User talk:Questionadora ávida

About last editions...

Look, what you're doing with the article doesn't make sense because it talks about the Swaziland's delegation on that date. What you're adding is untimely. It's as if we were talking about the participation of the delegations from Thailand and Ethiopia without a timeline when they were once called Siam and Abyssinia. What I see is that you're going to want to make a cross-examination of (now country X) in all the articles, and that breaks the timeline. Please don't pull off untimely stunts. You know that's the kind of edits that got you kicked off the Portuguese Wikipedia. Please use common sense and don't insist. Taichi (talk) 22:15, 3 June 2025 (UTC)

The reversion is still unjustified, look at the article about Dahomey at the 1972 Summer Games, the article literally starts with "Dahomey (now Benin). The edits on the Swaziland page were just following the pattern of this article, but of course it's much easier and more convenient for you to judge me by the edits on the Portuguese Wikipedia (which you probably only went to for a cursory analysis, since you never mentioned exactly what kind of edits I made there outside the blocking outlines). And please stop harassing me and leave my edits alone, no one is complaining but you (apart from one wrong edit I made on the page about trans rights in the UK, but other than that no one else complained). Questionadora ávida (talk) 08:19, 4 June 2025 (UTC)

I'm sorry, but you can't call it "harassment" if you did something wrong on another project. There's a saying that "birds can't shoot guns" so I'd appreciate it if you know your place. If you make a controversial edit, it's my duty to point it out to you. I don't intend to be silent or censored by your warnings. That applies to any project. I won't be held responsible if another user points out more errors. That's the last thing I'll warn you about, so you don't get ideas later about reversing the scenarios and favoring you with phantoms of "harassment". Taichi (talk) 16:49, 4 June 2025 (UTC)

Please understand one thing: it doesn't matter what I did on the Portuguese Wikipedia or the Spanish Wikipedia, what matters is what I did here on the English Wikipedia. I appreciate you pointing out my edits, but I will not accept being treated as if I were a mere article vandal. If you and the other users had treated me like a decent human being instead of just punishing me, there would be no problems and I would have fixed my edits without any problems. Pay attention to what I'm about to say: There are ways to point out someone's mistakes without making them feel horrible about themselves. A user on the Spanish Wikipedia did exactly that to me, and I thanked him for treating me more understandingly. Questionadora ávida (talk) 17:12, 4 June 2025 (UTC)

Furthermore, it is extremely hypocritical of you to come and talk to me about "common sense", when the English Wikipedia clearly uses "ESWATINI" and not "Swaziland" (with exceptions such as on the pages about the Olympic Games, since the country competed in them for many years as "Swaziland"). I will make the same argument that you used on the Spanish Wikipedia, do not change Wikipedia to favor your arguments. Questionadora ávida (talk) 16:44, 4 June 2025 (UTC)

Okay, I see these kinds of answers got you kicked off in the other project. Be happy and celebrate here then. Surely someone from here will point you out in the future. Let's see if the "avid questioner" attitude works here and they believe you. I won't bother you anymore here. Taichi (talk) 16:54, 4 June 2025 (UTC)

I have sent you an e-mail

Hello, Questionadora ávida. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.

Hi Questionadora ávida! I have sent you an e-mail with a request I made there. Can you complete it please? Thanks, Pawel PDoro (talk) 14:11, 15 June 2025 (UTC)

Okay Questionadora ávida (talk) 14:48, 15 June 2025 (UTC)

@Questionadora ávida Ok. Thank you so much... PDoro (talk) 14:48, 15 June 2025 (UTC)

@Questionadora ávida You still didn't started and completed the article. Can you make the request now? Thanks PDoro (talk) 15:33, 15 June 2025 (UTC)

The article in Nahuatl is actually already ready. Questionadora ávida (talk) 21:28, 16 June 2025 (UTC)

Ok. Thanks PDoro (talk) 21:33, 16 June 2025 (UTC)

Your Recent Edits

The reason I originally wanted to comment on this is that you simply added an excess citations tag to the article LGBTQ rights in New York, where I have no addressed that issue. I would request in future you first try to rectify the issue (in this case that means boldly removing some sources and explaining why) before simply tagging an issue, although I assume you did this in good faith.

