Pedohater
|
Jonathan King
editYou need to understand that Wikipedia is not a vehicle for "crusading" for or against anything. Your comments (and your username) suggest that you are trying to push an agenda. This is completely forbidden under WP rules, see WP:SOAPBOX. We have to restrict ourselves to strictly factual material backed up by reliable sources. Your or my personal opinions -- about Jonathan King, paedophilia, or any other subject -- do not come into it at all, and you must leave them at the door if you are going to edit here. -- Alarics (talk) 09:48, 27 December 2013 (UTC)
- Plus the obvious WP:USERNAME issue.--♦IanMacM♦ (talk to me) 08:51, 18 January 2014 (UTC)
While I certainly have no wish to defend paedophiles (and I have a couple of times myself clashed with celebrities trying to whitewash their biographies) I suggest you might consider changing your username to something less confrontational. PatGallacher (talk) 20:31, 18 January 2014 (UTC)
To change username see WP:CHU. PatGallacher (talk) 20:59, 20 January 2014 (UTC)
This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet of LudoVicar (talk · contribs · global contribs · page moves · user creation · block log) that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Yunshui 雲水 15:39, 21 January 2014 (UTC) |