User talk:PhilKnight/Archive103
A survey to improve the community consultation outreach process
Hello!
The Wikimedia Foundation is seeking to improve the community consultation outreach process for Foundation policies, and we are interested in why you didn't participate in a recent consultation that followed a community discussion you’ve been part of.
Please fill out this short survey to help us improve our community consultation process for the future. It should only take about three minutes.
The privacy policy for this survey is here. This survey is a one-off request from us related to this unique topic.
Thank you for your participation, Kbrown (WMF) 10:45, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
ArbCom 2019 election voter message
Administrators' newsletter – December 2019
News and updates for administrators from the past month (November 2019).
- EvergreenFir • ToBeFree
- Akhilleus • Athaenara • John Vandenberg • Melchoir • MichaelQSchmidt • NeilN • Youngamerican • 😂
Interface administrator changes
- An RfC on the administrator resysop criteria was closed. 18 proposals have been summarised with a variety of supported and opposed statements. The inactivity grace period within which a new request for adminship is not required has been reduced from three years to two. Additionally, Bureaucrats are permitted to use their discretion when returning administrator rights.
- Following a proposal, the edit filter mailing list has been opened up to users with the Edit Filter Helper right.
- Wikimedia projects can set a default block length for users via MediaWiki:ipb-default-expiry. A new page, MediaWiki:ipb-default-expiry-ip, allows the setting of a different default block length for IP editors. Neither is currently used. (T219126)
- Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee Elections is open to eligible editors until Monday 23:59, 2 December 2018 UTC. Please review the candidates and, if you wish to do so, submit your choices on the voting page.
- The global consultation on partial and temporary office actions that ended in October received a closing statement from staff concluding, among other things, that the WMF
will no longer use partial or temporary Office Action bans... until and unless community consensus that they are of value or Board directive
.
- The global consultation on partial and temporary office actions that ended in October received a closing statement from staff concluding, among other things, that the WMF
Draft:123456 --> 123456
More than ten years ago, you applied indefinite full-protection. However, for the last five years 123456 has been the most used password and has become a textbook example of a weak password. Therefore, I think the number is notable enough to warrant a disambiguation page. I submitted the page for creation at WP:AFC, but AngusWOOF rejected it. There has never been a deletion discussion concerning this page, but your decade-year-old comment that consensus this isn't a notable number
has stood in the way of its creation. Could you please re-review this matter and ping me a response? –MJL ‐Talk‐☖ 20:19, 16 December 2019 (UTC)
- @MJL: - I've unprotected the page. I suggest you start a discussion at deletion review about the page. PhilKnight (talk) 20:35, 16 December 2019 (UTC)
- Okay, I'll move the draft now then start a review when I get back home. Thank you so much! 😀 –MJL ‐Talk‐☖ 20:39, 16 December 2019 (UTC)
- MJL, PhilKnight, the items in the dab need to be elaborated upon as they don't meet MOS:DABMENTION. Otherwise this will end up being a redirect to the password. I don't see the value of listing the other options at this time as it isn't 123 (disambiguation) AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 20:53, 16 December 2019 (UTC)
- @AngusWOOF: a redirect with possibilities is fine with me. I just wanted the navigational aide. –MJL ‐Talk‐☖ 22:27, 16 December 2019 (UTC)
- MJL, PhilKnight, the items in the dab need to be elaborated upon as they don't meet MOS:DABMENTION. Otherwise this will end up being a redirect to the password. I don't see the value of listing the other options at this time as it isn't 123 (disambiguation) AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 20:53, 16 December 2019 (UTC)
Happy Holidays
Hello PhilKnight: Enjoy the holiday season, and thanks for your work to maintain, improve and expand Wikipedia. Cheers, DBigXrayᗙ Happy Holidays! 18:31, 24 December 2019 (UTC)
- Spread the WikiLove; use {{subst:Season's Greetings1}} to send this message
Good luck
Miraclepine wishes you a Merry Christmas, a Happy New Year, and a prosperous decade of change and fortune.
このミラPはPhilKnightたちのメリークリスマスも新年も変革と幸運の豊かな十年をおめでとうございます!
フレフレ、みんなの未来!/GOOD LUCK WITH YOUR FUTURE!
ミラP 04:29, 25 December 2019 (UTC)
Happy New Year PhilKnight!
Thanks for all of your contributions to improve the encyclopedia for Wikipedia's readers, and have a happy and enjoyable New Year! Cheers, Donner60 (talk) 05:19, 27 December 2019 (UTC)
Administrators' newsletter – January 2020
News and updates for administrators from the past month (December 2019).
|
|
- A request for comment asks whether partial blocks should be enabled on the English Wikipedia. If enabled, this functionality would allow administrators to block users from editing specific pages or namespaces, rather than the entire site.
