User talk:Random832/Archive 4

Archive 1

Archive 2

Archive 3

Archive 4

Archive 5

Archive 6

Archive 7

Username

As I had been reading this section from the user:Eonon userpage, what about user:Moorcroft shouldn't that lot be blocked as this is the reason why I plus some other users had to nominate pages related to the Moorcroft company considering that is all they had edited. Willirennen (talk) 18:38, 13 January 2008 (UTC)

Ron Paul - newsletter controversy

I kindly ask that you reconsider denying the requested protected edit of the Newsletter controversy section of the Ron Paul entry. The current version of the section opens with and repeatedly refers to "Paul's newsletters", yet Ron Paul claims he did not edit the newsletters and that he has "never uttered such words" as those quoted from the newsletters.[1]. I find our current language to be misleading and possibly violating WP:BLP, and potentially libelous (although presidential candidates are in open season so we're unlikely to be sued). I thus requested that the repeated instances of the possessive "Paul's newsletters" are changed to the neutral "the newsletters".

Please note how journalists at UPI and CNN report on the newsletters controversy, avoiding the possessive and using phrases like "newsletters under his name". I think we should stick to at least the same level of objectivity and neutral point of view. Of course, it is possible to cherry-pick media coverage that actively uses the possessive, particularly opinion articles and sensationalist press, headlines, blogs and letters to the editor. Case in point, The New Republic, listed by another editor in the discussion as an example of "three reputable publications" that "have used the terminology", is a limited circulation liberal opinion magazine. No surprise their article "Angry White Man - The bigoted past of Ron Paul" repeatedly refers to "Paul's newsletters". But that doesn't give us a free pass to frame our section that way without explicit citations and careful choice of language.

Most of the opposition arguments in the debate boils down to that the editor's point of view is that these were Ron Paul's newsletters, ergo we should write they are his newsletters. In contrast, my position is that we should carefully avoid imposing our own POV.

Note that I am not arguing for language that deny that these are Paul's newsletters, and we should of course not be shy about including material that may contradict Paul. I am arguing for use of neutral language that let the readers draw their own conclusions based on the facts presented in the section. I thus request that you make the requested protected edit to the article.

-- Terjen (talk) 18:58, 14 January 2008 (UTC)

Yukon stubs

One reason I used cut and paste was to avoid having to make multiple edits, since the categories the template fed into had to be changed as well. By the way, doing the move on top the new template caused a small problem that required a null edit in one of the articles using the template in order to have the template place them in the correct category(s). Caerwine Caer’s whines 22:04, 14 January 2008 (UTC)

Image:Macfx3mockup.png

I see I forgot one :) ˉˉ^anetode╦╩ 23:55, 14 January 2008 (UTC)

Like this alot!

		The Barnstar of Good Humour
		For this

Rudget. 18:14, 15 January 2008 (UTC)

Signpost updated for January 14th, 2008.

The Wikipedia Signpost Weekly Delivery

Volume 4, Issue 3	14 January 2008	About the Signpost

From the editor: A new weekly feature
Special: 2007 in Review	Wikimania 2009 bidding ends, jury named
Controversial non-administrator rollback process added	Supposed advance draft of Jobs keynote surfaces on talk page
WikiWorld comic: "The Nocebo Effect"	News and notes: Fundraiser ends, $500,000 donation, milestones
Wikipedia in the News	Tutorial: Fundamentals of editing
Features and admins	Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
The Report on Lengthy Litigation

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 08:51, 18 January 2008 (UTC)

RE: media deletion

Regarding the comment left on my talk page yup that's me, yup I said that, and yup, I'll say that again if anyone asks to use my anthems on Wikipedia! Pretty much my standing policy, they can use them if they want but IMHO it'd be better if they found an MP3. I would like for it to be reinstated if possible.

