User talk:Peter.C/2011
User:Peter.C 2011 Archive
editHello, happy new year and welcome to the 2011 WikiCup! Your submissions' page can be found here and instructions of how to update the page can be found here and on the submissions' page itself. From the submissions' page, a bot will update the main scoresheet. Our rules have been very slightly updated from last year; the full rules can be found here. Please remember that you can only receive points for content on which you have done significant work in 2011; nominations of work from last year and "drive-by" nominations will not be awarded points. Signups are going to remain open through January, so if you know of anyone who would like to take part, please direct them to Wikipedia:WikiCup/2011 signups. The judges can be contacted on the WikiCup talk page, on their respective talk pages, or by email. Other than that, we will be in contact at the end of every month with the newsletter. If you want to stop or start receiving newsletters, please remove your name from or add your name to this list. Good luck! J Milburn and The ed17 12:59, 1 January 2011 (UTC)
Input
editWould you be able to provide input on my article - Legal Services Corp. v. Velazquez? I'm looking for things to expand, questions that arise but aren't answered and any clarity issues. Cheers, Lord Roem (talk) 23:00, 1 January 2011 (UTC)
What is prodding?
editHey Peter - quick question - I've been seeing the usage of the word "prod" and "prodding" an article. What exactly does that mean? -- Lord Roem (talk) 21:29, 3 January 2011 (UTC)
- Prodding is a colloquial term for proposed deletion. Peter.C • talk 21:44, 3 January 2011 (UTC)
- Ok, thanks. Lord Roem (talk) 22:30, 3 January 2011 (UTC)
The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter, Q4 2010
edit
The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter
Volume 3, No. 3 — 4th Quarter, 2010
Previous issue | Next issue 
Project At a Glance
As of Q4 2010, the project has:
|
Content
|
|
MuZemike delivered by MuZebot 18:04, 6 January 2011 (UTC)
MCOTW
editHi Peter! Thanks for your enthusiasm on mcotm. When you change the subject, could you also add a notice to the article's talk page and perhaps on WT:MED? Thanks. --WS (talk) 23:45, 6 January 2011 (UTC)
- Sorry, I see you did add it to the talk page. Only the syntax has changed: mcotw=cur should be mcotm=cur. --WS (talk) 23:50, 6 January 2011 (UTC)
- Might be using too much abbreviations, I was talking about when you change the subject of the medicine collaboration of the month. We might consider a separate banner for the current article's talk page, it is barely visible when the template is collapsed with all other wikiproject templates. My second suggestion was also to give the collaboration some more visibility: many more people visit WP:MED on a regular basis than the collaboration's page. --WS (talk) 23:54, 6 January 2011 (UTC)
- Ah, I know MCOTW changed to MCOTM but I thought no one bothered to change the syntex so I kept it the way it already was. I will try to whip up a template that will be separate from that. Also I am well aware of the visibility issue and a lack of members. To counteract this issue I am going to NYC's Wikipedia 10th birthday bash and spam our project which will expose 165'ish highly active users to what we do and why we matter. I also am working on getting a IRC channel for the collaboration so we can collaborate in real time and have a sort of "recruitment center." Thanks! Peter.C • talk 00:09, 7 January 2011 (UTC)
- Might be using too much abbreviations, I was talking about when you change the subject of the medicine collaboration of the month. We might consider a separate banner for the current article's talk page, it is barely visible when the template is collapsed with all other wikiproject templates. My second suggestion was also to give the collaboration some more visibility: many more people visit WP:MED on a regular basis than the collaboration's page. --WS (talk) 23:54, 6 January 2011 (UTC)
Archive box
editWould you be able to check this diff - here - to see whether I put in the Archive feature correcly? Much appreciated, Lord Roem (talk) 07:25, 13 January 2011 (UTC)
