User talk:Paradise Chronicle/Archive 2

Archive 1

Archive 2

Archive 3

Archive 4

Archive 5

Sorry

I am sorry to have caused you some trouble. I will now take a break from Wikipedia for a while. Lean Anael (talk) 20:34, 16 January 2020 (UTC)

Ok, you're welcome. Paradise Chronicle (talk) 01:07, 17 January 2020 (UTC)

Qubad Talabani

Hello, I replied to you earlier regarding the English page of Qubad Talabani. The place of birth in the book is not accurate, will try to find an accurate source.

Regarding the other contents they deserve to be highlighted as they are a major milestones in his life (Operation Iraqi Freedom and KRG Representative to the US) and for Early life, it was placed at the bottom as it is not as important as his political career

I hope we can work it out to revert back the previous content I edited as the structure that it was set in makes more sense.

cheers :) Ditswiki (talk) 13:21, 17 January 2020 (UTC)

Hi Ditswiki, yeah, good, then we wait for a better source for the place of birth. I'll try to find a source, too. But you can not just copy paste text in the article. Not a single phrase should be copied from an other article. And biographies usually begin with early life and education. Look at Jalal Talabani. Or Albert Einstein and Bruce Chatwin both articles awarded with a Good Article. And read Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons. I think this helps. Paradise Chronicle (talk) 15:32, 17 January 2020 (UTC)

P.S:

Of course these guidelines are difficult to achieve standards for just one editor and there exist many Wikipedia Biographies that don't meet them. But on :Wikipedia we are a team and work together. One editor contributes one info to an article and an other one an other info. And an exemption for copying text :are quotes.Paradise Chronicle (talk) 20:09, 17 January 2020 (UTC)

Your thread has been archived

Hi Paradise Chronicle! You created a thread called Talk page archive at Wikipedia:Teahouse, but it has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please create a new thread. Archival by Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} (ban this bot) or {{nobots}} (ban all bots) on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:01, 20 January 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: List of arrested Mayors in Turkey has been accepted

List of arrested Mayors in Turkey, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

GeneralPoxter (talk) 03:45, 21 January 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 24

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Eva Palmer-Sikelianos, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Delphic Festival (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:05, 24 January 2020 (UTC)

Dear DPL Bot and others who read this page,

It was on purpose because it links to both Delphic festivals because the theme is THE (all) Festivals, further in the edit I also linked to the first and the second Delphic festival in separate wikilinks. From my point of view, all correct, but everyone who feels it is not correct, is free to change it.

Thank your very much for very attentive work,

Paradise Chronicle (talk) 20:50, 24 January 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 10

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Adnan Selçuk Mizrakli, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page People's Democratic Party (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 16:19, 10 March 2020 (UTC)

New message from Obi2canibe

Hello, Paradise Chronicle. You have new messages at Obi2canibe's talk page.
Message added 14:49, 28 March 2020 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Obi2canibe (talk) 14:49, 28 March 2020 (UTC)

Your thread has been archived

Hi Paradise Chronicle! You created a thread called Someone includes relevant info but sort of unsourced, what to do? at Wikipedia:Teahouse, but it has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please create a new thread. Archival by Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} (ban this bot) or {{nobots}} (ban all bots) on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:01, 3 April 2020 (UTC)

President of Turkey

Hi, I just wanted to let you know I just reverted a couple of your good-faith edits today in President of Turkey. You restored a section about the residence that had been blanked by an IP, and added a citation. However, the IP is an obvious sock of a blocked and long-term-abusive editor Shingling334, who has targeted that article extensively in the past (usually for vandalism, trying to get the page edit-protected). He first added the section, then blanked it, I guess hoping that someone else would restore it, which is a typical pattern. You or anyone else are welcome to write a section about the residence in your own words. However, I removed the material in accordance with WP:BMB, and I believe it should not be restored. Thanks... --IamNotU (talk) 14:29, 4 April 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 9

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Elazığ Province, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Maden (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:20, 9 April 2020 (UTC)

Your thread has been archived

Hi Paradise Chronicle! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Hello, advice on dealing with a redirect, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to create a new thread. The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} here on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:02, 15 April 2020 (UTC)

Edit-warring is not the solution

Hi, Your edit-warring on the Ras al-Ayn page is not constructive. If you are willing to work a solution out I will be happy to cooperate with you. Otherwise, simply reverting my edits will get you into sanctions. Thank you for your understanding. Amr ibn Kulthoumعمرو بن كلثوم (talk) 00:45, 20 April 2020 (UTC)

Thanks...

