PlanetDeadwing
Welcome PlanetDeadwing!
I'm Jax 0677, one of the other editors here, and I hope you decide to stay and help contribute to this amazing repository of knowledge.
| Some pages of helpful information to get you started: | Some common sense Dos and Don'ts:
|
| If you need further help, you can: | or you can: | or even: |
Alternatively, leave me a message at my talk page or type {{helpme}} here on your talk page, and someone will try to help.
There are many ways you can contribute to Wikipedia. Here are a few ideas:
|
|
Remember to always sign your posts on talk pages. You can do this either by clicking on the 
button on the edit toolbar or by typing four tildes ~~~~ at the end of your post. This will automatically insert your signature, a link to this (your talk) page, and a timestamp.
The best way to learn about something is to experience it. Explore, learn, contribute, and don't forget to have some fun!
{{My sandbox}} on your user page. By the way, seeing as you haven't created a user page yet, simply click here to start it.Sincerely, Jax 0677 (talk) 19:48, 1 July 2017 (UTC) (Leave me a message)
June 2017
edit
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Transformers: The Last Knight has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.
- ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
- For help, take a look at the introduction.
- The following is the log entry regarding this message: Transformers: The Last Knight was changed by PlanetDeadwing (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.894987 on 2017-06-21T17:43:03+00:00 .
Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 17:43, 21 June 2017 (UTC)
The article Little Rock nightclub shooting has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jax 0677 (talk) 19:48, 1 July 2017 (UTC)
October 2017
edit
Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.
When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:
Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)
I noticed your recent edit to 2017 Las Vegas Strip shooting does not have an edit summary. Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.
Edit summary content is visible in:
Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. You can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → 
Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary.
Edits such as this for example. The highest deaths figure I have found is 59 (plus perp.) You need to expalain changes like this. 220 of Borg 00:57, 4 October 2017 (UTC)
Hello, I'm Doniago. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Snakes on a Plane seemed less than neutral and has been removed. If you think this was a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. DonIago (talk) 20:15, 23 October 2017 (UTC)
Eglwyswrw
editSorry to undo your edit on Eglwyswrw - it did not seem right to me (as a local). If you have a published source for your edit, perhaps it might be re-included. The IPA pronunciations seems OK. Cheers, Tony Holkham (Talk) 12:35, 29 October 2017 (UTC)
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Tenable, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Home Lander (talk) 20:40, 30 October 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
edit
Hello, PlanetDeadwing. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
January 2018
edit
Please do not add commentary, your own point of view, or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to King Arthur: Legend of the Sword. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. SummerPhDv2.0 19:39, 5 January 2018 (UTC)
Notice
edit
Please carefully read this information:
The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding all edits about, and all pages related to post-1932 politics of the United States and closely related people, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.
Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you that sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.Please self-revert
editPlease self-revert what you just did at the Donald Trump racial views article and talk page. There is live discussion on the talk page, there's an AfD discussion on possibly deleting the article, and what you just chose to do unilaterally is neither helpful nor was it discussed. In short, it was completely disruptive. You'd be well advised to move on this immediately. -- ψλ ● ✉ ✓ 02:52, 19 January 2018 (UTC)
January 2018
edit Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, articles should not be moved, as you did to Racial views of Donald Trump, without good reason. They need to have a name that is both accurate and intuitive. Wikipedia has some guidelines in place to help with this. Generally, a page should only be moved to a new title if the current name doesn't follow these guidelines. Also, if a page move is being discussed, consensus needs to be reached before anybody moves the page. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. - MrX 🖋 03:03, 19 January 2018 (UTC)
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, as you did at HMHS Britannic, you may be blocked from editing. I wanted to assume good faith on this, but it's difficult to do so when I see you've been warned about this before. DonIago (talk) 17:29, 29 January 2018 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for February 8
editHi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Say Uncle, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Americanism (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:18, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
March 2018
edit Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, including your edits to Arguments for and against drug prohibition, but we cannot accept original research. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. ☆ Bri (talk) 23:38, 20 March 2018 (UTC)
Dan Schneider
editEdits such as this are unacceptable on wikipedia. You need very solid sources for any material of this sort (i.e. not TMZ, National Enquirer), otherwise wikipedia is open to legal action. Please read WP:BLP. MaxBrowne (talk) 03:35, 28 March 2018 (UTC)
June 2018
edit Please refrain from changing genres, as you did to Many Too Many, without providing a source or establishing a consensus on the article's talk page first. Genre changes to suit your own point of view are considered disruptive. Thank you. - FlightTime (open channel) 23:10, 22 June 2018 (UTC)
Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did on IQ (band). This violates Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia.