- A proposal asks whether admins who don't use their tools for a significant period of time (e.g. five years) should have the toolset procedurally removed.
- Following a successful RfC, a whitelist is now available for users whose redirects will be autopatrolled by a bot, removing them from the new pages patrol queue. Admins can add such users to Wikipedia:New pages patrol/Redirect whitelist after a discussion following the guidelines at Wikipedia talk:New pages patrol/Redirect whitelist.
- The fourth case on Palestine-Israel articles was closed. The case consolidated all previous remedies under one heading, which should make them easier to understand, apply, and enforce. In particular, the distinction between "primary articles" and "related content" has been clarified, with the former being
the entire set of articles whose topic relates to the Arab-Israeli conflict, broadly interpreted
rather thanreasonably construed
. - Following the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections, the following editors have been appointed to the Arbitration Committee: Beeblebrox, Bradv, Casliber, David Fuchs, DGG, KrakatoaKatie, Maxim, Newyorkbrad, SoWhy, Worm That Turned, Xeno.
- The fourth case on Palestine-Israel articles was closed. The case consolidated all previous remedies under one heading, which should make them easier to understand, apply, and enforce. In particular, the distinction between "primary articles" and "related content" has been clarified, with the former being
- This issue marks three full years of the Admin newsletter. Thanks for reading!
Peter Carey
Peter specifically (if it is indeed peter)) was trying to do up the article about himself, and then, due to the very thoughtful editors who love process - proceeded to identify coi and block, and now you have released him onto wikipedia. who is there to help or monitor his understanding of what wikipedia is WP:NOT ? I do not think from his first attempt he has any idea, I have tried to raise his response (nothing), and some people whom I thought were in contact with him, (no luck), and I really think there is something very lacking in the whole process... maybe wikipedia process, but with a potentially valuable contributor, all haste and little or no anything else... I do hope I am wrong. JarrahTree 00:09, 18 January 2020 (UTC)
You may wish to revoke talk page access.--Cahk (talk) 12:58, 1 February 2020 (UTC)
- Hi Cahk, I've revoked talk page access. Thanks for the prompt. PhilKnight (talk) 14:28, 1 February 2020 (UTC)
Administrators' newsletter – February 2020
News and updates for administrators from the past month (January 2020).
|
Interface administrator changes
|
- Following a request for comment, partial blocks are now enabled on the English Wikipedia. This functionality allows administrators to block users from editing specific pages or namespaces rather than the entire site. A draft policy is being workshopped at Wikipedia:Partial blocks.
- The request for comment seeking the community's sentiment for a binding desysop procedure closed with
wide-spread support for an alternative desysoping procedure based on community input
. No proposed process received consensus.
- Twinkle now supports partial blocking. There is a small checkbox that toggles the "partial" status for both blocks and templating. There is currently one template: {{uw-pblock}}.
- When trying to move a page, if the target title already exists then a warning message is shown. The warning message will now include a link to the target title. [1]
- Following a recent arbitration case, the Arbitration Committee reminded administrators
that checkuser and oversight blocks must not be reversed or modified without prior consultation with the checkuser or oversighter who placed the block, the respective functionary team, or the Arbitration Committee.
- Following a recent arbitration case, the Arbitration Committee reminded administrators
- Voting in the 2020 Steward elections will begin on 08 February 2020, 14:00 (UTC) and end on 28 February 2020, 13:59 (UTC). The confirmation process of current stewards is being held in parallel. You can automatically check your eligibility to vote.
- The English Wikipedia has reached six million articles. Thank you everyone for your contributions!
Block extension
Not to step on your toes, but I extended User_talk:50.102.207.35's block to 3 months given the block history. OhNoitsJamie Talk 17:05, 6 February 2020 (UTC)
- Thanks. PhilKnight (talk) 14:57, 7 February 2020 (UTC)
Russia page
You know, I am trying to help people learn and people like you are disrupting it, I have good faith in putting good and accurate information for everyone. I request that the page at least has a steady sign instead of decrease because Russia's population decline did halt. I'm so mad that nobody will even allow me to help, it's so disgraceful and intolerable that I can't even edit one thing without being threatened by another user. Please fix at least part of the page or else the warring may continue and if you block me, then people will never learn anything from bad sources. Either we settle this issue now or the warring proceeds, end of story. — Preceding unsigned comment added by IntercontinentalEmpire (talk • contribs)
- You need to establish a consensus on the talk page. If you continue to edit war, I'll be forced to block you. PhilKnight (talk) 17:18, 25 February 2020 (UTC)
Administrators' newsletter – March 2020
News and updates for administrators from the past month (February 2020).
|
- Following an RfC, the blocking policy was changed to state that sysops
must not
undo or alter CheckUser or Oversight blocks, rather thanshould not
. - A request for comment confirmed that sandboxes of established but inactive editors may not be blanked due solely to inactivity.