...for adding references. Ashurpedia (talk) 16:49, 24 April 2020 (UTC)

Grammar

The proper English grammar is "heavy drinker" and does not need to include "alcohol" and the phrase "first president to die office" is incorrect. It needs to be "First president to die in office". I am an American who understands English, and I can help you out. Can you please revert it back to my original edit. Thanks. Nusent (talk) 13:19, 7 May 2020 (UTC)

Ups, sorry I thought you deleted the in office. My mistake.Paradise Chronicle (talk) 13:26, 7 May 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Şark İslahat Plani

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Şark İslahat Plani requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by Şark İslahat Plani and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. - Flori4nKT A L K 21:23, 8 May 2020 (UTC)

New message from Flori4nK

Hello, Paradise Chronicle. You have new messages at Flori4nK's talk page.
Message added 00:56, 9 May 2020 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

- Flori4nKT A L K 00:56, 9 May 2020 (UTC)

Rollback granted

Hi Paradise Chronicle. After reviewing your request for "rollbacker", I have enabled rollback on your account. Keep in mind these things when going to use rollback:

• Getting rollback is no more momentous than installing Twinkle.
• Rollback should be used to revert clear cases of vandalism only, and not good faith edits.
• Rollback should never be used to edit war.
• If abused, rollback rights can be revoked.
• Use common sense.

If you no longer want rollback, contact me and I'll remove it. Also, for some more information on how to use rollback, see Wikipedia:Administrators' guide/Rollback (even though you're not an admin). I'm sure you'll do great with rollback, but feel free to leave me a message on my talk page if you run into troubles or have any questions about appropriate/inappropriate use of rollback. Thank you for helping to reduce vandalism. Happy editing! Anarchyte (talk • work) 09:55, 23 May 2020 (UTC)

Your thread has been archived

Hi Paradise Chronicle! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Script size, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days (usually at least two days, and sometimes four or more). You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to . The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} here on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:02, 29 July 2020 (UTC)

Your thread has been archived

Hi Paradise Chronicle! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Publishing an article on a blacklisted name, Aziz Feyzi Pirinççizâde, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days (usually at least two days, and sometimes four or more). You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to . The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} here on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:03, 30 July 2020 (UTC)

Your thread has been archived

Hi Paradise Chronicle! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Help with archiving my talk page., has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days (usually at least two days, and sometimes four or more). You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to . The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} here on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:03, 24 July 2020 (UTC)

Message.

Hello, Paradise Chronicle. You have new messages at Isik's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:00, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

Kirkuk

Kirkuk: Please don't cross out any fact, even if it's on one side, then I don't understand why the amendment is not neutral Torivar (talk) 19:27, 12 December 2020 (UTC)

I retrieved the amendment, because the information about the capital is in the foreground, and it doesn't need to be put elsewhere in the article, as it is only two phrases Torivar (talk) 19:40, 12 December 2020 (UTC)

Kirkuk is quite a contested article due to its History of Kurds, Arabs and Turkmens. Now presenting it as the undisputed capital of Kurdistan Region, which it is not even according to the constitution of the Kurdistan Region, is not very NPOV. (de jure=Legally) is usually used complementary with a (de facto) which is not the case, and it is not legally the capital of Kurdistan Region, but planned to become the capital of the Kurdistan Region. A hypothetical intent should be presented as such and doesn't need to be in the second phrase in the lead of an existing city. The Sharizor part can go into history to the other entities of which Kirkuk was a capital of.Paradise Chronicle (talk) 21:53, 12 December 2020 (UTC)

