Radical Mallard

History Clean-Up

Cleaned history today. Nothing really relevant to current editing habits or interests in old logs. Radical Mallard (talk) 21:39, 7 October 2014 (UTC)

Korean copycat product listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Korean copycat product. Since you had some involvement with the Korean copycat product redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Fram (talk) 08:49, 10 October 2014 (UTC)

I left a reply. The issue of it being racist to some people is an unfortunate one. I think what I find "dramatic" and "outstanding" about the Korean products is that the Japanese products "go out of their way" to make the packaging and such a unique part of the product experience, and they are based on ideas an artist came up with. The odds of the packaging looking the same, and the ingredients being the same with a few changes, by accident (so that at first glance one things the products are the same), seem astronomical. As opposed to how two milk or orange juice containers that have the same shape but the lettering, packaging, etc are just people selling something humans consume all over the world and there is no "gimmick" from another company that stands out to imitate. In the case of Korea, the Japanese "gimmick" is imitated and this is what stands out. Perhaps it is part of a broader phenomenon of "gimmick imitation": Topps products being copied by Fleer, Cracked and Crazy Magazine imitating Mad Magazine, etc. The subject apparently needs research done.--Radical Mallard (talk) 21:52, 10 October 2014 (UTC)

I am un-blanking my talk page posting a reply to this old comment thread of mine from years ago to try to clarify my involvement in this entry that was deleted (and I applaud it's deletion). It does not excuse the subject's unfortunate implications (which I realized were a very bad idea for Wikipedia: the idea of labeling something like this which is far more widespread around the world "[country-name] x") but I do believe it is worthwhile to explain it. At the time I was upset about the situation of the lack of reconciliation between Japan, Korea and China, and the racism directed between these 3 countries and societies at each other... why did Korea (or China or Japan for that matter) have imitation products of the other countries' products if they had so much animosity and disdain for each other since WWII? Why couldn't they reconcile if they liked aspects of each others cultures? Why have the modern commercial product sectors of China and Korea focused so much on imitation (at least this was my perception at the time) instead of innovation and originality? But this was not the way to go about addressing these issues and other entries on Wikipedia do better to address these issues - especially historical and cultural ones. My most humble apologies for this mistake. --Radical Mallard (talk) 00:41, 25 June 2020 (UTC)

October 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Nuclear electric rocket may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• chalmers.se/~valeri/Ajax/7b_vandy.pdf ''The Safe Affordable Fission Engine (SAFE) Test Series''])</ref><ref>NASA (2010): ''[http://sites.nationalacademies.org/SSB/cs/groups/ssbsite/documents/

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 21:18, 13 October 2014 (UTC)

Fixed! --Radical Mallard (talk) 21:51, 13 October 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 26

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Vaporization, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Nuclear. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:36, 26 September 2015 (UTC)

List of nicknames for farmers listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect List of nicknames for farmers. Since you had some involvement with the List of nicknames for farmers redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. -- Tavix ^(talk) 07:29, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:53, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

== August 2016 == Hello, I'm Doniago. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Super Size Me seemed less than neutral to me, so I removed it for now. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. DonIago (talk) 13:31, 31 August 2016 (UTC)

At the time the McLibel case hang over the consciousness of the public around McDonalds quite extensively. To not mention McLibel at all in Spurlock's Wikipedia film entry seems extremely unreasonable, as another case was also mentioned.. if we do not mention the McLibel case then we probably should not mention the other case in the entry, but that would detract from the important information that other lawsuits against McDonalds on the issue of health-concerns-to-the-public would be left out, and this information is crucial to understanding why Spurlock made his film, 'Super Size me', and enhances the value of the Wikipedia article. I have added a couple reference links for the mention of the McLibel case, in relation to a film about it, and in relation to health concerns about mcdonalds food at the time.---Radical Mallard (talk) 11:53, 1 September 2016 (UTC)

It was easy enough for me to address my POV concerns by simply removing "renowned and long-lasting", which are relative terms; I don't believe their removal hurts what you're trying to say. DonIago (talk) 19:17, 1 September 2016 (UTC)

Hmm. Well, both of those descriptive words could be backed up by references. Whether one has a POV or not, the McLibel case was renowned and unprecedented, and it also lasted a very long time. It feels suspiciously excessive that something like this would be challenged when it was simply a fact of reality at the time. As if any possible thing one could say about this would be under a "legal challenge" microscope. Am I to assume that is the case? And can you explain why you would make a claim of POV in the first place when this was simply a recording of actual historical events?---Radical Mallard (talk) 13:44, 2 September 2016 (UTC)

Because, as I said, they're both relative terms. There's no indication that Joe Normal would consider the case "renowned", and what makes a court case "long-lasting"? I doubt there's an official definition of such. I don't see that removing those descriptors harms the text. DonIago (talk) 14:08, 2 September 2016 (UTC)

November 2016

Hello, I'm Mlpearc. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Billy Jack, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. - Mlpearc (open channel) 23:43, 5 November 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Radical Mallard. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. Mdann52 (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Bazalt Russian Company Title.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Bazalt Russian Company Title.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:04, 1 May 2017 (UTC)

It is fine to delete the outdated image.-Radical Mallard (talk) 23:49, 1 May 2017 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of David Watson (anarchist)

Hello, Radical Mallard. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, David Watson (anarchist), for deletion because I don't think it meets our criteria for inclusion. If you don't want the article deleted:

1. edit the page
2. remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
3. save the page

Also, be sure to explain why you think the article should be kept in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. If you don't do so, it may be deleted later anyway.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

 Velella  ^{Velella Talk}   08:44, 30 June 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Radical Mallard. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of Fred Woodworth for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Fred Woodworth is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fred Woodworth until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. czar 23:33, 20 January 2018 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:The Match Issue103 Cover 75DPI.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:The Match Issue103 Cover 75DPI.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:11, 23 January 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Radical Mallard. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 9

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Marianne, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Equality (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 07:49, 9 November 2019 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of The Face of Battle (game)

The article The Face of Battle (game) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No evidence this board game passes WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 20:27, 23 January 2020 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:The Face of Battle cover.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:The Face of Battle cover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:41, 1 February 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:19, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of Angriff! for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Angriff! is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Angriff! until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

VickKiang (talk) 07:32, 8 July 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:26, 29 November 2022 (UTC)