Political junky

Welcome!

Hello, Political junky, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Help pages
• Tutorial
• How to write a great article
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!  Ground Zero | t 11:29, 9 September 2006 (UTC)

PJ,

Here are a few points to help you write better articles:

1. Remember that we are writign an international encyclopedia here. The introduction of an articel should provide enough context so that any reader can figure out early on what the article was about. Consider the statement:

"Mark Andrew MacGillivray was a candidate in both the 2004 and 2006 elections. In the 2006 election hes known for having the second most successful finish, next to Shane Jolley."

Many jurisdictions had elections in 2004 and 2006. What country was he running in? For what office?

1. There is no need to link an article to itself Putting the links to "Mark Andrew MacGillivray" in the Mark Andrew MacGillivray should be avoided.
2. In article sub-headings, only the first word is capitalized. Other words are capitalized only if the are proper nouns, e.g., a person's name, a place name, etc.

I hope these comments help. Keep up the good work. Ground Zero | t 12:47, 11 September 2006 (UTC)

{{helpme}} Hello what do you need help with??..----Cometstyles 14:18, 11 May 2007 (UTC)

What do you need help with?

Please state your problem. DebateKid 14:19, 11 May 2007 (UTC)

How do you embed an image, i have it in my pictures but can't get it on wiki. Political junky 14:22, 11 May 2007 (UTC)

well its simple relating to the size of the image..all you do is add (File:name of the image.jpg) this to the article by replacing the "name of the image.jpg" with the images name and adding it to a section of the article----Cometstyles 15:23, 11 May 2007 (UTC)

you mean the name I gave the image when I saved it to my pictures or something else? Political junky 23:15, 11 May 2007 (UTC)

Matthew Casselman

The article Matthew Casselman has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done because the article seemed to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it did not indicate how or why the subject is notable, that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert notability may be deleted at any time. If you can indicate why the subject is really notable, you are free to re-create the article, making sure to cite any verifiable sources.

Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and for specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. NawlinWiki 00:58, 12 May 2007 (UTC)

40th Canadian federal election

I've removed all party leader images from this article. It's crystal-balling (a Wikipedia no no) to presume these people will lead there parties into the 40th election. GoodDay 17:37, 12 May 2007 (UTC)

ok, thats alright Political junky 19:52, 12 May 2007 (UTC)

Image tagging for Image:SharonLabchuk.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:SharonLabchuk.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 20:11, 12 May 2007 (UTC)

okee dokee, i think i indicated the source... ha, I'm fairly e-literate... Political junky 20:56, 12 May 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Election-logo-English-Mar-19-07.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Election-logo-English-Mar-19-07.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 18:36, 14 May 2007 (UTC)

Non-free use disputed for Image:Gppeilogo.png

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Gppeilogo.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 16:00, 4 June 2007 (UTC)

Erich Jacoby-Hawkins

This article should immediately be merged into Green Party candidates, 2007 Ontario provincial election. Jacoby-Hawkins has not won an election yet and is not otherwise notable by Wikipedia standards. Per previous convention, this information should be merged into the party's article for the '07 Ontario election. See Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Elaine Kennedy to see how a similar situation played out. Realkyhick 16:27, 7 September 2007 (UTC)

Please do not revert these messages. I meant what I wrote. Realkyhick 05:47, 16 September 2007 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Erich Jacoby-Hawkins

Erich Jacoby-Hawkins, an article you created, has been nominated for deletion. We appreciate your contributions. However, an editor does not feel that Erich Jacoby-Hawkins satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in the nomination space (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and the Wikipedia deletion policy). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Erich Jacoby-Hawkins (2nd nomination) and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Erich Jacoby-Hawkins during the discussion but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Realkyhick 07:33, 16 September 2007 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Shane Jolley

Shane Jolley, an article you created, has been nominated for deletion. We appreciate your contributions. However, an editor does not feel that Shane Jolley satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in the nomination space (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and the Wikipedia deletion policy). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shane Jolley and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Shane Jolley during the discussion but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Realkyhick 20:32, 16 September 2007 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Shane Jolley

Shane Jolley, an article you created, has been nominated for deletion. We appreciate your contributions. However, an editor does not feel that Shane Jolley satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in the nomination space (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and the Wikipedia deletion policy). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shane Jolley and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Shane Jolley during the discussion but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Realkyhick 20:35, 16 September 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:PictureRF 006.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:PictureRF 006.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI 03:11, 15 November 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:PictureWC07 085.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:PictureWC07 085.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI 03:20, 15 November 2007 (UTC)

