User talk:Reaper Eternal/Archive 14

Archive 10

←

Archive 12

Archive 13

Archive 14

Archive 15

Archive 16

→

Archive 20

Adoption

Hey! There is a user looking for an adopter and when I looked through the Adoption headquarters and saw your name, I think you'd be a good fit for this user. He likes doing maintenance tasks just like you do. His name is User:Cyberpower678. He's had a few rough patches the last month and could use a pick up, motivation, and some good direction.--v/r - TP 14:09, 13 March 2012 (UTC)

I'll think this one over, but I really prefer it when the person requests me to mentor him. Additionally, I was mainly interested in adopting new users to show them how to edit and follow appropriate policies, which I think cyberpower knows. (He could use a hefty dose of WP:CLUE, though.) Reaper Eternal (talk) 21:43, 13 March 2012 (UTC)

Well it's up to you. I haven't mentioned to him that I've asked you so if you decide not to (or if you do), you're welcome to wipe this thread. No pressure.--v/r - TP 21:49, 13 March 2012 (UTC)

I'll mentor him, if he's willing. Reaper Eternal (talk) 16:08, 14 March 2012 (UTC)

Semi-Protect

If you wouldn't mind, can you add that to the

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2011–2012_Syrian_uprising

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Timeline_of_the_2011–2012_Syrian_uprising_(from_January_2012)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2011–2012_Idlib_Governorate_clashes

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2011–2012_Damascus_clashes pages

and http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Free_Syrian_Army pages

Sopher99 (talk) 19:46, 14 March 2012 (UTC)

I don't see the level of disruption on those pages as had occurred on the ones I did protect. Reaper Eternal (talk) 19:50, 14 March 2012 (UTC)

If you look at those pages, particularly the Idlib and Damascus clashes, as well as the 2011-2012 Syrian uprising, you would see a high usage of those 30 sock accounts that were blocked. Sopher99 (talk) 19:52, 14 March 2012 (UTC)

Oh yuck. There were even more puppets than I thought. Semi-protected. Reaper Eternal (talk) 20:38, 14 March 2012 (UTC)

Thanks. Sopher99 (talk) 20:48, 14 March 2012 (UTC)

aiv response

Are you sure these edits do not qualify as vandalism? BLPPROD is very specific about the criteria under which it should be removed, and I think it is quite clear that those standards are not being met in the current article? Gaijin42 (talk) 20:29, 14 March 2012 (UTC)

Please read WP:NOTVAND. Vandalism is the deliberate attempt to damage Wikipedia. If you have a dispute with somebody, try talking with them or pursuing dispute resolution. Reporting him to AIV is not an acceptable response. Reaper Eternal (talk) 20:39, 14 March 2012 (UTC)

GOCE March drive newsletter

Guild of Copy Editors March 2012 backlog elimination drive update GOCE March 2012 Backlog Elimination progress graphs Greetings from the Guild of Copy Editors March 2012 Backlog elimination drive! Here's the mid-drive newsletter. Participation: We have had 58 people sign up for this drive so far, which compares favorably with our last drive, and 27 have copy-edited at least one article. If you have signed up but have not yet copy-edited any articles, please consider doing so. Every bit helps! If you haven't signed up yet, it's not too late. Join us! Progress report: Our target of completing the 2010 articles has almost been reached, with only 56 remaining of the 194 we had at the start of the drive. The last ones are always the most difficult, so thank you if you are able to help copy-edit any of the remaining articles. We have reduced the total backlog by 163 articles so far. Special thanks: Special thanks to Stfg, who has been going through the backlog and doing some preliminary vetting of the articles—removing copyright violations, doing initial clean-up, and nominating some for deletion. This work has helped make the drive a more pleasant experience for all our volunteers. Your drive coordinators – Dianna (talk), Stfg (talk), and Dank (talk) To discontinue receiving GOCE newsletters, please remove your name from our mailing list.

Talkpage

Hmmm, interesting, if nothing else! Thanks for sorting that so quickly. Lugnuts (talk) 12:25, 15 March 2012 (UTC)

That was a vandalbot, hence the immediate indefblock without warnings, talkpage, or email access. Reaper Eternal (talk) 12:29, 15 March 2012 (UTC)

The Signpost: 12 March 2012

• Interview: Liaising with the Education Program

• Women and Wikipedia: Women's history, what we're missing, and why it matters

• Arbitration analysis: A look at new arbitrators

• News and notes: Sue Gardner tackles the funds, and the terms of use update nears implementation

• In the news: Britannica runs out of print as Jimmy Wales anointed UK transparency tsar

• Discussion report: Nothing changes as long discussions continue

• WikiProject report: WikiProject Women's History

• Featured content: Extinct humans, birds, and Birdman

• Arbitration report: Proposed decision in 'Article titles', only one open case

• Education report: Diverse approaches to Wikipedia in Education

• Technology report: Git learning curve steep but not insurmountable, plus a diff style we can all agree on?