- Following an RfC, the blocking policy was changed to state that sysops
- Following a discussion, Twinkle's default CSD behavior will soon change, most likely this week. After the change, Twinkle will default to "tagging mode" if there is no CSD tag present, and default to "deletion mode" if there is a CSD tag present. You will be able to always default to "deletion mode" (the current behavior) using your Twinkle preferences.
- Following the 2020 Steward Elections, the following editors have been appointed as stewards: BRPever, Krd, Martin Urbanec, MusikAnimal, Sakretsu, Sotiale, and Tks4Fish. There are a total of seven editors that have been appointed as stewards, the most since 2014.
- The 2020 appointees for the Ombudsman commission are Ajraddatz and Uzoma Ozurumba; they will serve for one year.
Anthony McGowan Article
Hi, the anonymous account that you blocked for 24 hours for vandalising the Anthony McGowan article is right back at it. It appears to be McGowan's niece, doing it for a prank (she includes things like "Veronica Hayes is the best niece ever"). Please ban them, if possible. Lilipo25 (talk) 22:46, 6 March 2020 (UTC)
- Hi Lilipo25, I've blocked them for 7 days. PhilKnight (talk) 22:53, 6 March 2020 (UTC)
Bullied for years
Hello. I have made complaints for several times at many instances of the Wikipedia, but until now didn't get any constructive answer. I seems that Wiki bureacrats are afraid of taking a decision against discrimination. Years ago I composed a text (Pedro Scuro) which - entirely out of the blue - was considered "promotional" by some reviewer, who did not care to explain his reasons. This was said to be a "gentle approach", followed by silence and by a discriminatory block against myself. Utterly disgusted with such a misogynist attitude I simply gave up contributing, until last week, when I edited a new article (Francesco Sidoti) which seems to blocked as well. I then decided to ask for Dispute Resolution but the matter seems so complicated that no answer was given. I believe that now I'm addressing an editor with a fresh approach. Hope i'm not wrong ... again. Awainting your kind reply. Down with discrimination! Yours Peiris Fox (talk) 15:07, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
- I'm sorry that your experience of editing Wikipedia has been negative. The Pedro Scuro was deleted following a discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pedro Scuro. Your block log shows you haven't been blocked. Your new Draft:Francesco Sidoti hasn't been deleted. You shouldn't use your user page to post the Pedro Scuro article. PhilKnight (talk) 20:33, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
Administrators' newsletter – April 2020
News and updates for administrators from the past month (March 2020).
|
- There is an ongoing request for comment to streamline the source deprecation and blacklisting process.
- There is a plan for new requirements for user signatures. You can give feedback.
- Following the banning of an editor by the WMF last year, the Arbitration Committee resolved to hold a
Arbcom RfC regarding on-wiki harassment
. A draft RfC has been posted at Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Anti-harassment RfC (Draft) and not open to comments from the community yet. Interested editors can comment on the RfC itself on its talk page.
- Following the banning of an editor by the WMF last year, the Arbitration Committee resolved to hold a
- The WMF has begun a pilot report of the pages most visited through various social media platforms to help with anti-vandalism and anti-disinformation efforts. The report is updated daily and will be available through the end of May.
Administrators' newsletter – May 2020
News and updates for administrators from the past month (April 2020).
- Discretionary sanctions have been authorized for all pages and edits related to COVID-19, to be logged at WP:GS/COVID19.
- Following a recent discussion on Meta-Wiki, the edit filter maintainer global group has been created.
- A request for comment has been proposed to create a new main page editor usergroup.
- A request for comment has been proposed to make the bureaucrat activity requirements more strict.
- The Editing team has been working on the talk pages project. You can review the proposed design and share your thoughts on the talk page.
- Enterprisey created a script that will show a link to the proper Special:Undelete page when viewing a since-deleted revision, see User:Enterprisey/link-deleted-revs.
- A request for comment closed with consensus to create a Village Pump-style page for communication with the Wikimedia Foundation.
Asking
Halo PhilKnight you blocked Agungsn and it's possible that user created a new account which i think is a user VioletSky575, Please check, Thanks. Adrizky (talk) 08:58, 5 May 2020 (UTC)
- Hi Adrizky, I used the checkuser tool and couldn't confirm the technical connection. PhilKnight (talk) 14:52, 5 May 2020 (UTC)
"Department of HeaIth and Social Care" listed at Redirects for discussion
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Department of HeaIth and Social Care. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 May 8#Department of HeaIth and Social Care until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. 59.149.124.29 (talk) 06:12, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
WikiProject India 10,000 Challenge
Administrators' newsletter – June 2020
News and updates for administrators from the past month (May 2020).
- CaptainEek • Creffett • Cwmhiraeth
- Anna Frodesiak • Buckshot06 • Ronhjones • SQL
- A request for comment asks whether the Unblock Ticket Request System (UTRS) should allowed any unblock request or just private appeals.
