User talk:Piledhigheranddeeper/Archives05
I think you missed this sentence: "The Vicinage Clause places no limits on the prosecution of crimes committed outside the territory of a state. Thus the Supreme Court has thrice held in murder cases arising from the Indian Territory,[21] Navassa Island,[22] and the No Man's Land of the Oklahoma Panhandle.[23]" Savidan 19:33, 17 January 2012 (UTC)
- Those cases all arose in connection with crimes committed in territory with no government, yet claimed by the United States. Other instances of extraterritorial jurisdiction have arisen in places with governments, such as Pakistan, or on territory of a different nature, such as Guantanamo Bay, or on non-territory, such as aboard aircraft in flight. The rapid recent growth of claims of extraterritorial jurisduction cries out for, at the least, an acknowledgement of this apparent conflict. --Piledhigheranddeeper (talk) 19:45, 17 January 2012 (UTC)
- I think those cases settle the question. But, if you have a source that says extraterritoriality is an open question for the Vicinage Clause, then add those. As it stands, I think there is an original research problem to include it with only sources like those you used last time. Savidan 19:55, 17 January 2012 (UTC)
Thanks for your help with this article. I have a few questions for you. First, what do you mean by "which direction is this?" in regards to the King Kamehameha III Elementary School in the south? Do you mean something other than the south? The school is the archaeological site associated with the aliʻi. If that was confusing, let me know. Second, I generally prefer to preserve quote integrity by refraining from linking to important concepts, such as kapu. Instead, I'll try to link to it outside of the quote. Let me know if you have any further concerns. I left a bunch on the talk page if you are interested. Viriditas (talk) 04:37, 26 January 2012 (UTC)
- The "south" appears between the mentions of the school and the archaeological site (separated by a comma), suggesting that the site is in another direction than south. I've tweaked that. Fine with linking another mention of "kapu", but the link should be on the first mention of the term, so ignoramuses such as myself don't ask "hunh?" and have nowhere to turn. --Piledhigheranddeeper (talk) 15:06, 26 January 2012 (UTC)
- Agreed. I should have it done later today. Thanks. Viriditas (talk) 22:07, 26 January 2012 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification
editHi. When you recently edited Saeed Malekpour, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Remand (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:27, 1 February 2012 (UTC)
- Oops. Thought I'd changed the disambig link to the specific one. Did it now! --Piledhigheranddeeper (talk) 15:06, 1 February 2012 (UTC)
DYK for Zombie strip
editOn 12 February 2012, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Zombie strip, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that Blondie, B.C., and Hägar the Horrible are all zombies? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Zombie strip.You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
The DYK project (nominate) 16:44, 12 February 2012 (UTC)
Hello!! You are right about that logical impossibility. I guess i misread the source and added the statement. The source says
Raj Kapoor's homage to Devdas is best seen in Aah (recall that in Bimal Roy's Devdas, the last word of the title character is "aah", which may be translated, in that context, as "oh! the pity of it all").
And i guess that it is just writer bringing it to our notice of this probable coincidence. I will remove that line now. Thanks for that brilliant help. -Animeshkulkarni (talk) 16:17, 23 February 2012 (UTC)
- Happy to help, and bully for Bolly! (And the article could be re-worked to refer to the book, not the movie...) --Piledhigheranddeeper (talk) 16:34, 23 February 2012 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification
editHi. When you recently edited Junius Richard Jayewardene, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Rugby (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:32, 25 February 2012 (UTC)
A kitten for you!
editThanks for the edits on the Kelsey Wakefield article. :D Much improved.
Disambiguation link notification for March 4
editHi. When you recently edited Pre-Code Hollywood, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page William H. Hays (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:07, 4 March 2012 (UTC)
- (Note to self: check those links more thoroughly!) --Piledhigheranddeeper (talk) 16:14, 5 March 2012 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for March 11
editHi. When you recently edited Female seminary, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Germantown, Pennsylvania (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:24, 11 March 2012 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for March 18
editHi. When you recently edited Napoléon (1927 film), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Scullion (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:43, 18 March 2012 (UTC)
- Every once in a while, it's intentional (or at least necessary, for the lack of an article by that name that refers to that use of the word).--Piledhigheranddeeper (talk) 16:49, 23 March 2012 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for April 6
editHi. When you recently edited Eighty Years' War, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Philip II (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:31, 6 April 2012 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for April 26
editHi. When you recently edited San Francisco plague of 1900–1904, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Caucasians (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:46, 26 April 2012 (UTC)
- Jeez! Let your guard down one time... --Piledhigheranddeeper (talk) 14:24, 26 April 2012 (UTC)
Episcopal-Episcopalian
editHi Piled!