Paradise Chronicle There is history, there is documentation of what happened and is happening. There is no need for the opinions or theories of certain parties, so the actual situation of the city must be clarified. As for the constitution, it can be ascertained, Erbil is the de facto capital, while Kirkuk is the de jure capital. It also has nothing to do with the attempt to de facto accompli, so this is not an excuse. my greetings. Torivar (talk) 00:55, 13 December 2020 (UTC)

I just tried to help, this kind of verve will likely lead to extensive discussions. The capital part is already covered further down I the article. A clarified version of the capital story is now also prominently in the lead. I see it as valid to include the info, but for now only chronologically. Calling this sabotage... can lead to a report for not assuming good faith, which I of course will not issue. I really just try to welcome you in a good and constructive manner. Happy editing.Paradise Chronicle (talk) 02:17, 13 December 2020 (UTC)

Thank you Paradise Chronicle, I accept. As for the term sabotage, see to know, He doesn't write an modified summary or respond to his discussion page, what is this contradiction? Torivar (talk) 14:05, 13 December 2020 (UTC)

Vandalism by Torivar

Hi, please undo the POV vandalism by Torivar on the Kirkuk page — Preceding unsigned comment added by MasgoufMaster (talk • contribs) 19:38, 12 December 2020 (UTC)

RfA

Hey, PC, I'm so sorry if I asked that question in a way that seemed harsh! I didn't intend that, only to try to attain clarity! —valereee (talk) 21:10, 18 February 2021 (UTC)

Don't worry, you were sort of right. My intention was good, too, but at the stage of RfA's one shouldn't wobble around with the phrasing of questions. There will be RfAs again, and similar questions will come up until the issue is solved. I actually try to formulate the questions in a general fashion, as last time (at Hog Farm) my question was maybe a bit too detailed and met with some slight criticism from a very respected editor.Paradise Chronicle (talk) 22:08, 18 February 2021 (UTC)

Ah, I see! You asked a very specific question at Hog Farm's and someone said it was too specific, and then you made it less specific for TJMS, and I came along and said it wasn't specific enough! :D I'm sorry about that!

Maybe if we turn this around, I can help you define your question for the next RfA: Can you think of an answer that would make you think, "Yes, that's what I was hoping to hear, I will support this candidate?" Or conversely, one that would make you think the opposite -- that you would oppose the candidate?

(The reason I ask is that unless you need to know the answer to this question before you can decide whether to support or oppose, it's probably not a question for RfA but instead should be discussed at some policy talk page.) —valereee (talk) 13:10, 19 February 2021 (UTC)

Proposed decision posted at the open Kurds and Kurdistan case

In the open Kurds and Kurdistan arbitration case, a number of remedies and finding of facts have been proposed, some of which relate to you. Please review this decision and draw the arbitrators' attention to any relevant material or statements. Comments may be brought to the attention of the committee on the proposed decision talk page. For a guide to the arbitration process, see Wikipedia:Arbitration/Guide to arbitration. For the Arbitration Committee, Dreamy Jazz ^{talk to me | my contributions} 16:08, 19 February 2021 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Kurds and Kurdistan closed

An arbitration case regarding Kurds and Kurdistan has now closed and the final decision is viewable at the link above. The following remedies have been enacted:

• Standard discretionary sanctions are authorized for the topics of Kurds and Kurdistan, broadly construed.
• GPinkerton (talk · contribs) is indefinitely banned from the English Wikipedia. This ban may be appealed twelve months after the enactment of this remedy, and every twelve months thereafter.
• GPinkerton (talk · contribs) is topic-banned from articles related to Kurds and Kurdistan, broadly construed. This ban may be appealed twelve months after the enactment of this remedy, and every twelve months thereafter.
• Thepharoah17 (talk · contribs) is topic-banned from articles related to Kurds and Kurdistan, broadly construed. This ban may be appealed twelve months after the enactment of this remedy, and every twelve months thereafter.
• عمرو بن كلثوم (talk · contribs) is topic-banned from articles related to Kurds and Kurdistan, broadly construed. This ban may be appealed twelve months after the enactment of this remedy, and every twelve months thereafter.
• Supreme Deliciousness (talk · contribs) is topic-banned from articles related to Kurds and Kurdistan, broadly construed. This ban may be appealed twelve months after the enactment of this remedy, and every twelve months thereafter.
• Paradise Chronicle is warned to avoid casting aspersions and repeating similar uncollegial conduct in the future.