• Read this Signpost in full
• Single-page
• Unsubscribe
• EdwardsBot (talk) 12:26, 15 March 2012 (UTC)

RevDel request

Hello, please revdel 2 racist slurs here and here. Thank you, --64.85.214.170 (talk) 13:04, 15 March 2012 (UTC)

Hi, those edits are just pretty normal vandalism—not hyper-disruptive or abusive, which would require revision deletion. We see edits like that all the time (and block the editors ;) ! Cheers! Reaper Eternal (talk) 13:49, 15 March 2012 (UTC)

The n-word is usually revdel'd under #2 as a racist slur I thought. Same with monkeys when used in that context, no? Monkey, ok let it slide, but please revdel the n-word. --64.85.214.170 (talk) 14:03, 15 March 2012 (UTC)

If that type of edit was usually revision deleted, we would have to revdel hundreds of edits daily, because vandals constantly add "penis!", "COCK!", "shithole", "nigger", etc. to articles. It's best to just revert them, block them, and ignore them after that. Reaper Eternal (talk) 14:13, 15 March 2012 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Admin's Barnstar
	Thanks for your quick block of vandals and lock on Richard Wright (author) Rich(MTCD)T|C|E-Mail 17:48, 15 March 2012 (UTC)

Thanks! Reaper Eternal (talk) 18:37, 15 March 2012 (UTC)

RE: category removal on | Shooting_of_Trayvon_Martin

I saw your removal of the category I placed in the article, and I saw your reason as well. I disagree that the category I placed in violates BLP. The shooters own words back up that this was indeed racially motivated. Yes, he hasn't been charged as such, further we have only his word that it was self defense. So, how about this, I won't replace my category, but self defense has to go as well, as we have only his word on it, and in this case, it can't be considered reliable either. What do you think ? @-Kosh► Talk to the Vorlons►Moon Base Alpha-@ 16:26, 19 March 2012 (UTC)

I agree with removing Category:Self defense, since the police / a court would have to decide that this was indeed a self-defense killing. What should we replace it with though—Category:HomicidesCategory:Homicide? Reaper Eternal (talk) 16:30, 19 March 2012 (UTC)

That sounds good. Good idea!

@-Kosh► Talk to the Vorlons►Moon Base Alpha-@ 16:33, 19 March 2012 (UTC)

 Done Actually, I only removed Category:Self-defense since Category:Homicide was already in the article. Cheers! Reaper Eternal (talk) 16:36, 19 March 2012 (UTC)

The Signpost: 19 March 2012

• News and notes: Chapters Council proposals take form as research applications invited for Wikipedia Academy and HighBeam accounts

• Discussion report: Article Rescue Squadron in need of rescue yet again

• WikiProject report: Lessons from another Wikipedia: Czech WikiProject Protected Areas

• Featured content: Featured content on the upswing!

• Arbitration report: Race and intelligence 'review' opened, Article titles at voting

• Technology report: Bugmeister to leave at end of May, but developers keen to "chart" a path ahead

• Read this Signpost in full
• Single-page
• Unsubscribe
• EdwardsBot (talk) 14:19, 20 March 2012 (UTC)

Appeal of Speedy Deletion: The Pledge of the Computing Professional

I'm part of the team of founders behind the organization The Pledge of the Computing Professional, whose new page you recently marked for speedy deletion based on criteria A7 (notability). Can we contest this with you? Admittedly, we're a very new organization, but we've been endorsed by two existing notable organizations and have 15 existing chapters. Details on all of the above are on the "Talk" page of the deleted article, as well as our website [1].

Most of us are also fairly inexperienced in the ways of Wikipedia; I'm probably the "most" experienced, but I'm hardly more than a novice myself. We think we objectively qualify for inclusion in Wikipedia. (I didn't see the original article, so I don't know if there were other issues that we didn't address the first time around ...) Jim Huggins (talk) 04:12, 19 March 2012 (UTC)

Hi! First of all (although not a factor in the page's deletion), the page was in the wrong namespace. It had been submitted under the "Wikipedia:" namespace, which is generally reserved for policies, guidelines, and the administration of Wikipedia. This can be easily rectified by submitting articles without a prefix; however, other problems existed.

