User talk:Peripitus/Archive8

RE: File permission problem with File:Press Photo.jpeg

I am confused what you are requesting. Can you please help me better understand what it is that you require. I did already mark the image with OTRS? Pending ... The photographer who took the photo gave her permission via email to both myself and wikipedia. I can forward it to wikipedia again if need be, however, she agreed to make it a Free Use Image according to Wikipedia requirements for use. Waytagojoe (talk) 03:38, 14 February 2011 (UTC)

Thank you. No sweat. It just was confirmed by the way. Waytagojoe (talk) 02:55, 16 February 2011 (UTC)

Erskine Clock Tower Picture

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Files_for_deletion/2009_December_19#File:Erskineclocktower.jpg is an image of the Erskine Clock Tower located on the main building on the Erskine College campus. I took the picture in 2005. It is a symbol to Erskine College alumni since the Erskine Clock Tower is produced in artwork and produced in anything dealing with the college. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Sycondavey (talk • contribs) 16:51, 21 March 2010 (UTC)

Sock Puppetry

Since you were vocal on the WP:COI and WP:COPYRIGHT of BioSlimDisk by User:Vernonheng, I invite you to read Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Vernonheng and possibly comment.  _{Guy M | Talk}  12:47, 22 March 2010 (UTC)

PS:

Have a great vacation!  _{Guy M | Talk}  12:49, 22 March 2010 (UTC)

Welcome

To WP Tasmania :) Aaroncrick ^TALK 06:02, 5 May 2010 (UTC)

Moved interstate? YellowMonkey (vote in the Southern Stars and White Ferns supermodel photo poll) 00:32, 6 May 2010 (UTC)

Oh, awesome :) Where did you move to? Near Launceston?? ... Aaroncrick ^TALK 05:38, 6 May 2010 (UTC)

Pity we didn't get to talk at the APril 07 meetup YellowMonkey (vote in the Southern Stars and White Ferns supermodel photo poll) 05:43, 6 May 2010 (UTC)

Block

Thank you for your block of Ulmgambolputty (talk · contribs). Can you please log the block, at the log of blocks and bans, on the page WP:ARBSCI ? Thank you for your time, -- Cirt (talk) 14:25, 6 May 2010 (UTC)

Okay, up to you, no worries. -- Cirt (talk) 23:48, 6 May 2010 (UTC)

A recent ffd closure

Howdy. With this edit it appears you forgot to put a closing result.--Rockfang (talk) 01:29, 7 May 2010 (UTC)

Theslider09

Today must the the day of editors not listening! Theslider09 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) keeps overlinking articles and lists, I've posted warnings on the talk page but the user will not listen. Bidgee (talk) 12:18, 7 May 2010 (UTC)

Hello, Peripitus. You have new messages at Bidgee's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Bidgee (talk) 15:52, 9 May 2010 (UTC)

Cuban Spanish

I checked the sources terms of use, and they have copyrighted the materials on their website. I guess I'll have to find another source. -Mike Oosting (talk) 14:38, 8 May 2010 (UTC)

FYI

FYI, please see recent actions of account Superfalse (talk · contribs), and related report filed at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/DavidYork71. Cheers, -- Cirt (talk) 19:43, 9 May 2010 (UTC)

Canberra, Australia and History of the ACT

All on FAR YellowMonkey (vote in the Southern Stars and White Ferns supermodel photo poll) 02:59, 10 May 2010 (UTC)

Thanks. I have to tell you that unfortunately that fixing up FARs correlates to a slower service time of your FACs :( YellowMonkey (vote in the Southern Stars and White Ferns supermodel photo poll) 00:48, 11 May 2010 (UTC)

Undeletion request

Two days ago you deleted File:StarTrek Logo.jpg because in a deletion discussion it was accused of being a copyright violation. This file was not a copyright violation though. In the discussion I tried to explain that this file was not a copyright violation because paramount pictures does not own the shape of a delta shield, the shape of the star trek logo. The picture that was deleted was a black delta shield. The star trek logo is silver with gold edging. The file was not a copyright violation, but was close enough to the logo to look ok in a userbox on star trek, since nonfree copyrighted files cannot be used in userboxes. I was wondering if you could please undelete the file. Thank you --Alpha Quadrant (talk) 16:25, 10 May 2010 (UTC)