For the Arbitration Committee, Dreamy Jazz ^{talk to me | my contributions} 14:35, 23 February 2021 (UTC)

Discuss this at: Wikipedia talk:Arbitration Committee/Noticeboard § Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Kurds and Kurdistan closed

DS alert

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in the topics of Kurds and Kurdistan, broadly construed. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Shadow4dark (talk) 06:56, 24 February 2021 (UTC)

Shadow4dark is an editor who opposed a topic ban on ThePharoah17 after I demanded one within the ArbCom Case on Kurds and Kurdistan for this edit and which was made in the ArbCom Case on Kurds and Kurdistan and where they for the record stated Kurdistan is a secular idea. It doesn't exist because it has no reason to exist. and in the same edit That's why there isn't really such thing as a Kurdish name. I thought it might be good to have it mentioned that they were a participant in the discussions of the case.Paradise Chronicle (talk) 23:59, 24 February 2021 (UTC)

ANI notification

Hello, Paradise Chronicle. I've opened a report on administrators' noticeboard regarding you. --► Sincerely: SolaVirum 13:30, 6 March 2021 (UTC)

This report led to the deletion of the article in question ("Gara Massacre").Paradise Chronicle (talk) 23:28, 15 March 2021 (UTC)

Ömer Faruk Gergerlioğlu

Hello Paradise Chronicle, in this edit you added probably that his legal immunity was removed. Yesterday, his parliamentary membership was removed, not his legal immunity. see The 16. Criminal Court of the Court of Cassation (Turkey) has approved the imprisonment, then Presidency of Turkey, sent a proposal for the abolition of the status of this MP on Turkish parliament. And yesterday when the vice president of the parliament read the relevant proposal of the Presidency of Turkey, his MP right was removed. I suggest if you can edit at this point? Regards. Uncitoyen (talk) 09:31, 18 March 2021 (UTC)

Istanbul Convention

Hello again Paradise Chronicle. Thank you for your editing. President of Turkey took this decision on March 20, but Turkey have reported the General Secretariat on 22 March for this decision of withdrawal. full-list of signatures In order to withdraw from the contract, this decision must be reported to the Council of Europe. For example, ratification date for Turkey is 14 March 2012, but Turkish parliament has taken this ratification on 24 November 2011. ratification of Turkish parliament Also on 10 February 2012, the Turkish government decided to transmit this decision of the parliament to the president, and this approval of the parliament was accepted by the president and was published in the official gazette on 8 March 2012 [1]. Probably Turkey has reported to the Council this ratification on 14 March 2012. Dates accepted by the Council are entered to this template. I wonder if you can edit withdrawal date that way? Regards. Uncitoyen (talk) 12:37, 27 March 2021 (UTC)

I can try to do so. I expanded on the ratification of the treaty at Women in Turkey. I also adapted my edits at the Istanbul Convention and I removed the withdrawal column for now as the process of withdrawal is still ongoing until the 1 July 2021. It can re-added at that date or a bit earlier with expected in parenthesis. Thank you for the trust. To have a Global Sysop with less than 400 edits in the English Wikipedia on my Talk Page twice within a few days is not something I was expecting.Paradise Chronicle (talk) 22:10, 27 March 2021 (UTC)

No problem. I wanted to make a small edit for the withdrawal, but it was better to inform you. I specify my views on issues related to Turkey, I had nothing to do with global sysop rights. :) In the meantime, related legal cases have begun to be filed for the cancel of the decision on the grounds that it is against the law. After that, probably no much will change, but everytime nothing is clear for Turkey. Also, thank you for make your edits according my comments and the resources. Uncitoyen (talk) 16:00, 29 March 2021 (UTC)

ANI notice

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.--Amr ibn Kulthoumعمرو بن كلثوم (talk) 00:35, 28 February 2021 (UTC)

