Porcelain808

Welcome!

Hello, Porcelain808, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! --Admrboltz (T | C) 17:16, 16 January 2006 (UTC)Reply

Image:YERCoverFall2005.jpg listed for deletion

Latest comment: 18 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

An image or media file that you uploaded, Image:YERCoverFall2005.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you.

Admrboltz (T | C) 17:16, 16 January 2006 (UTC)Reply

Image:YERCover.jpg listed for deletion

Latest comment: 18 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

An image or media file that you uploaded, Image:YERCover.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you.

Admrboltz (T | C) 17:27, 16 January 2006 (UTC)Reply

YER discussion page

See the discussion page for Yale_Economic_Review. Andrew Kliman Akliman (talk · contribs), an alleged advocate of pluralism_in_economics, wants your article to be tagged as an advertisement.

Watchdog07 Watchdog07 (talk · contribs)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Fall 2006 Cover.jpg

Latest comment: 17 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Thanks for uploading Image:Fall 2006 Cover.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 07:08, 27 October 2007 (UTC)Reply

Fair use image

Latest comment: 17 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Ok, as I understand it (and correct me if I'm wrong), what was uploaded was a low-res magazine cover for illustrative purposes on the article about the magazine? That should be fine (sometimes our fair use policing gets a bit overexcited).

Just upload the image again and template it as

This image is of a magazine cover, and the copyright for it is most likely held by either the publisher of the magazine or the individual contributors who worked on the cover depicted. It is believed that the use of low-resolution images of magazine covers

to illustrate the publication of the issue of the magazine in question
with the publication name either visible on the image itself or written in the image description above,

on the English-language Wikipedia, hosted on servers in the United States by the non-profit Wikimedia Foundation, qualifies as fair use under United States copyright law. Any other uses of this image, on Wikipedia or elsewhere, may be copyright infringement. See Wikipedia:Non-free content for more information.

To the uploader:

Please add a detailed non-free use rationale for each article the image is used in, which must also declare compliance with the other parts of the non-free content criteria, as well as the source of the work and copyright information.
For example non-free use rationales, see Wikipedia:Use rationale examples.
This tag should only be used for magazine covers. Do not use it for other purposes.
Consider using Template:Non-free use rationale serial publication to start the rationale

To patrollers and administrators: If this image has an appropriate rationale please append |image has rationale=yes as a parameter to the license template.

Note: If the image depicts a person or persons on the cover, it is not acceptable to use the image in the article of the person or persons depicted on the cover, unless used to directly illustrate a point about the publication of the image. Use of the image merely to depict a person or persons in the image will be removed.

for now, explicitly identifying the source of the image, and the statements that it is used to identify the publication, along with a statement of the article that it is to be used in. Then promptly insert it into the relevant article so it isn't flagged as "orphaned non-free image". That should be enough. The matter of regular updating the cover would be more complicated and I'll need to investigate that. I suspect that would require regular updates of low-res properly GFDLed covers but I'm not sure. I'll get back to you on that. JoshuaZ 13:15, 5 November 2007 (UTC)Reply

Image

JoshuaZ, Thanks for the reply - it's clear. I'll do as you suggest as soon as I have time. Our thanks as well for your earlier NPOV edits. -Rich

Proposed deletion of Yale Economic Review

Latest comment: 5 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

The article Yale Economic Review has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Ephemeral magazine that seems to have disappeared completely (website is dead). No independent sources. Does not meet WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Randykitty (talk) 12:32, 23 January 2019 (UTC)Reply

Add topic