May 2018
edit
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Drmies (talk) 16:25, 20 May 2018 (UTC)
Realnb (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
My comment wasn't a personal attack, nor was it harassment. This is what I wrote "The attacker in Paris today screamed 'Allahu Akbar' as he stabbed multiple people. Those "mentally ill" (i.e. Muslim terrorists) people sure do love the phrase."
Decline reason:
You seem to be arguing you should have your block extended. Are you sure this is what you want? Yamla (talk) 19:15, 20 May 2018 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. — Berean Hunter (talk) 19:20, 20 May 2018 (UTC)
- Drmies blocked you for an attack but I've blocked you six months for IP socking to keep a three year old edit war alive. I find your IP socking activities to be unacceptable.
— Berean Hunter (talk) 19:21, 20 May 2018 (UTC)
Realnb (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I understand the explanation Drmies gave for blocking me. It was inaccurate. I didn't 'attack' anybody. You blocking me for six months makes even less sense. I don't know what you're referring to when you say I used 'IP socking' to keep a three year old edit war alive. I never changed my IP address to keep a three year old edit war alive. If you're referring to the edit war on 'Mystery Diners', I was already penalized for that when it occurred.
Decline reason:
You're CheckUser blocked now. Even if you weren't, I wouldn't lift this block, and I've gone ahead and removed your talk page access because you've started resorting to calling other people liars. WP:UTRS is available to you if you want to appeal. TonyBallioni (talk) 14:27, 21 May 2018 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Realnb (talk) 21:24, 20 May 2018 (UTC)
...and when did that occur? I believe that you will need to give the checkusers permission to reveal your IP info to go further.
— Berean Hunter (talk) 21:27, 20 May 2018 (UTC)
I do not know the exact date, but I know for a fact that I was blocked for a period of time because of it. You have permission to do whatever you need to. It's a bit ridiculous that I was hit with a six month block out of retaliation for the fact that I objected to an erroneous block for 'harassment'. Realnb (talk) 21:36, 20 May 2018 (UTC)
The user ItsZippy left this comment on my profile in 2015: 'You have been blocked from editing for violation of the three-revert rule on Mystery Diner.' You can check the archives and see it yourself. You blocked me over something I was already penalized for. Realnb (talk) 21:42, 20 May 2018 (UTC)
- Thank you for giving your permission. ItsZippy's block should have given you a clue. 2601:C8:280:1710::/64 is you -
Technically indistinguishable. This shows that you were edit-warring with your account and as an IP on List of terrorist incidents in April 2018 with Special:Contributions/2601:C8:280:1710:F12D:6327:C60:A3AB. You also used Special:Contributions/2601:C8:280:1710:808B:7DC7:5491:557 on Mystery Diners to keep edit warring with Drmargi. That block by Jauerback on your IP belongs to this account but it becomes more when we see the May 2015 history and also that you started as 73.137.209.88 (and used it to continue IP socking over about two years). Your IPv6 and IPv4 addresses locate to the exact same place. Talk:Mystery Diners shows the disagreement. That is the same edit war over three years. Not Here might apply to you because you have been IP socking to continue it.