Secondarily, having looked at your edit history, I would like to remind you that any addition of content to an article or any change to an article text that affects its meaning should not be marked as a minor edit.

Hope you continue to edit wikipedia and thank you for your contributions, Emily.Owl ( she/her • talk) 13:20, 24 June 2025 (UTC)

"Fraysexuality (main article)" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Fraysexuality (main article) has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 June 30 § Fraysexuality (main article) until a consensus is reached. GZWDer (talk) 19:21, 30 June 2025 (UTC)

Suppressed edits

Hi, Questionadora ávida, I have unfortunately had to suppress some of your edits because they reveal too much personally identifiable information about you. We have a policy of protecting editors' safety by hiding such information if they share it. I'm really sorry about having to suppress your edits, and I know it's annoying, but it's for the best. Please don't re-add the information. For some useful information on privacy and safety, you can take a look at Wikipedia:Guidance for younger editors and Wikipedia:On privacy, confidentiality and discretion. Thanks, and sorry for messing about with your pages! PhilKnight (talk) 23:48, 1 July 2025 (UTC)

Nomination of Noetisexuality for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Noetisexuality is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Noetisexuality until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

꧁Zanahary꧂ 21:44, 16 July 2025 (UTC)

I'm a little embarrassed about it. I didn't expect the article to be this bad. The Portuguese version had few sources, and I wanted to add to them, but I didn't do a very good job. If I'm not even good enough to translate an article, imagine creating one on my own?... Questionadora ávida (talk) 22:14, 16 July 2025 (UTC)

Don't worry about it. The Portuguese article actually has the same problems—I don't know if Portuguese Wikipedia's reliable sourcing policy is different from the English Wikipedia's, but its sources are all either terrible or don't mention notiesexuality. If you just want the article deleted, you can say so at the deletion discussion and it'll be deleted quickly. ꧁Zanahary꧂ 22:31, 16 July 2025 (UTC)

Well, I just have one more thing to tell you: the Portuguese Wikipedia is completely crazy. Nothing about it makes sense. Sometimes administrators change article titles without the consent of other editors, and nothing happens. They say they only accept common names (in the case of articles about countries/territories), but there are articles there with extremely unusual names that few people use. I think I should analyze the articles there several times before starting a translation. Questionadora ávida (talk) 22:51, 16 July 2025 (UTC)

You can also try writing a new article here on your own! Check out WP:YFA for basic guidance ꧁Zanahary꧂ 23:04, 16 July 2025 (UTC)

July 2025

Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, please note that there is a Manual of Style that should be followed to maintain a consistent, encyclopedic appearance. Deviating from this style, as you did in LGBTQ rights in Rio de Janeiro (state), disturbs uniformity among articles and may cause readability or accessibility problems. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Jalen Barks (Woof) 23:29, 22 July 2025 (UTC)

I didn't do anything wrong, most other articles about LGBTQ rights follow the same editing pattern as I did, such as LGBTQ Rights in Hawaii, LGBTQ Rights in Portugal, LGBTQ Rights in the United Kingdom, LGBTQ rights in Brazil, LGBTQ rights in the Republic of Ireland, LGBTQ rights in Northern Ireland, etc. In reality, the real deviation was how the article was before and how you insisted on leaving it. Questionadora ávida (talk) 00:24, 23 July 2025 (UTC)

For this specific edit, please refer WP:OLINK. We cannot have links to commonly known subjects. Jalen Barks (Woof) 01:29, 23 July 2025 (UTC)

Okay, but then all the pages I cited and others should be changed, not just a specific, random page where I edited. Questionadora ávida (talk) 08:11, 23 July 2025 (UTC)

Furthermore, there was no need to remove "queer" from the text, since the article's title is "LGBTQ rights in Rio de Janeiro (state)". Questionadora ávida (talk) 08:12, 23 July 2025 (UTC)

Nomination of Apothisexuality for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Apothisexuality is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Apothisexuality until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Astaire (talk) 22:05, 24 July 2025 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 11