Any way I can get this taken care of so that this hassle isn't done again next time someone wants to use an anthem from my site without making it a hassle for them or me? I would like to know! --Canuckguy (talk) 05:04, 17 January 2008 (UTC)

I am quite sure that the song is public domain (as all anthems are, think of the kind of hassles there would be if anthems weren't!), but individual arrangements of the anthem are subject to, and often are, copyrighted. I use the MIDI files simply because (except in three or four cases, where they are clearly marked, and this one isn't one of them) they are free to be used. I'm hoping to make this more clear on my site, but I'm not sure how. My thought is to go with a tag from creativecommons.org that places them in the public domain, but then I'm wondering if I have to put it on every page? Also, I'd like the text to be used too (as I share Wikipedia's ideas that information should be free), but I don't think factual information is covered under a creativecommons tag. Regardless, I'd like to make the process easier for the next time this happens. Thoughts? --Canuckguy (talk) 01:50, 22 January 2008 (UTC)

my monobook.js

I've readded your script to my monobook, and reloaded with shift-control-R - but I still see no difference on AN/I. Can you take a look here and see if I missed a piece? ^Avruchtalk 19:37, 18 January 2008 (UTC)

I thought I'd try it and see what it did ;-) ^Avruchtalk 19:43, 18 January 2008 (UTC)

Ah, that fixed it. I see what you mean about resolved needing to be the first paragraph - if its inside archive tags, it shows up bolded still. ^Avruchtalk 19:49, 18 January 2008 (UTC)

Its pretty slick - it should be standard interface for that page. ^Avruchtalk 21:16, 18 January 2008 (UTC)

WP:ANI

Re: This. The I.P. involved in the dispute came to me and attached WP:STALKING to the incident. I had no reason to doubt the I.P.'s choice of words as he is a very experienced anon. I understand that maybe my language could've been perceived as 'gun ho' (If that's the expression I'm looking for) - but I certainly didn't mean to come off sounding like that. Neither did I, in my opinion, deserve that response from the user. I hope this clears things up on my side. Apologies for any confusion, friend. Thank you for taking the time to comment on it. Take care, Scarian^{Call me Pat} 16:06, 22 January 2008 (UTC)

"Poorly coded bots"

Well, the double redirect bots have been tripping over it all day. I can't think of why it wouldn't be unintentional, the redirect stretches the screen vastly on Widescreen. Will ^(talk) 17:41, 22 January 2008 (UTC)

Circular redirects just get skipped. This hung up my bot for eight hours. Will ^(talk) 17:46, 22 January 2008 (UTC)

I am about to rewrite the redirect.py pywikipedia bot such that infinite loops are cought. Sorry for my mishap, I soon found out and continued my tests at http://test.wikipedia.org .  Andreas  ^(T) 20:19, 22 January 2008 (UTC)

Removing comments from talk pages

Be careful with BillCJ, he tends to be a little sensitive. If he flares up with you as he did [here] with another editor, the best coarse may be to ignore him, his attention span is limited. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.244.255.234 (talk) 03:34, 23 January 2008 (UTC)

General Welfare Clause / Taxing and Spending Clause

I saw your comment at Wikipedia:ANI#History merge needed indicating your interest in this issue and think that you might want to comment at Talk:Taxing and Spending Clause#Requested move. MilesAgain (talk) 14:46, 23 January 2008 (UTC)

Hello

hi Mr.Random....there is a user here his name Nome060 ..he copied this page user, who has this name Thehelpfulone ...just i want you to know that, to take or adopt measures or steps...and thanks for you...--O.waqfi (talk) 16:03, 23 January 2008 (UTC)

WP:ANI

Thanks for getting back to me. --ShadowJester07 ► Talk 21:02, 23 January 2008 (UTC)

Signpost updated for January 21st, 2008.

The Wikipedia Signpost Weekly Delivery

Volume 4, Issue 4	21 January 2008	About the Signpost

Special: 2007 in Review, Part II	New parser preprocessor to be introduced
Commons Picture of the Year contest in final round	WikiWorld comic: "Buffalo buffalo Buffalo buffalo buffalo buffalo Buffalo buffalo"
News and notes: Freely-licensed music, milestones	Wikipedia in the News
Features and admins	Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 00:24, 24 January 2008 (UTC)

Template talk:Attack

Hey, I notice that you recently made an edit to the template. However, I recently used the template, and it did not come out correctly, as shown at the talk page. I added an editprotected request to it, but maybe since you were the one who made the changes you would know how to change it or what revision to go back to. Thank you for the help! Icestorm815 (talk) 20:31, 25 January 2008 (UTC)

[cookie]

Thanks for all your help I'm with cookie --RayquazaDialgaWeird2210 (talk) 22:29, 25 January 2008 (UTC)

v v v v v v v v

RayquazaDialgaWeird2210 (talk) has given you a cookie! Cookies promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a cookie, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy munching!

