 2020
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 15:03, 15 May 2020 (UTC)
Precious
Louisiana
Thank you for quality articles around Louisiana education and wildlife such as Beauregard Parish Training School (2008), Joyce Wildlife Management Area (2017) and Cheniere Caminada, Louisiana (2019), for meaningful redirects, for reviewing drafts, for dealing with article tags and excess image size and number, for missing, - you are an awesome Wikipedian!
--Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:55, 20 May 2019 (UTC)
A year ago, you were recipient no. 2207 of Precious, a prize of QAI! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 06:48, 20 May 2020 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Dingle International Film Festival has been accepted
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thanks again, and happy editing!
Otr500 (talk) 07:16, 21 May 2020 (UTC)Articles for Creation: List of reviewers by subject notice
Hi Otr500, you are receiving this notice because you are listed as an active Articles for Creation reviewer.
Recently a list of reviewers by area of expertise was created. This notice is being sent out to alert you to the existence of that list, and to encourage you to add your name to it. If you or other reviewers come across articles in the queue where an acceptance/decline hinges on specialist knowledge, this list should serve to facilitate contact with a fellow reviewer.
To end on a positive note, the backlog has dropped below 1,500, so thanks for all of the hard work some of you have been putting into the AfC process!
Sent to all Articles for Creation reviewers as a one-time notice. To opt-out of all massmessage mailings, you may add Category:Wikipedians who opt out of message delivery to your user talk page. Regards, Sam-2727 (talk)
Administrators' newsletter – June 2020
News and updates for administrators from the past month (May 2020).
Administrator changes
- CaptainEek • Creffett • Cwmhiraeth
- Anna Frodesiak • Buckshot06 • Ronhjones • SQL
CheckUser changes
Guideline and policy news
- A request for comment asks whether the Unblock Ticket Request System (UTRS) should allowed any unblock request or just private appeals.
- The Wikimedia Foundation announced that they will develop a universal code of conduct for all WMF projects. There is an open local discussion regarding the same.
Arbitration
The Bugle: Issue CLXX, June 2020
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 04:22, 14 June 2020 (UTC)
Feedback request: Biographies request for comment
| Your feedback is requested at Talk:Ronald Reagan on a request for comment. Thank you for helping out! You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name. |  |
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. Sent at 07:39, 16 June 2020 (UTC)
Feedback request: Wikipedia style and naming request for comment
| Your feedback is requested at Wikipedia talk:Naming conventions (use English) on a request for comment. Thank you for helping out! You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name. | |
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. Sent at 08:11, 16 June 2020 (UTC)
Feedback request: Biographies request for comment
| Your feedback is requested at Talk:Rupert Sheldrake on a request for comment. Thank you for helping out! You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name. | |
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. Sent at 08:12, 16 June 2020 (UTC)
Feedback request: Politics, government, and law request for comment
| Your feedback is requested at Talk:Frederick H. Fleitz on a request for comment. Thank you for helping out! You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name. | |
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. Sent at 08:16, 16 June 2020 (UTC)
Feedback request: History Good Article nomination
Your feedback is requested at Talk:Fatima bint al-Ahmar on a Good Article nomination. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 04:30, 18 June 2020 (UTC)
Feedback request: Geography and places Good Article nomination
Your feedback is requested at Talk:Stony Brook (Boston) on a Good Article nomination. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 22:31, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
Request
Hello, Im cleaning up some mess up articles that are terrible or not notable its because I cant requst on WP:Afd talk page anymore as they have limits. can you nominate into afd if you can on these articles of Jacob Rica, Cindy Kurleto, Geoff Eigenmann, Paolo Contis, Wendell Ramos, DM Sevilla and Yam Laranas as they are non-notable people with poor sourcing. I would thank you so much if you did it. Cleaning is caring =). 221.148.3.71 (talk) 04:23, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
- I have never participated in an AFD-by proxy. I also do not know about any "limits" on submissions. I did check out Cindy Kurleto as a random choice. This is a 2005 BLP, tagged since last year and with 2009 online cite tags. It actually has no references listed, improperly sourced through the "External links" section by an "official page" (primary and self-published source) that is archived and doesn't work, IMDb, a photo gallery (and photos) and FHM.com, that has the subject listed as a "hottie", cover-girl, and "FHM babe". The sourcing standard for a BLP is higher than this. The subject apparently left show biz for 13 years.