The reason I deleted the article was that it did not indicate why "The Pledge of the Computing Professional" was important or significant. Rather, the article merely described the organization, its rites of passage, and a bit of its history. If you want the article to be kept on Wikipedia, you will need to provide verifiable, reliable sources to show that the article passes the notability guidelines for organizations.

Lastly, if you would like, I could restore the article to a userspace draft for you to continue working on or email the contents to you since the article contained nothing blatantly inappropriate like copyright violations, libel, or vandalism. Reaper Eternal (talk) 12:24, 20 March 2012 (UTC)

We'd be quite grateful if you'd restore it to a userspace draft. I think, with some work, we can bring the article up to Wikipedia's standards. Jim Huggins (talk) 17:06, 21 March 2012 (UTC)

 Done Userspace draft now exists at User:Jim Huggins/The Pledge of the Computing Professional. Good luck! Reaper Eternal (talk) 17:11, 21 March 2012 (UTC)

Many thanks. Jim Huggins (talk) 17:17, 21 March 2012 (UTC)

trayvon protection

Thanks for the move protection. Could you also semi protect? There are some anon editors who keep putting in pov content (on both sides of the argument) and putting in unencyclopedic conetent (see the current "facts" section which keeps returning, even though most of that information is already elsewhere in the article). 16:27, 20 March 2012 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gaijin42 (talk • contribs)

I really can't semiprotect the article sinceI have been previously involved with its content. Hopefully the tag above will get an uninvolved admin to evaluate. Reaper Eternal (talk) 16:38, 20 March 2012 (UTC)

And another admin has now semiprotected the page. Cheers! Reaper Eternal (talk) 12:45, 21 March 2012 (UTC)

Removal of Howie's question

Hi... I'm just a random user of Wikipedia, who rarely makes significant edits (I'm on a library computer). I'm not completely sure if removing Howie's question was the right call. I don't see him or her as a troll, just someone unfamiliar to Wikipedia. Many of the answers pointing them in more helpful directions were perfectly appropriate, IMHO. I'm not convinced it would do any real damage to Wikipedia's reputation. The case you linked to (Billy Ego) involved an editor engaged in highly disruptive behaviour. Curious what your fellow admins (or Wikipedians in general) think. We do often get potentially controversial issues discussed on the Reference Desk, and I think caution is called for in removing genuine (if somewhat inappropriate) questions. 119.225.16.46 (talk) 00:54, 21 March 2012 (UTC)

If there is a policy or guideline which justifies your deletion of the question and responses to it, please cite same on the Ref Desk talk page, rather than just removing the question and some responses to it by respected Wikipedia contributors. This removal of content, and the Arb Com decision you see as justification for it, deserve discussion at the talk page of Ref Desk. Thanks! Edison (talk) 02:37, 21 March 2012 (UTC)

Discussion on WT:REFDESK. Reaper Eternal (talk) 12:45, 21 March 2012 (UTC)

Revdel request

Hi Reaper, I'm contacting you not because you were involved with this issue, but because you are listed in CAT:REVDEL. Please take a look at The Barney Bunch. Many of the revisions there would fit under CFRD 2 or 3. I realize that most of the attack content targets fictional characters, but there is plenty of mention of real people, living and deceased. I'm not sure if it would be better/easier to selectively revdel those edits, or to speedy it as an attack page. If you decide to revdel it then could you also fully protect it to prevent this vandalism from appearing again at this title? Or if you decide to delete if could you please salt it or recreate it as a protected redirect at your discretion? Thanks. —KuyaBriBri^Talk 14:45, 21 March 2012 (UTC)

 Done I nuked all the vandalized revisions of the page to stop the random vandals from reverting back to it. Cheers! Reaper Eternal (talk) 15:04, 21 March 2012 (UTC)

Thanks. Could you fully protect as well? I'm concerned that with the amount of time that content was on the page it may have been picked up by a Wikipedia mirror and therefore will be very easy for someone to copy and paste. —KuyaBriBri^Talk 15:15, 21 March 2012 (UTC)

I semiprotected it. All the vandals were on unconfirmed (and now indefinitely blocked) accounts, and the one autoconfirmed user merely was trying to get the vandalism deleted via PROD. Reaper Eternal (talk) 15:19, 21 March 2012 (UTC)

Understood. Thanks again. —KuyaBriBri^Talk 15:36, 21 March 2012 (UTC)

Saban troll

Might you add his new catch phrase to his edit filter? Also revoking talk page access might be helpful.—Ryulong (竜龙) 23:46, 15 March 2012 (UTC)

