Prashanna01

Welcome!

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. The following links will help you begin editing on Wikipedia:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Editing tutorial
• Picture tutorial
• How to write a great article
• Naming conventions
• Simplified Manual of Style

Please bear these points in mind while editing Wikipedia:

• Respect copyrights – do not copy and paste text or images directly from other websites.
• Maintain a neutral point of view – this is one of Wikipedia's core policies.
• Take particular care while adding biographical material about a living person to any Wikipedia page and follow Wikipedia's Biography of Living Persons policy. Particularly, controversial and negative statements should be referenced with multiple reliable sources.
• No edit warring or abuse of multiple accounts.
• If you are testing, please use the Sandbox to do so.
• Do not add troublesome content to any article, such as: copyrighted text, libel, advertising or promotional messages, and text that is not related to an article's subject; doing so will result in your account or IP being blocked from editing.
• Do not use talk pages as discussion or forum pages as Wikipedia is not a forum.

The Wikipedia tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and discussion pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~ (the software will replace them with your signature and the date). Again, welcome! Kautilya3 (talk) 10:25, 20 November 2019 (UTC)

November 2019

Welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions. I am glad to see that you are discussing a topic. However, as a general rule, talk pages such as Talk:Gautama Buddha are for discussion related to improving the article in specific ways based on reliable sources and the project policies and guidelines, not for general discussion about the topic or unrelated topics, or statements based on your thoughts or feelings. If you have specific questions about certain topics, consider visiting our reference desk and asking them there instead of on article talk pages. Thank you. JimRenge (talk) 11:22, 20 November 2019 (UTC)

Please take your time and read our Wikipedia:Talk page guidelines and please stop copying your deleted talk page (off topic) contributions to my talk page. If you need help editing wikipedia you may consider to ask the expert editors at the WP:TEAHOUSE. Thank you JimRenge (talk) 11:58, 20 November 2019 (UTC)

Talk:Kalapani territory

Hi Prashanna, thank you for removing your post at the Talk:Kalapani territory page. I would have collapsed it in due course. But whatever you write has to address specifically the issues of that page, viz., Kalapani territory. General history of the entire area (especially, Garhwal which is further away to the west) will be considered off-topic. -- Kautilya3 (talk) 11:25, 20 November 2019 (UTC)

Hi Kautilya I removed the post at the Talk: Kalapani territory page. But the reason for removal is misunderstood by you.

Kumaun & Garhwal region is a princely state of India of approx 10,400 Km only with nearly 7-8,000 Population in 1947. Kalapani is a part of this Kingdom. If I don't discuss the history of the kingdom, how it was attacked by a country called Gurkha/Nepal, how it became an area of dispute between Nepal & India... the whole concept of the dispute is gone. It is a historical conflict & the history must be understood before any conclusion is drawn.

Nepal considers it to be its integral part because of confusing historical record. To be an integral part, every country has to give historical insight. Nepal occupied this land only for 12 years. Before their attack & after their attack, this area again became part of its original Garhwal Kingdom (Present-day India). I have also written how Garwal chooses to become part of India. How Nepalese troops enslaved people of Garhwal. This talk will help people of Nepal & India understand the root of conflict & come to a solution. Short-sighted people don't know the root cause, they can't understand the solution.

Kalapani is a part of Garhwal & one cannot ignore its historical roots. I am not discussing the whole country India. I am very specific about the history of that particular area only. Kalapani was occupied only for 12 years by Nepal & it was a dark history for the people living there.

Prashanna01 (talk) 12:15, 20 November 2019 (UTC)

I am not objecting to the fact that you wrote a post. But it needs to be a lot more succinct, as JimRenge has also pointed out to you above, and it needs to address the topic of the page. You might think of Kumaun & Garhwal as one unit based on the present day disposition. But in early 19th century, they were separate kingdoms. We do not precisely what the boundaries of Kumaun were at that time. If you have any knowledge of that, please share that with us. The point that Nepal occupied these territories for 12 years is quite valid and should definitely be made. -- Kautilya3 (talk) 16:35, 20 November 2019 (UTC)

Wikipedia and copyright

Hello Prashanna01, and welcome to Wikipedia. Your additions to Indian National Congress have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues.

• You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
• Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. (There is a college-level introduction to paraphrase, with examples, hosted by the Online Writing Lab of Purdue.) Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
• Our primary policy on using copyrighted content is Wikipedia:Copyrights. You may also want to review Wikipedia:Copy-paste.
• If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into the public domain (PD) or under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. Such a release must be done in a verifiable manner, so that the authority of the person purporting to release the copyright is evidenced. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
• In very rare cases (that is, for sources that are PD or compatibly licensed) it may be possible to include greater portions of a source text. However, please seek help at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions, the help desk or the Teahouse before adding such content to the article. 99.9% of sources may not be added in this way, so it is necessary to seek confirmation first. If you do confirm that a source is public domain or compatibly licensed, you will still need to provide full attribution; see Wikipedia:Plagiarism for the steps you need to follow.
• Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps in Wikipedia:Translation#How to translate. See also Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 12:42, 12 December 2019 (UTC)

December 2019

Hello, I'm Shrikanthv. I noticed that you made a comment that didn't seem very civil, so it has been removed. Wikipedia is built on collaboration, so it's one of our core principles to interact with one another in a polite and respectful manner. If you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Shrikanthv (talk) 14:05, 12 December 2019 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for violating copyright policy by copying text or images into Wikipedia from another source without evidence of permission. Please take this opportunity to ensure that you understand our copyright policy and our policies regarding how to use non-free content.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Yunshui ^雲_水 08:56, 13 December 2019 (UTC)

I should be unblocked

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Prashanna01 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Your reason here Prashanna01 (talk) 09:18, 13 December 2019 (UTC)

Decline reason:

Talk page access revoked for legal threats. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 09:34, 13 December 2019 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I was told: "Your additions to Indian National Congress have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. "

Source: http://www.legalserviceindia.com/copyright/historical-book.htm

(Redacted)

• • • I know you will never allow anyone to write 1 single fact: "Congress was founded by British officer Hume". Instead you will write it in a much complicated sentence/paragraph to limit the meaning. I just want to write this in a simple single line...and people with vested interest won't allow this fact to be written in simple words. I request you to write this yourself in a simple text.

• • • If i am still blocked...since there was actually no violation. I WILL GO TO COURT TO GET MY ACCOUNT UNBLOCKED. Thus the fact will again come as News in every news paper. More you hide more you face truth. DO YOU WANT TO FACE LEGAL ACTION & NEWS HIGHLIGHT???

• • • THANKS THANKS THANKS.

Prashanna01 (talk) 09:15, 13 December 2019 (UTC)

Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive.

(block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. If the block is a CheckUser or Oversight block, was made by the Arbitration Committee or to enforce an arbitration decision (arbitration enforcement), or is unsuitable for public discussion, you should appeal to the Arbitration Committee.
Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.

NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 09:34, 13 December 2019 (UTC)