- It is pretty much correct except for the date, three days is WAY to much, I would change it to seven. Also, I would change the archive to Archive/%(year)d/%(monthnameshort)s to keep it organized. In addition add {{archive box|[[User talk:Lore Roem/Archive/Info|Index of archives]]}} so you can have it nice and organized when you need it. Lastly I would add the warning template to your talk page ({{AutoArchivingNotice|bot=MiszaBot III|small=yes|dounreplied=yes|target=User talk:Lord Roem/Archive/{{CURRENTYEAR}}/{{CURRENTMONTHABBREV}}}}) so people will know that old discussions get archived. I think that about sums it up. If you need any more help just ask. Peter.C • talk 11:13, 13 January 2011 (UTC)
- Got it. Thanks! Lord Roem (talk) 16:56, 13 January 2011 (UTC)
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Beyond My Ken (talk) 02:51, 19 January 2011 (UTC)
- Thanks for removing the warning -- I've responded a bit over there. Beyond My Ken (talk) 03:49, 19 January 2011 (UTC)
Speedy deletion of Template:WPHomeliving/hide
editHello Peter.C, this is a message from an automated bot to inform you that the page you created on June 4 2009, Template:WPHomeliving/hide, has been marked for speedy deletion by User:This, that and the other (note: page has no mainspace links, and 2 edits). This has been done because the page was created to test Wikipedia (see CSD). If you think the tag was placed in error, please add "{{hangon}}" to the page text, and edit the talk page to explain why the page should not be deleted. If you have a question about this bot, please ask it at User talk:SDPatrolBot II. If you have a question for the user who tagged the article, see User talk:This, that and the other. Thanks, - SDPatrolBot II (talk) on behalf of This, that and the other (talk · contribs) 14:09, 23 January 2011 (UTC)
Hi Peter, the bot just linked your Abbreviated Injury Scale lemma to my German one de:Abbreviated Injury Scale. There are a couple of points I would like you to take into account:
- Be very careful of what you write, the AAAM is very peculitar about its copyright of the scale.
- Be very careful as to the usage of secondary sources with regard to the AIS: There are AIS Codebooks which state the coding principles. Consider these codebooks the law everybody who thinks AIS coding has to adhere to - no exceptions.
- Earlier than later you will come into contact with 'the coding branch of the AAAM' namely Elaine Wodzin. Be nice to her, it is her coordination work that resulted in the AIS as we know it today. She is most concerned about worng coding standards and people using the AIS without any idea what it is supposed to be.
- Read the German Wikipedia entry (for example by use of the Google translator) and you'll get a better idea of what the AIS really is: A mortality scale for single injuries.
I know why I did not translate my German AIS lemma into English...
Have fun, --DrJunge (talk) 11:24, 24 January 2011 (UTC)
Wikipedia Ambassador Program Newsletter: 28 January 2011
edit
|
Delivered by EdwardsBot (talk) 00:34, 29 January 2011 (UTC)
Added a better rhythm strip. We would never see something like this on EKG as we would not do one in this sort of case. --Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 22:42, 5 February 2011 (UTC)
- Thanks! Peter.C • talk 23:16, 5 February 2011 (UTC)
Added template for SuggestBot
editHi,
Thanks for being one of SuggestBot's users! I hope you have found the bot's suggestions useful.
We are in the process of switching from our previous list-based signup process to using templates and userboxes, and I have therefore added the appropriate template to your user talk page. You should receive the first set of suggestions within a day, and since we'll be automating SuggestBot you will from then on continue to receive them regularly at the desired frequency.
We now also have a userbox that you can use to let others know you're using SuggestBot, and if you don't want to clutter your user talk page the bot can post to a sub-page in your userspace. More information about the userbox and usage of the template is available on User:SuggestBot/Getting Recommendations Regularly.
If there are any questions, please don't hesitate to get in touch with me on my user talk page. Thanks again, Nettrom (talk) 17:45, 6 February 2011 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
editSuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker.
