User talk:Philosopher/Archive 5

Latest comment: 6 years ago by Eastmain in topic Amadu Sulley
Archive 1Archive 3Archive 4Archive 5Archive 6Archive 7Archive 10

Re:Chuck Grassley

While I have found other sources listing him as Charles, [1] [2] [3] I suppose the sources that you found are more official. I guess that keeping the article at Chuck Grassley will be fine. Captain panda 22:20, 24 August 2008 (UTC)

Deletion request

Could you help me delete this image? Thanks. --Amazonien (talk) 06:05, 25 August 2008 (UTC)

  Done. --Philosopher Let us reason together. 06:07, 25 August 2008 (UTC)

Peter Schechter page

Hi, The texts were released into the Public Domain. Heather Freeman is the PR consultant of Peter Schecter and the Bio (the text) was released to the public. Please approve the page. Thanks very much, Shlomi. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Szadok (talkcontribs) 20:00, 25 August 2008 (UTC)

Peter Schechter page another question

Heather Freeman wishes to remove the page from her website. Will that help? Szadok (talk) 21:35, 25 August 2008 (UTC)

Um. I don't think so - regardless of where/if the work is published, the author retains copyright unless it is explicitly given up. But how to do that if the page is taken down? I don't remember, sorry. Perhaps you could ask at Wikipedia talk:Copyright problems. Wish I could help more. --Philosopher Let us reason together. 03:50, 26 August 2008 (UTC)
This is basically the approach I took. I'm going to do my best to help Szadok. Thanks! Nyttend (talk) 11:20, 26 August 2008 (UTC)

Hi, I originally posted the following at User:Nyttend's discussion page, I just wanted to keep you on the loop, as I really want to solve this and add the Peter Schechter page. Thanks.

Hey, I also noticed (sadly) that you deleter Peter Schechter for copyright infringment. I do not know how to express myself better, but the texts were written by Peter Schechter and edited myself and the texts realeased under GFDL license by Mr. Peter Schechter and myself. Now, a similar text was posted at heatherfreeman.com and was removed completely, mainly to avoid any copyright disputes, as the texts that were under heatherfreeman.com were written by Peter Schechter and edited by Mrs. Heather Freeman (Mr. Schechter's PR).

I would like to re-enter the texts again to Peter Schechter value. Can I do that, or do I need other type of proof, to show that the text is free to the public under GFDL license? If yes, What type of proof?. Thanks alot, Please feel free to contact me also at: info (AT) israel-hosting(DOT)net Szadok (talk) 11:21, 26 August 2008 (UTC)

CSD on Dragonfly Executive Air Charter

Your reasoning on removing my CSD on Dragonfly Executive Air Charter does not follow. It serves no airports. It is based at Cardif airport but only flies charter to where ever the customer wishes, potentially 1000s of airports. But that does not make it notable in any way. The article has been changed to show that. I am holding off on the AfD to see how it devolopes, but by Wikipedia:Notability (organizations and companies) it clearly fails. --triwbe (talk) 09:25, 30 August 2008 (UTC)

The article appeared to show that it served several airports - which I took as an assertion of notability - remembering that speedy deletion can't be used on non-notable articles that at least assert notability. --Philosopher Let us reason together. 09:50, 30 August 2008 (UTC)

Unwrapped steel

AfD nomination of Unwrapped steel

 

An article that you have been involved in editing, Unwrapped steel, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Unwrapped steel. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? User A1 (talk) 02:28, 31 August 2008 (UTC)

Russian Mordor rises again

User:Abkhazeti-online is, I believe, a duplicate of the page Мордор, which you deleted as an attack page. Since I cannot read Russian, I can't be sure, but it looks like the same thing and was created around the same time by the same person. Beeblbrox (talk) 03:50, 31 August 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for the heads-up! The text is different than that at Мордор, Google Translate says it means "MIG Abhazeti - an international initiative group 'Abhazeti'" which sounds innocent enough. --Philosopher Let us reason together. 04:34, 31 August 2008 (UTC)