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited LGBTQ rights in Rondônia, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Pedro I. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 19:57, 11 October 2025 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Lauri Miranda Silva

The article Lauri Miranda Silva has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

WP:N

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. 0xReflektor (talk) 09:49, 14 October 2025 (UTC)

Nomination of Lauri Miranda Silva for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Lauri Miranda Silva is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lauri Miranda Silva until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

0xReflektor (talk) 09:56, 14 October 2025 (UTC)

ArbCom 2025 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2025 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 1 December 2025. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2025 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:52, 18 November 2025 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 9

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited LGBTQ rights in Pará, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page G1.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:55, 9 December 2025 (UTC)

A rainbow for you!

	Colorful world
	Thanks for bringing more information for all pages on LGBTQ rights in Brazil by state, and updating through fulfilling the gaps. Abesca (talk) 21:54, 13 December 2025 (UTC)

Thank you so much for the compliment (⁠◍⁠•⁠ᴗ⁠•⁠◍⁠)! I plan to create more pages about other states in the future. I would also like to thank you for the excellent work you did on the Brazil section of the Legal recognition of non-binary gender page; that table was very well organized and informative. Questionadora ávida (talk) 23:38, 13 December 2025 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi Questionadora ávida. Thank you for your work on Baptista Miranda. Another editor, Mariamnei, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Thank you for your work on this article. Please establish notability as per WP:BIO. Thanks and have a great day!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Mariamnei}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Mariamnei (talk) 12:47, 6 January 2026 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi Questionadora ávida. Thank you for your work on Politics of Amapá. Another editor, Lynch44, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Thank you for creating the article!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Lynch44}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Lynch44 01:49, 12 January 2026 (UTC)

Nomination of Lá Ele for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Lá Ele is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lá Ele until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Broc (talk) 19:13, 4 February 2026 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi Questionadora ávida. Thank you for your work on Religious symbols in classrooms. Another editor, Klbrain, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Thank you for helpfing building this article, initially from a translation from Portuguese. A very small quibble: thank you for mentioning the translation in your first edit summary, but it would have been helpful to have had the language version specifically named. I wonder whether the article could be broadened to other religious symbols, as currently it is rather crucifix-focussed. For example, icons in Greece, or Koranic verses or Bismillah in Muslim-majority countries.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Klbrain}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Klbrain (talk) 18:28, 14 February 2026 (UTC)

Nomination of Hytalo Santos for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Hytalo Santos is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hytalo Santos until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

V. S. Video (talk) 00:56, 21 February 2026 (UTC)

DYK for Curitiba Pride

On 28 March 2026, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Curitiba Pride, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that there have been two unsuccessful proposals to make Curitiba Pride intangible cultural heritage? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Curitiba Pride. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Curitiba Pride), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to nominate it.

~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 00:03, 28 March 2026 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 17

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Castelo dos Sonhos, a link pointing to the disambiguation page Altamira was added.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:02, 17 April 2026 (UTC)

DYK for Transgender quotas in Brazil

On 1 May 2026, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Transgender quotas in Brazil, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that some universities in Brazil have quotas for transgender people? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Transgender quotas in Brazil. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Transgender quotas in Brazil), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to nominate it.

Dclemens1971 (talk) 00:04, 1 May 2026 (UTC)

Hey

I will create the LGBTQ rights in Mato Grosso to the LGBTQ Wikipeda event, as you not created. VitorFriboquen :] (Talk) 23:42, 6 June 2026 (UTC)

Okay, no problem! :) Questionadora ávida (talk) 00:29, 7 June 2026 (UTC)

DYK for XXYYY syndrome

On 18 June 2026, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article XXYYY syndrome, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that facial dysmorphism and moderate intellectual disability are symptoms of 49,XXYYY syndrome? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/XXYYY syndrome. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, XXYYY syndrome), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to nominate it.

 — Amakuru (talk) 00:02, 18 June 2026 (UTC)

		Hook update
		Your hook reached 21,998 views (916.6 per hour), making it one of the most viewed hooks of June 2026 – nice work!

