Prabhsahni
Welcome
edit
|
This is Prabhsahni's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments. |
|
Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (April 27)
edit- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Prabhsahni/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to User:Prabhsahni/sandbox, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
- If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
- If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
Hello, Prabhsahni!
Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! KylieTastic (talk) 13:39, 27 April 2019 (UTC)
|
May 2019
editHello, I'm MrOllie. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. MrOllie (talk) 10:48, 14 May 2019 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Kochartech (May 14)
edit- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Kochartech and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Kochartech, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
- If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
- If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
Speedy deletion nomination of User:Prabhsahni/sandbox
editIf this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on User:Prabhsahni/sandbox, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. creffett (talk) 12:47, 14 May 2019 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Kochartech
editIf this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Draft:Kochartech, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. creffett (talk) 12:48, 14 May 2019 (UTC)
May 2019
edit{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
. MER-C 12:54, 18 May 2019 (UTC)Prabhsahni (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
MER-C Hi MER-C, It is been more than 1 week since i am blocked by wikipedia. Please un-block me as i am learning how to submit my wiki pedia page and want to contribute to Wikipedia as well. Give me a platform to share my thoughts and let the people understand any topic which i edit and share valuable information, Thanks, Fingers crossed — O Still Small Voice of Clam 08:36, 8 June 2019 (UTC)
Decline reason:
As others state below, you do not seem to grasp the concept of what Wikipedia is. I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that
- the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
- the block is no longer necessary because you
- understand what you have been blocked for,
- will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
- will make useful contributions instead.
Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. — O Still Small Voice of Clam 08:36, 8 June 2019 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
MER-C please reply on this
I've repaired your unblock request. Note that you do not address the reason you were blocked in your request, which makes it unlikely to be granted. Wikipedia is NOT a vehicle for advertising. --Dirk Beetstra T C 01:28, 8 June 2019 (UTC)
Hi, Dirk Beetstra, Please un-block me as i am learning how to submit my wiki pedia page and want to contribute to Wikipedia as well. Give me a platform to share my thoughts and let the people understand any topic which i edit and share valuable information, Thanks, Fingers crossed ~~~~}} Prabhsahni
- First, please stop pinging random people on your talkpage. Your request is currently awaiting review. Secondly you wrote " Give me a platform to share my thoughts [...]" above. Based on that, I'm not sure whether you understand the purpose of Wikipedia or not. At first, Wikipedia is a project to build an Encyclopedia. Based on that, there are certain things that Wikipedia is not. Due to that, wikipedia is further only interested in what independent, Reliable sources say about a given subject. Jannik Schwaß (talk) 05:00, 8 June 2019 (UTC)