Rollback

Thank you. I'll bear your injunction in mind. Kanguole (talk) 15:38, 31 August 2008 (UTC)

Deletions

What do you consider required to allow a page like bass pro shops stay? I would like to recreate our page in a manner fits the wikipedia requirements? What suggestions would you have? —Preceding unsigned comment added by TFH1982 (talkcontribs) 19:10, 3 September 2008 (UTC)

I'm sorry, are you referring to THE FISHIN' HOLE which I recently deleted or are you referring to a different article? Either way, I would suggest reading the suggestions at Wikipedia:Starting an article and the notability requirements at Wikipedia:Notability for general principles related to article development. If you have a more specific question, feel free to ask. --Philosopher Let us reason together. 19:18, 3 September 2008 (UTC)
Philosopher, Yes I did post the article for The Fishin' Hole. I thought I had made it within requirments for wikipedia. Where or what can I change? I would like to have a similar post to that of Bass pro or Cabela's. —Preceding unsigned comment added by TFH1982 (talkcontribs) 20:24, 3 September 2008 (UTC)

Uw-vandalism5

Good point. I can actually speedy it myself if you want. Khoikhoi 23:22, 4 September 2008 (UTC)

Done. Khoikhoi 23:25, 4 September 2008 (UTC)

Re:Rollback

Thank you very much! I promise to use it wisely! :) --Skunkboy74 (talk) 04:44, 7 September 2008 (UTC)

I've read your note and will be sure to take it very seriously. Thank you very much. Magiciandude (talk) 22:38, 11 September 2008 (UTC)

Customer-centric

Hello Philo. I see that you stubbed Customer-centric after not seeing any advertising. The author has already spammed this article over at Customer Centric Selling‎ which is exactly the same as what customer-centric was before he chopped the links off of it. It's meant to drive people to the corporate page of the author as well as their book. So that's where my original CSD request came from if you were wondering. Rob Banzai (talk) 19:12, 9 September 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for letting me know - I've deleted the latter article for advertising and warned the user to stop creating inappropriate articles. The stubbed version appears to be fine, though (with regard to advertising, I can't comment on its appropriateness as a marketing/sales article). --Philosopher Let us reason together. 19:19, 9 September 2008 (UTC)

Hi Philosopher,

I understand that you're quite familiar with possible copyright problems. I was thinking of uploading a couple of pictures to these articles, however I'm not to sure about the copyright. . .

  • this picture is permitted, I understand (due to Flickr)
  • this picture of the exact same event, I'm not so sure about, even though it looks like it belongs to a user page (hence the domain http://www.users.bigpond.com), and also considering this event was published widely, it may be listed in Archives as an ubiquitous 'household' image. .

Could I get some help. . . Thanks in advance --124.181.8.159 (talk) 09:12, 11 September 2008 (UTC)

I'll look into it and get back to you. --Philosopher Let us reason together. 10:04, 11 September 2008 (UTC)
It looks like the latter image [4] is under the copyright here. The former image [5] states explicitly that it was a press photo and therefore presumably copyrighted by the press agency that took it. As a result, neither image would be appropriate for these articles (at least not as a main image) as Wikipedia:Non-free content#Policy states (point #1) that "Non-free content is used only where no free equivalent is available, or could be created, that would serve the same encyclopedic purpose." As the annual event is still occurring and the athlete in question is alive, it would be possible to create a free equivalent by taking a picture of the event/person. Indeed, in the case of Mark of the Year, the primary picture is currently a free image.
The rules may be slightly different if you intend to use the pictures to illustrate a particular event that has already happened - in which case, let me know how you would like to use the image and I'll get back to you again.
All the best, Philosopher Let us reason together. 21:55, 11 September 2008 (UTC)
Hi Philospher,
Thanks for the feedback. The 2nd picture from Flickr, I managed to find in various locations such as here and here. I'm not sure, but maybe these pictures constitute {Non-free historic image}, and therefore they maybe OK. . .? In the article Mark of the Year, the current primary image is part of a template, and I wanted to upload the picture of Alex Jesaulenko's mark (known as the 'mark of the century') and use it as an image within the article.
The photo however I could only find once. Its over here with this being the Main Page of that particular portal, and, I couldn't find a copyright in what appears to be a user page (much the same as a myspace or facebook page).
Under the acceptable use policy, it says that Images with iconic status or historical importance may be used, and I think these images have somewhat of an 'iconic' status (certainly within Australia). How can I get these pics onto wikipedia?
Thanks once again, (I wasn't logged in at the time when I sent you the above message.) --Superflewis (talk) 08:38, 12 September 2008 (UTC)
If you believe the images meet the requirements of our policy for fair use, I suppose it doesn't matter that much what their actual copyright status is. The way to upload an image is to click on "Upload file" in the "toolbox" on the left-hand column of the screen and follow the instructions on the page - you should be able to upload it directly from the website it's on. Be sure that after the file is uploaded it has a clear "Fair use rationale" for its use on each Wikipedia page you use it on. If you have any further questions or concerns, let me know and I'll try to help. --Philosopher Let us reason together. 15:44, 12 September 2008 (UTC)
Hi Philosopher, just one more thing: What would I need to do in order to get this article: Mark of the Year to featured lists status? Thanks --Superflewis (talk) 06:50, 13 September 2008 (UTC)