 Done Reaper Eternal (talk) 17:07, 16 March 2012 (UTC)

He's been hitting Super Sentai (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) a lot lately. Do you think there's a way to prevent him from blanking all that content? He seems to be capitalizing the section titles if that may help.—Ryulong (竜龙) 20:23, 16 March 2012 (UTC)

Edgar181 (talk · contribs) has just solved that problem for you. Reaper Eternal (talk) 20:25, 16 March 2012 (UTC)

He's got a new catchphrase.—Ryulong (竜龙) 19:41, 22 March 2012 (UTC)

Gah. Fixed. Reaper Eternal (talk) 20:08, 22 March 2012 (UTC)

Could we maybe...just block all IPs from using "Haim Saban" on their talk page?—Ryulong (竜龙) 20:14, 22 March 2012 (UTC)

Unfortunately, then, if any IP wanted to discuss something he would be blocked. Additionally, IPs trolling on their talk pages after getting blocked isn't really that big of an issue. Reaper Eternal (talk) 14:03, 23 March 2012 (UTC)

Also I think blocking 70.52.172.0/22 for some time will keep him out of our hair, at least until Bell Canada responds to my 4 emails saying "Revoke this person's services".—Ryulong (竜龙) 21:05, 22 March 2012 (UTC)

I'll look into this one. Reaper Eternal (talk) 14:03, 23 March 2012 (UTC)

Yeah, only bad edits from that range, so  IP blocked. Reaper Eternal (talk) 14:11, 23 March 2012 (UTC)

Request for arbitration assistance

Hi, I just want to ask your help in resolving this issue with another editor on the Mount Pinatubo article. I'm Briarfallen and a regular editor of said article. The problem is on the second sentence of the lead section about the Cabusilan Mountains. One disruptive editor, (User:FromTarlac) keeps changing it to Tri-Cabusilan Mountain Range which is wrong, even though I presented two online references: an online copy of a Geography book and an online topography map of the area from the 1950s by the US Corps of Engineers. I thought he did not check my references. In his defense, he says, "he lives near the mountain and that's how they call the mountain range" and he gave two books as references: one is a book and not verifiable online, but the other "Fire and Mud" is also a book but has an online version from the USGS website. It is also one of the External links of the Mount Pinatubo article. I checked the website but 'Cabusilan Mountains' was not mentioned. In the Philippines, misinformation is a problem so together with my references, I presented him with the link for WP:Verifiability, not truth and WP:Verifiability. On his last edit on March 19th, he again changed it to Tri-Cabusilan but the worse part is that he removed my reference link to the topographic map!!! What kind of editor would do that? Isn't that foul? Please help me on what to do with this other editor. (History page of Mount Pinatubo). Thanks. - Briarfallen (talk) 03:29, 20 March 2012 (UTC)

Well, the main problem I can see is that neither of you has yet engaged in discussion on the talk page. Try discussing with the other editor, and perhaps reminding him that the burden of proof is not on you to find the sources that disprove you; rather, he needs to find them. Reaper Eternal (talk) 12:57, 21 March 2012 (UTC)

Thanks for your advice - Briarfallen (talk) 00:58, 24 March 2012 (UTC)

IP continues to troll after warning

IP continues to troll at my talk page (here) after you gave them a very generous warning here. ISTB351 (talk) (contributions) 16:50, 21 March 2012 (UTC)

Blocked, and edits oversighted. Reaper Eternal (talk) 20:09, 22 March 2012 (UTC)

Al Stokes (Musician) speedy deletion

Hi you said that Al needs to email OHDT (or something like that) . Where do I find the email address for Al to email to as I don't know it? Once he has done that would you be able to undelete the page to save me having to post it all up again?Richard Anvil (talk) 16:20, 23 March 2012 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. Reaper Eternal (talk) 16:31, 23 March 2012 (UTC)

Let's make this an opportunity to unhate!

The Fæ classy in crisis LGBT ally Barnstar!

Recently there was some anti-gay hate here on wikipedia and you worked to unhate. Because we need to show our overwhelming support of what people hate on to create unhate whenever it shows up. I compel everyone that supports unhate to repost this on their user page or talk page and especially on any page that has been the location of LGBT harassment or ignorance, that way the haters will know the only consequence of their hate will be more gayness and education and community. Congratulations on being an unhater! LuciferWildCat (talk) 23:33, 23 March 2012 (UTC)

Decic equation

Hi Reaper, sorry I've had to revert your last edit to Decic equation, but the paper I added as further reading is not a source for any part of the article. I came across the article when checking the contributions of a new editor. It was unsourced and a messy half-copy of Septic equation, so I did my best to clean it up. I couldn't quickly find anything to source it to (although it's clear to a mathematician how it should be). I did however find a paper that proposes a possible method of solution, so I added it as further reading for others to make use of.

