Phill.Provance

Welcome!

Hello, Phill.Provance, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Tutorial
• How to edit a page and How to develop articles
• How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! --Slgrandson (How's my egg-throwing coleslaw?) 04:21, 1 November 2010 (UTC)

December 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, but when you add or change content, as you did to the article James F. Reynolds, please cite a reliable source for the content of your edit. This helps maintain our policy of verifiability. Take a look at Wikipedia:Citing sources for information about how to cite sources and the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Cindamuse (talk) 11:41, 1 December 2010 (UTC)

Re: James F. Reynolds page

Cindamuse. Many apologies. I saved it before adding a few more sources last night because I was tired and didn't want to lose my work. Anyhow, I added a few more citations today. I'll try to expand and add more citations as I find them, but I wasn't able to find much on Mr. Reynolds. And, after all, he was tagged as a person of interest in the Cable television in the United States page, so I figured any info I could find on him would be OK. I'd welcome some other hands on the page as it's very tough sorting through the mess of Web pages. Google apparently has done something with its news archives page and I'm having trouble finding source material now from media outlets.:-( —Preceding unsigned comment added by Phill.Provance (talk • contribs) 23:21, 1 December 2010 (UTC)

• Unfortunately, the citations that you added (Askville.com and Rootsweb) are not reliable and cannot be used to establish notability. (The Askville.com webpage is simply a copy/paste of the Wikipedia article.) While the other citation (Museum of Broadcast Communications) is reliable, it does not mention the subject of the article. The obituary states that Reynolds started the first cable television commercial in Sandy Lake, rather than in the United States. At this point, I would recommend copying the article to your userspace and developing it there. When you have found significant coverage of the subject from reliable and independent sources, then it should be safe to move to the mainspace. At this point, it may be appropriately deleted. Let me know if you have any questions. Best regards, Cindamuse (talk) 17:38, 2 December 2010 (UTC)
  • How do I do I move it to my user space?
    
    Also, I'm confused about your determination on the Roots Web obit. It says, "He also started the first cable television commercial system that began in Sandy Lake and expanded to Stoneboro, Cochranton, Utica and Polk."
    
    It does not say, "He also started the first cable television commercial system in Sandy Lake and expanded to Stoneboro, Cochranton, Utica and Polk."
    
    There's a definite syntactical difference between the two statements insomuch as the first is saying "He began the first commercial cable system - and it began in Sandy Lake," whereas the second is saying, "He began the first commercial cable system Sandy Lake had."
    
    I mean, if you want me to drive to Sandy Lake and question the man's family I will certainly do it because I'd hate to think that possibly someone who came up with or introduced an idea someplace would be plastered over after some others with more money took his idea and ran with it. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Phill.Provance (talk • contribs) 21:44, 2 December 2010 (UTC)
    • Sorry for the confusion. The assessment of Rootsweb has been made because it is a user-generated website. While the newspaper itself would be considered reliable, Rootsweb is not. The concern is notability. The lede of the article states that "He is best known for starting the first commercial cable TV system in the United States." The reference provided does not support this statement. No need to drive to the family's house. However, if you can find documentation through significant coverage by reliable sources that are independent of the subject, that would certainly help support notability. To move the article to a subpage, first copy the article from James F. Reynolds; then click this link User:Phill.Provance/James F. Reynolds; and finally, paste the article into the subpage and save. For the sake of continuity, please feel free to respond here if you have further questions. Thanks, Cindamuse (talk) 23:14, 2 December 2010 (UTC)

• I found Mr. Reynolds's son and have contacted the family about third party sources they might have on file that might not be online yet. We will know soon.:-) -Phill —Preceding unsigned comment added by Phill.Provance (talk • contribs) 22:08, 3 December 2010 (UTC)
  • Phill, for the sake of continuity, please keep the conversation on your talk page. That said, speaking with the family will not support notability. Obscure files in the family's possession won't help. If you can locate either secondary or third party sources that specifically support notability, we can work from there. Happy hunting! ;) Cindamuse (talk) 02:00, 4 December 2010 (UTC)
    • Phill, for the sake of continuity, please keep the conversation here on your talk page. Remember, all sources of information must be verifiable. Obscure files in the family's possession fails verifiability. Thank you. Cindamuse (talk) 02:38, 4 December 2010 (UTC)

Your recent edits

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you must sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 02:05, 4 December 2010 (UTC)

Nomination of Gabé Hirschowitz for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Gabé Hirschowitz is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gabé Hirschowitz until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 08:17, 5 June 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 6

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Gabé Hirschowitz, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Nina Ricci. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:07, 6 June 2021 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of CMT Front Row

The article CMT Front Row has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Sources are WP:PRIMARY or unreliable. No other sourcing found.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 23:14, 26 March 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (June 23)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Asilvering was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Phill.Provance/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to User:Phill.Provance/sandbox, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

asilvering (talk) 01:41, 23 June 2022 (UTC)

Hello, Phill.Provance! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! asilvering (talk) 01:41, 23 June 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Gabé Hirschowitz (July 30)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Z1720 was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Gabé Hirschowitz and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Z1720 (talk) 03:45, 30 July 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Gabé Hirschowitz has been accepted

Gabé Hirschowitz, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

_Signed, Pichemist ^{( Contribs | Talk )} 07:26, 2 January 2023 (UTC)

Thank you Pichemist! :-) Phill.Provance (talk) 18:09, 3 January 2023 (UTC)