(outdent) As far as that goes, I'm afraid you know as much as I do - I don't have any featured content to my name. Sorry. --Philosopher Let us reason together. 06:55, 13 September 2008 (UTC)

AfD nomination of IRrelevant Astronomy

 

An article that you have been involved in editing, IRrelevant Astronomy, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/IRrelevant Astronomy. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Corvus cornixtalk 23:43, 11 September 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for the notice - though I wasn't really involved in editing the article. --Philosopher Let us reason together. 23:45, 11 September 2008 (UTC)

About Damaged Goods article

Sorry, the category was assigned in error. However, the fact remains that this page should belong to Wiktionary, and not here on Wikipedia. Arbiteroftruth (talk) 00:07, 12 September 2008 (UTC)

Lucky Star albums/singles

Mind telling me why you deleted the Lucky Star articles? I'm a little pissed off, to be honest. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Doggiedoggie (talkcontribs) 07:02, 12 September 2008 (UTC)

If you want to know why an article was deleted, you can click the "logs" tab in the "toolbox" section of the bottom left column of the page to see the deletion log. In the case of List of Lucky Star character song singles, I deleted it because the sole author requested deletion. The same goes for List of Lucky Star singles and albums. The only content of the articles was a redirect anyway - perhaps the articles you're looking for are the ones at List of Lucky Star albums and List of Lucky Star character song albums? --Philosopher Let us reason together. 15:48, 12 September 2008 (UTC)

Still cant use AWB after im approved

When i log in to AWB it says ' ' Jer10 95 is not enabled to use this"Jer10 95 Talk 22:02, 15 September 2008 (UTC)

It appears that I approved Jer10_95 by mistake. I've fixed the name - see if it works now. --Philosopher Let us reason together. 18:06, 16 September 2008 (UTC)

My RfA

  Thank you for supporting me in my RfA, which passed with a count of (166/43/7). I appreciate your comments and in my actions as an administrator I will endeavor to maintain the trust you have placed in me. I am honored by your trust and your support. Thank you, Cirt (talk) 03:15, 16 September 2008 (UTC)

18:08, 9 April 2018 (UTC)

15:21, 16 April 2018 (UTC)

18:16, 23 April 2018 (UTC)

The Signpost: 26 April 2018

16:18, 30 April 2018 (UTC)

WikiCup 2018 May newsletter

The second round of the 2018 WikiCup has now finished. Most contestants who advanced to the next round scored upwards of 100 points, but two with just 10 points managed to scrape through into round 3. Our top scorers in the last round were:

  •   Cas Liber, our winner in 2016, with three featured articles
  •   Iazyges, with nine good articles and lots of bonus points
  •   Yashthepunisher, a first time contestant, with two featured lists
  •   SounderBruce, a finalist last year, with seventeen good topic articles
  •   Usernameunique, a first time contestant, with fourteen DYKs
  •   Muboshgu, a seasoned competitor, with three ITNs and
  •   Courcelles, another first time contestant, with twenty-seven GARs