As I remember you understand the dreaded "Episcopal-Episcopalian" distinction - I don't. Also, I've gotten used to you copyediting my dyks. I don't think I'll send this to dyk (takes a bit more time and effort), but could you take a look at Samuel S. Fleisher Art Memorial.
Any help appreciated,
Smallbones (talk) 19:18, 15 May 2012 (UTC)
- I am touched and flattered that you would ask me for advice. Nice article—I'll have a closer look in a bit. "Episcopal" means "having to do with bishops" and thus can be applied to any denomination that has bishops. For example, there's an episcopal residence associated with most Catholic cathedrals. "Episcopalian" refers to the Protestant Episcopal Church, the United States' principal involvement with the Anglican Communion (the idea is that they don't have any clergy higher in rank than bishops, therefore the sect is "episcopal" in nature). Plenty of people say "Episcopal" anyway (I guess it's more inclusive and less stuffy-sounding); see, for example, the Episcopal Academy, the more-or-less official school of the Episcopalian Diocese of Pennsylvania.--Piledhigheranddeeper (talk) 20:45, 15 May 2012 (UTC)
Nguyen v. INS — where is he now?
editHi. I agree that it would be nice to know where Tuan Anh Nguyen is now. In 2008, if I remember correctly, the US and Vietnam reached an agreement which was supposed to facilitate the deportation of Vietnamese with criminal records from the US to Vietnam. However, despite a lot of searching using Google, ProQuest, and LexisNexis, I haven't been able to find any reliable source specifically saying that Tuan Anh Nguyen was ever deported per this or any other scenario. Without an explicit statement in a reliable source, there is only speculation, which isn't good enough here. If you can find something in a reliable source, by all means feel free to add it. Keep in mind that "Tuan Anh Nguyen" (or "Nguyen Tuan Anh") appears to be a fairly common (or, at least, not extremely rare) Vietnamese name; I found some items about people with this name which, upon closer examination, must obviously have been referring to other people and not the subject of Nguyen v. INS. — Richwales 21:22, 1 June 2012 (UTC)
Pizza hospital (Melville Island)
editMissed one - sorry! And well spotted. Awien (talk) 19:43, 3 August 2012 (UTC)
- You should have seen how long I tried to figure out what a "pizza hospital" was before it dawned on me that it might be a prank. Duh... --Piledhigheranddeeper (talk) 21:02, 5 August 2012 (UTC)
Ruth Norman
editHi Piledhigheranddeeper, I know you often copyedit articles that are on the main page, so I thought I'd ask if you'd be interested in going over Ruth Norman (on DYK today). I'd love if you could look at the grammar in prose, if you're interested and have time. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 18:59, 21 August 2012 (UTC)
- I'm (almost) always interested in good grammar! I must say that I was impressed at the overall quality of this article. So many of the DYK listings are short to the point of incompleteness, poorly written, less-than-fully cited, and/or generally haphazard that this was a welcome change. I made a number of edits, but they are, by and large, pretty low on the significance scale. I do have an issue with the heavy reliance on one source (Tumminia), and noted that in the GA review. Keep up the good work!--Piledhigheranddeeper (talk) 20:58, 21 August 2012 (UTC)
- Thanks for the help with the article, I really appreciate it. Glad to hear that you liked it, in large part the article's polished state is because of the attention it received from the GA reviewer and a couple people who I asked for copyediting help. I'll probably nominate it for featured article eventually, so I knew I'd have to get editing help before then. In regards to the sourcing, yes, I have been concerned about that too. It's hard not to depend on her since she has published so much about Unarius, but I'll see what I can manage. Thanks again, Mark Arsten (talk) 21:23, 21 August 2012 (UTC)
- Here's a possible source of material: http://articles.latimes.com/keyword/unarius-academy-of-science; I seemed to remember reading about this group while in L.A., and it looks like I was right. --Piledhigheranddeeper (talk) 15:19, 22 August 2012 (UTC)
- Thanks for the help with the article, I really appreciate it. Glad to hear that you liked it, in large part the article's polished state is because of the attention it received from the GA reviewer and a couple people who I asked for copyediting help. I'll probably nominate it for featured article eventually, so I knew I'd have to get editing help before then. In regards to the sourcing, yes, I have been concerned about that too. It's hard not to depend on her since she has published so much about Unarius, but I'll see what I can manage. Thanks again, Mark Arsten (talk) 21:23, 21 August 2012 (UTC)
Thanks
editHi Phd, and thanks for the edits on Antinomian Controversy and Samuel Cole (settler). Friendly, helpful edits are so greatly appreciated! I've been dismayed over recent turf battles, and just found your user page to be the right dose of medicine.Sarnold17 (talk) 19:34, 21 August 2012 (UTC)
Your Credo Reference account is approved
editGood news! You are approved for access to 350 high quality reference resources through Credo Reference.