Spread the goodness of cookies by adding {{subst:Cookie}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

Notwithstanding the above

you do, in fact, have a new message. Again. — Carl (CBM · talk) 02:44, 26 January 2008 (UTC)

Thanks

Hey i have to thank you for deleting that image. mickyfitz13 ^Talk 20:12, 26 January 2008 (UTC)

MediaWiki:Gadget-removeAccessKeys.js

I think your recent changes to MediaWiki:Gadget-removeAccessKeys.js is causing errors. I first noticed it when MediaWiki:Sysop.js wasn't working for me anymore. Looking at the FireBug console, FireBug reports:

columnOne.getElementById is not a function
removeKeys(columnOne.getElementById('p-cactions').getElementsByTagName('a'));

Since I'm not familiar with the script, I thought I would let you fix it. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 01:31, 27 January 2008 (UTC)

Re your message: No problem. =) It took me awhile to figure out what the problem was. I first noticed the problem when all of the CSD reasons disappeared. I thought Sysop.js changed or something, but then noticed that Gadget-removeAccessKeys.js was throwing errors. Ah, JavaScript programming, what fun... not! -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 01:38, 27 January 2008 (UTC)

Changes to uw-vandal4

Hey, you recently attempted to change the substs on the level four vandalism template, but in doing so accidentally broke the template. This was pointed out on the help desk and I went ahead and reverted it. Whatever change you were attempting to make looks to have been a good one, but I do not know enough about writing templates to correct it. Either way, you should probably test it in the future before going live with it. At any rate, warm regards, SorryGuy  Talk  05:17, 27 January 2008 (UTC)

My Rfa

My effort to regain adminship was unsuccessful, But I wanted to thank you for taking some time out of your day to voice your opinion.--MONGO 19:30, 27 January 2008 (UTC)

MediaWiki:Gadget-edittop.js

Can you have a look at this script? On line 14, within var localtitles initialization, the "ja:" line ends with a comma but is the last one in the list. Isn't that a no-no? When I remove the comma locally, it seems to eliminate an error message I've been getting. Thanks. Franamax (talk) 00:01, 30 January 2008 (UTC)

Thanks. It's all working tickety-boo for me now. I got into solving this as a result of this thread but I see that the timing of your edits to this file don't match to the timing of the problems the other people reported, I assume the are using different tools or skins than I.

Is there any chance that you would have copy/pasted that code block into other scripts within the last little while that would be causing their similar errors? Not trying to pin any blame here, just a thought... Cheers! Franamax (talk) 00:37, 30 January 2008 (UTC)

Thx for the response, it was just a long shot. You're a far more disciplined programmer than I am, I copy/paste code all the time, it saves so much time - except for the time fixing the same mistake over and over :) Franamax (talk) 01:18, 30 January 2008 (UTC)

That 90's show

Well it was sort of a content dispute, the edits were in good faith, but there are very few editors that would agree with them. And note, the user blanked my userpage.--The Dominator (talk) 04:25, 30 January 2008 (UTC)

Signpost updated for January 28th, 2008.

The Wikipedia Signpost Weekly Delivery

Volume 4, Issue 5	28 January 2008	About the Signpost

From the editor: New feature
Special: 2007 in Review, Part III	Signpost interview: John Broughton
New parser preprocessor introduced	Best of WikiWorld: "Truthiness"
News and notes: Estonian Wikipedia, Picture of the Year, milestones	Wikipedia in the News
Tutorial: Reporting and dealing with vandals	WikiProject Report: Molecular and Cellular Biology
Wikipedia Dispatches: Banner year for Featured articles	Features and admins
Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News	The Report on Lengthy Litigation

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 04:10, 31 January 2008 (UTC)

Gadget popups

Saw your change on the popups code. Please be aware that usage of document.write should be avoided at all times. It causes problems with Safari and Opera if you have multiple levels of javascript inclusion. The Common.js function importScript is written as it is for that exact reason. I propose we just implement the solution that was considered on MediaWiki talk:Common.js --TheDJ (talk • contribs) 18:49, 31 January 2008 (UTC)

