PvanJaarsveld
|
Hi PvanJaarsveld! I have undone your change to Namibia for now, as it introduced an inconsistency with the article Allgemeine Zeitung. However, the source given in the Namibia article is offline... if you have a better source or if the article's information is wrong, please don't hesitate to contact me.
I have seen that you unlinked other articles. Red links are not a bug on Wikipedia, they are a feature, showing what articles have yet to be written. On the Wikipedia app, however, they do not appear in red but in blue, and they are more annoying than useful. Cheers, Pgallert (talk) 15:28, 10 November 2016 (UTC)
PvanJaarsveld, you are invited to the Teahouse!
editHi PvanJaarsveld! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. We hope to see you there!
Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:05, 10 November 2016 (UTC) |
Blocked as a sockpuppet
editThis account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet of Stoubora (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · logs · block log · arb · rfc · lta · SPI · cuwiki) that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. Vanjagenije (talk) 22:42, 2 August 2017 (UTC) |
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article CHAK89 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/CHAK89 until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Störm (talk) 12:44, 20 February 2018 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of CHAK89
editIf this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on CHAK89, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Störm (talk) 17:11, 20 February 2018 (UTC)