Your submission at Articles for creation: Konbostrea has been accepted

edit
 
Konbostrea, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Stevey7788 (talk) 14:48, 24 April 2019 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Aberrosquama has been accepted

edit
 
Aberrosquama, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Stevey7788 (talk) 15:03, 24 April 2019 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Andreolepis petri has been accepted

edit
 
Andreolepis petri, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Stevey7788 (talk) 15:22, 24 April 2019 (UTC)Reply

Paleofroggy, you are invited to the Teahouse!

edit
 

Hi Paleofroggy! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like ChamithN (talk).

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:03, 25 April 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Trachosteus has been accepted

edit
 
Trachosteus, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Gpkp (utc) 16:39, 25 April 2019 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Doliodus has been accepted

edit
 
Doliodus, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Stevey7788 (talk) 17:41, 25 April 2019 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: LazarBeam (April 25)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by AngusWOOF were:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
AngusWOOF (barksniff) 21:35, 25 April 2019 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Xingtianosaurus (April 26)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Boothsift was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
BoothSift 01:05, 26 April 2019 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Dinosaurs and Friends (April 26)

edit
 
Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Randykitty was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: To show notability, you need reliable sources that describe the subject in-depth and are independent of it.
Randykitty (talk) 11:33, 26 April 2019 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Geographic origin of dinosaurs has been accepted

edit
 
Geographic origin of dinosaurs, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Stevey7788 (talk) 13:10, 26 April 2019 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Indosinosuchus has been accepted

edit
 
Indosinosuchus, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Stevey7788 (talk) 13:11, 26 April 2019 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Omalodus has been accepted

edit
 
Omalodus, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Stevey7788 (talk) 13:29, 26 April 2019 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: LazarBeam (April 27)

edit
 
Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by CNMall41 was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: Doesn't meet notability guidelines. The references in the draft are not considered reliable or in-depth and my search online was unable to find anything of value. It was a quick search as there were not many results searching both the real name and moniker.
CNMall41 (talk) 04:10, 27 April 2019 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Chap Mei (April 27)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by JalenFolf were:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Jalen D. Folf (talk) 17:03, 27 April 2019 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Enalikter has been accepted

edit
 
Enalikter, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Gpkp (utc) 05:02, 5 May 2019 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Bundenbachiellus has been accepted

edit
 
Bundenbachiellus, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Gpkp (utc) 05:11, 5 May 2019 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Eurycyde golem

edit
 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that the page you created, Eurycyde golem, was tagged as a test page under section G2 of the criteria for speedy deletion and has been or soon may be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Wgolf (talk) 22:54, 17 May 2019 (UTC)Reply

Ways to improve Ophisaurus manchenioi

edit

Hello, Paleofroggy,

Thanks for creating Ophisaurus manchenioi! I edit here too, under the username MrClog and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:-

A quick Google search shows that there are various Spanish sources (in this case news articles) that discuss the Ophisaurus manchenioi. The one source mentioned on the talk does not appear to be a reliable source.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|MrClog}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

MrClog (talk) 16:57, 16 June 2019 (UTC)Reply

A page you started (Rieppelophis) has been reviewed!

edit

Thanks for creating Rieppelophis.

User:Lapablo while reveiwing this page as a part of our page curation process had the following comments:

Thanks for creating this page

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Lapablo}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Lapablo (talk) 16:41, 26 June 2019 (UTC)Reply

Overlinking

edit

Hi, please remember NOT to link years, dates, or common terms. Tony (talk) 12:41, 7 July 2019 (UTC)Reply

A page you started (Schoenesmahl) has been reviewed!

edit

Thanks for creating Schoenesmahl.

User:Nick Moyes while reviewing this page as a part of our page curation process had the following comments:

Jake should be Jack, surely?

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Nick Moyes}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Nick Moyes (talk) 03:39, 18 July 2019 (UTC)Reply

Rutiodon priscus listed at Redirects for discussion

edit
 

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Rutiodon priscus. Since you had some involvement with the Rutiodon priscus redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. signed, Rosguill talk 14:42, 18 July 2019 (UTC)Reply