Re:1911 Cleveland Naps season

OK then. There's about 2000 or so of those baseball seasonal articles, and some of them which aren't yet Start-Class or higher still need to be expanded. Unfortunately, I have been delaying the expansion of these articles (which I really shouldn't have done), but since you have brought it to my attention, I will take care of it. If it's all right, I'd like to restore the article, expand it, and expand all of the others around it (or as many as I can).   jj137 (talk) 20:59, 1 February 2008 (UTC)

No, just my laziness showing. :) I'll get to work.   jj137 (talk) 21:05, 1 February 2008 (UTC)

Hi

Thanks for your help. It seems to me that until now the blocking admins have all been friends with User:Schuminweb. I have posted on the Village pump. Thanks again. Markanthony102 (talk) 13:22, 2 February 2008 (UTC)

Delete reason dropdown script

I checked your delete reason dropdown script and it seems to be working okay. My only concern is where you use some of the captured text from the regular expression back into the summary (afd, mfd, prod, unknown db) as the text is "tainted". While the text is provided by the MediaWiki software and should be untainted, it's still a bit dangerous, though I couldn't figure out any situation where it might be bad (see my deleted Sandbox for my experiments). -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 19:33, 4 February 2008 (UTC)

Re your message: Yes, that's what I figured out after awhile. Eh, just being cautious from years of defensive coding. Never trust anything. =) My specific concerns were script injection and overflow of the input field. However, like you said, you're using nothing that the MediaWiki software didn't already put in and you're doing replacement of the value, not adding HTML, so the content should be safe. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 19:53, 4 February 2008 (UTC)

Hi, there

WikiProject Indianapolis		An invitation to join us!
		Your recent edits seem to indicate that you have some local knowledge of Indianapolis, Indiana. If so, perhaps you would like to join WikiProject Indianapolis, a project for the creation, expansion and improvement of articles related to metropolitan Indianapolis. Check out our project page, and if you like what you see, join us by adding your name to our membership list. Hope to see you at WikiProject Indianapolis!

Cheers, Basketballone10 23:59, 4 February 2008 (UTC)

Signpost updated for February 4th, 2008.

The Wikipedia Signpost Weekly Delivery

Volume 4, Issue 6	4 February 2008	About the Signpost

Special: 2007 in Review, Part IV	Tensions in journalistic use of Wikipedia explored
Best of WikiWorld: "Calvin and Hobbes"	News and notes: Milestones
Wikipedia in the News	Tutorial: Adding citations
Dispatches: New methods to find Featured Article candidates	Features and admins
Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News	The Report on Lengthy Litigation

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 08:32, 6 February 2008 (UTC)

IP

The discussion is closed, so I'll explain here. It gives away the geographical location of the user via WHOIS (take, for example, User:66.218.71.198 and [2]). In some cases, the WHOIS information resolves to a person. In some cases, that IP address may be used to correlate activity for other things for sites whose privacy policies may be less strict than the Wikimedia Foundation's. And for some ISPs, an IP address may be assigned to a very small geographical area, and with other habits for that user, can be used to trace someone in real life. There's other things as well, but that's the gist of IPs being revealed. x42bn6 Talk Mess 18:03, 6 February 2008 (UTC)

ANI Scripts

Hi Random, what would I type if I wanted to use the "importScript" for your AN/I TOC marker and section collapse monobook additions? Also, for some reason Twinkle isn't working for me in the Modern skin. I noticed you said it worked for you, any idea why it wouldn't for me? Firefox 2.0.0.11. Thanks! Avruchtalk 16:02, 8 February 2008 (UTC)

Template:Indefblockedbecause

Why does this put user pages in cat Temp user pages? Rich Farmbrough, 03:22 10 February 2008 (GMT).

I am concerned with the number of user-pages in this category, which means that they will be deleted. In particular, because of another warning template User talk:Thegone was deleted taking useful warnings with it. Rich Farmbrough, 13:40 10 February 2008 (GMT).

MFD for COI/N

Hi there. I'm inclined to close this discussion per WP:SNOW, but I wanted to see if you had some strong objection to my doing so. I think you're right about the conflict in the two guidelines, and you've gotten some good comments to that effect. I personally don't see the benefit in extending the MFD, but as I said, I wanted to see what you think. Thanks, Xymmax (talk) 20:43, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

Apology from him due

See Wikipedia:RFCU#Markanthony101, I think someone owes me an apology (the puppetmaster, not you). — Rlevse • Talk • 10:58, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

Signpost updated for February 11th, 2008.