So far contestants have achieved twelve featured articles between them and a splendid 124 good articles. Commendably, 326 GARs have been completed during the course of the 2018 WikiCup, so the backlog of articles awaiting GA review has been reduced as a result of contestants' activities. As we enter the third round, remember that any content promoted after the end of round 2 but before the start of round 3 can be claimed in round 3. Remember too that you must claim your points within 14 days of "earning" them. When doing GARs, please make sure that you check that all the GA criteria are fully met; most of the GARs are fine, but a few have been a bit skimpy.

If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article nominations, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed (remember to remove your listing when no longer required). Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Godot13 (talk), Sturmvogel 66 (talk), Vanamonde (talk) and Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:10, 1 May 2018 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – May 2018

News and updates for administrators from the past month (April 2018).

 

  Administrator changes

  None
  ChochopkCoffeeGryffindorJimpKnowledge SeekerLankiveilPeridonRjd0060

  Guideline and policy news

  • The ability to create articles directly in mainspace is now indefinitely restricted to autoconfirmed users.
  • A proposal is being discussed which would create a new "event coordinator" right that would allow users to temporarily add the "confirmed" flag to new user accounts and to create many new user accounts without being hindered by a rate limit.

  Technical news

  • AbuseFilter has received numerous improvements, including an OOUI overhaul, syntax highlighting, ability to search existing filters, and a few new functions. In particular, the search feature can be used to ensure there aren't existing filters for what you need, and the new equals_to_any function can be used when checking multiple namespaces. One major upcoming change is the ability to see which filters are the slowest. This information is currently only available to those with access to Logstash.
  • When blocking anonymous users, a cookie will be applied that reloads the block if the user changes their IP. This means in most cases, you may no longer need to do /64 range blocks on residential IPv6 addresses in order to effectively block the end user. It will also help combat abuse from IP hoppers in general. This currently only occurs when hard-blocking accounts.
  • The block notice shown on mobile will soon be more informative and point users to a help page on how to request an unblock, just as it currently does on desktop.
  • There will soon be a calendar widget at Special:Block, making it easier to set expiries for a specific date and time.

  Arbitration

  Obituaries

  • Lankiveil (Craig Franklin) passed away in mid-April. Lankiveil joined Wikipedia on 12 August 2004 and became an administrator on 31 August 2008. During his time with the Wikimedia community, Lankiveil served as an oversighter for the English Wikipedia and as president of Wikimedia Australia.

16:28, 7 May 2018 (UTC)

22:23, 14 May 2018 (UTC)

17:34, 21 May 2018 (UTC)

The Signpost: 24 May 2018

12:40, 29 May 2018 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – June 2018

News and updates for administrators from the past month (May 2018).

 

  Administrator changes

  None
  Al Ameer sonAliveFreeHappyCenariumLupoMichaelBillington

  Guideline and policy news

  Technical news

  • IP-based cookie blocks should be deployed to English Wikipedia in June. This will cause the block of a logged-out user to be reloaded if they change IPs. This means in most cases, you may no longer need to do /64 range blocks on residential IPv6 addresses in order to effectively block the end user. It will also help combat abuse from IP hoppers in general. For the time being, it only affects users of the desktop interface.
  • The Wikimedia Foundation's Anti-Harassment Tools team will build granular types of blocks in 2018 (e.g. a block from uploading or editing specific pages, categories, or namespaces, as opposed to a full-site block). Feedback on the concept may be left at the talk page.
  • There is now a checkbox on Special:ListUsers to let you see only users in temporary user groups.
  • It is now easier for blocked mobile users to see why they were blocked.

  Arbitration

  • A recent technical issue with the Arbitration Committee's spam filter inadvertently caused all messages sent to the committee through Wikipedia (i.e. Special:EmailUser/Arbitration Committee) to be discarded. If you attempted to send an email to the Arbitration Committee via Wikipedia between May 16 and May 31, your message was not received and you are encouraged to resend it. Messages sent outside of these dates or directly to the Arbitration Committee email address were not affected by this issue.