P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot (talk) 12:29, 7 February 2011 (UTC)
Hey Peter this user is the author of some of the best known reviews and textbook on anaerobic infections. Thus you will notice he has extensively referenced his own work which is okay. Referencing his blog of course is not. What he adds may appear like copyright infringement but isn't. Maybe re-factor you comments a bit... Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 12:22, 9 February 2011 (UTC)
- I am pretty sure you are addressing what I said about OR. I shoulda tried to put more emphasis on the "...information you created WITHOUT having it published from a reliable source." By "reliable source" I meant any publishing company that does editing/fact checking. Sorry for the confusion! Peter.C • talk 22:02, 9 February 2011 (UTC)
February collaboration: Spinal cord injury
edit | The WikiProject Medicine Collaboration of the Month for February 2011 is Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. The previous collaboration was Psoriasis. We welcome your help! |
Thank you for your interest in seeing this article promoted as the collaboration of the month. A collaborative project only works if interested people show up and help out. To help, please look over the article, and either make improvements or leave a note on the article's talk page about what you think should be done. Good luck, WhatamIdoing (talk) 18:30, 10 February 2011 (UTC)
- I have been gathering sources and will be able to help after Thursday of next week since I am up to my neck in homework. No matter what though, I will be editing SCI for at least one solid week. Peter.C • talk 23:12, 10 February 2011 (UTC)
- Sounds great. It's looking a little neglected, so if you've got a couple of minutes to spare, a note on the article's talk page to that effect might be appropriate. WhatamIdoing (talk) 23:32, 10 February 2011 (UTC)
Wikipedia Ambassador Program Newsletter: 13 February 2011
edit
|
Delivered by EdwardsBot (talk) 18:24, 11 February 2011 (UTC)
A kitten for you
edit
Panyd has given you a kitten! Kittens promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Kittens must be fed three times a day and will be your faithful companion forever! Spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a kitten, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend.
Spread the goodness of kittens by adding {{subst:Kitten}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message, or kittynap their kitten with {{subst:Kittynap}}
Thank you for your well-wishes. They were very much appreciated and made me feel a lot better during my time off. For your kindness I present you with a kitten! They may not be as cute as the puppies you sent me but they are still adorable! PanydThe muffin is not subtle 23:04, 12 February 2011 (UTC)
Online Ambassador Program
editPlease take a look at this project page and see if you can be a mentor to one of the many Areas of Study. If you can, please put your name in the "Online Mentor" area of the Area of Study of your choice and then contact the students you will be working with. As the Coordinating Online Ambassador for this project, please let me know if I can be of assistance. Take Care...Neutralhomer • Talk • 04:36, 3 March 2011 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
editSuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 15:05, 7 March 2011 (UTC)
Thank you , Peter Kellystick (talk) 10:48, 15 March 2011 (UTC)
Peter , nice talking n thanks for ur help, plz help me in making more valid in my article "Bupenda Meitei",plz see the history of it n do the needful,i dont know,u help me out, i can give u sources of information,the technicalities here,i dont know. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bupenda_Meitei , i removed the orphan tag after linking it to the List of Stephanians in the wikepedia itself n then again,another guy placed it there,plz see into it,my humble plea. wud be glad.Kellystick (talk) 12:14, 15 March 2011 (UTC) plz see into it http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Bupenda_Meitei&action=history n help me,i dont know wat this guy Chzz is doing ,take charge in wikifying my articleKellystick (talk) 12:25, 15 March 2011 (UTC)
Re. above
editHi Peter.C. I'm sure you'll see what I have done from the page history, and the comments I made on User_talk:Kellystick#Bupenda Meitei. I did indeed reinstate the edit with the 'orphan' tag, here, because the edit included lots of good stuff - and the tag was, really, appropriate (with only 2 incoming links). However, once I started checking refs, etc, I quickly realised that the 'orphan' issue was the very least of the problems - so I tagged, and dealt with, the more pressing concerns of verifiability. Note, I've also posted to BLPN asking for further help. The user did also post this on my talk, and this on the article talk - so I'm guessing you know what this is about. Cheers, Chzz ► 13:05, 15 March 2011 (UTC)
Marking articles students are working on
editHowdy, Online Ambassador!
This is a quick message to all the ambassadors about marking and tracking which articles students are working on. For the classes working with the ambassador program, please look over any articles being worked on by students and make sure these things are taken care of (especially for classes that aren't working with mentors):
- Add {{WAP assignment | term = Spring 2011 }} to the articles' talk pages. (The other parameters of the {{WAP assignment}} template are helpful, so please add them as well, but the term = Spring 2011 one is most important.)
- If the article is related to United States public policy, make sure the article the WikiProject banner is on the talk page: {{WikiProject United States Public Policy}}
- Add Category:Article Feedback Pilot (a hidden category) to the article itself. The second phase of the Article Feedback Tool project has started, and this time we're trying to include all of the articles students are working on. Please test out the Article Feedback Tool, as well. The new version just deployed, so any bug reports or feedback will be appreciated by the tech team working on it.