The Wikipedia Signpost Weekly Delivery

Volume 4, Issue 7	11 February 2008	About the Signpost

Petition seeks to remove images of Muhammad	Foundation's FY2007 audit released
Vatican claims out-of-context Wikipedia quote was used to attack Pope	Best of WikiWorld: "W"
News and notes: Working group, Wik-iPhone, milestones	Wikipedia in the News
Tutorial: Basic dispute resolution	Dispatches: Great saves at Featured article review
Features and admins	Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
The Report on Lengthy Litigation

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 09:11, 14 February 2008 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Mantanmoreland

An Arbitration case in which you commented has been opened, and is located here. Please add any evidence you may wish the Arbitrators to consider to the evidence sub-page, Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Mantanmoreland/Evidence. Please submit your evidence within one week, if possible. You may also contribute to the case on the workshop sub-page, Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Mantanmoreland/Workshop.

On behalf of the Arbitration Committee, — Rlevse • Talk • 23:17, 14 February 2008 (UTC)

deletion reason script

You wanted to know which tags you missed. I found one: {{db-empty}} -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 01:22, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

Re your message: A3 is what I've seen it mostly used for. However, I've also seen some people using it instead of G7.

On a side note, one bug that I've run into that burned me on an attack page is that if somebody blanks a page, but doesn't tag it with a CSD tag, if you select a deletion reason, you end up the deletion reason and content before blanking was: 'whatever' in the deletion log. See User:Gogo Dodo/Sandbox2 for what happens. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 18:30, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

I found another one that the script doesn't handle: db-nn. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 21:35, 15 February 2008 (UTC)

Re your message: Yeah, and I kind of miss that from the previous script. From the previous script, the "CSD A7 (Bio)" option would be be perfect for db-nn. I also happen to miss CSD A7 (Band) since it was a specific link to the music notability (though I wish it said "musical artist or band" instead of just "band").

Another thing I just discovered is that if you delete an article with a talk page, MediaWiki inserts "[[WP:CSD#G8|CSD G8]] - talk page of a deleted page" into the reason. Perhaps the script should recognize that and select the proper reason? I ran into this with Sullenearth. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 22:03, 15 February 2008 (UTC)

Request for production of a magic word by a developer

Random832: A consensus appears to have been reached in support of a {{delimitnum}} parser function/magic word (detailed description here). From Jimp’s earlier posts on my talk page it appears that pulling off what is needed via a template would be suboptimal due to its complexity and the fact that numeric values may occasionally exceed 12 digits. You wrote on my talk page (here/difference) that a magic word is the best technique to handle this. How can this request be presented to a developer? Can you help? Greg L (my talk) 05:48, 15 February 2008 (UTC)

• Regarding your post on my talk page regarding the location of </span>, no objection at all; thanks for making a suggestion. And thank you very much for writing up the proposal. Greg L (my talk) 16:36, 15 February 2008 (UTC)
  
  

• P.S. Jimp, Atakdoug, and I did a bunch of work on gap widths. It was a contentious issue that took hard work and lots of file sharing to resolve because some computer platforms only allow span gap resolutions of 0.1-em increments, others can handle 0.05-em gap resolutions, different platforms handle span gaps slightly differently, and the eye is very sensitive to gap width issues so that gaps that appear too wide are objectionable and those that are too narrow seem to pretty much disappear. I couldn’t quite keep up at bugzilla:13025 when you wrote “it is better practice to use a class and control the specific styles with stylesheets so that users may override this style in their own user css.” But it seems that what you wrote means the editor—not the “reader”—would be setting styles. If that impression is correct—and I hope I’m wrong—then one will have editors using Macs making decisions that look just perfect on thier machines but which looks bad for Windows people using Explorer (and visa versa). A tweak of just 0.05 em makes a big difference in how satisfied everyone is. I ended up treating the gap after the digit 1 differently from those that follow the other nine digits in order to obtain a solution that satisfied all parties.