Warren Trdrea image

Why did you delete my image. I was going to put in what was needed and without given me anytime you have deleted the image. Why did you that? You had no right to do so. I had 7 days to do it, I was going to do it and you deleted it. (GuineaPigWarrior) 7:30, 15 May 2010 (UTC)

Queen of Swords image

The reason to include the image was to show the similarity of costume with the articles existing poster illustration of the film to explain why the lawsuit of sony failed because they were out of copyright.--REVUpminster (talk) 23:23, 20 May 2010 (UTC)

• Zorro and the QoS are fictional characters WP:NOTOR#Works of fiction but the lawsuit was not. This is another link to a more detailed review of the court case Sony v Fireworks. Can you put two different rationales on an image? Help me out? After all the Zorro image is on a number of different articles and I think you can not deny Zorro and the QoS are linked even if it is only to say the TV series jumped on a band wagon to make money out of Zorro, but saying that would be original research.--REVUpminster (talk) 08:59, 21 May 2010 (UTC)
• Ps. Have a look at this youtube link if you think the Zorro/QoS connection is weak and I think I can understand why Sony sued.Queen of Swords opening titles and of the horses Toronado and Chico.--REVUpminster (talk) 10:49, 21 May 2010 (UTC)

Permissions for use of Rik Torfs Portrait.jpg

I've forwarded the email received from the author of the photograph. Could you please verify and let me know if its sufficient? Thanks! Asterysk (talk) 12:32, 24 May 2010 (UTC)

Adelaide Meetup2010?

When's the next Adelaide Meetup? 2010? Especially as there still is none in planning? I'm really keen to meet & sort several Pre-eminent enduring Sovereignty issues especially Ramindjeri-Ngadjuri? Mifren (talk) 10:46, 26 May 2010 (UTC)

File:MattJacobson.jpg

Hi, you added an "OTRS received" template and this sat forever without proper permission. The uploader changed the source so the image would comply with some statement in the OTRS. Could you check again so there's clarity about whether this is legit? Thanks! Hekerui (talk) 19:32, 1 June 2010 (UTC)

Jennifer Korbee Photo

I have forwarded the e-mail that I received today from the photographer. I hope this clears up any future issues regarding photos. JennFan24 (talk) 02:03, 5 June 2010 (UTC)

Seeing that the page of this file now reads that an e-mail was received, but doesn't have adequate permission for me to upload the photo, what do I need to do in order for the photo to remain on the site? This has become a very frustrating situation that has gone on for at least a few years now; it has been an ongoing ordeal between the photographer and me, and it is quite an inconvenience to continually bother him when he has sent his permission before. JennFan24 (talk) 16:04, 6 June 2010 (UTC)

Reminder

Hi, you should vote for your favorite at Picture of the Year before it's too late tomorrow. Hekerui (talk) 12:25, 10 June 2010 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Red-browed Finch 2

Hey, just thought you'd like to know that I have (re-)nominated one of your pictures for FP status. J Milburn (talk) 19:04, 12 June 2010 (UTC)

Listed for deletion

I agree with you, these images Anastacia - Boom.JPG and Anastacia - Boom.JPG should be deleted, they do not have much importance. Lucas Brígido (talk) 01:24, 20 June 2010 (UTC)

Please undelete Talk page

You recently deleted File:The Time of Angels illustrative image.jpg. Could you please undelete the Talk page only, and preserve it using {{G8-exempt}}. The Talk page contains a substantive discussion which I would like to keep archived. (Please respond here.) Many thanks. HairyWombat (talk) 03:42, 21 June 2010 (UTC)

Undeleted and moved to User:HairyWombat/File talk:The Time of Angels illustrative image.jpg] for neatness sake - Peripitus (Talk) 04:05, 21 June 2010 (UTC)

Thanks. HairyWombat (talk) 16:34, 21 June 2010 (UTC)

Regarding the file weekly.jpg

Sir, the file weekly.jpg is a direct image of the first page of the newsletter The Mayo Mail. This newsletter has no copyright problems because I, Mridul Godha (student of Mayo College, Ajmer), am the Editor-in-Chief of this newsletter. So, since I have uploaded the picture myself, it should not be a problem to put it on the article - Mayo College, Ajmer. Please reload the image.

Thank You,

Mridul Godha (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 05:03, 4 July 2010 (UTC).