I'm grateful for your attempt to clean up the article, but there's no point in pretending that it has any sources at present. It's possibly a candidate for deletion, as there are potentially an infinite number of polynomial equations of increasing degree and we need to stop somewhere. Any thoughts you might have on that would be appreciated. Cheers --RexxS (talk) 00:42, 24 March 2012 (UTC)

Autopattrolled of User:Abhijay

 Not done was your reply to his request, but when i opened his edit counts and user rights, 'autopatrolled' was there. I m surprised to see that. How is it possible? Yasht101 :) 02:16, 24 March 2012 (UTC)

See also: User_talk:Samir#User:Abhijay_and_autopatrolled →Στc. 02:19, 24 March 2012 (UTC)

After leaving this message I got it and was going to right write it and an Edit conflict showed up with you. I dont know y but it always happens with u even at new pages. Anyways, now doubts are clear. Yasht101 :) 02:24, 24 March 2012 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue LXXII, March 2012

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; award recipients; contest results Articles: The month's Featured and A-class content Book reviews: Nick-D looks into two recent Milhist books Op-ed: Hawkeye on Wikipedia collaborating with the AWM

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Ed ^{[talk] [majestic titan]} 02:34, 24 March 2012 (UTC)

User script listing cleanup project

I'm leaving this message for known script authors, recent contributors to Wikipedia:WikiProject User scripts/Scripts, and those who've shown interest in user scripts.

This scripts listing page is in dire need of cleanup. To facilitate this, I've created a new draft listing at Wikipedia:WikiProject User scripts/Scripts cleanup. You're invited to list scripts you know to be currently working and relevant. Eventually this draft page can replace the current scripts listing.

If you'd like to comment or collaborate on this proposal, see the discussion I started here: Wikipedia talk:WikiProject User scripts#Scripts listing cleanup project. Thanks! Equazcion ^(talk) 04:57, 25 Mar 2012 (UTC)

Please comment on Wikipedia talk:Guide to appealing blocks

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Guide to appealing blocks. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot (talk) 09:04, 26 March 2012 (UTC)

The Signpost: 26 March 2012

• News and notes: Controversial content saga continues, while the Foundation tries to engage editors with merchandising and restructuring

• WikiProject report: WikiProject Rock Music

• Featured content: Malfunctioning sharks, toothcombs and a famous mother: featured content for the week

• Arbitration report: Race and intelligence review at evidence, article titles closed

• Recent research: Predicting admin elections; studying flagged revision debates; classifying editor interactions; and collecting the Wikipedia literature

• Education report: Universities unite for GLAM; and High Schools get their due.

• Technology report: A busy week: Git switchover, mobile site upgraded, and still time for three security releases

• Read this Signpost in full
• Single-page
• Unsubscribe
• EdwardsBot (talk) 00:49, 27 March 2012 (UTC)

Al Stokes (musician) page

Hi there as directed by you Al has now emailed OTRS giving them permission for his material to be shared. You said an OTRS Volunteer may undelete the page. Is there anyone I can contact to see if this can be done?Richard Anvil (talk) 13:29, 27 March 2012 (UTC)

Ponyo may be a good person to talk to, as (s)he has OTRS access and knows more than I do, and thus will likely be better able to answer your questions. I think HJ Mitchell has OTRS access too, and he will also be better able to answer your questions. Cheers! Reaper Eternal (talk) 12:27, 28 March 2012 (UTC)

YGM

Hello, Reaper Eternal. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.

Okeyes (WMF) (talk) 03:42, 2 April 2012 (UTC)

The Signpost: 02 April 2012

• Interview: An introduction to movement roles

• Arbitration analysis: Case review: TimidGuy ban appeal

• News and notes: Berlin reforms to movement structures, Wikidata launches with fanfare, and Wikipedia's day of mischief

• WikiProject report: The Signpost scoops The Signpost

• Featured content: Snakes, misnamed chapels, and emptiness: featured content this week

• Arbitration report: Race and intelligence review in third week, one open case

• Technology report: Somewhere amongst the endless discussions about Gerrit lie details of hackathons, performance blips explained and more