- A WP:BEFORE returned some more photos, Instagram, and "GMA Entertainment". In that source it states the subject quit working in 2007 because of PCOS and that she could never have children. She now has two ages 9 and 2.Another source states she quit acting "to focus on raising a family" but that does not appear to be reliable information as the timeline is off by around 4 years. The article states: "Kurleto was declared FHM Philippines' "Sexiest Woman of the World" in 2004. This might be a source if presented correctly, but the archived link does not support content.
- The main problem is that there just is not enough sourcing to advance notability (NACTOR) for an article that is rife with apparent original research such as in the unsourced biography section. I would be tempted to list this one but not as a proxy-listing.
- Your request seems valid (in this case) but the reasoning for the request is unclear. Of course, I dug a little deeper. You show to be a new IP editor here jumping into maintenance. I can't see that as a bad thing but the seven articles listed have a central "Filipino" theme so I don't know if you just have interests in that area or edited on that Wikipedia. As I am an inquiring-mind your request raises more questions than I am prepared to deal with. Suggestion: To not appear as an IP SPA (AFD's of Filipino related BLP's) I would suggest registering (or logging-in if the case) so things will not appear shady. That may not be the case but I really can't tell. I will put these on my "things to look at list" though. Thanks, -- Otr500 (talk) 11:46, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
IP user posted at Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_deletion#Minor_celebrities_major_cleanup_Afd_req but initially listed 5 articles, which I complied. Then they tacked the other 9 on. While they have a similiar theme, I think mass blasting the AFD on behalf of an IP is pushing the purpose of proxy IP nomination. --Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk) — If (reply) then (ping me) 17:56, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
- Yes, so do I-- Thanks, -- Otr500 (talk) 23:30, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
- Hey User:Tyw7 and owner of talk page, I apologized for unable to be patient for the five afd to finish before nominating others too. I saw once on twitter about minor celebrities talking wikipedia and editing their article which is the reason im here for their articles, if its bad I request for afd so I apologize again and be patient this time, promise wont request someone other than talk page of WP:RFD. Stay safe guys. 101.109.209.204 (talk) 04:00, 23 June 2020 (UTC)
- Note: I am NOT the "owner" of WP:AFD. Heck, I don't think there is an owner of AFD. Edit: IP editor, maybe you should register since your IP number keeps changing. --Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk) — If (reply) then (ping me) 06:45, 23 June 2020 (UTC)
- Hey User:Tyw7 and owner of talk page, I apologized for unable to be patient for the five afd to finish before nominating others too. I saw once on twitter about minor celebrities talking wikipedia and editing their article which is the reason im here for their articles, if its bad I request for afd so I apologize again and be patient this time, promise wont request someone other than talk page of WP:RFD. Stay safe guys. 101.109.209.204 (talk) 04:00, 23 June 2020 (UTC)
- --LOL-- I think "owner of talk page" was referring to me. -- Otr500 (talk) 00:15, 24 June 2020 (UTC)
- I didn't mean to imply the IP did anything "wrong" or deserving a block (certainly without investigation) but was just giving suggestions. I am not familiar with a rationale of such a block because of "nmap-confirmed OpenVPN". I am all for registering, but that is not currently Wikipedia's direction and respect it. In fact a couple of the suggested nominations I checked appear to me to be justifiable. -- Otr500 (talk) 00:28, 24 June 2020 (UTC)
June 2020
Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, such as at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/John Medina (actor), (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:
- Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment, or
- With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button
located above the edit window.
