Welcome!

edit

Hello, Razamohsin894, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions, especially your edits to Media of Pakistan. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Ammarpad (talk) 06:36, 30 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!

edit
 
Hi Razamohsin894! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

-- 10:14, Monday, October 16, 2017 (UTC)

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!

edit
 
Hi Razamohsin894! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

-- 10:23, Monday, October 16, 2017 (UTC)

January 2018

edit
 
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for advertising or promotion. From your contributions, this seems to be your only purpose.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Yunshui  23:56, 19 January 2018 (UTC)Reply
 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Razamohsin894 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Kindly unblock me , i was not intended to advertise / spam content . I assure i will not do it again , sorry for this bad experience.

Decline reason:

If this is true, you lack sufficient competence to edit here. If this is not true, you've shown you can't be trusted. Either way, the block is appropriate. Yamla (talk) 00:10, 20 January 2018 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.


 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Razamohsin894 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Remove this ban ,i will not disappoint u Mohsin Raza Nadeem 10:13, 20 January 2018 (UTC)

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

  • the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
  • the block is no longer necessary because you
    1. understand what you have been blocked for,
    2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
    3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. SQLQuery me! 21:16, 20 January 2018 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.



 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Razamohsin894 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

i will not do it again and will make useful contributions as i done in past. Mohsin Raza Nadeem 10:16, 30 January 2018 (UTC)

Decline reason:

Your edit history speaks to the opposite, and I also do not believe you have the competence to edit here as well. RickinBaltimore (talk) 13:13, 30 January 2018 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Razamohsin894 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I has been since 1 year kindly unblock me , i want to make useful contributions . I will not damage and disrupt wikipedia

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

  • the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
  • the block is no longer necessary because you
    1. understand what you have been blocked for,
    2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
    3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla (talk) 12:47, 23 May 2019 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.


 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Razamohsin894 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

i understand what i have done before and i promise i wil not repeat again

Decline reason:

It is not enough for you to merely state that you understand, you must demonstrate your understanding by explaining specifically what you did wrong, what steps you will take to not do it again, and what constructive contributions you will make instead. I am declining your request; if you don't make progress towards doing what I state here, you may lose access to this page too. 331dot (talk) 13:05, 23 May 2019 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

(edit conflict) I have revoked talk page access. I'm not sure if you are trolling or if you lack sufficient competence to follow the instructions you've been given. Either way, your unblock requests are simply disruptive at this time, serving only to waste our time. That leaves you with WP:UTRS. You'll want to read WP:GAB before making a request there, so you can avoid wasting their time, too, and losing access to your final possibility of unblocking. --Yamla (talk) 13:06, 23 May 2019 (UTC) Reply

 
This blocked user is asking that his block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

Razamohsin894 (block logactive blocksglobal blocksautoblockscontribsdeleted contribsabuse filter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


UTRS appeal #25685 was submitted on Jun 22, 2019 13:38:48. This review is now closed.


--UTRSBot (talk) 13:38, 22 June 2019 (UTC)Reply