For transparency here is the discussion we had at the ANI.Paradise Chronicle (talk) 22:23, 29 April 2021 (UTC)

Must see once

Hello @Paradise Chronicle:, I want to make Emiway Bantai. I tried once before to create an article Emiway Bantai (Indian rapper), but it was deleted, which probably would not have passed GNG at that time. Then I found a Machayenge article from Emiway on Wiki. When I checked that article, it turned out that it was created by CptViraj. He is also an NPR. When I talked to him about this, he said that he was previously associated with this subject. So now he does not want to make it. Then I saw their sandbox which was made to make User:CptViraj/sandbox/Emiway Bantai. Recently I have prepared an article on their sandbox. Therefore, I will ask you to review it. Since its main title is Protected by the Administrator, I will ask you to move it to Emiway. Must see once. Thank you 2402:3A80:10CA:7818:C024:C6CC:B8CC:5E1E (talk) 10:23, 9 May 2021 (UTC)

@Paradise Chronicle:, I am waiting for your reply. 2402:3A80:10C5:7807:E52F:490A:CE8F:4B74 (talk) 14:20, 9 May 2021 (UTC)

Sorry for the delay. I have made a short overview of the article in question, but I am not as experienced enough yet, to move it to draft space. Then also I am not experienced enough in the Indian rapper scene and I'd prefer someone with more knowledge on the topic has a look at it as well. The article seems to have enough sources though. Maybe you could ask at the WP:TEAHOUSE for some help, I received a lot of help there as well. And create an account? I hope this was an encouraging advice. Happy editing.Paradise Chronicle (talk) 16:13, 9 May 2021 (UTC)

May 2021

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 month for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  — Ched (talk) 04:36, 15 May 2021 (UTC)

• I'd ask that any admin responding to an unblock request review this AE thread I didn't specifically make it an WP:AE block, so any admin is free to unblock if they feel it's the right thing to do. — Ched (talk) 04:45, 15 May 2021 (UTC)

  Ched, Where did you see any support for one month block for the filer? Shrike (talk) 09:28, 15 May 2021 (UTC)

  @Ched: I started looking at WP:AE due to a backlog report. I can see that Paradise Chronicle was criticized for various inappropriate behavior, but it seemed minor and not warranting a block. My reading of AE is that the admins commenting where saying the reported user needed a one-month block, not Paradise Chronicle. I see your above disclaimer that I can unblock if wanted, but I'll wait a while to see if you are available to let me know if there is something I'm missing. Johnuniq (talk) 09:59, 15 May 2021 (UTC)

  (edit conflict) I had a lengthy reply but didn't "copy" before hitting enter. So ... Johnuniq, that's fine. I have no problem with the unblock, personally I would have gone with maybe a week, but based the length mentioned on the AE report, which hadn't been edited for several days, - so I took a shot at closing. There's no special info I have or any preference one way or the other. — Ched (talk) 10:12, 15 May 2021 (UTC)

  OK, thanks I unblocked. Johnuniq (talk) 10:23, 15 May 2021 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

Paradise Chronicle (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

MY user page gets edited in bad faith within a topic ban violation, I report it and then I get blocked for 1 month? In the report it was clear that ThePharoah17 incurred in a topic ban violation also in an other talk page removing a DS alert. Sysop Bishonen also noticed this during the discussion. This must be a mistake. Paradise Chronicle (talk) 04:52, 15 May 2021 (UTC)

Accept reason:

Block not needed per discussion with blocking admin above and WP:AE comments. Johnuniq (talk) 10:22, 15 May 2021 (UTC)

Precious

peace referendum

Thank you for quality articles about Kurdish topics such as Süreyya Bedir Khan and Academics for Peace, and Swiss culture, including 1967 Basel Picasso paintings purchase referendum, for "don't worry, you were sort of right", - you are an awesome Wikipedian!