This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.
Thank you. Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk) — If (reply) then (ping me) 20:24, 21 June 2020 (UTC)
- Oops! A draw-back to being "on-call" everyday with my job is the call can be inopportune causing a rush to complete a current task --and an inadvertent error of some sort. Thanks for the instructions though. I keep forgetting to try the second option. -- Otr500 (talk) 00:37, 24 June 2020 (UTC)
Feedback request: History Good Article nomination
Your feedback is requested at Talk:Ridwan ibn Walakhshi on a Good Article nomination. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 19:30, 27 June 2020 (UTC)
Administrators' newsletter – July 2020
News and updates for administrators from the past month (June 2020).
|
|
|
Guideline and policy news
- A request for comment is in progress to remove the T2 (template that misrepresents established policy) speedy deletion criterion.
Technical news
- Protection templates on mainspace pages are now automatically added by User:MusikBot II (BRFA).
Arbitration
- Following the banning of an editor by the WMF last year, the Arbitration Committee resolved to hold an
RfC regarding on-wiki harassment
. The RfC has been posted at Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Anti-harassment RfC and is open to comments from the community. - The Medicine case was closed, with a remedy authorizing standard discretionary sanctions for
all discussions about pharmaceutical drug prices and pricing and for edits adding, changing, or removing pharmaceutical drug prices or pricing from articles
.
- Following the banning of an editor by the WMF last year, the Arbitration Committee resolved to hold an
Feedback request: Geography and places Good Article nomination
Your feedback is requested at Talk:Manganese, Minnesota on a Good Article nomination. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 06:30, 3 July 2020 (UTC)
Feedback request: History Good Article nomination
Your feedback is requested at Talk:Šćepan Mali on a "History" Good Article nomination. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 01:31, 9 July 2020 (UTC)
Feedback request: History Good Article nomination
Your feedback is requested at Talk:Flag of Grenada on a "History" Good Article nomination. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 07:31, 11 July 2020 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue CLXXI, July 2020
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 11:45, 13 July 2020 (UTC)
"Urdudaan" listed at Redirects for discussion
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Urdudaan. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 July 18#Urdudaan until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. -- Toddy1 (talk) 05:17, 18 July 2020 (UTC)
thanks for flagging it in your !vote here. I did some research and cleaned it up some. StarM 22:37, 20 July 2020 (UTC)
Feedback request: Politics, government, and law request for comment
Your feedback is requested at Talk:LGBT on a "Politics, government, and law" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 05:30, 21 July 2020 (UTC)
Feedback request: WikiProjects and collaborations request for comment
Your feedback is requested at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Islam on a "WikiProjects and collaborations" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 07:31, 27 July 2020 (UTC)
Administrators' newsletter – August 2020
News and updates for administrators from the past month (July 2020).
Administrator changes
Oversight changes
Guideline and policy news
- There is an open request for comment to decide whether to increase the minimum duration a sanction discussion has to remain open (currently 24 hours).
- Speedy deletion criterion T2 (template that misrepresents established policy) has been repealed following a request for comment.
- Speedy deletion criterion X2 (pages created by the content translation tool) has been repealed following a discussion.
- There is a proposal to restrict proposed deletion to confirmed users.
