PeterbrownDancin
 | An editor has expressed a concern that this account may be a sockpuppet of Torkmann (talk · contribs · logs). Please refer to the sockpuppet investigation of the sockpuppeteer, and editing habits or contributions of the sockpuppet for evidence. This policy subsection may be helpful. Account information: block log – contribs – logs – abuse log – CentralAuth |
Talk page content
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
test  This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Super Ball (TM), and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.freebase.com/view/en/super_ball. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 17:56, 31 January 2010 (UTC) Speedy deletion nomination of Super Ball (TM)edit If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here. If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding
ApologyeditSorry about that [[1]], unintentional oversight. Gerardw (talk) 00:03, 6 February 2010 (UTC) Your commentseditRE:
This RFC will end in rancor and acrimony. Perhaps the RFC will end when AARBCOM unilaterally shuts it down and quashes debate. Probably over half of those who took part here will be left with feelings of disgust and utter hopelessness. The predicted close result: Delete all 60,000 unreferenced BLPS at once, just as Mick MacAnee did.
InvitationeditI note your bad mood (and I can relate) and the many articles you have created which have been deleted (I can also relate), you maybe interested in a group of editors who try to reference articles up for deletion:
RE: Thank you for your invitation. I would have joined but there are already too many members. How would you like to start up a newer, more aggressive, Squad of those squarely against this mass-deletionists. We can start it together.
Glad to see you joiningeditNice to see your name again ;-)
RE: your comments Very interesting, stark turn around, from rescue commando to deletion-motivation advocate. I have changed myself to support DGGs views, that no deadline to deletion is necessary. I want to take the positive approach, thus the contest and bots to motivate wikiprojects, without the animosity of deletion debates. I am actually very surprised about your example. That article was lucky it got so much attention. What was its name? Thanks for your help, motivation, and assistance. Okip BLP Contest 19:43, 14 February 2010 (UTC)
MfD nomination of Wikipedia:Article Special CommandoseditWikipedia:Article Special Commandos, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Article Special Commandos and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Wikipedia:Article Special Commandos during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Kevin (talk) 22:29, 14 February 2010 (UTC)
Messages in one central placeedit
Please see latest comment on the RFC talk: [4]. PeterbrownDancin (talk) 19:38, 14 February 2010 (UTC)
Are you saying I should be booted? PeterbrownDancin (talk) 19:57, 14 February 2010 (UTC)
So, can I nominate you for administrator? I think you'd be a shoo-in. PeterbrownDancin (talk) 02:41, 15 February 2010 (UTC)
Why do you speaking in such urgent terms? And why are you accusing me of being a sockpuppet of Greg Kohs? PeterbrownDancin (talk) 02:58, 15 February 2010 (UTC)
Okip, please tone down your language about MZMcBride. You are a valuable voice with plenty of experience and you are needed to advocate against mass-deletion. Please don't let this thing with MZ become something the others can use to run you off the debate. This is for the greater good. PeterbrownDancin (talk) 06:41, 15 February 2010 (UTC)
 You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template. Strawman sockpuppeteditStrawman socks: Creating a separate account to argue one side of an issue in a deliberately irrational or offensive fashion, to sway opinion to another side." I knew all along, ever since you started soliciting me to start a more radical Article Rescue Squadron. I was just trying to contain your damage until you were exposed. Good riddance. Okip BLP Contest 07:21, 15 February 2010 (UTC) No you weren't. I believe you are suffering from delusions of grandeur. I have no need for a project with such insuffable nits running about. PeterbrownDancin (talk) 07:28, 15 February 2010 (UTC)
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
.jpg){kind=link}