You are recipient no. 2596 of Precious, a prize of QAI. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 11:11, 18 May 2021 (UTC)

Dealing with time-wasting editors

I appreciate the patience you show when dealing with the IP on Talk:Armenian genocide. However, time is the most precious commodity of good-faith editors. When I can, I try not to waste it on those who aren't WP:HERE to build an encyclopedia. Apologies if this unsolicited advice is unwanted, and thanks for everything you do here. (t · c) buidhe 10:33, 24 May 2021 (UTC)

The advice is very welcome and I intend to adhere to it.Paradise Chronicle (talk) 11:17, 24 May 2021 (UTC)

Sunshine

		Sunshine!
		Hello Paradise Chronicle! Mccapra (talk) has given you a bit of sunshine to brighten your day! Sunshine promotes WikiLove and hopefully it has made your day better. Spread the sunshine by adding {{subst:User:Meaghan/Sunshine}} to someone else's talk page, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. In addition, you can spread the sunshine to anyone who visits your userpage and/or talk page by adding {{User:Meaghan/Sunshine icon}}. Happy editing! Mccapra (talk) 21:19, 20 June 2021 (UTC)

AANES disruption

Hi Paradise Chronicle. Regarding the disruption at AANES, if you don't get a robust enough response to your report at AN/3RR, or it gets archived without action, maybe it's better to file a report at AN/I or AE? They seem like more appropriate forums given the general battleground behaviour and whiff of meatpuppetry. I apologise for not filing something myself, but I'm really stretched for time at the moment. Jr8825 • Talk 00:11, 3 July 2021 (UTC)

Thank you. It's ok. They are blocked for a while now. Next time (if there will be one) it will be longer. I'll look into the AN/I, AE possibility, but as for this one, I thought it would be a bit harsh for a new Editor.Paradise Chronicle (talk) 05:49, 3 July 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of 2021 Konya massacre for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 2021 Konya massacre is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2021 Konya massacre until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

GenQuest ^"scribble" 11:48, 7 August 2021 (UTC)

DYK for Philip G. Kreyenbroek

On 8 August 2021, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Philip G. Kreyenbroek, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Philip Kreyenbroek taught Iranian studies at the University of Göttingen due to his interest in Yazidi traditions and the fact that about half of the Yazidi diaspora lived in Germany at the time? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Philip G. Kreyenbroek. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Philip G. Kreyenbroek), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cwmhiraeth (talk) 00:02, 8 August 2021 (UTC)

Thank you for the scientist! He is also featured on Portal:Germany! Yesterday I had two interesting DYK (I think), and the day before was at a concert with Daniel Barenboim just playing piano, and afterwards he and the orchestra received last year's prize (pictured). --Gerda Arendt (talk) 20:55, 8 August 2021 (UTC)

Those were interesting cultural DYKs. Inspiring. And good to know the Portal Germany has a DYK as well. Paradise Chronicle (talk) 20:28, 10 August 2021 (UTC)

The German DYK is fed by the other, taking everything on board that is remotely related, - keep watched if interested. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 20:36, 10 August 2021 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Resilient Barnstar
	Thank you for defending and contributing to Kurdish-related topics! Épine (talk) 14:24, 25 August 2021 (UTC)

Atatürk's nationalism

Hi Paradise Chronicle. A recently-created article Atatürk's nationalism looks like an unnecessary pro-Turkish nationalist POV fork of Kemalism and Turkish nationalism to me, but I'm no expert on this area. Would you mind taking a quick look and offering a second opinion? Thanks. – Joe (talk) 06:21, 3 September 2021 (UTC)

Hi Joe, I was looking at it and the Nationalism section at Kemalism as to me is more on topic of Atatürks nationalism than the article Atatürk's Nationalism. I suggest to expand the Nationalism section in Kemalism much more before creating a new article on the subject. Paradise Chronicle (talk) 08:04, 3 September 2021 (UTC)

Incomplete DYK nomination

Hello! Your submission of Template:Did you know nominations/Racism-Turanism trials at the Did You Know nominations page is not complete; if you would like to continue, please link the nomination to the nominations page as described in step 3 of the nomination procedure. If you do not want to continue with the nomination, tag the nomination page with {{db-g7}}, or ask a DYK admin. Thank you. DYKHousekeepingBot (talk) 05:11, 10 September 2021 (UTC)

Pending changes reviewer granted

Hello. Your account has been granted the "pending changes reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on pages protected by pending changes. The list of articles awaiting review is located at Special:PendingChanges, while the list of articles that have pending changes protection turned on is located at Special:StablePages.