• Read this Signpost in full
• Single-page
• Unsubscribe
• EdwardsBot (talk) 07:33, 3 April 2012 (UTC)

sorry for the revert

I have self reverted, Thanks-- ÐℬigXЯaɣ 14:13, 3 April 2012 (UTC)

OK. Please be more careful in the future when reverting with antivandalism tools, as your edits left the article looking like this. Reaper Eternal (talk) 14:14, 3 April 2012 (UTC)

I tried self reverting the article as well but it was already reverted by you again. yeah i saw that article state later . I suspected it as blatant content removal on the DIff Screen. My bad :( - -- ÐℬigXЯaɣ 14:16, 3 April 2012 (UTC)

• Caught the Culprit for my embarassment, please look at his contribution. Special:Contributions/Bleu84-- ÐℬigXЯaɣ 14:20, 3 April 2012 (UTC)

Thanks for the revdel

Didn't even have a chance to request it. :) Writ Keeper ⚇♔ 17:19, 3 April 2012 (UTC)

You're welcome! I hid all of that guy's edits, and just blocked his new sockpuppet account. :/ Reaper Eternal (talk) 17:46, 3 April 2012 (UTC)

Once more unto the breach, I suppose; keep fighting the good fight! Writ Keeper ⚇♔ 17:48, 3 April 2012 (UTC)

72.161.167.123

I posted about this anon vandal at WP:ANV but it appears you blocked them before I finished. —Al E.^(talk) 17:44, 3 April 2012 (UTC)

Yep! Apparently someone doesn't like the colts. :) Reaper Eternal (talk) 17:48, 3 April 2012 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Admin's Barnstar
	Must say, you were quick blocking 97.89.229.182 after the vandalism he had done! ~ ⇒TomTomN00 @ 17:07, 3 April 2012 (UTC)

Thanks! Reaper Eternal (talk) 17:44, 3 April 2012 (UTC)

No problem! ~ ⇒TomTomN00 @ 11:46, 4 April 2012 (UTC)

Yet another barnstar!

		The Huggler's Barnstar
		It's always good to see another admin's face coming through the Huggle queue. Thanks for your vandalism-fighting efforts - we need as many admins working the front lines as we can get! A fluffernutter is a sandwich! (talk) 19:04, 3 April 2012 (UTC)

Thanks! Reaper Eternal (talk) 14:22, 4 April 2012 (UTC)

Your edit history

This page has some really interesting shove-under-the-carpet editing. Is it just because you can, or was there a real reason.

NB: If I come across as offensive, I apologize. I'm just curious, you don't have to answer this if you don't want to. :-) 23.16.216.127 (talk) 02:40, 4 April 2012 (UTC)

What are you talking about? Reaper Eternal (talk) 14:18, 4 April 2012 (UTC)

Article Feedback Tool updates

Hey all. My regular(ish) update on what's been happening with the new Article Feedback Tool.

Hand-coding

As previously mentioned, we're doing a big round of hand-coding to finalise testing :). I've been completedly bowled over by the response: we have 20 editors participating, some old and some new, which is a new record for this activity. Many thanks to everyone who has volunteered so far!

Coding should actively start on Saturday, when I'll be distributing individualised usernames and passwords to everyone. If you haven't spoken to me but would be interested in participating, either drop me a note on my talkpage or email okeyeswikimedia.org. If you have spoken to me, I'm very sorry for the delay :(. There were some toolserver database issues beyond our control (which I think the Signpost discussed) that messed with the tool.

New designs and office hours

Our awesome designers have been making some new logos for the feedback page :) Check out the oversighter view and the monitor view to get complete coverage; all opinions, comments and suggestions are welcome on the talkpage :).

We've also been working on the Abuse Filter plugin for the tool; this will basically be the same as the existing system, only applied to comments. Because of that, we're obviously going to need slightly different filters, because different things will need to be blocked :). We're holding a special office hours session tomorrow at 22:00 UTC to discuss it. If you're a regex nut, existing abuse filter writer, or simply interested in the feedback tool and have suggestions, please do come along :).