Feedback request: WikiProjects and collaborations request for comment
Your feedback is requested at Wikipedia:Teahouse on a "WikiProjects and collaborations" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 06:30, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
WikiWound.com
Hello, My name is Moe and I have started a Wiki website called Wikiwound.I am a nurse practitioner and a wound specialist. With Wikiwound I am trying to fill a gap in wound care all around the world as many clinicians and patients cannot find the information they need.If you would like to write about wound care please visit https://wikiwound.com or https://wikiwound.org. If you need to contact me, please email me at info@wikiwound.com. Regards, Moe Karimi Mosayebkarimi (talk) 03:41, 6 August 2020 (UTC)
Feedback request: Geography and places Good Article nomination
Your feedback is requested at Talk:Kirkandrews, Dumfries and Galloway on a "Geography and places" Good Article nomination. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 18:31, 6 August 2020 (UTC)
Feedback request: History Good Article nomination
Your feedback is requested at Talk:Manuel Komnenos (kouropalates) on a "History" Good Article nomination. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 21:31, 6 August 2020 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue CLXXII, August 2020
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 14:30, 8 August 2020 (UTC)
Feedback request: History Good Article nomination
Your feedback is requested at Talk:Flag of Cimișlia on a "History" Good Article nomination. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 19:30, 9 August 2020 (UTC)
Feedback request: Wikipedia proposals request for comment
Your feedback is requested at Talk:Isuzu Giga on a "Wikipedia proposals" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 06:31, 11 August 2020 (UTC)
Religion and Philosophy
I have run across many articles in the realm of "Religion and Philosophy" that seem to broadly present original research and synthesis. An example can be found in the article Rabbi. -- Otr500 (talk) 05:07, 13 August 2020 (UTC)
Feedback request: Politics, government, and law request for comment
Your feedback is requested at Talk:National Rally on a "Politics, government, and law" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 22:31, 13 August 2020 (UTC)
Feedback request: Wikipedia proposals request for comment
Your feedback is requested at Wikipedia talk:Namespace on a "Wikipedia proposals" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 02:31, 24 August 2020 (UTC)
Feedback request: Biographies request for comment
Your feedback is requested at Talk:Clarrie Jeffreys on a "Biographies" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 09:31, 29 August 2020 (UTC)
Wikiproject Military history coordinator election nominations open
Nominations for the upcoming project coordinator election are now open. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 UTC on 14 September! Voting doesn't commence until 15 September. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the coord team. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 02:06, 1 September 2020 (UTC)
Feedback request: Geography and places Good Article nomination
Your feedback is requested at Talk:Lafayette Park Historic District on a "Geography and places" Good Article nomination. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 05:30, 1 September 2020 (UTC)
Administrators' newsletter – September 2020
News and updates for administrators from the past month (August 2020).
Administrator changes
CheckUser changes
Guideline and policy news
- Following a request for comment, the minimum length for site ban discussions was increased to 72 hours, up from 24.
- A request for comment is ongoing to determine whether paid editors
must
orshould
use the articles for creation process. - A request for comment is open to resolve inconsistencies between the draftification and alternative to deletion processes.
Arbitration
- A request for comment is open to provide an opportunity to amend the structure, rules, and procedures of the 2020 English Wikipedia Arbitration Committee election and to resolve any issues not covered by existing rules.
- An open request for comment asks whether active Arbitrators may serve on the Trust and Safety Case Review Committee or Ombudsman commission.
Feedback request: History and geography request for comment
Your feedback is requested at Talk:List of largest empires on a "History and geography" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 13:31, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
Feedback request: Wikipedia style and naming request for comment
Your feedback is requested at Category talk:Roman Catholic prayers on a "Wikipedia style and naming" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 17:32, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
Feedback request: History Good Article nomination
Your feedback is requested at Talk:Cai Lun on a "History" Good Article nomination. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 03:31, 3 September 2020 (UTC)
Feedback request: Miscellaneous Good Article nomination
Your feedback is requested at Talk:Salyut 1 on a "Miscellaneous" Good Article nomination. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 15:30, 3 September 2020 (UTC)
The Planning Exchange Draft
Hello
Thank you for taking the time to comment on my draft entry for The Planning Exchange. I've made the suggested changes to the lead section and in the 'Acquisition by Idox' section I've moved the external links to footnotes. I hope this is clearer and compliant with guidelines. Can the draft now be moved to the article space? Kind regards --Iandubya (talk) 14:18, 4 September 2020 (UTC)