Realyxvngdon
Realyxvngdon, you are invited to the Teahouse!
editHi Realyxvngdon! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. We hope to see you there!
Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:01, 4 June 2021 (UTC) |
June 2021
editHello, I'm JPxG. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to D. B. Cooper—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. jp×g 08:25, 10 June 2021 (UTC)
Please do not add or change content, as you did at Travis Scott, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. AshMusique (talk) 13:10, 30 June 2021 (UTC)
Sourcing
editHi. The Daily Mail is a deprecated source and should never be cited in articles for any reason. Please make sure not to add any more Mail sources in articles. SK2242 (talk) 07:56, 16 June 2021 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Jae Lynx (June 22)
edit- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Jae Lynx and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Jae Lynx, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
- If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
- If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
July 2021
editHello, I'm Materialscientist. I noticed that in this edit to Travis Scott, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 10:41, 3 July 2021 (UTC)
Please do not add or change content, as you did at Pop Smoke, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Magnolia677 (talk) 09:26, 16 July 2021 (UTC)
October 2021
editThis account has been blocked indefinitely as a sockpuppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sockpuppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. Vanjagenije (talk) 08:51, 24 October 2021 (UTC) |