Unsourced, unexplained date change - FlightTime (open channel) 23:12, 22 June 2018 (UTC)
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you change genres in pages without discussion or sources, as you did at We Can't Dance. - FlightTime (open channel) 23:13, 22 June 2018 (UTC)
July 2018
edit Hello, I'm IJBall. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Portal:Current events/2018 July 16 seemed less than neutral and has been removed. If you think this was a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. --IJBall (contribs • talk) 18:59, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
edit Hello, PlanetDeadwing. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
November 2018
edit Please do not add commentary, your own point of view, or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Euroscepticism. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. --John Maynard Friedman (talk) 16:06, 25 November 2018 (UTC)
December 2018
editPlease do not change numbers as you did at 2018 United States House of Representatives elections that are either unsourced or contradicted by the included sources. 2605:A000:FFC0:D8:3059:8016:5847:3E43 (talk) 02:59, 3 December 2018 (UTC)
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by inserting unpublished information or your personal analysis into an article, as you did at Rick Astley.
This is an Encyclopedia, we don't want your opinions - FlightTime (open channel) 02:19, 25 December 2018 (UTC)
May 2019
edit You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by inserting commentary or your personal analysis into an article, as you did at Johnny Depp. Theroadislong (talk) 10:39, 21 May 2019 (UTC)
Good talker but, as for your reading ...
editHi PlanetDeadwing. We might agree on some important topics yet I feel I must, sadly, take issue with you on a particular aspect - that of your non-following of Wikipedia guidelines. Please correct me if I am wrong.
There is evidence of your talking. This contrasts - perhaps completely? - with your reading of this page - your own Talk page - you've never replied to any post made here, to date.
The particular WP guideline I'm referring to is as in Help:Edit summary#Always provide an edit summary. I note that numerous other editors have tried to bring this to your attention, seemingly in vain(?).
I do hope you read this and, of course - as others would doubtless echo - I would genuinely appreciate it if you could grace us with your own thoughts on this matter. Thank you. Trafford09 (talk) 20:29, 4 August 2019 (UTC)
- I'm sorry, I didn't know I was supposed to reply to messages left on my Talk Page.
