Paatv

Speedy deletion of Trempy

A tag has been placed on Trempy requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, "See also" section, book reference, category tag, template tag, interwiki link, rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. BigDunc (talk) 12:55, 18 March 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Janine Trempy

A tag has been placed on Janine Trempy requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. ninety:one 22:33, 21 March 2008 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Freshwater library

I have nominated Freshwater library, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Freshwater library. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Otolemur crassicaudatus (talk) 23:55, 4 April 2008 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Molecular microbiology laboratory.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:Molecular microbiology laboratory.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Ricky81682 (talk) 05:01, 23 May 2008 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Neisseria lactamica.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:Neisseria lactamica.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Ricky81682 (talk) 05:01, 23 May 2008 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Laura Trant

The article Laura Trant has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this newly created biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Matty.007 16:34, 22 July 2013 (UTC)

Your edits

A topic concerning you is currently being discussed at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents. Paul B (talk) 20:37, 24 July 2013 (UTC)

August 2013

Hello, I'm Me and. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Slut because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, you can use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! —me_and 09:53, 12 August 2013 (UTC)

September 2013

Please do not add or change content, as you did to Katharine McPhee, without verifying it by citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Elizium23 (talk) 15:53, 10 September 2013 (UTC)

WP:3RR

Please be aware that edit warring is not an appropriate way to deal with content disputes. Please read WP:3RR, which prohibits more than 3 reverts in a a 24 hour period. Paul B (talk) 15:58, 11 September 2013 (UTC)

The White Queen

I really have to wonder whether you saw this episode at all. You say:

• "Henry Tudor begins to recruit an army of French convicts." This doesn't happen in the episode; Henry already has the army, which Jasper has recruited.
• "Following the death of his only son and heir, Richard casts his barren wife Anne aside in favour of his niece Elizabeth of York." No, he doesn't, he just takes more of an interest in her, and you've removed the sentence explaining why he does this. Nor does it happen "following the death of his only son and heir".
• "An embittered Anne dies of tuberculosis." At no point is it stated that she has tuberculosis.
• "Tudor is clearly outmatched by the king's forces until Stanley finally declares in favour of Tudor." It is actually not clear who is winning until the moment before Stanley's charge. And he doesn't declare.

If you want to use fancy phrases like "Time is running out for Richard III", "Henry Tudor crosses the Channel with his raggedy army", "a solar eclipse signals to all that a change is coming". "Richard knows all too well that his throne is at stake", etc, at least try and get your facts right. Deb (talk) 20:00, 11 September 2013 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for to include edit warring, and abusing multiple accounts (User:WhiteQueen2013) to avoid scrutiny, as you did at The White Queen (TV series). Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.  Tiptoety ^talk 20:10, 11 September 2013 (UTC)

July 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Hot (Mel B album) may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• * [[Richard Stannard (songwriter)[[Laura Trant]]

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 18:24, 11 July 2014 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Martin Glennie

Hello Paatv,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Martin Glennie for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Kges1901 (talk) 21:59, 11 December 2014 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:45, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Paatv. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)