Otto Sheva2

Recent edit to Acer campestre

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Acer campestre, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! Materialscientist (talk) 10:19, 28 December 2014 (UTC)

Mikhail Grigorevich Popov

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Mikhail Grigorevich Popov, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://encyclopedia2.thefreedictionary.com/Popov%2c+Mikhail+Grigorevich.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 19:35, 29 December 2014 (UTC)

Ganeshida

Thsank you for your contribution but it's your task to quote reliable sources.Xx236 (talk) 08:41, 28 April 2016 (UTC)

Common fig

I reverted your edits today, at first suspecting vandalism, because there was no explanation and the abbreviations/names you added didn't make sense to me (as a food scientist). Perhaps you can change them back if you add a description for what the edits represent. Thanks. --Zefr (talk) 19:48, 28 April 2016 (UTC)

Plantdrew cleared up my confusion; he stated that the linking was excessive, but the derivations ok. --Zefr (talk) 22:40, 28 April 2016 (UTC)

Ways to improve Igor Lintchevski

Hi, I'm Pmaccabe. Otto Sheva2, thanks for creating Igor Lintchevski!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. There is a more substantial article on this person in French, I added a link on the Talk page.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse. Phil (talk) 19:04, 29 April 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 16

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Leiden anatomical theatre, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Late modern period. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:53, 16 May 2016 (UTC)

May 2016

Hello, I'm Zppix. I noticed that you recently removed all content from Pre-classical Arabic with this edit without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, I restored the page's content. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Ⓩⓟⓟⓘⓧ (talk) 23:18, 19 May 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 24

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of paintings by Pierre Mignard, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages National Portrait Gallery and Chantilly. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:32, 24 May 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Royal Garden of Prague Castle

Hello Otto Sheva2,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Royal Garden of Prague Castle for deletion, because it appears to duplicate an existing Wikipedia article, Prague Castle#Gardens.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. ubiquity (talk) 18:25, 24 July 2016 (UTC)

July 2016

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you removed a speedy deletion tag from Royal Garden of Prague Castle, a page you have created yourself. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Contest this speedy deletion which appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the page's talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Thank you. ubiquity (talk) 18:41, 24 July 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Otto Sheva2. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

Ways to improve Campanula alpestris

Hi, I'm TonyBallioni. Otto Sheva2, thanks for creating Campanula alpestris!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Adding references can help the reader verify the information provided.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

TonyBallioni (talk) 18:25, 1 April 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Cornelius Roelans

Hello Otto Sheva2,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Cornelius Roelans for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

Onel5969 ^{TT me} 02:46, 29 May 2017 (UTC)

Cornelius Roelans

Hello. It would be helpful to have a source for the info in the article. Thanks Dlohcierekim (talk) 06:35, 29 May 2017 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Josse Le Plat

Hello, Otto Sheva2. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Josse Le Plat, for deletion because I don't think it meets our criteria for inclusion. If you don't want the article deleted:

1. edit the page
2. remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
3. save the page

Also, be sure to explain why you think the article should be kept in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. If you don't do so, it may be deleted later anyway.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

Onel5969 ^{TT me} 20:06, 30 May 2017 (UTC)

A page you started (Victor Botchantsev) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Victor Botchantsev, Otto Sheva2!

Wikipedia editor Hydronium Hydroxide just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Would you please include a reference for biographical details you use (particularly since this one doesn't include the authority control).

To reply, leave a comment on Hydronium Hydroxide's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

^~Hydronium^~Hydroxide^~(Talk)~ 09:46, 1 June 2017 (UTC)

Ways to improve Theodor Dorsten

Hi, I'm Winged Blades of Godric. Otto Sheva2, thanks for creating Theodor Dorsten!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Take a look at this and add the relevant info with citations.Cheers!

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Winged Blades ^Godric 10:03, 5 June 2017 (UTC)

A page you started (Draco timoriensis) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Draco timoriensis, Otto Sheva2!

Wikipedia editor Boleyn just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Can you please add your sources?