— Berean Hunter (talk) 22:15, 20 May 2018 (UTC)
The Jauerback block is the one I was actually referring to. The date he blocked me is the last date I edited the Mystery Diners page. So, 'ItsZippy's' block might not have given me a clue, but that last one obviously did. As for the 'terrorist incidents' page, that user was inserting objectively false information. I contacted him through his talk page and we settled it (he stopped adding the erroneous info). Realnb (talk) 22:32, 20 May 2018 (UTC)
- This just to say that "Those "mentally ill" (i.e. Muslim terrorists) people sure do love the phrase" for its racist, xenophobic, islamophobic permutations. Also, if you knew your ass from your elbow and if you had the best intentions in mind for Wikipedia, you would have read an article like this which clearly lays out the history of that almost hopelessly despondent man and what led to his crazy attack For fuck's sake, read the story. Consider what his poor brother went through: beaten up by his own brother in a fit. Their father died trying to get out of Syria. But no, you heard someone yell something and just jumped on it. So "mentally ill" in scare quotes isn't just an attack on the mentally ill (in this case, verified by a reliable source) and a denial of what reliable sources state, and your easy identification of "Muslim terrorist" with anyone who is violent and yells something is using the kind of stereotype that at least is not allowed. Drmies (talk) 01:19, 21 May 2018 (UTC)
You're clearly emotional. You fabricated an offense just to get my account blocked. Claiming I 'harassed/attacked' you is laughable. 'racist' Muslim does not denote a race of people. 'xenophobic' Crying xenophobic is not an argument. 'islamophobic' The word islamophobic carries about as much weight as 'Naziphobic', 'Christophobic', 'Scientologophobic', or 'Cultophobic'. 'hopelessly despondent man' Muslim apologists make the same argument for everybody that carries out an attack in the name of Islam. 'crazy attack' Flying airplanes into the Twin Towers could qualify as a 'crazy attack'. That doesn't take away from the Islamic element. 'for fuck's sake' Cursing doesn't add any credibility to your argument. It just makes you seem like even more of an irrational and emotional person. 'beaten up by his own brother in a fit.' So he had a past of violent behavior. Therefore? You think because he beat up his brother 'in a fit' that he could not have been motivated by Islam to go on a killing spree? Interesting logic. 'Their father died...' And your point is? Many Muslim terrorists have had family members die. That's often part of their motivation for carrying out attacks against Western society. In case you didn't know this or not, having a mental illness doesn't preclude someone from carrying out an attack based on a religious motive. 'an attack on the mentally ill' Don't try and exploit/hide behind the mentally ill. This is an issue of you being personally offended by the statement that I made. Your ego was bruised.'...and yells something' He didn't just yell something. He yelled the popular Muslim phrase 'Allahu Akbar'. This 'mentally ill' person could've yelled anything. He happened to choose the religious phrase that Muslim terrorists are known to yell before going on a killing spree. '...using the kind of stereotype...' There's no point in lying and making up an offense when you have the ultimate say in the matter. By the way, if you wanted an actual example of an 'attack', you might want to take a look at your 'ass from your elbow' comment. That's more of an 'attack' than anything that I said. Realnb (talk) 03:32, 21 May 2018 (UTC)
- Oh I'm emotional. I never said you attacked me, BTW. You obviously still couldn't be bothered to read the sources; your interpretation of what might have happened, unhindered by facts, are not appropriate here: this is not a forum for such theorizing. Drmies (talk) 17:59, 21 May 2018 (UTC)
Yes, you are emotional. You're also a poor spin artist. If I didn't attack you, then who exactly did I attack? According to you, the mentally ill, but you and I both know that that was a bold-faced lie. You specifically accused me of 'Harassment', which is odd because nothing on the 'Wikipedia:Harassment' page applies to what I did/said. You can read it and see for yourself that I wasn't in violation of anything. Arbitrarily applying rules out of partisan spite isn't appropriate here. This was the comment that got under your skin: 'The attacker in Paris today screamed "Allahu Akbar" as he stabbed multiple people. Those "mentally ill" (i.e. Muslim terrorists) people sure do love the phrase.' The reality is I didn't 'attack' anyone. I challenged your Muslim apologist excuse-making and pointed out how common it is for Muslim terrorists to shout 'Allahu Akbar' during a terrorist attack. And, hey, what do you know? It happened again today in Strasbourg. But his mental illness probably drove him to do it, too. I read the sources back when I first responded. They're inconsequential to the point I made. Stories about being beat up by his brother and his father dying have absolutely nothing to do with anything. Having a stable home life is not a precondition to being a Muslim terrorist. By the way, in case you didn't know (and I know how important facts are to you), mental illness and Muslim terrorism are not mutually exclusive ideas. Contrary to popul...your thinking, a person can have both a mental illness and an ideology that drives them to do certain things, like kill people in the name of Allah. Realnb (talk)