ParillasAndrie
July 2020
edit
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.
- If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
- If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.
Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Pseud 14 (talk) 12:39, 27 July 2020 (UTC)
August 2020
edit
Hello, I'm Subwaymuncher. Your recent edit(s) to the page Dreamscape Entertainment appear to have added incorrect information, so they have been removed for now. If you believe the information was correct, please cite a reliable source or discuss your change on the article's talk page. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. - SUBWAY 12:19, 10 August 2020 (UTC)
Image without license
edit
Unspecified source/license for File:TWKA.jpg
edit
Thanks for uploading File:TWKA.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time after the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|cc-by-sa-4.0}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: Once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot (Talk • Contribs • Owner) 06:45, 18 August 2020 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for August 21
editHi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Vandolph, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page It's Showtime. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:25, 21 August 2020 (UTC)
Image without license
edit
Unspecified source/license for File:GMA Artist Center 2020.jpg
edit
Thanks for uploading File:GMA Artist Center 2020.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time after the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|cc-by-sa-4.0}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: Once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot (Talk • Contribs • Owner) 11:45, 29 August 2020 (UTC)
September 2020
edit Hello, I'm Pinoy Wikipedian Pride. Your recent edit(s) to the page TV Patrol appear to have added incorrect information, so they have been removed for now. If you believe the information was correct, please cite a reliable source or discuss your change on the article's talk page. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Pinoy Wikipedian Pride (talk) 01:42, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
Warning
edit
Please stop your disruptive editing.
- If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
- If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.
If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. TheHotwiki (talk) 11:08, 5 September 2020 (UTC)
Hotwiki you're eliminated ParillasAndrie (talk) 11:33, 5 September 2020 (UTC)
Hi ParillasAndrie, I have noticed that you have blanked the page entirely and therefore it meets the criteria for speed deletion under WP:G7. Moreover, this title already exists on Wikipedia (see here Iba 'Yan!) and being redirected to Angel Locsin, so you don't need to create a new one. Please use SandBox if you would like to experiment or need more time to create a full article.Umakant Bhalerao (talk) 04:27, 16 September 2020 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Iba Yan!
edit
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Iba Yan! requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. JamesG5 (talk) 05:34, 16 September 2020 (UTC)
September 2020
edit
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Vandolph. Stop adding unsourced Date of Births. Fylindfotberserk (talk) 13:09, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
Warning
edit You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia. TheHotwiki (talk) 13:54, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
Edit summary
edit
Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.
When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:
Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)
Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.
Edit summary content is visible in:
Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. With a Wikipedia account you can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → 
Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary.
Thanks!TheHotwiki (talk) 13:56, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
Adding unsourced birthdates and other content
edit
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. OhNoitsJamie Talk 14:01, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
Hotwiki blocks Migo Adecer ParillasAndrie (talk) 22:13, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
@OhnoitsJamie: sorry for this blocking for me please unblock me {ParillasAndrie (talk) 08:39, 25 September 2020 (UTC)}
ParillasAndrie (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Why OhnoitsJamie do blocking this edits please unblock ParillasAndrie (talk) 08:43, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
Decline reason:
I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that
- the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
- the block is no longer necessary because you
- understand what you have been blocked for,
- will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
- will make useful contributions instead.
Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. only (talk) 10:15, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Thanks ParillasAndrie (talk) 10:22, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
- @Ohnoitsjamie:, the blocked editor has created a new account under User:ParillasAndrie2. TheHotwiki (talk) 00:34, 3 October 2020 (UTC)
- @Ohnoitsjamie:, could you do an IP check for User:AndreiJames2007 if its related to the blocked editor. The username is suspicious. Thank you.TheHotwiki (talk) 04:53, 4 October 2020 (UTC)
- Sorry, I don't have WP:CHECKUSER access; you can make a report at WP:SPI. (However, that account was quacking loudly, so it has been blocked as well. OhNoitsJamie Talk 19:55, 4 October 2020 (UTC)
- @Ohnoitsjamie:, could you do an IP check for User:AndreiJames2007 if its related to the blocked editor. The username is suspicious. Thank you.TheHotwiki (talk) 04:53, 4 October 2020 (UTC)
September 2020
edit
(block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. If the block is a CheckUser or Oversight block, was made by the Arbitration Committee or to enforce an arbitration decision (arbitration enforcement), or is unsuitable for public discussion, you should appeal to the Arbitration Committee.
Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.
Speedy deletion nomination of User:ParillasAndrie
edit
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on User:ParillasAndrie, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Vizzinifezzikwomanchuck (talk) 23:52, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
Blocked for sockpuppetry
edit
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 14:36, 31 December 2020 (UTC)
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Iba 'Yan! until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
The article Paano Kita Mapasasalamatan? (Philippine TV program) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
No WP:RS cited on the article.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Howard the Duck (talk) 16:39, 21 April 2021 (UTC)
Nomination of Paano Kita Mapasasalamatan? (Philippine TV program) for deletion
edit The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paano Kita Mapasasalamatan? (Philippine TV program) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
Sockpuppet investigation
edit
An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/ParillasAndrie, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.
—hueman1 (talk • contributions) 08:47, 29 September 2021 (UTC)
My Last Appeal
edit ParillasAndrie (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I didn't notice this rule. Thank you ParillasAndrie (talk) 08:31, 27 September 2021 (UTC)
Decline reason:
Given that you were blocked at the end of last year for sockpuppetry, in big bold writing with links to the issue, even if your ignorance was true back then, I can only assume you are either being deceptive or unacceptably blind to issues being raised for you to have continued with the offence afterwards. I believe the only chance for you to be unblocked is to avoid sockpuppetry for the next six months, then to request unblocking under the standard offer. Further sockpuppetry can result in a community ban, which will make it even harder to ever get unblocked. Nosebagbear (talk) 10:01, 30 September 2021 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
- My unblock decline I was writing, but Nosebagbear was too quick for me. I find your rationale that you did not understand the rule to be unsustainable. Especially at this point. You have had many sockpuppets blocked since December 2020. The most recent one was blocked in September of this year. With all those blocks, you never saw the block notice that said abusing multiple accounts is wrong? It never occurred to you that evading your block was wrong? In any event, the most recent socking was just this month. The earliest you could hope to be unblocked would be March 2022. Waiting a year to request unblocking would be better.
- You will need to be much more convincing than saying you did not understand the rule. You will need to address the original reasons for the original blocks. As to the block evasion/sockpuppetry, I've no idea how you would convince anyone to trust you after all this deception and block evasion. You would need to be convincing indeed. This is a WP:checkuser block. You will need checkuser approval to be unblocked. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 10:06, 30 September 2021 (UTC)
Rename not done
edit
Renamer note: You are not eligible for a rename To be eligible for a global rename, the . . . user is not seeking the rename to conceal or obfuscate bad conduct. Renaming would cause confusion and disruption. It would obfuscate the SPI. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 09:29, 30 September 2021 (UTC)
Deepfriedokra, changed block settings from indefinite to 48 hours ParillasAndrie (talk) 21:56, 30 September 2021 (UTC)
- You do know I can tell that that's not true, right? --Deepfriedokra (talk) 23:12, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
My Last Unblock Request
edit ParillasAndrie (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Before the 2021 ends, my former sockpuppet account, AnsrieJames9 is leaving Wikipedia and now, i'm going to unblock and continued editing.
Decline reason:
Nope. Yamla (talk) 10:26, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Unban/unblock
edit ParillasAndrie (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
After 1 year from being banned by checkuser, I decided that i am not a banned user and continued editing.
Decline reason:
Not sure what you're trying to say, but it sounds like you're continuing to sock. — Daniel Case (talk) 04:44, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
ParillasAndrie (talk) 23:51, 5 October 2021 (UTC)
ParillasAndrie (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
For my request, i decided have no longer block and the previous account (AbsrieJames9) is currently leaving and i'm decided to unblock and not a banned user again.
Decline reason:
You seem to be under the (mis)assumption that you get to dictate the terms of an unblock from this account. This is a complete waste of time for admins, so I'm revoking your talk page access.Jezebel's Ponyobons mots 22:30, 7 October 2021 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
(block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System.
Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.
Orphaned non-free image File:GMA Artist Center 2020.jpg
edit
Thanks for uploading File:GMA Artist Center 2020.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:30, 11 January 2022 (UTC)
is closed. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 01:03, 9 April 2022 (UTC)
is closed. User is again banned from UTRS. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 10:58, 4 May 2022 (UTC)
is closed. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 15:44, 5 November 2022 (UTC)
- banned 1 year. continued block evasion -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 15:44, 5 November 2022 (UTC)