PatriotMapperCDP

Your submission at Articles for creation: Arson Party (February 18)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DannyS712 was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Arson Party and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Arson Party, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DannyS712 (talk) 23:43, 18 February 2021 (UTC)

Hello, PatriotMapperCDP! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! DannyS712 (talk) 23:43, 18 February 2021 (UTC)

Important Notice

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Doug Weller talk 19:55, 6 July 2021 (UTC)

Flags

Please read the guideline about use of such flag icons in articles, Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Icons#Flags. I wish I'd known about it when I was new. Doug Weller talk 19:58, 6 July 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Arson Party

Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages, such as Draft:Arson Party, to Wikipedia. Doing so is considered vandalism and is prohibited. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. wizzito | say hello! 10:27, 22 August 2021 (UTC)

September 2021

Hello, I'm M.Bitton. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Kabylia have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Thanks. M.Bitton (talk) 23:25, 2 September 2021 (UTC)

Hello, M.Bitton. Thank you for the feedback. My edit on the Kabylia article was to add the Kabyle flag in the infobox. If you believe that isn’t necessary, then I shall accept that. PatriotMapperCDP (talk) 01:00, 3 September 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 3

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Reconquista, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page History of Iberia. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:02, 3 October 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of Flag of Panjshir for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Flag of Panjshir is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Flag of Panjshir until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

 Vanilla  Wizard 💙 05:58, 6 October 2021 (UTC)

No worries, I’d be fine if the article got deleted. I think it isn’t really an important thing, just thought it would be an interesting subject to cover. You may delete it. PatriotMapperCDP (talk) 21:56, 16 October 2021 (UTC)

October 2021

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, you may be blocked from editing. Zefr (talk) 21:33, 9 October 2021 (UTC)

I'm sorry, but it said on the article that Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez was a member of the Democratic Socialists of America, so I added it to the other political affiliations section of the infobox. I'm confused on how that's vandalism.

Your edit indicated to me that the DSA was being presented in the infobox as an "official" political affiliation (DSA has no official political recognition), when I'm unsure if that is the case, and it seems best not to feature the DSA there. Note that no other editor has reverted my revert. As you likely know, her article is continuously vandalized by right-wing editors, and I felt that undoing your edit was best for neutrality. I may have had a hair-trigger reaction by undoing your edit, so my apologies to you. Zefr (talk) 16:14, 10 October 2021 (UTC)

No worries, I may have overreacted in my response a bit. Have a great day! PatriotMapperCDP (talk) 22:43, 14 October 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of Scratch Mapping Community for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Scratch Mapping Community is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Scratch Mapping Community until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

I dream of horses (Contribs) (Talk) 00:46, 12 November 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 20

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Bleeding Kansas, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page John Brown.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:01, 20 November 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:04, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

Workers Power USA moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Workers Power USA, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Jmertel23 (talk) 19:45, 31 December 2021 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Second insurgency in Ogaden

The article Second insurgency in Ogaden has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article is entirely original research. None of the sources call this a "second insurgency" or an insurgency at all.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ue3lman (talk) 22:12, 26 January 2022 (UTC)

Nomination of Spillover of the 2022 Russian invasion of Ukraine for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Spillover of the 2022 Russian invasion of Ukraine is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Spillover of the 2022 Russian invasion of Ukraine until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

― Tartan357 ^Talk 06:43, 28 February 2022 (UTC)

Wave of Russian surrenders moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Wave of Russian surrenders, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. HᴇʀᴘᴇᴛᴏGᴇɴᴇꜱɪꜱ (talk) 00:11, 2 March 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Wave of Russian surrenders (March 3)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by BuySomeApples was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Wave of Russian surrenders and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Wave of Russian surrenders, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

BuySomeApples (talk) 00:44, 3 March 2022 (UTC)

Page deletion request

I would like my main user page to be deleted due to previous revisions containing personal information that I'd rather not be accessible by people. I was an idiot when I put it there and want to protect myself. PatriotMapperCDP (talk) 00:42, 17 March 2022 (UTC)

 Done Nick-D (talk) 22:50, 26 March 2022 (UTC)

March 2022

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent further vandalism.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Nick-D (talk) 22:35, 26 March 2022 (UTC)

Block imposed for adding blatantly false claims with faked sources into articles. E.g. here you added a claim that it has been alleged that US forces in Afghanistan committed genocide, when the source actually discusses such allegations being levelled at Soviet forces in the 1980s. Here you falsely claimed that "the United States warned that Russia would invade Ukraine that day" (with this being an example of 'disinformation', when the source states that what acctually happened that day "Biden and Blinken warn that Russia could be on the brink of invading Ukraine", with no suggestion that this was 'disinformation' - for obvious reasons, as it turned out to be correct. Given the anti-US bias in both edits, I don't think that this is an accident or sloppy editing. Nick-D (talk) 22:39, 26 March 2022 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

PatriotMapperCDP (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I agree that I have put biased information on articles and promise to avoid doing such things again. PatriotMapperCDP (talk) 21:05, 1 May 2022 (UTC)

Decline reason:

Your statement below does not give me confidence that you will indeed avoid that. This is not the forum to protest or criticize the US government, please do that elsewhere. Being biased is fine, but you need to be able to control it. To consider unblocking you I would want you to agree to a topic ban from editing about the US government or its policies, broadly construed. I am declining your request. 331dot (talk) 21:18, 1 May 2022 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

• I would be open to accepting a topic ban on the US government and its policies. I mainly would like to continue editing infoboxes about wars and such to improve articles about such topics. PatriotMapperCDP (talk) 21:30, 1 May 2022 (UTC)

You may make another unblock request for someone else to review. Please note that a topic ban from subjects related to the US government might prevent you from editing about some aspects of various wars. Just make sure that you understand what you are agreeing to. 331dot (talk) 23:32, 1 May 2022 (UTC)

I do have an anti-US bias in my editing. Unlike some people, I'm not afraid to admit by biases. But at least I admit it. By voiding criticism of the US, Wikipedia is inherently showing pro-US bias. Even when I use words like 'alleged', it is somehow coming off as being biased. And, as I've stated, I am in fact biased against the US. Considering the US has invaded so many countries in the past twenty years and killed so many civilians. I'm tired of the oppression people are internationally put under by the US. PatriotMapperCDP (talk) 06:24, 27 March 2022 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, PatriotMapperCDP

Thank you for creating Muslim–Quraysh War.

User:North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Nice work

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 20:46, 1 June 2022 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Workers Power USA

Hello, PatriotMapperCDP. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Workers Power USA, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 01:02, 29 July 2022 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Workers Power USA

Hello, PatriotMapperCDP. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Workers Power USA".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 00:18, 26 August 2022 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Wave of Russian surrenders

Hello, PatriotMapperCDP. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Wave of Russian surrenders".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. ✗plicit 13:45, 10 November 2022 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Right-wing patriotism

The article Right-wing patriotism has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Neologism/WP:OR, sources aren't all about this but just use this phrase in passing. No detailed sources about this term

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Andre🚐 20:27, 11 February 2023 (UTC)