- Fill out the survey with your username and an email address where your sign-up information can be sent.
- If you need assistance, ask User:Ocaasi.
- A quick reminder about using the account: 1) try it out; 2) provide original citation information, in addition to linking to a Credo article; 3) avoid bare links to non-free Credo pages; 4) note "(subscription required)" in the citation, where appropriate. Examples are at WP:Credo accounts/Citations.
- Credo would love to hear feedback at WP:Credo accounts/Experiences
- Show off your Credo access by placing {{User:Ocaasi/Credo_userbox}} on your userpage
- If you decide you no longer can or want to make use of your account, donate it back by adding your name here
Thanks for helping make Wikipedia better. Enjoy your research! Cheers, Ocaasi 17:21, 22 August 2012 (UTC)
Your free 1-year HighBeam Research account is approved!
editGood news! You are approved for access to 80 million articles in 6500 publications through HighBeam Research.
- The 1-year, free period begins when you enter the code you were emailed. If you did not receive a code, email [email protected] your Wikipedia username.
- To activate your account: 1) Go to http://www.highbeam.com/prof1
- If you need assistance, email or ask User:Ocaasi. Please, per HighBeam's request, do not call the toll-free number for assistance with registration.
- A quick reminder about using the account: 1) try it out; 2) provide original citation information, in addition to linking to a HighBeam article; 3) avoid bare links to non-free HighBeam pages; 4) note "(subscription required)" in the citation, where appropriate. Examples are at WP:HighBeam/Citations.
- HighBeam would love to hear feedback at WP:HighBeam/Experiences
- Show off your HighBeam access by placing {{User:Ocaasi/highbeam_userbox}} on your userpage
- When the 1-year period is up, check applications page to see if renewal is possible. We hope it will be.
Thanks for helping make Wikipedia better. Enjoy your research! Cheers, Ocaasi 15:32, 30 August 2012 (UTC)
Thank you
editThanks for your contributions to the quotient filter article. RMcPhillip (talk) 15:12, 1 September 2012 (UTC)
- Happy to help. We do what we can. —Piledhigheranddeeper (talk) 16:03, 2 September 2012 (UTC)
Norman
editThanks for your help on Ruth Norman, it is now a featured article! Mark Arsten (talk) 21:24, 11 September 2012 (UTC)
- And thanks for the edits on Sadler too, quite the pair they would have been. Mark Arsten (talk) 20:31, 12 September 2012 (UTC)
Your Credo account access has been sent to your email!
editAll editors who were approved for a Credo account and filled out the survey giving their username and email address were emailed Credo account access information. Please check your email.
