Welcome!

Hello, Owlice1! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking   or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! Randykitty (talk) 20:59, 6 December 2013 (UTC)Reply
Getting Started
Getting Help
Policies and Guidelines

The Community
Things to do
Miscellaneous

I got new images from APOD!

edit

I got pictures from the internet (http://apod.nasa.gov/).

--Jcpag2012 (a.k.a. John Carlo) from Wikipedia 11:54, 18 August 2014 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi, I know you mean well, but there is a policy that talks about not adding it there. Specifically, it states, External links should not normally be used in the body of an article. Instead, include appropriate external links in an "External links" section at the end of the article... I've reverted your changes per the policy. I hope you understand. — kikichugirl speak up! 18:16, 18 February 2015 (UTC)Reply

Hi. I know you mean well, but "external links should not normally be used in the body of an article" != no external links in the body of an article. Your actions wiped out relevant external links not only in the body of the article, but also in a separate section, links that had been included in this article when it was first approved. This article is now not as useful as it was/could be. I hope you understand. Owlice1 (talk) 01:05, 19 February 2015 (UTC)Reply

3RR warning

edit
 

Your recent editing history at e (mathematical constant) shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. D.Lazard (talk) 17:46, 7 July 2018 (UTC)Reply

A barnstar for you!

edit
  The Original Barnstar
Thanks for your Talk on "e (mathematical constant)". I also care, and am trying to continue your arguments. Rick314 (talk) 01:07, 3 April 2019 (UTC)Reply