Question on Pics

If it's a picture of me, and I have the rights to it, what do I do to keep it from being deleted? Watchout4snakes! (talk) 22:18, 28 July 2010 (UTC)

• The pic was taken by my grandmother.Watchout4snakes! (talk) 15:46, 30 July 2010 (UTC)
• Yeah, that's right. She took them as publicity shots for my mom. Watchout4snakes! (talk) 14:05, 3 August 2010 (UTC)
• They all were. She's somewhat of a photographer, though not professional. Watchout4snakes! (talk) 18:16, 9 August 2010 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, Peripitus. You have new messages at SchuminWeb's talk page.
Message added 00:06, 1 August 2010 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

SchuminWeb (Talk) 00:06, 1 August 2010 (UTC)

VPC

— raekyT 00:10, 2 August 2010 (UTC)

Alexander Bain (actor)

I see you speedied Alexander Bain (actor) as G5; no problem there, but I believe that the same editor created Alex Bain(actor). Is this a G5 candidate also? --Redrose64 (talk) 22:05, 4 August 2010 (UTC)

The VFT

Hi Peripitus, I've been working on High-speed rail in Australia and I think it is very close to being GA and potentially a FAC, especially if the VFT gets back on the national agenda due to the election. If you are interested, I'm sure the article would benefit from your methodical and balanced approach! Hope you are well, --Yeti Hunter (talk) 02:46, 6 August 2010 (UTC)

Possible sock of Daveygp

Hi Peripitus. I see that you blocked a number of socks of Daveygp (talk · contribs). Having caught one myself, I'm now beginning to see them everywhere. Could you please have a look at Wallett (talk · contribs). Same MO, creating minimalist stubs of Hollyoaks actors, one of them (Paul Opacic) was previously deleted by you as a G5. Favonian (talk) 21:41, 6 August 2010 (UTC)

Capolinho

Capolinho (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log)

Hi! You recently deleted this editor's uploaded images due to licensing issues. I've been chatting to them about an article they created (I declined a speedy on it). They're currently blocked, and asked me to ask you about restoring one of the images (apparently it's theirs, though licensing confused them and they didn't make that clear...)

I've not seen the image, and have no idea whether the image would be OK (assuming the licensing concerns were addressed), and I do continue to have concerns about the editor's competence (links "confuse" them, apparently). However, if you could consider restoring the image it'd be good - even if it just means me explaining to them why it can't be restored.

Many thanks, TFOWR 13:54, 8 August 2010 (UTC)

"James Cartwright (actor)"

This was killed for a G5. Not that I personally give a crap for the content of the article, but could you have not copied the content, and re-created the article yourself or given the opportunity for another do do so, rather than have wasted anyone's even nominal effort? Vinithehat (talk) 17:19, 10 August 2010 (UTC)

thanks for the reply, let it die. it was barely worth the edit.Vinithehat (talk) 01:52, 11 August 2010 (UTC)

New English School (Jordan)

Just a quick FYI. Your edits to New English School (Jordan) were reverted as vandalism. As that was totally inappropriate, I have re-inserted them. I commented on the talk page to that end; I would appreciate it if you could read it and comment also, as it seems there is some serious suspiciousness in both the article's history (which, amongst other things, has had the section you removed removed multiple times), and the talk page discussion.

Peace and Passion ☮  ("I'm listening....") 21:51, 19 August 2010 (UTC)

Pamela Prati

Yes I have indeed taken the liberty of extracting the photo from there, but I have seen many such photos taken from different websites on wikipedia, where the uploader argues that he hasn't uploaded it for any commercial purpose, just for letting others view it, which is what they call Fair Use Rationale or something. I intend to do the same.Cupidcobra1 (talk) 04:55, 01 September 2010 (UTC)

Daveygp is back

Hi Peripitus. Bikergrove (talk · contribs) recreated a couple of Davey's favorite actor sub-stubs, so I blocked the account indefinitely. 77.99.47.42 (talk · contribs · WHOIS) was also involved (again), so it got blocked for three months. Favonian (talk) 14:33, 10 September 2010 (UTC)

File talk:Swarnalatha.jpg

I would like you to have your views on the above link --Kalarickan (talk) 21:17, 14 September 2010 (UTC)

Help with OTRS

Hello. I came across File:Alex Pacheco (PETA) (2).jpg. It mentions permissions being emailed but there isn't an {{OTRS}} tag. Any chance you could have a look and see if you can find the OTRS ticket number? Many thanks in advance, Angus McLellan (Talk) 15:53, 16 September 2010 (UTC)

Thanks. Didn't think to look on Commons, silly me. Angus McLellan (Talk) 14:18, 19 September 2010 (UTC)

BAC TSR-2 Image

Thanks, I made a major error in downloading the image, not looking at the public domain restrictions. Is there a way to rectify a mistake like that? FWiW Bzuk (talk) 22:01, 23 September 2010 (UTC).