  Miscellaneous


21:54, 4 June 2018 (UTC)

21:55, 11 June 2018 (UTC)

21:47, 18 June 2018 (UTC)

23:10, 25 June 2018 (UTC)

The Signpost: 29 June 2018

Notification of pending suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity

  Following a community discussion in June 2011, consensus was reached to provisionally suspend the administrative permissions of users who have been inactive for one year (i.e. administrators who have not made any edits or logged actions in more than one year). As a result of this discussion, your administrative permissions will be removed if you do not return to activity within the next month. If you wish to have these permissions reinstated should this occur, please post to the Wikipedia:Bureaucrats' noticeboard and the userright will be restored per the re-sysopping process (i.e. as long as the attending bureaucrats are reasonably satisfied that your account has not been compromised, that your inactivity did not have the effect of evading scrutiny of any actions which might have led to sanctions, that you have not been inactive for a three-year period of time, and that you have not been inactive from administrative tasks for a five year period of time). If you remain inactive for a three-year period of time, including the present year you have been inactive, you will need to request reinstatement at WP:RFA. Further, following a community discussion in March of 2018, Administrators suspended for inactivity who have not had any logged administrative activity for five years will need to request reinstatement at WP:RFA. This removal of access is procedural only, and not intended to reflect negatively upon you in any way. We wish you the best in future endeavors, and thank you for your past administrative efforts. — JJMC89 bot 00:05, 1 July 2018 (UTC)

WikiCup 2018 July newsletter

The third round of the 2018 WikiCup has now come to an end. The 16 users who made it to the fourth round had at least 227 points. Our top scorers in round 3 were:

  •   Courcelles, a first time contestant, with 1756 points, a tally built largely on 27 GAs related to the Olympics
  •   Cas Liber, our winner in 2016, with two featured articles and three GAs on natural history and astronomy topics
  •   SounderBruce, a finalist last year, with a variety of submissions related to transport in the state of Washington

Contestants managed 7 featured articles, 4 featured lists, 120 good articles, 1 good topic, 124 DYK entries, 15 ITN entries, and 132 good article reviews. Over the course of the competition, contestants have completed 458 GA reviews, in comparison to 244 good articles submitted for review and promoted. As we enter the fourth round, remember that any content promoted after the end of round 3 but before the start of round 4 can be claimed in round 4. Please also remember that you must claim your points within 14 days of "earning" them. When doing GARs, please make sure that you check that all the GA criteria are fully met. Please also remember that all submissions must meet core Wikipedia policies, regardless of the review process; several submissions, particularly in abstruse or technical areas, have needed additional work to make them completely verifiable.

If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article nominations, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed (remember to remove your listing when no longer required). Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Godot13 (talk), Sturmvogel 66 (talk), Cwmhiraeth (talk), Vanamonde (talk) 04:55, 2 July 2018 (UTC)

00:46, 3 July 2018 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – July 2018

News and updates for administrators from the past month (June 2018).

 

  Administrator changes

  PbsouthwoodTheSandDoctor
  Gogo Dodo
  AndrevanDougEVulaKaisaLTony FoxWilyD

  Bureaucrat changes

  AndrevanEVula

  Guideline and policy news

  • An RfC about the deletion of drafts closed with a consensus to change the wording of WP:NMFD. Specifically, a draft that has been repeatedly resubmitted and declined at AfC without any substantial improvement may be deleted at MfD if consensus determines that it is unlikely to ever meet the requirements for mainspace and it otherwise meets one of the reasons for deletion outlined in the deletion policy.
  • A request for comment closed with a consensus that the {{promising draft}} template cannot be used to indefinitely prevent a WP:G13 speedy deletion nomination.