- The Wikimedia Foundation announced that they will develop a universal code of conduct for all WMF projects. There is an open local discussion regarding the same.
A kitten for you!
Thanks for unblocking the students, but particularly for actually saying 'sorry' to them. That is rare enough the universe owes you a kitten. Here you go!
Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 13:46, 24 June 2020 (UTC)
- Thanks. PhilKnight (talk) 12:16, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
Administrators' newsletter – July 2020
News and updates for administrators from the past month (June 2020).
- A request for comment is in progress to remove the T2 (template that misrepresents established policy) speedy deletion criterion.
- Protection templates on mainspace pages are now automatically added by User:MusikBot II (BRFA).
- Following the banning of an editor by the WMF last year, the Arbitration Committee resolved to hold an
RfC regarding on-wiki harassment
. The RfC has been posted at Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Anti-harassment RfC and is open to comments from the community. - The Medicine case was closed, with a remedy authorizing standard discretionary sanctions for
all discussions about pharmaceutical drug prices and pricing and for edits adding, changing, or removing pharmaceutical drug prices or pricing from articles
.
- Following the banning of an editor by the WMF last year, the Arbitration Committee resolved to hold an
Re: Pamasawata0296
Good day PhilKnight!
Dropped by your talkpage to personally thank you for blocking the disruptive editor Pamasawata0296. I also dropped by to ask if it is possible to tag an already blocked account for sockpuppetry.
Prior to his spree of disruptive edits, I had reported the user to NinjaRobotPirate as a possible sockpuppet of Albe23413. The said user has compiled a long list of sockpuppet accounts, which I've reported to various administrators such as Bbb23, El_C and NinjaRobotPirate. For my active pursuit of reporting him, I have become the subject of his harrassments, which includes being stalked to see if I've reported his new sockpuppet or outright harassing me on my talkpage. I was again a victim of his harassment as the unconstructive edits of his such as this consisted of him shouting in Filipino, which when translated reads: YOU SON OF A BITCH!!! GARDO VERSACE!!! YOU ARE A DUMB EDITOR ON THE FACE OF THE EARTH AND YOU ARE ALSO A BLOCKER YOU ANIMAL!!!! I HOPE YOU DIE OF COVID YOU HAVE NO MERCY AND YOU ARE HEARTLESS YOU FOOL!!! YOU SHOULD BE WITH SATAN IN HELL!!!! The shouting all but confirms his anger at being repeatedly reported by me, which can be read as an admission of his being a sockpuppet of Albe23413.
Other than the above, as I have mentioned, I had reported the user to NinjaRobotPirate before he was blocked for unconstructive editing. In the said report I attached the following diffs to bolster my claim that the said user is an Albe23413 sock:
Pamasawata0296 - Special:Diff/965268942 Cocisj455 - Special:Diff/964765048 Albe23413 - Special:Diff/936184741
If officially tagged, Pamasawata0296 would be Albe23413's 15th sock account since his first block for sockpuppetry in July 2019. If it is possible, I would also like to ask if the hate-filled shouting comments made by Pamasawata0296 can be redacted as well. Hoping for your consideration on these requests. Warmest regards. Gardo Versace (talk) 06:28, 2 July 2020 (UTC)
- Hi Gardo Versace, I've tagged the user page and revision deleted the shouting. PhilKnight (talk) 11:19, 2 July 2020 (UTC)
- @PhilKnight: Thank you so much for acting swiftly on the above requests I made Warmest regards. Gardo Versace (talk) 11:21, 2 July 2020 (UTC)
Your edit to Black Lives Matter (disambiguation)
Hey there! I know you're an administrator, so I don't want to try and be invasive here, but I noticed your edit to Black Lives Matter (disambiguation). Was this just an edit conflict gone poorly, or did you purposefully edit the dab page with those additions/allegations? ItsPugle (talk) 10:02, 7 July 2020 (UTC)
- Thanks for noticing. I don't know what happened. PhilKnight (talk) 11:00, 7 July 2020 (UTC)
- Easy, just wanted to make sure that your account wasn't compromised or anything like that :) Must just be a conflict error or something of the sorts! ItsPugle (talk) 12:11, 7 July 2020 (UTC)
2600:1000:b10e:c51e:0:9:e434:2c01
Could you please block user:2600:1000:b10e:c51e:0:9:e434:2c01 asap. She will likely not stop vandalizing until then. CLCStudent (talk) 13:56, 28 July 2020 (UTC)
- BTW, she vandalized after the warning you gave her. CLCStudent (talk) 13:59, 28 July 2020 (UTC)
- Hi CLCStudent, I've blocked the IP. PhilKnight (talk) 14:02, 28 July 2020 (UTC)