New here and need help

G'day, new here and need help in all things Wiki. Is there anyone in the northern suburbs I can spend some time with to help me get started on articles, images etc. Most of the stuff I read doesn't make any sense. Would prefer if someone could show me one to one and not over the net. Available most days for tuition. Can you please put the reply on my page if it doesn't happen already. Thanks, Fairv8 Fairv8 (talk) 06:30, 25 September 2010 (UTC) As I live in Playford Council I though I might start with my hometown of Angle Vale and work out from there as my council area has Sweet FA on wiki. Also I travel around a bit in SA as I now have plenty of spare time (lucky me) and take many pictures and I sometimes read up about the history of an area b4 i go so I can see more of the places there, so I may as well put 2+2 together and contribute on wiki as I use it a fair bit. I will be starting an article on the Light River as well, those two articles should keep me busy for a while. I struggle with a lot of the info here on what to do and how to do it. On W.Commons I am having a few issues, operator error I suspect, usually is with me when it comes to computers. I'm sure it's something simple I'm not doing correctly but I am so blind to it (scratches head). My major contribution would be in pics of places inserted into completed articles and filling in details on country towns in the mid north mainly and other places I visit. Having a project to do gives me an excuse to get out of the house occassionally. Fairv8 (talk) 12:20, 2 October 2010 (UTC)

Third (or somethingth) opinion

Hello. If you have a minute or two, can you look at User talk:Angusmclellan#Copyright status and see if you agree, or not, with my suggestion? Angus McLellan (Talk) 17:31, 18 October 2010 (UTC)

It seems our old friend in Brisbane articles is back

Tamara1503 (talk · contribs) editing contributions is too similar to Tasos90 (talk · contribs) with the Brisbane based edits (with some other region edits) and the image uploads to Brisbane is looking very suspect. I'd suggest you have a look at it. Sb617 (Talk) 09:07, 22 October 2010 (UTC)

File:Wall.jpg missing description details

Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as File:Wall.jpg is missing a description and/or other details on its image description page. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors to make better use of the image, and it will be more informative for readers.

If the information is not provided, the image may eventually be proposed for deletion, a situation which is not desirable, and which can easily be avoided.

If you have any questions please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 17:52, 6 November 2010 (UTC)

Pic prob

May you help me in re-uploading this picture? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Awlad_El_Am_Scene.jpg#Summary--Capo (talk) 05:05, 1 January 2011 (UTC)

Reonkadenaunderboob.JPG

this is an original image taken by myself. there is no need to delete it. thanks. User:Awolf58 Awolf58 (talk) 22:53, 4 February 2011 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, Peripitus. You have new messages at AgadaUrbanit's talk page.
Message added 09:17, 5 February 2011 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Kandazburg

His unblock is challenging your finding that he was a sock. I put the unblock on hold. Could you elaborate a little, given the minimal contrib history there? (If it's something you'd rather keep confidential, you can email it to me). Daniel Case (talk) 17:17, 9 February 2011 (UTC)

Deletion of images Daniel_de_jongh.jpg and Jochemjacobsindia.jpg

Hi,

You have marked the above mentioned images for deletion. However, I have sent an e-mail to permissions-en@wikimedia.org with a copy of an e-mail conversation between me and the photographer. I have also asked the photographer to send an e-mail himself. Please look into it and unmark the images. Thanks. Kartikdhar (talk) 18:34, 13 February 2011 (UTC)

