Pontmarcheur
April 2012
edit
Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, but when you add or change content, as you did to the article Milk (film) , please cite a reliable source for your addition. This helps maintain our policy of verifiability. See Wikipedia:Citing sources for how to cite sources, and the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. -- Doniago (talk) 14:17, 27 April 2012 (UTC)
Please do not edit war on Human penis size
editPontmarcheur, the RfC drew more editors into the discussion, which was a good thing. The closure explicitly notes that there is no consensus to include (or not include) the image. Any previous consensus is no longer relevant. Lacking consensus to include the image, it should not be included. You are welcome to start a new RfC as suggested by the admin who closed the last one, but please stop edit warring. Thanks. Delicious carbuncle (talk) 13:15, 10 October 2012 (UTC)
Thank You!
editThank you Pontmarcheur, for all your support. Spent many hours to draw the image, I think this whole story is big fun, totally worth the effort. Include or not? Who cares. Just enjoy. Thanks again. :) Moscowsky-talk- 14:12, 10 October 2012 (UTC)
- Moscowsky, you appear to be admitting that your motivation in the discussion regarding the inclusion of the image at Human penis size is not the improvement of the article, but trolling.
Zad6814:53, 10 October 2012 (UTC)
- See? A good-willing thanks message can get challenges like this. Offering help to Wikipedia is big fun for me, whether the help is well received or ignored, it doesn't matter. Negative conjecture comes from negative minds; next time I would hope there can be more respect and considerations of other people's own creative work and less paranoid arguments about nothing else but only reverting edits. Moscowsky-talk- 15:10, 10 October 2012 (UTC)
- I have never edited the article regarding the image, and I have not participated in any Talk page discussion about it. But when you state that "this whole story is big fun" and don't really care about whether the image is included, that sounds like what you find enjoyable is the reactions of the participants in the discussion, which is trolling. I'd rather not spend my time and energy dealing with those engaging in trolling. If you're not trolling, my apologies, but time will tell.
Zad6815:42, 10 October 2012 (UTC)
- I have never edited the article regarding the image, and I have not participated in any Talk page discussion about it. But when you state that "this whole story is big fun" and don't really care about whether the image is included, that sounds like what you find enjoyable is the reactions of the participants in the discussion, which is trolling. I'd rather not spend my time and energy dealing with those engaging in trolling. If you're not trolling, my apologies, but time will tell.
- Apologies accepted. Time may tell something; but it never did, nor it will, add any points to narrow-minded conjectures on a good willing thank you letter. Moscowsky-talk- 00:02, 11 October 2012 (UTC)