I'm pretty sure that's it; if I've missed anything or you have any additional queries, don't hesitate to contact me! Thanks, Okeyes (WMF) (talk) 14:44, 4 April 2012 (UTC)

Edit filter question

Hi. I often see your name pop up when edit filters are being discussed, so I'm wondering if you could comment at Wikipedia:Bot requests#Bot to target a common vandalism at San Diego article, where I've suggested that an edit filter might be a solution to the problem. Cheers, Jenks24 (talk) 15:32, 4 April 2012 (UTC)

I've replied there and semiprotected the page to stop the vandalism. Reaper Eternal (talk) 16:14, 4 April 2012 (UTC)

That works too. Thanks, Jenks24 (talk) 16:31, 4 April 2012 (UTC)

GOCE March drive wrap-up

Guild of Copy Editors March 2012 backlog elimination drive GOCE March 2012 Backlog Elimination progress graph Greetings from the Guild of Copy Editors March 2012 Backlog elimination drive! This is the most successful drive we have had for quite a while. Here is your end-of-drive wrap-up newsletter. Participation Of the 70 people who signed up for this drive, 40 copy-edited at least one article. Thanks to all who participated! Special acknowledgement goes out to Lfstevens, who did over 200 articles, most of them in the last third of the drive, and topped all three leaderboard categories. You're a superstar! Stfg and others have been pre-checking the articles for quality and conformance to Wikipedia guidelines; some have been nominated for deletion or had some preliminary clean-up done to help make the copy-edit process more fun and appealing. Thanks to all who helped get those nasty last few articles out of the target months. Progress report During this drive we were successful in eliminating our target months—October, November, and December 2010—from the queue, and have now eliminated all the 2010 articles from our list. We were able to complete 500 articles this month! End-of-drive results and barnstar information can be found here. When working on the backlog, please keep in mind that there are options other than copy-editing available; some articles may be candidates for deletion, or may not be suitable for copy-editing at this time for other reasons. The {{GOCEreviewed}} tag can be placed on any article you find to be totally uneditable, and you can nominate for deletion any that you discover to be copyright violations or completely unintelligible. If you need help deciding what to do, please contact any of the coordinators. Thank you for participating in the March 2012 drive! All contributions are appreciated. Our next copy-edit drive will be in May. Your drive coordinators – Dianna (Talk), Stfg (Talk), and Dank (talk) To discontinue receiving GOCE newsletters, please remove your name from our mailing list. EdwardsBot (talk) 22:17, 4 April 2012 (UTC)

Thank you!

WikiThanks

Thank you

... for fixing our vandalism problem at San Diego! --MelanieN (talk) 00:19, 5 April 2012 (UTC)

Chicago Cubs

Maybe the article needs semi-protection. Please roll back the edits after yours. 66.168.247.159 (talk) 20:14, 4 April 2012 (UTC)

Whoops! I forgot to reply here, but I've semiprotected the page. For some reason, the protection form reported that the page could not be protected, but the protection went through, resulting in my protecting the page multiple times. Reaper Eternal (talk) 00:40, 8 April 2012 (UTC)

Dispute resolution survey

Dispute Resolution – Survey Invite Hello Reaper Eternal. I am currently conducting a study on the dispute resolution processes on the English Wikipedia, in the hope that the results will help improve these processes in the future. Whether you have used dispute resolution a little or a lot, now we need to know about your experience. The survey takes around five minutes, and the information you provide will not be shared with third parties other than to assist in analyzing the results of the survey. No personally identifiable information will be released. Please click HERE to participate. Many thanks in advance for your comments and thoughts. You are receiving this invitation because you have had some activity in dispute resolution over the past year. For more information, please see the associated research page. Steven Zhang DR goes to Wikimania! 23:54, 5 April 2012 (UTC)

Sock puppet at Bikini Beach

You dealt with a sock a few months ago at Bikini Beach. The same sock seems to be back (Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/John Daker). I wondered if you knew if there were other articles we should check up on or if the sock managed to keep itself to just the one. They've made two accounts in a short amount of time so I requested a CU on it too. If you have any additional info though it'd be helpful. Thanks. Shadowjams (talk) 00:32, 8 April 2012 (UTC)

I protected the page, and during the meantime, 7 (talk · contribs) blocked both of them. I guess some people stalk my talkpage closely! ;) Reaper Eternal (talk) 00:37, 8 April 2012 (UTC)

Froehliche Ostern

Hallo Reaper Eternal. Ich wollte nur ihnen einen Froehlichen Ostern wuenschen.