And of course, don't forget to check in on the students, give them constructive feedback, praise them for positive contributions, award them {{The WikiPen}} if they are doing excellent work, and so on. And if you haven't done so, make sure any students you are mentoring are listed on your mentor profile.
Thanks! --Sage Ross - Online Facilitator, Wikimedia Foundation (talk) 18:30, 15 March 2011 (UTC)
Wikipedia Ambassador Program Newsletter: 21 March 2011
edit
|
Delivered by EdwardsBot (talk) 22:25, 21 March 2011 (UTC)
Helping with Brooklyn Museum
editHi Peter. It would be great if you could help answer some of the questions at User talk:WilliamJustinM. Thanks!--Pharos (talk) 14:07, 30 March 2011 (UTC)
April Meetup
editCan you make a meetup on 4/23? That seems to be a date that's good for everyone else, but you said you prefer May 1. I wasn't sure if you can't make it the other dates, or just prefer the 1st. A fluffernutter is a sandwich! (talk) 19:31, 31 March 2011 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
editSuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 10:17, 4 April 2011 (UTC)
YUM! :D
edit
MacMed has given you a cookie! Cookies promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. You can Spread the "WikiLove" by giving someone else a cookie, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend.
To spread the goodness of cookies, you can add {{subst:Cookie}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message, or eat this cookie on the giver's talk page with {{subst:munch}}!
The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter, Q1 2011
edit The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter
Volume 4, No. 1 — 1st Quarter, 2011
Previous issue | Next issue
Project At a Glance
As of Q1 2011, the project has:
|
Content
|
|
MuZemike delivered by MuZebot 03:01, 6 April 2011 (UTC)
Wikipedia Ambassador Program Newsletter: 22 April 2011
edit
|
Delivered by EdwardsBot (talk) 16:35, 22 April 2011 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
editSuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 09:29, 2 May 2011 (UTC)
Please take the Wikipedia Ambassador Program survey
editHi Ambassador,
We are at a pivotal point in the development of the Wikipedia Ambassador Program. Your feedback will help shape the program and role of Ambassadors in the future. Please take this 10 minute survey to help inform and improve the Wikipedia Ambassadors.
WMF will de-identify results and make them available to you. According to KwikSurveys' privacy policy: "Data and email addresses will not be sold, rented, leased or disclosed to 3rd parties." This link takes you to the online survey: http://kwiksurveys.com?u=WPAmbassador_talk
Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments, Thank You!
Amy Roth (Research Analyst, Public Policy Initiative) (talk) 20:43, 24 May 2011 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
editSuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 14:02, 31 May 2011 (UTC)
You're invited to the New York Wiknic!
edit
This message is being sent to inform you of a Wikipedia picnic that is being held in your area next Saturday, June 25. From 1 to 8 PM or any time in between, join your fellow volunteers for a get together at Norman's Landscape (directions) in Manhattan's Central Park.
Take along your friends (newbies permitted), your family and other free culture enthusiasts! You may also want to pack a blanket, some water or perhaps even a frisbee.
If you can, share what you're bringing at the discussion page.
Also, please remember that this is the picnic that anyone can edit so bring enough food to share!
To subscribe to future events, follow the mailing list or add your username to the invitation list. BrownBot (talk) 19:09, 19 June 2011 (UTC)
You're invited to the New York Wiknic!
edit This message is being sent to inform you of a Wikipedia picnic that is being held in your area next Saturday, June 25. From 1 to 8 PM or any time in between, join your fellow volunteers for a get together at Norman's Landscape (directions) in Manhattan's Central Park.
Take along your friends (newbies permitted), your family and other free culture enthusiasts! You may also want to pack a blanket, some water or perhaps even a frisbee.
If you can, share what you're bringing at the discussion page.
Also, please remember that this is the picnic that anyone can edit so bring enough food to share!
