RealRyanLicker

March 2024

Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to Webull. Your edits do not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use your sandbox. Thank you. Bbb23 (talk) 22:32, 19 March 2024 (UTC)

You mean updated the headquarters? We have moved our core team to St. Pete, I work there. 2600:1006:B086:5115:5D72:5639:1676:4A80 (talk) 22:35, 19 March 2024 (UTC)

Do not edit without logging in.--Bbb23 (talk) 22:40, 19 March 2024 (UTC)

Hi, can you explain? I work in our new global headquarters in St Petersburg, FL. What source do you recommend to accompany that update? RealRyanLicker (talk) 01:33, 20 March 2024 (UTC)

RealRyanLicker (talk) 13:34, 20 March 2024 (UTC)

RealRyanLicker (talk) 14:11, 20 March 2024 (UTC)

{{unblock|I hope this message finds you well. I am writing to appeal the block placed on my account, RealRyanLicker, with the utmost respect for the Wikipedia community and its policies. I understand the concerns that led to my block, specifically being identified as a "meat puppet." I want to clarify that my actions, though aimed at transparency regarding previous edits to the page on Webull, were not intended to serve another's agenda or bypass Wikipedia's collaborative editing process. I see, in hindsight, how my actions could have been interpreted as such, and for that, I apologize. My aim was to be upfront about my contributions and their context, but I understand now that my approach may not have aligned with the best practices of the community.|reason=Upon reflection, I realize how my actions may have been perceived as contrary to the community’s standards. My intention was to contribute factual, verifiable information to enhance the accuracy and comprehensiveness of Wikipedia, specifically regarding Webull. I now recognize the importance of engaging with the community in a manner that upholds the principles of neutrality and verifiability. To this end, I am actively seeking guidance on how to navigate these situations better in the future, ensuring that my contributions are beneficial and in line with Wikipedia’s values. I am committed to learning from this experience to avoid any appearance of impropriety and to work within the framework set by the Wikipedia community to make positive, informed contributions.}}

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

RealRyanLicker (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I hope this message finds you well. I am writing to appeal the block placed on my account, RealRyanLicker, with the utmost respect for the Wikipedia community and its policies. I understand the concerns that led to my block, specifically being identified as a "meat puppet." I want to clarify that my actions, though aimed at transparency regarding previous edits to the page on Webull, were not intended to serve another's agenda or bypass Wikipedia's collaborative editing process. I see, in hindsight, how my actions could have been interpreted as such, and for that, I apologize. My aim was to be upfront about my contributions and their context, but I understand now that my approach may not have aligned with the best practices of the community. :Upon reflection, I realize how my actions may have been perceived as contrary to the community’s standards. My intention was to contribute factual, verifiable information to enhance the accuracy and comprehensiveness of Wikipedia, specifically regarding Webull. I now recognize the importance of engaging with the community in a manner that upholds the principles of neutrality and verifiability. To this end, I am actively seeking guidance on how to navigate these situations better in the future, ensuring that my contributions are beneficial and in line with Wikipedia’s values. I am committed to learning from this experience to avoid any appearance of impropriety and to work within the framework set by the Wikipedia community to make positive, informed contributions.

Decline reason:

One open unblock request at a time, please. You had two.  Confirmed to FatherOf5. Furthermore, you claim your aim was to be upfront, but I cannot see where you disclosed your use of multiple accounts. Please show where you did this. Or alternatively, please do not claim your aim was to be upfront. Additionally, there's no chance you'll be unblocked to write about Webull. If this is your only goal, this is the end of the line. Yamla (talk) 14:29, 20 March 2024 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I hope this message finds you well. I am writing to appeal the block placed on my account, RealRyanLicker, with the utmost respect for the Wikipedia community and its policies. I understand the concerns that led to my block, specifically being identified as a "meat puppet." I want to clarify that my actions, though aimed at transparency regarding previous edits to the page on Webull, were not intended to serve another's agenda or bypass Wikipedia's collaborative editing process. I see, in hindsight, how my actions could have been interpreted as such, and for that, I apologize. My aim was to be upfront about my contributions and their context, but I understand now that my approach may not have aligned with the best practices of the community.

Upon reflection, I realize how my actions may have been perceived as contrary to the community’s standards. My intention was to contribute factual, verifiable information to enhance the accuracy and comprehensiveness of Wikipedia, specifically regarding Webull. I now recognize the importance of engaging with the community in a manner that upholds the principles of neutrality and verifiability. To this end, I am actively seeking guidance on how to navigate these situations better in the future, ensuring that my contributions are beneficial and in line with Wikipedia’s values. I am committed to learning from this experience to avoid any appearance of impropriety and to work within the framework set by the Wikipedia community to make positive, informed contributions. RealRyanLicker (talk) 14:22, 20 March 2024 (UTC)

RealRyanLicker (talk) 14:21, 20 March 2024 (UTC)

Conflict of interest

In addition to my unblock decline, please also show where you disclosed your conflict of interest. You were clearly aware of the need to do so (see User talk:FatherOf5) and you claim your aim was to be upfront, but I can't see where you made this mandatory disclosure. --Yamla (talk) 14:38, 20 March 2024 (UTC)

I made it in my profile as an employee of Webull. After I registered yesterday, I was informed about all these attempts in the past to update the page. Now, if he did not disclose that he was an employee, that should not influence my status, or does it? 38.104.166.170 (talk) 14:51, 20 March 2024 (UTC)

Sorry! Logged in now: I made it in my profile as an employee of Webull. After I registered yesterday, I was informed about all these attempts in the past to update the page. Now, if he did not disclose that he was an employee, that should not influence my status, or does it? RealRyanLicker (talk) 14:53, 20 March 2024 (UTC)