Pogba12345678910

nine percent

Greetings. As a editor who has a fair experience in editing celebrity related articles, I am here to tell you that your sources are poor as they are categorised as unreliable. There are many publications that you may consider, Global Times, Phoenix TV, NetEase, Tencent, CCTV, Sina Corp, Xinhua News Agency and etc. Using iQiyi would be primary sourcing while the others like world of buzz would not be good sources either as it is a tabloid press. Please take my advice in good faith as I am just trying to help out. Nevertheless, cheers and happy editing. EROS ^message 12:27, 10 April 2018 (UTC)

Invitation to join Women in Red

		Thank you for creating several articles on women and their works over the past few weeks. We have become aware of your contributions thanks to research undertaken by Bobo.03 at the University of Minnesota. We think you might be interested in becoming a member of our WikiProject Women in Red where we are actively trying to reduce Wikipedia's content gender gap. You can join by using the box at the top of the WiR page. But if you would like to receive news of our activities without becoming a member, you can simply add your name to our mailing list. In any case, thank you for actively contributing to the coverage of women (currently, 17.63% of English Wikipedia's biographies). Our priorities for May: Women of the Sea Villains Women in Sport Central Eastern European women #1day1woman Global Initiative
		(To subscribe: Women in Red/English language mailing list and Women in Red/international list. Unsubscribe: Women in Red/Opt-out list)

--Ipigott (talk) 08:52, 23 May 2018 (UTC)

June 2018

Hello, I'm Jake Brockman. I noticed that you made an edit concerning content related to a living (or recently deceased) person on Wei Daxun, but you didn't support your changes with a citation to a reliable source, so I removed it. Wikipedia has a very strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate and clear. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Note that user curated pages such as the one you added are not reliable sources and are not suitable to establish notability or support statements. I have removed unreferenced statements. You may re-add them once you have identified reliable sources. _pseudonym Jake Brockman ^talk 16:46, 12 June 2018 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Nine Percent

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Nine Percent requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band or musician that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. scope_creep (talk) 12:36, 6 July 2018 (UTC)

July 2018

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Bbb23 (talk) 13:47, 6 July 2018 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of GBB (band)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on GBB (band) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band or musician that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. — Frayæ (Talk/Spjall) 17:54, 6 July 2018 (UTC)

July 2018

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Pogba12345678910 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

The reason why my account "Pogba12345678910" should be unblocked, as firstly, I am not a sock puppet. The reason why another account have the same IP address, is clearly because two registered editors use the same computer or network connection. However, it is my fault for not declaring it which therefore, caused a misunderstanding. Hence, as it both have the same IP address, there is a misunderstanding of me being a sock puppet. Thank You and I hope my account and IP address can be unblocked as i am passionate and has always enjoy making and editting constructive articles.

Decline reason:

Same IP, same computer, same articles. It's irrelevant whether there's a single person (which is almost certain) or two people (which is treated as though it were a single person, in this case). The block is valid. Yamla (talk) 11:08, 9 July 2018 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

Pogba12345678910 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

UTRS appeal #22012 was submitted on Jul 09, 2018 08:27:14. This review is now closed.

--UTRSBot (talk) 08:27, 9 July 2018 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Pogba12345678910 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

How do you know if it is a single person doing it? It makes no sense and I should have declared it.

Decline reason:

 Confirmed abuse of multiple accounts or, at minimum, two people sharing the same device while editing the same topics. ​—DoRD (talk)​ 16:37, 9 July 2018 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

You misunderstand. It's irrelevant. In such cases, we treat it as a single person and therefore a clear violation of WP:SOCK. --Yamla (talk) 13:46, 9 July 2018 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Denise Camillia Tan

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Denise Camillia Tan requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Waddie96 (talk) 14:17, 14 July 2018 (UTC)

Nomination of Zhu Zhengting for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Zhu Zhengting is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zhu Zhengting until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Capitals00 (talk) 18:22, 6 August 2018 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Template:Eric Chou discography

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that the page you created, Template:Eric Chou discography, was tagged as a test page under section G2 of the criteria for speedy deletion and has been or soon may be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. TheImaCow (talk) 13:37, 21 June 2020 (UTC)