To reply, leave a comment on Boleyn's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Boleyn (talk) 14:55, 9 July 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Otto Sheva2. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Otto Sheva2. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:47, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:23, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

December 2023

Hello, I'm Aintabli. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Aintabli (talk) 00:52, 12 December 2023 (UTC)

February 2024

Thank you for your contributions. It seems that you have added Creative Commons licensed text to one or more Wikipedia articles, such as Borum Eshøj Family. You are welcome to import appropriate Creative Commons licensed content to articles, but in order to meet the Wikipedia guideline on plagiarism, such content must be fully attributed. This requires not only acknowledging the source, but acknowledging that the source is copied. There are several methods to do this described at Wikipedia:Plagiarism#Compatibly licensed sources, including the usage of an attribution template. Please make sure that any Creative Commons content you have already imported is fully attributed. From [1]. —Matrix(!) (a good person!)_{[Citation not needed at all; thank you very much]} 17:29, 6 February 2024 (UTC)

You also need to provide attribution when copying from public domain sources. Simply add the template {{source-attribution}} after your citation. I have done so for Feliks Kreutz. Please do this in the future so that our readers will be aware that you copied the prose rather than wrote it yourself, and that it's okay to copy verbatim. Thanks, — Diannaa (talk) 15:48, 24 February 2024 (UTC)

Borum Eshøj Family moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Borum Eshøj Family. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 16:44, 29 February 2024 (UTC)

Acta Botanica Fennica moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Acta Botanica Fennica, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Randykitty (talk) 15:17, 8 March 2024 (UTC)

• PS: Please see our journal article writing guide for tips on how to expand this article. On my home page you can find pre-formatted references. Hope this helps. --Randykitty (talk) 15:44, 8 March 2024 (UTC)

  Hello, User:Randykitty

  I admit it has a long way to go to achieve a level of a good referenced article, but it is a stub with essential informations on the topic, and can always be improved, moving it to draftspace is gonna kill all attempt of improving it. Thanks! Otto Sheva2 (talk) 15:59, 8 March 2024 (UTC)

• Draft space was specifically developed to ameliorate articles before they get to "prime time". As it is, in main article space this stub would sooner rather than later tagged with all kinds of banners (needs third party sources; one source only; notability; etc), is that really what you want? --Randykitty (talk) 18:50, 8 March 2024 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 14

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Cornelius Roelans, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page University of Leuven. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 06:07, 14 March 2024 (UTC)

April 2024

Your edit to Charles Percy Pickering has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for information on how to contribute your work appropriately. For legal reasons, Wikipedia strictly cannot host copyrighted text or images from print media or digital platforms without an appropriate and verifiable license. Contributions infringing on copyright will be removed. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. — JJMC89 (T·C) 05:08, 12 April 2024 (UTC)

Vasily Vitkovsky moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Vasily Vitkovsky. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Boleyn (talk) 07:10, 12 April 2024 (UTC)

Pavel Kokovtsov moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Pavel Kokovtsov, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Dan arndt (talk) 02:14, 20 April 2024 (UTC)

Ways to improve John Ruhräh

Hello, Otto Sheva2,

Thank you for creating John Ruhräh.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

You've created an well-written article, but it's exclusively from one source. It would be very helpful to including more than one, primarily to establish the notability of Ruhräh.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Klbrain}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Klbrain (talk) 12:16, 12 May 2024 (UTC)

John Ruhräh moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, John Ruhräh, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Mccapra (talk) 07:50, 5 June 2024 (UTC)

I stopped creating new articles just because of people like you. Thanks a lot. Otto Sheva2 (talk) 22:10, 5 June 2024 (UTC)

Charles Percy Pickering moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Charles Percy Pickering. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 03:44, 3 July 2024 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Borum Eshøj Family

Hello, Otto Sheva2. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Borum Eshøj Family, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 17:06, 31 July 2024 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Acta Botanica Fennica

Hello, Otto Sheva2. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Acta Botanica Fennica, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 16:06, 8 August 2024 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Acta Botanica Fennica

Hello, Otto Sheva2. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Acta Botanica Fennica".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 18:37, 8 September 2024 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Pavel Kokovtsov

Hello, Otto Sheva2. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Pavel Kokovtsov, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 03:06, 20 September 2024 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Pavel Kokovtsov

Hello, Otto Sheva2. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Pavel Kokovtsov".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 02:12, 20 October 2024 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:John Ruhräh

Hello, Otto Sheva2. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:John Ruhräh, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 08:07, 5 November 2024 (UTC)