{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Materialscientist (talk) 08:29, 10 October 2018 (UTC)
P.Wyeet (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
per:WP:GF P.Wyeet (talk) 08:30, 10 October 2018 (UTC)
Decline reason:
Assuming good faith does not explain your unconstructive edits, or your attempts at inappropriate edits blocked by the edit filters- which were particularly vulgar and offensive. Certainly not in good faith. To be unblocked, you will need to explain what was wrong about your edits, why we should trust that you won't do them again, and what constructive contributions you intend to make. I am declining this request as there is clearly no benefit to this project in unblocking you at this time. 331dot (talk) 09:34, 10 October 2018 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
P.Wyeet (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
ok im sorry about what i did but i promise to start making constructive edits i have proved i can do this by the good editing in my alt P.Wyeet (talk) 09:43, 10 October 2018 (UTC)
Decline reason:
Vandalism and now, violations of WP:SOCK too? You've shown unblocking you would be the wrong choice. Note that this block applies to you personally, no matter which account you use. You are not permitted to edit here while this account is blocked. Yamla (talk) 11:44, 10 October 2018 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
So you are saying you have used another account? Specifically what constructive edits do you want to make? Another admin will review your request, but they will want to know those things. 331dot (talk) 09:46, 10 October 2018 (UTC)
P.Wyeet (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I edited good on loosmark and I plan to edit on eastern EuropeP.Wyeet (talk) 18:30, 10 October 2018 (UTC)
Decline reason:
You have admitted to operating no less than 50 accounts. You will need to give a good explanation for this, and then apply for unblock, which I do not promise, at your primary account.----Anthony Bradbury"talk" 18:56, 10 October 2018 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Wow. Loosmark is your evidence that you are constructive?!? Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Loosmark/Archive shows otherwise. A huge quantity of sockpuppets. And now your block evasion here. --Yamla (talk) 18:36, 10 October 2018 (UTC)