- If you didn't receive an email, or didn't fill out the survey, please email me at [email protected]
- If you tried out Credo and no longer want access, email me at [email protected]
If you have any other questions, feel free to contact me. I hope you enjoy your account! User:Ocaasi 15:37, 13 September 2012 (UTC)
Please keep in mind that in-text questions or comments are almost always useless. Please post your questions in the article talk page, if you want an attention brought to them. Staszek Lem (talk) 21:20, 5 October 2012 (UTC)
Louden Machinery Company
editThank you for your edits on the Louden article today. Whenever one of my articles hit DYK, you're the one person who always seems to read things carefully and fix the typos, grammar issues that I may have missed. That's how DYK should work. We need more people like you. Cheers. Cbl62 (talk) 16:57, 11 October 2012 (UTC)
Air Florida statement
editHi! What is the source for this statement?. While stuff in the lead normally doesn't get cited, that's because it's cited elsewhere in the document and non-controversial. I also need to know because I started Air_Florida_Flight_90#Contribution_to_demise_of_Air_Florida and would like more information for this section WhisperToMe (talk) 19:32, 26 October 2012 (UTC)
- As I recall, it was in the the Washingon Post. This may help a little: http://weblogs.sun-sentinel.com/news/weather/hurricane/blog/2009/01/air_florida_disaster_27_years.html Will look more. --Piledhigheranddeeper (talk) 22:19, 26 October 2012 (UTC)
- Thank you! So we have a journalist who said it did, and another journalist and two experts interviewed by that journalist who said it didn't. Perhaps additional articles will give a full picture WhisperToMe (talk) 22:27, 26 October 2012 (UTC)
- Don't forget the distinction between "caused" and "contributed to". I don't think anybody says the crash caused the demise by itself, but a number see it as helping along the way. --Piledhigheranddeeper (talk) 15:11, 27 October 2012 (UTC)
- Ok. It may also be a matter of whether people believe it had a significant effect. Turk had said "Air Florida would have folded without the crash" which made it sound like he believes the crash had an insignificant effect on things. Anyway I'd like to see the sources where they believe the crash had a significant effect. The quotes may show the nuances between the viewpoints. WhisperToMe (talk) 15:54, 27 October 2012 (UTC)
- Survivors Remember Flight 90: "The Air Florida accident led to the carrier's eventual demise."
- Is there life for airlines after crash?: "Airlines such as ValuJet, Pan Am, Swissair and Air Florida have all been severely effected [sic] by crashes. Although in most cases, there were some underlying problems with the carriers prior to the crash for example operational or financial difficulties.[sic]" If you ignore the spelling and grammar errors, this piece makes a pretty good argument for helping or hastening the end.
- Air Florida crash 25 years later, LTBEWR:"It made the NTSB make sure airlines in the deregulation era maintained high safety standards despite financial pressures. It would ruin Air Florida."
- We can't use AviationGeeks nor can we use the forum posts (see WP:RS). But the ABC News one, we can use. WhisperToMe (talk) 15:07, 30 October 2012 (UTC)
- Ok. It may also be a matter of whether people believe it had a significant effect. Turk had said "Air Florida would have folded without the crash" which made it sound like he believes the crash had an insignificant effect on things. Anyway I'd like to see the sources where they believe the crash had a significant effect. The quotes may show the nuances between the viewpoints. WhisperToMe (talk) 15:54, 27 October 2012 (UTC)
- Don't forget the distinction between "caused" and "contributed to". I don't think anybody says the crash caused the demise by itself, but a number see it as helping along the way. --Piledhigheranddeeper (talk) 15:11, 27 October 2012 (UTC)
- Thank you! So we have a journalist who said it did, and another journalist and two experts interviewed by that journalist who said it didn't. Perhaps additional articles will give a full picture WhisperToMe (talk) 22:27, 26 October 2012 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for November 13
editHi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Red Onion State Prison, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Richmond (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:15, 13 November 2012 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for November 22
editHi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Eid Passport, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Eid (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:14, 22 November 2012 (UTC)
- This one was intended, as "Eid" refers to a number of different holidays and observances in the world of Islam.--Piledhigheranddeeper (talk) 22:58, 26 November 2012 (UTC)
Thanks for your copyediting and notes. I've tried to clarify the parts you had concerns about. Many thanks! Yazan (talk) 17:34, 29 November 2012 (UTC)
Amos Pinchot
editHi. Per your this hidden edit note on the Amos Pinchot article, I've since changed the text. Late night editing, an incorrect source and my brain don't mix well. Pinkadelica♣ 01:54, 8 December 2012 (UTC)
Thought you'd like to know that this article's references follow a specific template/style, with <ref name = "whatever"/> placed inline and the full reference of 'Cite book'/'Cite web'/etc then placed within the References section. Thanks, Shearonink (talk) 21:15, 19 December 2012 (UTC)
- Thx. Nothing like a rushed job on a frenetic day, hunh? --Piledhigheranddeeper (talk) 13:03, 20 December 2012 (UTC)
Merry Christmas
editSmallbones(smalltalk) 01:14, 20 December 2012 (UTC)
- Thanks, oh my most constant observer! Same to you. --Piledhigheranddeeper (talk) 13:04, 20 December 2012 (UTC)