GalliumBot (talk • contribs) (he/it) 03:28, 19 June 2026 (UTC)

WikiProject Latin music invitation

You are invited to join invite to join the WikiProject Latin music, a WikiProject dedicated to improving articles related to music performed in Spanish, Portuguese and languages of Ibero-America. Simply click here to accept! Or, if you're interested in reading more on Latin music, you may want to check out the Latin music portal.

I've noticed your edits to Brazilian musicians and thought you might be interested. Erick (talk) 23:40, 30 June 2026 (UTC)

Nomination of Irmãs de Pau for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Irmãs de Pau is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article is being discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Irmãs de Pau until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may still edit the article, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the AfD notice from the article until the discussion is closed.

Svartner (talk) 22:53, 3 July 2026 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Battle of Cachoeira has been accepted

Battle of Cachoeira, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been accepted!

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions. Feel free to further improve your accepted article.

Future articles

• Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without submitting a draft for review. However, you may continue submitting drafts to Articles for creation if you prefer.

• Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

Next steps

• Find other Wikipedia articles related to your topic and add links pointing to the new article. This helps readers find it.
• Group the article with similar subjects by adding relevant categories.
• You may consider nominating a fact from the article within the next 7 days to appear on the Main Page's Did you know section.
• Wikipedia is a work in progress. You can continue to expand and improve the new article.
• The new article will become eligible to be indexed on search engines once patrolled or after 90 days; search engines may take time to reflect this.
• For friendly peer support regarding editing, sourcing, or policies, visit the Teahouse, a question and answer hub for new editors.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

ScalarFactor (talk) 18:26, 19 July 2026 (UTC)

DYK for Popó Vaz

On 8 August 2026, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Popó Vaz, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that sales of a book honoring Popó Vaz, a police officer, were to be donated to transgender-rights organizations? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Popó Vaz. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (Popó Vaz), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to nominate it.

 — Chris Woodrich (talk) 00:02, 8 August 2026 (UTC)

DYK for Murder of Dandara dos Santos

On 13 August 2026, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Murder of Dandara dos Santos, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Dandara dos Santos, a murdered Brazilian, was honored with a sculpture exhibited in Manhattan from 2019 to 2020? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Murder of Dandara dos Santos. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (Murder of Dandara dos Santos), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to nominate it.

 — Chris Woodrich (talk) 00:03, 13 August 2026 (UTC)

My advice

Hello @Questionadora ávida. :)

I see you created Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Talk:Almerinda Farias Gama/GA1. Instead of creating MfD, consider using the following templates:
{{Db-g7}}, {{Db-author}}, {{Db-blanked}} and {{Db-self}}, per WP:G7. VitorFriboquen :] (Talk) 23:40, 17 August 2026 (UTC)

Thanks for the tip! Questionadora ávida (talk) 08:14, 18 August 2026 (UTC)

DYK for Migalhas

On 27 August 2026, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Migalhas, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the Brazilian online newspaper Migalhas published a book by Supreme Court justice Luís Roberto Barroso under its own publishing house? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Migalhas. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (Migalhas), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to nominate it.

Z1720 (talk) 12:03, 27 August 2026 (UTC)

DYK for CasaNem

On 2 September 2026, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article CasaNem, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that a building occupied by CasaNem contained works of art, including a bust of Santos-Dumont? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/CasaNem. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (CasaNem), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to nominate it.

Z1720 (talk) 12:02, 2 September 2026 (UTC)

Your nomination of Almerinda Farias Gama is under review

Your good article nomination of the article Almerinda Farias Gama is under review. See the review page for more information. This may take up to 7 days; feel free to contact the reviewer with any questions you might have. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Simongraham -- Simongraham (talk) 16:42, 3 September 2026 (UTC)

Your nomination of Almerinda Farias Gama is on hold

Your good article nomination of the article Almerinda Farias Gama has been placed on hold, as the article needs some changes. See the review page for more information. If these are addressed within 7 days, the nomination will pass; otherwise, it may fail. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Simongraham -- Simongraham (talk) 07:02, 4 September 2026 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 4

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Lei Maria da Penha, a link pointing to the disambiguation page Superior Court of Justice was added.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 17:55, 4 September 2026 (UTC)