  I am putting in the extra effort of writing this post to you only because I want the developer’s work to be well-received and widely adopted. I think that may not happen if some people find the results to be “ugly.” My only request is that you ensure that the developer is made aware of the technique we used to get span-widths that resulted in a satisfactory compromise for us all. Background information can be found here, at Talk:Greg L#Platform-independent span-gap comparison, and the full details on the gap width nuances here, at Talk:MOSNUM#Gap width details. Greg L (my talk) 19:40, 15 February 2008 (UTC)

• Regarding your latest post (difference), I now understand. I thought that might be the case and felt that advanced issues like setting monobook.css—while possible for anyone to do—will be beyond the immediate grasp of many users. Ensuring that the default settings are the best possible compromise right out of the gate is certainly the way to go. I much appreciate your latest post at bugzilla. With everyone’s thoughtful input at each step of the way, I think this is being done perfectly. Regards.

  Please let me know when there is something to try. Greg L (my talk) 20:20, 15 February 2008 (UTC)

• Should I post a message, perhaps at 1.4.6.2, alerting interested parties that the proposal has been advanced to a developer to be made into a parser function? The only reason I’m reticent to do so is it would likely be tagged as “resolved” and then archived. The primary disadvantage of doing this is the links in bugzilla:13025 would have to be updated so the developer can refer to the proposal’s details. That seems easy enough to do as I’m now registered on bugzilla. Greg L (my talk) 05:07, 16 February 2008 (UTC)

Negatives

Yes, thank you for your note. I had originally some incomprehensible statement filled with double negatives, which I pruned down when even I couldn't understand it, barely minutes after I wrote it. Seems I pruned just a little too much or too little. Relata refero (talk) 15:56, 15 February 2008 (UTC)

Re: Rename

Hi. If it works, no problem. The reason why I did it is that we used to ask for logged-in confirmation, until we created the template. After the template's inception, we started declining requests that failed to follow the basic instructions. Declining and asking people to repost when the basic instructions are not followed also served the purpose of preventing people from trying to fix the links in the template (people used to get the filling out of the template wrong all the time...), which would normally only make it worse. In order to optimize the time the Bcrats would spend in renames, we were making it clear that if a user didn't take the time to read simple instructions, the requests would be denied, which would cause people to read the instructions, thus preventing silly mistakes that caused us to take more and more time to handle simple requests.
Most of this, however, was before clerks started helping out with renames. With the help of the clerks, there's less of a need for us to be too concerned with wasting time fixing silly mistakes. But I guess I was on "automatic". Thanks for the help. :)
As a matter of fact, you don't even need to wait until the repost is accepted (if it hasn't been already by now, I haven't checked), you can go ahead and merge now, if you want to. Cheers, Redux (talk) 22:59, 15 February 2008 (UTC)

Indeed, you said "I've merged", and I somehow read "I'll merge". I probably need some coffee... All is well then, thanks again. Redux (talk) 01:40, 16 February 2008 (UTC)

Re: your deleted comment

It's difficult to find another way to express this, since the temperature seems to be rising on this discussion. Yes, I do understand. Quite well. And I have been endeavoring to explain to you that the vote stacking issue was by no means a byproduct of the investigation or an afterthought to it. It was in fact one of the principal grounds for suspicion and principal avenues of inquiry, examined at great length and in exacting detail.[3] Durova^Charge! 07:18, 16 February 2008 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Archive126#deletion reason script

I just noticed that Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion#Redirects reason #2 is not part of the drop down list. Any chance it could be added? Thanks. CambridgeBayWeather Have a gorilla 02:46, 17 February 2008 (UTC)

Regarding: Biting the newbies

The user's previous name, User:Poo headed monster and his continual recreation of material without using the hangon template after instructed to lead me to believe he was not making edits in good faith. If I was wrong, I apologize to him but I have a feeling that's not the case. Redfarmer (talk) 17:13, 18 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks

I have never used the FAQ template before, and didn't realise that saving the edits within it would create a subpage (next time I will know better :) Thanks for the delete, I apreciate it. TomStar81 (Talk) 19:10, 18 February 2008 (UTC)

Re: deletion

No problem. The page in question (User:Gyrofrog/2006-07-19) was a copy of an unsolicited canvassing email that I received, and I guess I had kept it as evidence. I had forgotten about it. Thanks, -- Gyrofrog (talk) 19:12, 18 February 2008 (UTC)