- PlanetDeadwing (talk) 9:58 pm, Today (UTC+1)
Thanks for the reply, PD. Hope you don't mind, but I've copied it to here, to keep the thread together. You've proved me wrong, then - you do read your talk page :) So then, would you try to include more Edit Summaries to help your fellow-editors, &/or do you have any thoughts, e.g. on WP or ESs? Regards, Trafford09 (talk) 21:25, 4 August 2019 (UTC)
- OK, I shall include more edit summaries in the future. PlanetDeadwing (talk) 23:33, 4 August 2019 (UTC)
Thx PD. We can look forward to your ESs. Trafford09 (talk) 23:48, 4 August 2019 (UTC)
November 2019
edit Hello, I'm Aranya. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Blue, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. – Aranya (talk) 20:42, 17 November 2019 (UTC)
ArbCom 2019 election voter message
edit| | Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
August 2020
edit Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to Rey (Star Wars), it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. Thank you. SolarFlashTalk Page 17:46, 23 August 2020 (UTC)
Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to Star Wars fandom. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. SolarFlashTalk Page 18:19, 23 August 2020 (UTC)
November 2020
edit Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to 2020 United States presidential election in Ohio. Your edits could be interpreted as vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use your sandbox. Thank you. ― Tartan357 Talk 00:51, 7 November 2020 (UTC)
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at New York City, you may be blocked from editing. Alternate spelling only Chompy Ace 06:36, 19 November 2020 (UTC)
ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message
edit| | Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
December 2020
edit You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Adrien Zenz. Horse Eye's Back (talk) 17:20, 22 December 2020 (UTC)
DYK for Bernie Sanders mittens meme
edit
On 12 February 2021, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Bernie Sanders mittens meme, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the Bernie Sanders mittens meme has raised nearly $2 million for Vermont charities? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Bernie Sanders mittens meme. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Bernie Sanders mittens meme), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (ie, 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:04, 12 February 2021 (UTC)
|
|
Hook update | |
| Your hook reached 6,467 views (538.9 per hour), making it one of the most viewed hooks of February 2021 – nice work! |
theleekycauldron (talk • contribs) (she/they) 01:04, 12 May 2022 (UTC)
Congratulations
editYour DYK hook about the Bernie Sanders mittens meme drew 6,011 page views (501 per hour) while on the Main Page. It is the one of most viewed hooks so far during the month of February and has earned a place on the Best of February list. Keep up the great work! Cbl62 (talk) 10:07, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for February 16
editHi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Parasite (2019 film), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Native Americans. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:41, 16 February 2021 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for April 11
editAn automated process has detected that when you recently edited Monsters, Inc., you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page David Silverman.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:56, 11 April 2021 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for June 27
editAn automated process has detected that when you recently edited Monster, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Spirit.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:59, 27 June 2021 (UTC)
August 2021
editJust to let you know that I reluctantly reverted your edit to the article SARS-CoV-2 Delta variant as the claim that it's the "most dangerous" strain globally was not supported by the existing source (Ref. 25, WHO report)[1]. However, after doing a Google search, it seems the claim can be supported by reliable sources, for example, the Economist [2] and there's a Channel 4 [3] one too. So if you want to undo my revert or make the edit afresh, feel free to do so provided you add a quality source and you can put the reference in right after reference 25. SpookiePuppy (talk) 18:23, 7 August 2021 (UTC)
ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message
edit| | Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
edit Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:33, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
edit Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:50, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
January 2024
edit Hello, I'm MichaelMaggs. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Little Miss Muffet, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. MichaelMaggs (talk) 17:57, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
July 2024
edit Hello, I'm CanonNi. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to 2024 United Kingdom general election seemed less than neutral and has been removed. If you think this was a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. '''[[User:CanonNi]]''' (talk • contribs) 06:57, 5 July 2024 (UTC)
July 2024 - 2
edit Hello! I'm The Kip. Your recent edit(s) to the page Portal:Current events/2024 July 18 appear to have added incorrect information, so they have been reverted for now. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite a reliable source or discuss your change on the article's talk page. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. The Telegraph article is full of vague wording that "sources say" Obama's told "allies" that Biden needs to "seriously consider" dropping out - it never says that he's officially called on him to do so. The Kip (contribs) 18:41, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
Please discuss page moves
editDo not unilaterally move pages that are as high traffic as 2024 CrowdStrike incident. - Fuzheado | Talk 11:51, 19 July 2024 (UTC)
August 2024
edit Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. ภץאคгöร 18:35, 8 August 2024 (UTC)
October 2024
edit Please stop. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Hell, you may be blocked from editing. Belbury (talk) 10:20, 14 October 2024 (UTC)
November 2024
edit You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at 2013. Departure– (talk) 21:37, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia by deliberately introducing incorrect information. Mike Allen 10:21, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
- Oh great, a page full of warnings that go back years. How are you not blocked. Mike Allen 10:22, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. PhilKnight (talk) 12:08, 12 November 2024 (UTC)