  Technical news

  • Starting on July 9, the WMF Security team, Trust & Safety, and the broader technical community will be seeking input on an upcoming change that will restrict editing of site-wide JavaScript and CSS to a new technical administrators user group. Bureaucrats and stewards will be able to grant this right per a community-defined process. The intention is to reduce the number of accounts who can edit frontend code to those who actually need to, which in turn lessens the risk of malicious code being added that compromises the security and privacy of everyone who accesses Wikipedia. For more information, please review the FAQ.
  • Syntax highlighting has been graduated from a Beta feature on the English Wikipedia. To enable this feature, click the highlighter icon ( ) in your editing toolbar (or under the hamburger menu in the 2017 wikitext editor). This feature can help prevent you from making mistakes when editing complex templates.
  • IP-based cookie blocks should be deployed to English Wikipedia in July (previously scheduled for June). This will cause the block of a logged-out user to be reloaded if they change IPs. This means in most cases, you may no longer need to do /64 range blocks on residential IPv6 addresses in order to effectively block the end user. It will also help combat abuse from IP hoppers in general. For the time being, it only affects users of the desktop interface.

  Miscellaneous

  • Currently around 20% of admins have enabled two-factor authentication, up from 17% a year ago. If you haven't already enabled it, please consider doing so. Regardless if you use 2FA, please practice appropriate account security by ensuring your password is secure and unique to Wikimedia.

23:09, 9 July 2018 (UTC)

16:01, 16 July 2018 (UTC)

09:44, 24 July 2018 (UTC)

Notification of imminent suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity

  Following a community discussion in June 2011, consensus was reached to provisionally suspend the administrative permissions of users who have been inactive for one year (i.e. administrators who have not made any edits or logged actions in more than one year). As a result of this discussion, your administrative permissions will be removed if you do not return to activity within the next several days. If you wish to have these permissions reinstated should this occur, please post to the Wikipedia:Bureaucrats' noticeboard and the userright will be restored per the re-sysopping process (i.e. as long as the attending bureaucrats are reasonably satisfied that your account has not been compromised, that your inactivity did not have the effect of evading scrutiny of any actions which might have led to sanctions, that you have not been inactive for a three-year period of time, and that you have not been inactive from administrative tasks for a five year period of time). If you remain inactive for a three-year period of time, including the present year you have been inactive, you will need to request reinstatement at WP:RFA. Further, following a community discussion in March of 2018, administrators suspended for inactivity who have not had any logged administrative activity for five years will need to request reinstatement at WP:RFA. This removal of access is procedural only, and not intended to reflect negatively upon you in any way. We wish you the best in future endeavors, and thank you for your past administrative efforts. — JJMC89 bot 00:01, 25 July 2018 (UTC)

Thanks for the note. – Philosopher Let us reason together. 07:45, 25 July 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Donald Trump

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Donald Trump. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 26 July 2018 (UTC)

14:05, 30 July 2018 (UTC)

The Signpost: 31 July 2018

Administrators' newsletter – August 2018

News and updates for administrators from the past month (July 2018).

 

  Administrator changes

  Sro23
  KaisaLYmblanter

  Guideline and policy news

  • After a discussion at Meta, a new user group called "interface administrators" (formerly "technical administrator") has been created. Come the end of August, interface admins will be the only users able to edit site-wide JavaScript and CSS pages like MediaWiki:Common.js and MediaWiki:Common.css, or edit other user's personal JavaScript and CSS. The intention is to improve security and privacy by reducing the number of accounts which could be used to compromise the site or another user's account through malicious code. The new user group can be assigned and revoked by bureaucrats. Discussion is ongoing to establish details for implementing the group on the English Wikipedia.
  • Following a request for comment, the WP:SISTER style guideline now states that in the mainspace, interwiki links to Wikinews should only be made as per the external links guideline. This generally means that within the body of an article, you should not link to Wikinews about a particular event that is only a part of the larger topic. Wikinews links in "external links" sections can be used where helpful, but not automatically if an equivalent article from a reliable news outlet could be linked in the same manner.

  Technical news


19:39, 6 August 2018 (UTC)

Amadu Sulley

The article about Amadu Sulley, a former elections official in Ghana, is at AfD at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Amadu Sulley. Your comments would be welcome. Eastmain (talkcontribs) 10:43, 13 August 2018 (UTC)

17:53, 13 August 2018 (UTC)