Petrus de Isep

Your submission at Articles for creation: Isépy family (November 20)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Vanderwaalforces was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Isépy family and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Vanderwaalforces (talk) 19:35, 20 November 2023 (UTC)

Hello, Petrus de Isep! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Vanderwaalforces (talk) 19:35, 20 November 2023 (UTC)

Hello, dear Vanderwaalforces! I hope, this finds you well. Thank you very much for your critics on my Draft:Isépy family, which is, as you have noticed, dealing with a historical topic of the Middle Ages in the Kingdom of Hungary! I decided to write this draft in the first place because I saw the article Bogátradvány (genus) mentioning the House of Monok and Rákóczi, with own further Wikipedia articles. As to the notability issue, why would the same be true for another family stemming from the Bogátradvány (genus) and mentioned in the article?

Second, the references and information in the article Bogátradvány (genus) seem to me much fewer and less deeper than in my Draft:Isépy family.

Apart from this, however, could you kindly, with all your experience, indicate precisely what the problems regarding the references involved are? They are certainly scientific, in-depth, reliable, secondary, and insofar "independent of the subject", as far one can be independent of a subject, treating the very topic in question. They are in different languages, coming from published Latin, Hungarian and German books, some of them are the standard works on the issue. The English written "History" is available through the inserted link, and can be read and evaluated by the readers. Please, let me know, what - besides the general critics - your thoughts on this are. I gladly add tho the references other definitive books on the topic, as dictionary lemmata etc.

Many thanks again and all the best! Petrus de Isep (talk) 13:28, 21 November 2023 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Isépy family

Hello, Petrus de Isep. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Isépy family, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 14:06, 22 April 2024 (UTC)

October 2024

Hello, Petrus de Isep. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on the page Isépy, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for article subjects for more information. We ask that you:

• avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors;
• propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{edit COI}} template)—don't forget to give details of reliable sources supporting your suggestions;
• disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest § How to disclose a COI);
• avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam § External link spamming);
• do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicizing, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. If you are actually from the Isépy family as your username makes it sound like, then you have a COI, otherwise it's fine! Chaotic Enby (talk · contribs) 09:52, 29 October 2024 (UTC)