To subscribe to future events, follow the mailing list or add your username to the invitation list. BrownBot (talk) 19:18, 19 June 2011 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
editSuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 07:42, 28 June 2011 (UTC)
The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter, Q2 2011
edit The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter
Volume 4, No. 2 — 2nd Quarter, 2011
Previous issue | Next issue
Project At a Glance
As of Q2 2011, the project has:
|
Content
|
|
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
editSuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 11:55, 26 July 2011 (UTC)
Ambassador Program: assessment drive
editEven though it's been quiet on-wiki, the Wikipedia Ambassador Program has been busy over the last few months getting ready for the next term. We're heading toward over 80 classes in the US, across all disciplines. You'll see courses start popping up here, and this time we want to match one or more Online Ambassadors to each class based on interest or expertise in the subject matter. If you see a class that you're interested, please contact the professor and/or me; the sooner the Ambassadors and professors get in communication, the better things go. Look for more in the coming weeks about next term.
In the meantime, with a little help I've identified all the articles students did significant work on in the last term. Many of the articles have never been assessed, or have ratings that are out of date from before the students improved them. Please help assess them! Pick a class, or just a few articles, and give them a rating (and add a relevant WikiProject banner if there isn't one), and then update the list of articles.
Once we have updated assessments for all these articles, we can get a better idea of how quality varied from course to course, and which approaches to running Wikipedia assignments and managing courses are most effective.
--Sage Ross - Online Facilitator, Wikimedia Foundation (talk) 17:28, 27 July 2011 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
editSuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 14:56, 23 August 2011 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
editWe are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot’s recommendations. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information in the consent information sheet.
We have added information about the quality of the suggested articles using a Low/Medium/High scale which goes from Low 
to High 
.
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 02:10, 21 September 2011 (UTC)
Hi Peter.
I have made a number of changes to your new article as there were some inaccurate statements therein:
- stab wounds can be caused by any sharp object, not just knives
- direct pressure on a bleeding wound may be required in addition to the interventions you detailed
- the majority of stab wounds do not require surgical intervention, but can be treated in the emergency department
The need to explore stab wounds in the emergency department is controversial in the UK, but I have left this in the text as it is sourced. I suspect that the articles you have read are biased towards the more serious abdominal injuries, while the reality is that many stab wounds are minor. Hopefully as the article is expanded more references about different types of injury will balance this out.
Please let me know if you have any thoughts about this, or if I can provide any further explanation. Best wishes, GILO A&E⇑ 23:25, 30 September 2011 (UTC) Hello,
- The first mistake was my fault, I was using the first definition of "stab" from Taber's, but I decided after your edits to clarify that it is a wound caused by a knife or a similar pointed object. With regards to pressure on the wound, I was going to add that later as I am still refining sources, and they made no mention of that. I also based the statement that most stab wounds require OR intervention based on "Emergency! Stab wound." PMID which in the "how to intervene" section only seems to mention taking the patient to the OR. However, given that you have more experience with this as you are a physician I will take your word for it :). Peter.C • talk • contribs 23:40, 30 September 2011 (UTC)
The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter, Q3 2011
edit The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter
Volume 4, No. 3 — 3rd Quarter, 2011
Previous issue | Next issue
Project At a Glance
As of Q3 2011, the project has:
|
Content
|
|
MuZemike delivered by MuZebot 07:41, 6 October 2011 (UTC)
DYK for Stab wound
edit | On 10 October 2011, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Stab wound, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that even though stab wounds occur four times more often than gunshot wounds, there is a lower mortality rate? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Stab wound.You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
The DYK project (nominate) 00:03, 10 October 2011 (UTC)
Kubla Khan and Xandadu
editDear Peter, Can you please explain why you deleted the section about the historical Xanadu that I added to the article on Kubla Khan? A previous version had been deleted, stating that it was original research. I rewrote the section with verifiable references to the UNESCO website, the Marco Polo texts in Wikisource, and a published biography of Kubla Khan, but it was deleted. I think it's important for readers of an article on this poem to know that Xanadu was an historic place; it's very well documented, but nowhere mentioned in the article. What more do you think I should add? Best wishes, SiefkinDR (talk) 16:43, 11 October 2011 (UTC)
- Most of the material you attempted to introduce was either redundant or direclty contradicted already sourced information in the text.Your statements about Marco Polo are wrong according to the background section. Instead, Coleridge used another source. Additionally, your statements about Mongolia, a nation that did not exist at the time, are contradicted by sources on Coleridge as demonstrated in this section on Tartars. As the 19th century knew it, and as we still follow, Tartar was the name for the ethnicity of Kublai Khan and his subjects. Also, the Mongl tribes do not discuss race, just as Germanic tribes only describe loose configuration and are made of multiple nationalities. Furthermore, Kublai Khan created the Chinese Yuan Dynasty and his people were seen as from China, especially with consideration to that being the location of the city. Finally, the material you submitted lacked sourcing from Coleridge related sources and were primarily original source based. Tatar confederation and Tatars explain how the ethnicity is connected to the Mongolian empire and why the term was used by most critics to discuss the ethnicity of Kublai Khan. Have a good day. Peter.C • talk • contribs 00:38, 12 October 2011 (UTC)
Wikipedia:The Musical in NYC Oct 22
edit
You are invited to Wikipedia:The Musical in NYC, an editathon, Wikipedia meet-up and lectures that will be held on Saturday, October 22, 2011, at the New York Public Library for the Performing Arts (at Lincoln Center), as part of the Wikipedia Loves Libraries events being held across the USA.