Supreethsgowda's uploads

Since you took care of this previously and this is slightly complicated (there is no CSD for deleting just a specific revision), could you help me with this? For File:Bommarilluposter.jpg, File:Krishnudu.jpg and File:Vishal's simple pose.jpg, Supreethsgowda has done an "upload new version of this file" but the new file is a completely different photo and Supreethsgowda has not changed any of the this file's source or licensing information or provided evidence of permission. Could you delete Supreethsgowda's revision, leaving the previous version of this file? Thanks. - Kollision (talk) 03:35, 5 March 2011 (UTC)

tosha thakkar

This article on an indian girl brutally murdered was deleted by you based on a discussion with your peers yesterday Mar15 2011 ,

There was a pattern of violence in Australia against Indian students who also worked part time there. If there is a discussion about showing the Australian authorities in a positive light , the resources linked to ,in this case and the case itself , would have been instrumental in showing the alacrity with which Australian authorities acted against the heinous and violent crime by an Australian , albeit of non-caucasian origin.

That page would have been an appreciation of the prompt action and also possible beginnings of a trend of serious action against Australian offenders in cases of violence against Indian immigrant/students.

Of course , you ,being a cabal, can go ahead and delete whatever you wish.I hope you come to regret this decision on deletion. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Chimesmonster (talk • contribs) 06:30, 16 March 2011 (UTC)

Re: User:Adammw/Sandbox/List of characters in The Simpsons and images

Re: User_talk:Adammw#User:Adammw.2FSandbox.2FList_of_characters_in_The_Simpsons_and_images

Is this a blanket rule on the use of images in lists? Most of the images have not been uploaded and are primarily used in their main articles, their non-free fair use status should be unaffected. Adammw (talk) 09:33, 10 April 2011 (UTC)

US 131

Thank you for your edits to the article. In the US, we do say that a highway is "signed" as a synonym for "signposted", but the latter isn't uncommon here either. If you see any other little improvements, be bold, and if you're interested, the article is at WP:FAC. Imzadi 1979 → 18:51, 17 April 2011 (UTC)

Hi Imzadi1979, From my reading Signposted is more common in English writing outside the use and is consequently more widely understandable. Signed in the used context is odd as it introduces a clash of tenses. I was about to leave FAC comments but decided twas better to fix than complain - I'll try to read it thoroughly in the next day or so and leave comments - but my net access is somewhat poor - Peripitus (Talk) 10:53, 19 April 2011 (UTC)

I'm just saying that in the US, and American English, "signed" and "unsigned" are common and acceptable adjectives to describe a road, a trail, a building or whatever. I didn't change that word based on your comments, but the usage was correct for American English previously. Imzadi 1979 → 17:55, 19 April 2011 (UTC)

Just a PS, but given the age of the nomination (it's currently the oldest open FAC and going on about 5.5 weeks in age), you might want to toss a note on the FAC page to say that you're going to offer a review or comments. The delegates might hold the nomination open longer if they know someone else is working on comments that are forthcoming instead of closing the review. The current suggestion is that if you have detailed comments, but expect to support the article at some point, put the comments in a section of the talk page for the review. (WT:Featured article candidates/U.S. Route 131/archive1 instead of WP:Featured article candidates/U.S. Route 131/archive1) and leave a link to that specific section on the FAC page. That way the delegates don't have to read through dozens of bullet points on resolved comments when the reviewer is supporting the article only to find that... the reviewer is supporting the article. Imzadi 1979 → 19:34, 19 April 2011 (UTC)

File you just deleted is back

See File:KurtHummelseasonone.jpg. Maybe you should drop a note on the talk page of the user who keeps uploading it; editing warring with admins enforcing the results of deletion discussions are usually a bad idea. Make sure to refer him to the original deletion discussion at [1]. Again, I would manage this myself, but I was involved in the first discussion and so want to avoid giving the illusion that this is a singular voice. Thanks again for handling this the first time, and thanks in advance for handling this again. --Jayron32 04:39, 23 April 2011 (UTC)

And File:Emmapillsbury.JPG. --Jayron32 04:40, 23 April 2011 (UTC)

tongue-in-cheek

they have a soccer do they. Actually, apparently they have "an soccer". (Yes, that's a new one on me, too.) Pdfpdf (talk) 10:53, 24 April 2011 (UTC)

Questions re: mass deleted images

I'm trying to see if there are reasonable grounds for requesting an undeletion for some images. The questions are not about your procedural deletions which were made based on consensus, and I have no issue with those. It's more about whether a different standard for reviewing those initial image FfDs should have been considered. Had there been, based on a few points I'll mention below, a much higher burden of proof might have shifted to the tagging editor. Here are some questions:

