User talk:PapaJeckloy/Archive 5

Archive 1

←

Archive 3

Archive 4

Archive 5

Archive 6

Archive 7

Archive 8

Unblock request

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

PapaJeckloy (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I also appealed few hours ago and the admin who checked the case said I need to provide all of the accounts I have created so I will do this again. After almost a month of getting blocked, I know many other users don't want me back, but I loved Wikipedia so much that i can't quit editing, I'm very sorry for my very noob actions and I apologize for the problems I brought to other users, giving them headaches and messing up this community. I just want a willing user who will test my eligibility here and how can I contribute to the wiki, I want to make significant and useful contributions. I just don't know what I am doing way back before then, because of lack of experience in the Wiki. But I am assured that of 23 days of training to become a good user and reading and studying the policies and guidelines mainly giving attention on the behavioural policies, I must be ready now, you can test me. All I want is to be a good user now, No further excuses. I'll promise if you give me one last chance, I'll never waste the opportunity as I can contribute also.

I have created several accounts, I'm very sorry that I do so, that's because before I am not familiar with the guidelines (but it's past). I am honestly saying that I created these accounts. I said this honestly because I want to prove myself that I have changed. I am sure that I have changed, I almost got depressed because I miss editing, but I want to show everybody that I'm not rude anymore that I did before. I realized my wrong actions and understands why I became controversial, I'm just very rude before that upto now I feel sorry for myself.

User:PapaJeckloy's lover- A legitimate declared alternative account before, blocked because of my case. User:Gelkia31, User:Gongon3336, User:Gelacost Mouse, User:EtitsNgKabayo- socks. --PAPAJECKLOY (hearthrob! kiss me! <3) (talk) 14:14, 23 September 2014 (UTC)

Decline reason:

I don't think so, no. You've done what's one of the worst possible things on Wikipedia: creating multiple accounts so as to feign consensus. That's downright fraud, and you don't seem to understand just how destructive that is to community here. Intolerable. --jpgordon^{::==( o )} 17:47, 23 September 2014 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I would like to point out that it has been only three weeks—21 days—since PapaJeckloy was blocked. Not "almost a month", or 23 days; even now, the request is guilty of exaggerating, and the admitted socks above were being vociferously denied right up until the original block occurred. Given the damage PapaJeckloy did at both DYK and GAN—he used his socks at the former to approve his own articles and promoted articles he'd reviewed, both against DYK policty—it's far too soon to let him loose to do anything. If for some reason the block is lifted, I think there at least needs to be restrictions against participating in those areas until PapaJeckloy can demonstrate responsible editing elsewhere. BlueMoonset (talk) 16:05, 23 September 2014 (UTC)

I would tend to concur with this. PapaJeckloy not only used socks to approve DYKs, but ultimately caused an article containing a blatant copyvio image to appear on the main page. Should an unblock even be considered, I would strongly advise the admin to make it conditional on accepting a topic ban from DYK, GAN, FAC, and all related processes (especially those where content can be put on the main page). —/Mendaliv/^2¢/_Δ's/ 02:49, 26 September 2014 (UTC)

Just to add on BlueMoonset and Mendaliv's comments, the administrator that will check on this case should consider the aggressive/rude behavior he showed to other editors (including myself), on top of what big mess he did in DYK and GA. To Jeckloy, learn to accept criticism and take it positively. For the past months that you have edited here, whenever I correct your grammar, you took it negatively and started attacking me. If someone added information on an article that you are focusing on, you delete it and say rude things on the editor. And please, if you edited an article and nominated it in DYK, you should acknowledge the other editors who painstakingly edited them before you and don't own all of the credits that comes along with it. You showed that behavior to me and others in multiple instances. -WayKurat (talk) 11:15, 4 October 2014 (UTC)