All are welcome, sign up on the wiki and here!--Pharos (talk) 04:25, 18 October 2011 (UTC)
Wikipedia:The Musical in NYC Oct 22
edit You are invited to Wikipedia:The Musical in NYC, an editathon, Wikipedia meet-up and lectures that will be held on Saturday, October 22, 2011, at the New York Public Library for the Performing Arts (at Lincoln Center), as part of the Wikipedia Loves Libraries events being held across the USA.
All are welcome, sign up on the wiki and here!--Pharos (talk) 04:50, 18 October 2011 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
editWe are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot’s recommendations. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information in the consent information sheet.
We have added information about the quality of the suggested articles using a Low/Medium/High scale which goes from Low to High .
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 01:01, 19 October 2011 (UTC)
Membership of the Counter-Vandalism Unit
editAs you may know, the Counter-Vandalism unit is inactive. So for reviving the WikiProject, we will need to sort out the members. So if you are active, please put your username at the bottom of the list at Wikipedia talk:Counter-Vandalism Unit#Sort out the members.
You are receiving this message as a current member of the CVU.
Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of Counter-Vandalism Unit at 00:28, 30 October 2011 (UTC). Redirected here from User talk:Irunongames.
2011 WikiCup participation
edit
It was good to have you on board this time around- we hope you enjoyed the competition! In case you are interested, signups for next year are open. Thanks, J Milburn and The ed17 20:44, 2 November 2011 (UTC)
Feedback Dashboard task force
editHi Peter C.,
Since you were a part of the WikiGuides project, I thought I'd give you a heads-up about a new way you can help/mentor newbies on en.wiki: we've recently released a feature called the Feedback Dashboard, a queue that updates in real time with feedback and editing questions from new registered contributors who have attempted to make at least one edit. Steven Walling and I are putting together a task force for experienced Wikipedians who might be interested in monitoring the queue and responding to the feedback: details are here at Wikipedia:Feedback Dashboard. Please sign up if you're interested in helping out! Thanks, Maryana (WMF) (talk) 21:56, 7 November 2011 (UTC)
Interview
editHi Peter.C, I am a Wikipedian and researcher from Carnegie Mellon University, working with Professors Robert E. Kraut and Aniket Kittur. We’ve published many scholarly papers on Wikipedia and are partnering with the Wikimedia Foundation on several new projects.
I have been analyzing collaboration in Wikipedia, especially Collaborations of the Week/Month. My analysis of seven years of archival Wikipedia data shows that Collaborations of the Week/Month substantially increase the amount and nature of project members’ contributions, with long lasting effects. We would like to talk to Wikipedians to better understand the processes that that produce this behavior change.
We’ve identified you as a particularly good candidate to speak with because of your involvement with the WikiProject Medicine' Collaborations, which is one of those we’ve been investigating. It would really help us if you would be willing to have a short talk with us, less than 30 minutes of your time. We can talk via skype or instant messenger or other means if you’d prefer. Do you have time at any point during this week to chat? If so, please send an email to haiyiz@cs.cmu.edu or drop a line on my talk page.
