Reviewed block in error. Apologies on mistaken identity. Unblocked. -- `Alexf(talk)

PenaVegaUniversal, while Alexf has lifted the hard block on your account your username is still in contravention of the English Wikipedia's username policy which does not allow usernames which represent a business. A {{uw-softerblock}} may have been more appropriate than either a {{uw-spamublock}} or lifting the block without addressing the username issue. In any case please request a change of your username as your first priority. Cabayi (talk) 12:37, 30 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

September 2024

edit
 
Your account has been indefinitely blocked from editing because it has been used for advertising or promotion, which is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia. Also, your username gives the impression that the account represents a business, organisation, group, or web site, which is against the username policy.

If you intend to make useful contributions instead of promoting your business or organization, you may request unblock and a username change. In your reasons, you must follow all these steps:

  1. Disclose any compensation you may receive for your contributions in accordance with the paid-contribution disclosure requirement; and
  2. Convince us that you understand the reason for your block and that you will not repeat the kind of edits for which you were blocked; and
  3. Describe in general terms the contributions that you intend to make if you are unblocked; and
  4. Provide a new username.

To do this, insert the text {{unblock-spamun|Your proposed new username|Your reason here}} at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your proposed new username" with your new username and replace the text "Your reason here" with your reasons to be unblocked.

Please note that the new username you choose cannot already be taken and in use by another account. You can search to see if the username you'd like to choose is available. If the search returns that no global account with that username exists, that means it is still available.

Appeals: If, after reviewing the guide to appealing blocks, you believe this block was made in error, you may appeal it by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your reason here" with the reasons you believe the block was an error, and publish the page.

Cullen328 (talk) 01:08, 26 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

You are a horrible human being who has caused me much destress and heartache by your reluctant determination to terrorize me for doing something that everyone else does, which is promote truth and edit out lies and misinformation in wikipedia pages. You should be congratulating me that I made the decision to stand up amongst the ranks of individuals who actual believes in the ongoing project that is wikipedia. Instead you mock my intelligence, persecute me, and harbor an unnecessary and unwarranted grudge against me, as if this is somehow personal. You are not at the least acting professional, and are instead acting like a right wing thug. I have no problem with you as a human being, but your actions and character are threatening, offensive, and bias. This is not how civilized human beings should act. Instead of you attacking me, we should be continuing to create the world of wikipedia together. Also ignoring what you done does not solve the problem that you caused here. Quit hiding behind your shadow government of wikipedia and actually address the reality of this situation. Unless you're more of the problem then I realized PenaVegaUniversal (talk) 10:23, 27 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

Being discriminated against and violated

edit

Attacking my right to edit and to actually want to contribute to wikipedia does not give you victory but it does make you look like the fascist bullies you are PenaVegaUniversal (talk) 17:40, 26 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

Request to be unblocked

edit
 
This user's request to be unblocked to request a change in username has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without a good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

PenaVegaUniversal (block logactive blocksglobal blocksautoblockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Requested username:

Request reason:

To do research, edit pages, and to make sure information is accurate.

Decline reason:

This does not address the problems that lead to your block. Additionally, your comments above make it very clear that unblocking you would be a complete disaster. Yamla (talk) 12:20, 27 September 2024 (UTC)Reply
i hate the fact that you think that my suffering caused by "administrators" like yourself is a good cause, because it is not. Instead of abusing and terrorizing me, do your civic duty as an administrator, start acting professional, unblock me, and quit trying to censor me. Your personal issues has nothing to do with me, so don't even start persecuting me for them. PenaVegaUniversal (talk) 12:34, 27 September 2024 (UTC)Reply
Also for your information, this request addresses the block exactly, as it handles the name change request required to remove the block for the issue involving the username. Which is the original block. Please do your research before addressing this situation. Also you as an administrator is the true "disaster" as you are an embarrassment to wikipedia and what it stands for. Your insults is not required of you to do your job as administrator, so keep it to yourself. PenaVegaUniversal (talk) 12:39, 27 September 2024 (UTC)Reply


 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

PenaVegaUniversal (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I have been unfairly and unjustly blocked and accused, censored, insulted, ignored, persecuted, and distressed. I am not a spammer nor am I a advertiser. I am a victim of a failed wikipedia system, where the red tape is so thick that there is little chance for justice let alone a non bias review. This is ridiculous and unprofessional. Do your civic duty, unblock me and quit censoring the truth. All I want to do is edit pages, which does not warrant this personal attack against my person.

Decline reason:

Checkuser verified abuser of multiple accounts. --jpgordon𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇 16:27, 27 September 2024 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

PenaVegaUniversal (talk) 13:03, 27 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

 
Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive.

(block logactive blocksglobal blocksautoblockscontribsdeleted contribsabuse filter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System.
Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the posting of this notice.

 Ponyobons mots 15:37, 27 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

UTRS appeal #94476

edit

is declined. No further unblock requests will be considered unless you unconditionally and with prejudice withdraw your legal threat. You also have to address the other problems that lead to your block. --Yamla (talk) 17:48, 5 October 2024 (UTC)Reply