Absolutely

You are absolutely right. I was going way too fast. I looked at the history, say Happy-melon (who I trust) as the most recent contrib, and deleted away. I'll go back through my deletion log to be sure I didn't do any others. Thanks, Random, good catch. Keeper | 76 | Disclaimer 21:18, 19 February 2008 (UTC)

Just went through my deletion log, say your name way too many times:-). Thanks for your vigilance. Those were my only errs I hope. I deserved your "Gah" comment. Hitting myself with a trout now. And slowing down. And...ok that's it, no more ands. Thanks again Random Keeper | 76 | Disclaimer 21:21, 19 February 2008 (UTC)

Nice to know I'm trusted, but Wikipedia is not melon-proof :D! Thanks for the quick fix, Random... and I think we should split a nice fat trout between us, Keeper!! Happy‑melon 21:25, 19 February 2008 (UTC)

Deep fried is my preference. Or perhaps plank-smoked. Just please not raw. I hate Sushi. Random832 is my hero today. Keeper | 76 | Disclaimer 21:27, 19 February 2008 (UTC)

Nominator message on db-copypaste

The template db-copypaste is a recently created speedy deletion template which deals with a particular case of g6 that occurs frequently. The soft redirect by Happy Melon does not allow me to reinsert the nominator message within the box itself, and I believe it is an essential part of the template, even though other g6 templates do not require such a message. Is this something you can fix, or should we revert HappyMelon's work on this particular template altogether? --Blanchardb-^{Me•MyEars•MyMouth}-timed 22:05, 19 February 2008 (UTC)

deletion reason script

I found another one not handled by the script: db-rediruser. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 19:46, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Further tests

I've responded on my talk page, asking for more specific parameters. Cheers, alanyst ^/talk/ 20:22, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Reason Deletion

Hi, a few tags that would be great: {{csb-pageincludes}} and {{Csb-pageincluded}} --> G12. Both tags are put by User:CorenSearchBot when he finds a copyright violation. Thanks :) -- lucasbfr ^talk 14:31, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Lost edits of analysis

Hi. I did a rewrite of the lede of analysis back when I split it into a prose article and a disambiguation article. Apparently the rewritten version was deleted in the process of moving the disambiguation page over it; could you possibly retrieve the deleted version and put it somewhere where I can access it? (A subpage of my user space, talk:analysis, I don't care where.) Thanks.--Father Goose (talk) 21:52, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

db-notice issue

Noticed your note on Template talk:Db-notice. The same problem was reported as Twinkle bug 117 I cannot think of a better way to solve it atm either, but perhaps we just need to add a "namespace" parameter instead and then have all templates and scripts that invoke this set that instead ? Seems like a more general approach to solve it that might be easier to implement in the various templates and scripts ? --TheDJ (talk • contribs) 13:47, 22 February 2008 (UTC)

I still need to discuss this a bit with AzaToth I think. I'm not sure yet which of the 2 solutions would be best, but I think its good to consider both of them :D --TheDJ (talk • contribs) 19:26, 22 February 2008 (UTC)

Semapedia

Hi Random, you made the last edit (in Nov) at WT:Semapedia, so you might be a good person to run this by. What projects that seek to establish some kind of link between Wikipedia articles and objects in the real world seem most successful to you? The issue is coming up today because the homeschooling people are trying to re-redirect "WP:HOME". There is enough interest in the world (particularly among the Germans) for projects like Semapedia that my guess is that someone several months from now typing in WP:HOME would be looking for some similar project, but I'd like to nail this down before WP:HOME becomes forever tied to homeschooling! (P.S. Feel free to reply either here or on my talk page.) - Dan Dank55 (talk) 19:19, 22 February 2008 (UTC)

>WP:Semapedia was an article, not a project page.

Understood, thanks. - Dan Dank55 (talk) 19:31, 22 February 2008 (UTC)

Please cancel an edit violating The 3RR

1. Some days ago, an editor made this edit.
2. On 23 February, at 5:15, the same editor has made his first revert.
3. On the same day, at 22:23, the same editor made his second revert.
4. On that very day, at 22:57, the same editor made his third revert.
5. On the same day, at 23:26, the same editor made his fourth revert.

Please cancel his fourth revert - which violates 3RR. No need to warn him, because I'm sure it was not done on purpose! He's an honest person who is absolutely aware to the 3RR and has always obeyed the 3RR. Eliko (talk) 01:28, 24 February 2008 (UTC)