Thanks! (This my personal website)Haiyizhu (talk) 02:45, 11 November 2011 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
editWe are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot’s recommendations. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information in the consent information sheet.
We have added information about the quality of the suggested articles using a Low/Medium/High scale which goes from Low to High .
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 04:58, 16 November 2011 (UTC)
Future of the US Education Program and the Ambassador Project
editThere is a discussion about the future and the growth of the US education program along with the future of the Wikipedia Ambassador Project here. Voceditenore (talk) 08:13, 18 November 2011 (UTC)
Student assessment
editThanks for taking on some of this work. Please have a look at my notes on the page. It has taken me many hours to just do 50 students so I don't have the strength and time to do them all. The stats so far are not encouraging wrt the cost/benefit of the assignment. Perhaps the later students are better? BTW: I queried one of your copyvio reverts and have restored the text (this). Perhaps you can clarify where the copyvio was from -- beware of WP mirrors and sites that take WP content. I'm off to bed. -- Colin°Talk 23:43, 9 December 2011 (UTC)
- think I can get through it, I went through ~250 edits for copyvios only. I will be sure to "grade" them tonight and/or tomorrow. Thanks for pointing out I did not put a URL to the place where it was copied from, I will do that right now.Peter.C • talk • contribs 23:50, 9 December 2011 (UTC)
- Great. Remember to comment on the good edits too, if you can find them. Colin°Talk 23:56, 9 December 2011 (UTC)
Thanks for adding all those students to the list. I'm afraid I still don't understand your numbering, which ranges from 0 to 11. For my own numbers, I wasn't really using a scale, more just numbers for grouping. 1 and 2 for two grades of good edit, 3 for no edit, 4 and 5 for two grades of bad edit (with 5 being a copyvio). For the articles the students edited, I put the best article's edits into the Best column and similarly for the worst. If they only edited one article then I just repeated the score. This let me allocate the "editors who did bad" as those with a 4 or 5 in the Worst column and "editors who did good" (which overlaps) as those with a 1 or 2 in the Best column. I don't think you need to align your scoring with mine, but I would like to understand it. Perhaps you can also give your thoughts on the students, the assignment, etc. In my latest summary I mentioned that I had seen no students doing X, Y or Z things we might want them to do. Did you find any? Cheers, Colin°Talk 18:53, 12 December 2011 (UTC)
- I thought we were supposed to simply write how many "good" edits a student had vs "bad" edits. I guess you can assign a point value of 1 to a good edit and a score of -2 to a bad one and draw your conclusions as to how a student did. With regards to writing thoughts on what I have seen so far, I will I will write up some initial conclusions when I get home from work later and then draw final conclusions later on. Thanks, Peter.C • talk • contribs 20:57, 12 December 2011 (UTC)
Hi Peter,
Thanks again for helping with the analysis of these students contributions. I've expanded the activity stats HERE and used all the material to write an essay: User:Colin/A large scale student assignment – what could possibly go wrong?. I'd value your opinion. You can use the essay talk page if you like. Colin°Talk 22:38, 2 January 2012 (UTC)
December 2011 Newsletter for WikiProject United States
edit
The December 2011 issue of the WikiProject United States newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
editWe are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot’s recommendations. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information in the consent information sheet.
We have added information about the quality of the suggested articles using a Low/Medium/High scale which goes from Low to High .
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 14:27, 14 December 2011 (UTC)
| You are invited to the National Archives ExtravaSCANza, taking place every day next week from January 4–7, Wednesday to Saturday, in College Park, Maryland (Washington, DC metro area). Come help me cap off my stint as Wikipedian in Residence at the National Archives with one last success!
This will be a casual working event in which Wikipedians are getting together to scan interesting documents at the National Archives related to a different theme each day—currently: spaceflight, women's suffrage, Chile, and battleships—for use on Wikipedia/Wikimedia Commons. The event is being held on multiple days, and in the evenings and weekend, so that as many locals and out-of-towners from nearby regions1 as possible can come. Please join us! Dominic·t 01:21, 30 December 2011 (UTC) 1 Wikipedians from DC, Baltimore, Philadelphia, Newark, New York City, and Pittsburgh have been invited. |
|