• Using the example of a swarm of deletion requests on 4/16/11, for example, it can be seen that the tagger placed tags on many images over a few minute time period - some within a few seconds. The articles they came from were quite large, so reviewing each image for compliance with NFCC#8 would not have been possible, and declaring them to be "decorative" could not have been reasonably thought out;
• The above subject was referred to in a copyright questions discussion showing that similar mass taggings have been criticized previously, yet oddly was not criticized here;
• Many of the images, like this one, used the same cut and paste statement, which ignored and undermined sourced rationales by noted experts. Note that most of these deleted files were declared and justified PD images. It seems that any editor tagging a PD image with a justification of "Not enough evidence for believing the claim . . ." requires that the image and editor's comments be given much greater scrutiny;
• The tagging editor relied in many cases on an assumption of bad faith to support their tagging, in numerous cases simply pasting their POV that the rationale was "untruthful" and "untrustful." This ABF basis was used without any comment by "deleting" editors;
• It is unclear and never explained how a completely evident, on its face, image like Laraine Day's could be anything but a publicity still,and fully PD as explained in the article about copyrights of such movie stills.

The above list gives some of the reasons why the issue is very significant for many other similar images used in other articles. Another admin states that on many images "generic support" is unacceptable to use. So I'm hoping you can explain some of this as an alternative to requesting a formal review. Thanks. --Wikiwatcher1 (talk) 20:03, 28 April 2011 (UTC)

Article review

From the off set I just say there is no dramas if you say no to this request. Another editor and I are in disagreement about the contents of an article. The editor has placed a cleanup banner[2] on the article containing an attack on me and will not remove it until another editor reviews the article. Is there a chance you could review the article and evaluate the claim in the banner? Again I will understand if you don't wish to get involve. Thanks. — [d'oh] 14:00, 29 April 2011 (UTC)

Thank you for doing the review. — [d'oh] 10:59, 30 April 2011 (UTC)

File:Gemma Hasson 1975.png listed for deletion

Hi, I have added a comment at Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2011 April 30#File:Gemma Hasson 1975.png, and given more details and a more precise source of File:Gemma Hasson 1975.png, with a link to the photo I used to extract this picture. Yes, I went really too fast when I uploaded it... --Vegetable man38 (talk · contribs) 11:10, 1 May 2011 (UTC)

Hi, new answer added. Vegetable man38 (talk · contribs) 01:26, 7 May 2011 (UTC)

Hi, I just see that the photo has been deleted without any warning and no answer to my last argument which I think fit the picture with wikipedia rules, see Wikipedia:NFC#Images 2. What I am supposed to do? I can't tell more than the rules... "However, for some retired or disbanded groups, or retired individuals whose notability rests in large part on their earlier visual appearance, a new picture may not serve the same purpose as an image taken during their career, in which case the use would be acceptable." Vegetable man38 (talk · contribs) 11:32, 8 May 2011 (UTC)

Ok, thanks for your answer. Vegetable man38 (talk · contribs) 15:27, 8 May 2011 (UTC)

Talk:Avatar (2009 film)#Deleted images

Hello, Peripitus. Will you take a look at this discussion and reconsider the deletion of one image in particular (the deletion I take issue with)? Flyer22 (talk) 20:41, 5 May 2011 (UTC)

As I stated at the talk page, the file is File:Avatarmotioncapture.jpg. But does there really need to be a discussion about it? It seems pretty clear cut to me that it shouldn't have been deleted. It was not there to simply decorate the text. It was showing the difference between a face with and without the special effects mentioned. If you do decide to relist the image instead of simply undeleting it and leaving it at that, please let us know there on the talk page that you have done so with a link to the deletion discussion. Flyer22 (talk) 23:13, 8 May 2011 (UTC)

File:Foxtrot wikipedia.png

As you mentioned in the deletion discussion, the image COULD be used in the FoxTrot article. Would you reconsider its deletion in order to place it in that article? — BQZip01 — ^talk 17:22, 7 May 2011 (UTC)

David Tombe

David Tombe (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
FDT (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

So, did he leave "in good standing", or not? ←Baseball Bugs ^{What's up, Doc?} carrots→ 10:20, 8 May 2011 (UTC)