Being granted reviewer rights neither grants you status nor changes how you can edit articles. If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.

See also:

• Wikipedia:Reviewing pending changes, the guideline on reviewing
• Wikipedia:Pending changes, the summary of the use of pending changes
• Wikipedia:Protection policy#Pending changes protection, the policy determining which pages can be given pending changes protection by administrators.
  

Ks0stm ^{(T•C•G•E)}  If you reply here, please ping me by using {{re|Ks0stm}} in your reply.  08:45, 18 October 2021 (UTC)

November 2021 at Women in Red

Women in Red | November 2021, Volume 7, Issue 11, Numbers 184, 188, 210, 212, 213 Online events: New: Film + Stage | Endocrine health Contest (Oct/Nov/Dec): Women in Oceania contest Continuing: Women's rights | #1day1woman See also: Wikipedia Asian Month 2021 Other ways to participate: Join the conversations on our talkpage. Help plan and coordinate future events. Become a member. You can always opt-out of notifications. Follow Women in Red on social media: Facebook | Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

--Innisfree987 (talk) 21:32, 24 October 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Concern regarding Draft:Benedetta Argentieri

Hello, Paradise Chronicle. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Benedetta Argentieri, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 13:01, 31 October 2021 (UTC)

you likely undid my edit..please explain the logic.

hi, im just hoping you can explain why my edit was wrong and how the lineage currently in print makes any logical sense. i could totally be wrong here, and if i am i do hope to learn, but it seriously is really hard to wrap my mind around the way it stands. thanks.

ok I edited the page: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arrhidaeus

because i arrived there by starting at alexander the greats page, clicking on the link for his father phillip II, then from phillip II page i clicked on his father amyntas III, then from amyntas III page i clicked his father arrhidaeus....hopefully we can both agree that 3 fathers deep from a person would equate to their great grandfather...that being said, arrhideaus would be alexanders great grandfather.... however, the page for arrhidaeus has him listed as one of alexanders generals, it also states he was selected to return alexanders body when alexander died in 323BC...using the years listed throughout the lineage, in 323BC arrhidaeus would have been well over 100 years of age.

now i find a few things highly unlikely 1.)that alexander would have his grandfather as a general, not to mention his GREAT grandfather.. 2.)that arrhideaus was even still alive in 323BC (a 100+ year life span was prettymuch unheard of during those times) 3.)that even if this 100+ year old general and great grandfather of the king WAS in fact in the kings army, he would be one of the LAST people selected to shoulder the burden of bringing the deceased kings body back home.

Could you PLEASE explain to me why the history that is listed is correct.. if its not correct and it was my poor editing and poor wikietiquette, could you please let me know the correct way that it needs to be done.

but yeah, its just so completely far fetched it makes no sense at all..almost like there should be 2 people named arrhidaeus and the one thats currently linked would be his general and then a separate page linking to his great gandfather...can you please explain the logic or let me know somehow whats really going on there..if you check the talk page for arrhidaeus, im not the first person to notice things literally dont add up.

sorry to be a bother, i just feel like if it can be fixed, it probably should be fixed. thanks for your time either way it goes.

i appreciate any info you can share. Snarevox (talk) 06:18, 18 November 2021 (UTC)

link to alexanders page https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alexander_the_Great

link to phillip II page https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Philip_II_of_Macedon

link to amyntas III page https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Amyntas_III_of_Macedon

link to arrhideaus page https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arrhidaeus Snarevox (talk) 06:26, 18 November 2021 (UTC)

