Latest comment: 15 days ago2 comments2 people in discussion
Draft declinedThank you for contributing to Wikipedia. Your draft submission to Articles for creation has been reviewed but not accepted at this time.
FeedbackThe reviewer, MidnightMayhem, left the following feedback:
This draft's references do not show that the subject meets Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion. The draft requires multiple published secondary sources that:
provide significant coverage: discuss the subject in detail, not just brief mentions or routine announcements;
are reliable: from reputable outlets with editorial oversight;
are independent: not connected to the subject, such as interviews, press releases, the subject's own website, or sponsored content.
Please add references that meet all three of these criteria. If none exist, the subject is not yet suitable for Wikipedia.
Not clear that this passes WP:GNG when the only sources provided have less than a page each discussing it. Is there more significant coverage? Any military engagements it was involved in?
The draft as it stands has a reference to a detailed page on the specific vehicle by a UK national museum (which already has a wikipage, wikilinked in the draft). This reference 1. provides significant coverage (detailed page dedicated only to this vehicle) 2. is reliable (reputable source i.e. established domain-specific museum) 3. is independent (non-profit museum established after the vehicle left service).
There are additional references from prominent military historians (again, already with wikipage, wikilinked in the draft) of books not dedicated entirely to the vehicle itself but which explain the importance of the vehicle in the context of other significant organizations and events (again, already with wikipages, wikilinked in the draft).
As such, I do not understand what further modification you require. Please make a more detailed specific request.
Furthermore, although it doesn't directly engage with the criteria you state here, I note for background that every vehicle that has served with a major military (and even minor militaries) appears to have a wikipage as a matter of course, and there can be no doubt from the references given that this vehicle existed and that it served with the British Army. Any decision to reject this vehicle in particular therefore requires specific and extraordinary justification. Phranosaur (talk) 07:17, 16 August 2026 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 7 days ago2 comments1 person in discussion
Draft declinedThank you for contributing to Wikipedia. Your draft submission to Articles for creation has been reviewed but not accepted at this time.
FeedbackThe reviewer, Kovcszaln6, left the following feedback:
This draft's references do not show that the subject meets Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion. The draft requires multiple published secondary sources that:
provide significant coverage: discuss the subject in detail, not just brief mentions or routine announcements;
are reliable: from reputable outlets with editorial oversight;
are independent: not connected to the subject, such as interviews, press releases, the subject's own website, or sponsored content.
Please add references that meet all three of these criteria. If none exist, the subject is not yet suitable for Wikipedia.
To understand why your draft was declined, please read the reviewer's feedback and follow any links to help pages you've been given. If you're still confused, try asking for advice at the Articles for creation Help desk.
For peer support regarding all other editing, sourcing, or policies, visit the Teahouse, a friendly question and answer hub for new editors. We'd love to see you there! Kovcszaln6 (talk) 09:10, 24 August 2026 (UTC)Reply
Getting Started
Tips