No, he does NOT have a clean block record. I asked your same question at ANI, and was told that he was renamed to FDT, which is where the blocks appear.[3] ←Baseball Bugs ^{What's up, Doc?} carrots→ 11:14, 8 May 2011 (UTC)

To my observation, this was NOT handled the standard way, and it leaves the impression that someone is trying to hide something. Jimbo said something about google indexing. Supposedly, user talk pages are not indexed. So it looks as if there's something mysterious going on. ←Baseball Bugs ^{What's up, Doc?} carrots→ 11:22, 8 May 2011 (UTC)

It was not me that raised this question initially. And the question raised, which has not been answered satisfactorily, is "Why?" What's special about this guy that his activities need to be hidden from the readers? And no one, yet, has satisfactorily answered the question, "Did he leave in good standing?" More to the point, did the user FDT leave in good standing? A simple "yes" or "no", please. ←Baseball Bugs ^{What's up, Doc?} carrots→ 11:50, 8 May 2011 (UTC)

I have no personal stake in it other than concerns for the integrity of wikipedia. Your saying you "don't know or care" does not speak well to that integrity. Questions have been raised, which is what triggered the DRV, and those questions were evaded. That is not good. ←Baseball Bugs ^{What's up, Doc?} carrots→ 12:07, 8 May 2011 (UTC)

It just looks fishy, especially when guys like Jimbo make weaselly and untrue statements. ←Baseball Bugs ^{What's up, Doc?} carrots→ 12:22, 8 May 2011 (UTC)

...for your valuable input.

I am known for cutting the admins a lot more slack than a lot of users here do. But when you close out a discussion that still has unaddressed issues, and then refuse to talk about it, I wonder if my trust in admins is misplaced. ←Baseball Bugs ^{What's up, Doc?} carrots→ 12:57, 8 May 2011 (UTC)

Burj Khalifa image on Marshall Strabala page

Periputus, I am trying to understand the non-free image use restrictions you used to remove the Burj Khalifa image from Marshall Strabala's page. In plain English, can you tell me why that image does not qualify for use there? Is it simply that the photo has to be placed there with the proper written explanation of why it is being used and the context? Finally, if that image cannot be used under any circumstances on Marshall's page, what CC licenses are best for me to find a Burj Khalifa image that can be placed on the page. Keep in mind, that many of the Burj Khalifa images taken are not taken by UAE residents, so while I am not a lawayer, I do not believe that UAE government rules will impact images taken by non-residents. Correct? Thank you in advance for your assistance. Mykjoseph (talk) 12:56, 13 May 2011 (UTC)

ANI mention

You have been directly or indirectly mentioned on this ANI thread. --Damiens.rf 14:47, 16 May 2011 (UTC)

File:Portalgame.jpg

While I am the primary contributor on the Portal (video game) article which the above image was used on, I did not upload it and so only saw that it was up for deletion when you actually deleted it. As such, I noticed you did not close out that discussion, so I have added my rationale to it (a keep, as the images in this article are the same as they were when reviewed at FAC a few years ago), and am a bit concerned that your interpretation of that discussion pointed to deletion when there pretty much was no consensus from the three inputs (the nominator and the two others). Mind you, I think there's a better solution to reduce the non-free images, but it is not the deletion of this specific image. --MASEM (t) 12:27, 26 May 2011 (UTC)

please wait on these image files

I am currently on vacation, using an iphone for this comment, and will be back Monday. I will solve the issues for the files then. Also, with a valid fair use rationale I don't think these are good speedy candidates. Best, 4meter4 (talk) 12:14, 27 May 2011 (UTC)

My appologize on the press photos, I didn't realize that press images could not be used under a fair use rationale. That seems odd to me.4meter4 (talk) 12:22, 27 May 2011 (UTC)

FfD closure contnended

Hi there. Please take a look at the image below, the subject of the FfD discussion here.