Green Party of Canada

I'll reply on the talk page. :) J 01:18, 16 November 2007 (UTC)

You really need to read WP:OWN. J 01:45, 16 November 2007 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. J 01:45, 16 November 2007 (UTC)

Green Party of Ontario

You are in danger of violating the three-revert rule on Green Party of Ontario. Please cease further reverts or you may be blocked from editing. J (talk) 03:57, 20 November 2007 (UTC)

Sure I did, it's on the article's talk page. J (talk) 04:01, 20 November 2007 (UTC)

Please assume good faith when dealing with other editors. See Wikipedia:Assume good faith for the guidelines on this. J (talk) 04:18, 20 November 2007 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. J (talk) 04:18, 20 November 2007 (UTC)

Three revert rule violation block

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for violating the three-revert rule at Green Party of Ontario. Please be more careful to discuss controversial changes or seek dispute resolution rather than engaging in an edit war. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below.

Sam Blacketer (talk) 15:04, 20 November 2007 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Political junky (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Greenjoe, was deleting my edits without valid reason. Saying things like no sources as a reason to delete edits that have taken me HOURS when I did include sources. I find it increasingly frusturating that this user is standing in the way of progress.

Decline reason:

This does not excuse edit warring. — Yamla (talk) 21:22, 20 November 2007 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Green Party of Ontario

a) Yes, but all three references aren't necessarily good. b) You can't simply link to the Elections Ontario website. You have to link to the specific part that has the info, otherwise it does not count. c) The AGM is the here and now. The article is about the broader sense of the party. Thus irrelevant. d) See above. J (talk) 05:39, 23 November 2007 (UTC)

To make it easy, I put fact tags on the items that require references, and I removed the AGM part. J (talk) 05:52, 23 November 2007 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. J (talk) 05:54, 23 November 2007 (UTC)

The policy part has had a tag since FEBRUARY. Time for it to go. J (talk) 05:57, 23 November 2007 (UTC)

You are in danger of violating the three-revert rule. Please cease further reverts or you may be blocked from editing. J (talk) 05:57, 23 November 2007 (UTC)

So try to discuss the edits before you make them, and give time for response instead of reverting immediately. J (talk) 05:58, 23 November 2007 (UTC)

Once again, you've been blocked for edit warring on this article. As a side note, if you are indeed restoring uncited material to the article, you should note that it's your responsibility to add citations, and that such uncited material may be removed at any time. You are not being blocked for the content, though, but for your excessive reverting. Heimstern Läufer (talk) 06:34, 23 November 2007 (UTC)

I am sorry that you are upset. I'm not trying to make you upset, I simply want the article to have sources. Other articles not having them isn't an excuse. See WP:WAX. It has to be done. I'm willing to help, that's what the fact tags are for. J (talk) 04:08, 27 November 2007 (UTC)

You may also wish to consider checking out WP:COOL. It's got a few tips for avoiding an upset state. :) J (talk) 04:11, 27 November 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:GreenPartyofCanadalogo.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:GreenPartyofCanadalogo.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot (talk) 20:21, 15 December 2007 (UTC)

Image source problem with Image:AlbertaGreenslogo.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading Image:AlbertaGreenslogo.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 18:37, 20 January 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. GreenJoe (talk) 18:37, 20 January 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:AlbertaGreenslogo.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:AlbertaGreenslogo.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 10:03, 22 January 2008 (UTC)

Green Party of Prince Edward Island

While I appreciate what you are trying to do here, you still fail to cite sources. It looks good so far, but you do have to back it up. GreenJoe 19:09, 9 March 2008 (UTC)

Help?

I could use some help at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Joan Russow. GreenJoe 21:55, 12 March 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image (File:AlbertaGreenslogo.jpg)

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:AlbertaGreenslogo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. ZooFari 00:42, 9 November 2009 (UTC)

Ontario general election, 2007

Could you please explain at Talk:Ontario general election, 2007 why you think that the infobox should be used for more than the parties that won. Thanks, 117Avenue (talk) 01:45, 2 September 2011 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:18, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Political junky. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:08, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:30, 24 November 2020 (UTC)