Hi Snarevox, after you edited the Arrhidaeus article you left a large amount of text above and within the article pointing out there was a mistake. I first tried to understand and to fix it, but I was a bit slow and had low internet access these days. Today I took off the wikilink to Arrhidaeus at Amyntas III of Macedon. I hope your concern is addressed for now. If you feel there is a mistake again, do not hesitate to leave me a message. Paradise Chronicle (talk) 15:38, 18 November 2021 (UTC)

thank you!!!! i really do appreciate the fix. it made no sense and i know i left a buncha junk where it didnt belong but there were just too many little tidbits relating back to alexander for me to fix it without affecting more links that i had no business messing with. i never thought about simply removing the link from the previous page to essentially make it two separate arrhideaus'(s?). what you did was so simple yet simultaneously brilliant it actually kinda blows my mind. thanks again. im not super into punctuation as i hate cellphone keyboards. have a great day, and may you be blessed with free unlimited broadband for the resta your days!!! Snarevox (talk) 20:46, 18 November 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:54, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 12

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Ottmar Hitzfeld Stadium, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Le Matin.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:05, 12 May 2022 (UTC)

Precious

One year!

Your draft article, Draft:Benedetta Argentieri

Hello, Paradise Chronicle. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Benedetta Argentieri".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:17, 30 April 2022 (UTC)

Edit Request: Help needed for Chobani

Hello. I am Kait and I work for Chobani. I recently posted an edit request on the Talk:Chobani page, which has so far gone unanswered. I am hoping that since in the past you have made edits to the Chobani page, you would like to continue helping to improve the article with what I believe are straightforward updates to keep the page current. Please examine my edit request, and if you agree that they improve the article, kindly implement them. Thanks in advance. Kait at Chobani (talk) 14:38, 24 November 2021 (UTC)

December 2021 at Women in Red

Women in Red | December 2021, Volume 7, Issue 12, Numbers 184, 188, 210, 214, 215, 216 Online events: New: "Double the lede!" | Women who died in 2021 Contest (Oct/Nov/Dec): Women in Oceania contest Continuing: Women's rights | #1day1woman See also: Women in Climate Change and preparations for our 2022 Climate initiative Other ways to participate: Join the conversations on our talkpage. Help plan and coordinate future events. Become a member. You can always opt-out of notifications. Follow Women in Red on social media: Facebook | Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

--Innisfree987 (talk) 00:13, 27 November 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging

ITN recognition for Aron Atabek

On 30 November 2021, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Aron Atabek, which you created. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Spencer^T•C 00:48, 30 November 2021 (UTC)

Thank you

November songs

... for the teamwork barnstar, much appreciated! Today 3 DYK, Brahms depicted + sadly Aga Mikolaj (listen!). May the roads that we travel make us meet again! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 19:58, 14 November 2021 (UTC)

The memory of SlimVirgin is pictured again, in the context about my dangerous thoughts about arbcom. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 17:03, 29 November 2021 (UTC)

Thank you for the information on the concern on Rexxs, I am not as much into it as you and I haven't really had much (if at all) interaction with Rexxs in the past. I just think Rexxs should edit again or show that he is editing. And if so, maybe have some more patience. Maybe he already is active and will show it later? Who knows?Paradise Chronicle (talk) 14:11, 5 December 2021 (UTC)

Copyright policy

Hi, I saw your comment "no copyvio as sources are in German" at Template:Did you know nominations/Rudolf Pohl, is that correct? I understand that translating non-English sources can breach copyright, see e.g. Copyright#Economic rights, but can't see any obvious Wikipedia policy on this. TSventon (talk) 07:30, 17 December 2021 (UTC)

Yeah, thanks for the heads up. Well I figured that the copyvio of earwig will give a negative turnout if it translates from German to English, which is also correct. What I didn't see is, that there is actually also an English source. I any case, I should have worded it out better and will add the earwig result for the DYK prepper. Paradise Chronicle (talk) 07:48, 17 December 2021 (UTC)

Thanks, my concern is whether the guidance should be clarified, rather than the risk of copyvio in that specific article. TSventon (talk) 08:01, 17 December 2021 (UTC)

How about contacting Diannaa with this issue? Paradise Chronicle (talk) 08:46, 17 December 2021 (UTC)

Funnily enough that was exactly what I was thinking. Now done. TSventon (talk) 09:05, 17 December 2021 (UTC)

Your thread has been archived

Hi Paradise Chronicle! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Wikilinks in templates, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please . See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). Muninnbot (talk) 19:01, 20 December 2021 (UTC)