File:Sikandar Hayat Khan Bural Site.JPG

That copyright notice in the image means that, contrary to your FfD closing statement, the image is not free. I'd like for you to reconsider your decision to keep this. Sven Manguard Wha? 21:43, 31 May 2011 (UTC)

Regex question

Did the answers you got at the Reference Desk solve your regex problem? If they didn't I thought I might take a crack at it but because it's a little stale I wanted to ask first. Shadowjams (talk) 22:01, 1 June 2011 (UTC)

Tasmanian Alkaloids

This is an automated message from VWBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Tasmanian Alkaloids, and it appears to be a substantial copy of http://www.tasalk.com.au.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) VWBot (talk) 00:33, 4 June 2011 (UTC)

Tasmanian Alkaloids 2.0

Hi! All set. I restored the article and removed the bot notice. In looking more closely at the article, it really did appear to be a bot error. PMDrive1061 (talk) 14:15, 4 June 2011 (UTC)

File:Chastity Bono.jpg

I don't understand your reasoning. F7 says "Non-free images or media from a commercial source (e.g., Associated Press, Getty), where the file itself is not the subject of sourced commentary, are considered an invalid claim of fair use and fail the strict requirements of WP:NFCC; and may be deleted immediately." That's not the case. CTJF83 16:59, 4 June 2011 (UTC)

Never mind, IRC explained it...is [4] ok? CTJF83 17:22, 4 June 2011 (UTC)

Meh, ok, I don't care that much to devote time to finding and understanding ok images. CTJF83 19:54, 5 June 2011 (UTC)

Deletion comment on Fire Department.jpg

Sorry, I'm afraid not. Although I know a great deal about the region, I do not live in this area nor do I know anyone who does. I have searched the web and have found no un-copyrighted images. Violeta123321

Deletion Reply

Ah, what a shame! All that hard work! *makes a frustrated face* I understand though. The real shame is that no free images exist to help illustrate the places! I'm new at Wikipedia and still learning, thanks for the tip and the polite response. (I've come across some very rude people due to the fact that I'm not 100% at writing and editing articles yet. I'm just trying to learn!) I will remember this and do my best to find and upload free images, versus non free ones. --Violeta123321 (talk) 00:52, 6 June 2011 (UTC)

Closing

Hi, I know it would be a controversial close to do in any case, but what is the rationale for ignoring the fact that all keep voters ignored the WP:NFCC#2 concern involved in using the unique journalistic photo of a given event to illustrate the event itself, when the photo is not otherwise notable? Thanks, --damiens.rf 15:25, 7 June 2011 (UTC)

File:Stonewall riots.jpg - would have been a controversial close is a masterful understatement. The inimitable Damiens.rf fights against eight with a signpost article on the opposition side, loses the decision and still fights on. Any other close would have gone straight to DRV and been overturned. I would be, perhaps rightly, accused of using my close as a supervote. Peripitus (Talk) 21:46, 7 June 2011 (UTC)

And what is the rationale for ignoring the fact that all keep voters (and the signpost article) ignored the WP:NFCC#2 concern? --damiens.rf 22:11, 7 June 2011 (UTC)

Difficult question? --damiens.rf 17:33, 9 June 2011 (UTC)

Life is more important and often more interesting than Wikipedia, and it took precedence. I judged that there was consensus in the debate that the image passed item 8 of Wikipedia:NFC#Images while not failing item 7 of Wikipedia:NFC#Images_2 and there were enough who responded after your repeated NFCC#2 interjections that wrote in a way that showed they'd thought about it. Peripitus (Talk) 08:58

No keep voter ever cared to address the NFCC#2 concern, neither in reply to the nomination, nor in reply to any of my "repeated interjections". Do you really see a consensus in that discussion that the image passes NFCC#2 ? --damiens.rf 14:07, 10 June 2011 (UTC)

Improper deletion request for File:2001 school class deleted scene.jpg

The well-known USER:DAMIENS.RF improperly FFDd this file without even trying to discuss it on the 2001: A Space Odyssey talk page, let alone notifying us that he had made the FFD so we could argue for its inclusion. His intentions are clear - after failing his previous attempt to delete another image in this discussion, he changed tactics and this time disregarded discussing the deletion of File:2001 school class deleted scene.jpg altogether. Instead filing the FFD without notifying anyone - the result of which was your deletion of the file(for lack of response?). I don't think this kind of improper and disruptive behavior on USER:DAMIENS.RF's part should be rewarded, do you? Shirtwaist chat 02:10, 8 June 2011 (UTC)

"Play the ball not the man." I like that, I'll be saving that one. :) Erik (talk | contribs) 11:33, 8 June 2011 (UTC)