Translated: Hello Reaper Eternal. I only want to wish you a happy easter.—cyberpower ^Chat_Offline 12:09, 8 April 2012 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
	Nice to see you of all people beating me in Huggle this morning. Calabe1992 16:21, 4 April 2012 (UTC)

Thanks! Reaper Eternal (talk) 17:44, 10 April 2012 (UTC)

The Signpost: 09 April 2012

• Wikidata: The next big thing? An interview with Wikidata

• Interview: Funds, fiduciaries, and the Foundation: the complex dynamics of scaling

• News and notes: Projects launched in Brazil and the Middle East as advisors sought for funds committee

• WikiProject report: The Land of Steady Habits: WikiProject Connecticut

• Featured content: Assassination, genocide, internment, murder, and crucifixion: the bloodiest of the week

• Arbitration report: Arbitration evidence-limit motions, two open cases

• Technology report: Next Wikimedia deployment already in the pipeline and details of recent performance improvements

• Read this Signpost in full
• Single-page
• Unsubscribe
• EdwardsBot (talk) 00:53, 10 April 2012 (UTC)

Please comment on Wikipedia talk:Categorization

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Categorization. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot (talk) 09:15, 10 April 2012 (UTC)

Request

If you wouldn't mind, please review this edit for possible RevDel because of the personal information. Thanks! Ravensfire (talk) 18:48, 10 April 2012 (UTC)

Hi, the next time you need personal information hidden, it is best to email oversight rather than posting the link on my or another admin's talk page. This will get the information suppressed to the point that even admins will be unable to see it. Thanks! Reaper Eternal (talk) 19:24, 10 April 2012 (UTC)

Will do - first time I've actually spotted something like this that hadn't been dealt with and wasn't totally sure. Note made, appreciate the advice! Ravensfire (talk) 23:02, 10 April 2012 (UTC)

A WikiChild in need of adoption

I would like assistance in becoming an established editor. I chose you to make a request to for these reasons:

1. You're an admin.
2. I plan to do the same Wikitasks that you do.
3. You have a lot of experience.
4. People commenting in your administrator review seem to like you.
5. You're an admin.
6. You say that you help clean up citations, which I don't really understand.
7. You're flexible.
8. You share my views on Wikipedia.
9. You seem to have a good sense of humo(u)r.

And, last but not least...,

10. You're an admin.

Will you adopt me? ChromaNebula (talk) 17:57, 6 April 2012 (UTC)

Certainly I will! Just give me a day or so to get stuff set up. Reaper Eternal (talk) 00:25, 8 April 2012 (UTC)

 Done See User:Reaper Eternal/Mentoring/ChromaNebula. Reaper Eternal (talk) 17:15, 11 April 2012 (UTC)

Thanks

Thank you for your support at my RfA - and for your congratulations. I will do my best to live up to people's confidence in me. Yngvadottir (talk) 17:28, 9 April 2012 (UTC)

You're welcome! Reaper Eternal (talk) 16:56, 11 April 2012 (UTC)

That username block

Was there something I was missing that I should know in the future? It's not every day I make a username hard block only to have the block made even harder. Ks0stm ^{(T•C•G•E)} 17:15, 11 April 2012 (UTC)

Though it was pretty clear that there was no way that person would be allowed to edit with that username again, also given the grossness in his edit filter log.--Jasper Deng (talk) 17:18, 11 April 2012 (UTC)

Actually, I had initially thought it was yet another sockpuppet of the serial harasser who makes usernames attacking User:B.wilson. I had seen it on the user creation log and then immediately blocked it without talkpage or email access, then found out it was actually just a random attack account. Since I saw no point in letting the account appeal (it would get talkpage access revoked very quickly), I didn't bother to restore access. Reaper Eternal (talk) 17:21, 11 April 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion template filter

Does the filter that catches removed speedy deletion templates cover:

• placing the tag in <!--invisible comments-->
• changing the template to {{db-u1}} or {{db-g7}} and then removing that template
• inserting random characters between the braces (something like {-{db-g13}-})
• removing braces ({db-g13} or {{db-g13} rather than {{db-g13}})
• wrapping the tag in any tag that does not properly display templates (such as <source> or <nowiki> or <pre>)

If not, could the filter be made to catch them? →Στc. 18:51, 11 April 2012 (UTC)

Replied at WT:EF. Reaper Eternal (talk) 12:41, 12 April 2012 (UTC)

Rollback rights request

Hello: I see you are listed as an admin. who is willing to consider and grant rollback rights. I would ask for that consideration at this time. I have 9,175 edits and have reviewer rights. I have written ten articles and helped two gain "good article status". Please feel free to ask me any questions needed. Thank you for your time, Kierzek (talk) 14:31, 12 April 2012 (UTC)

(talk page stalker)Rollback requests should be made at WP:PERM.—cyberpower ^Chat_{Limited Access} 14:41, 12 April 2012 (UTC)

Cyberpower678, thanks for the link. I put in my request therein. Kierzek (talk) 15:01, 12 April 2012 (UTC)

 Done Actually, editors may request rollback on admins' talk pages. Reaper Eternal (talk) 17:06, 12 April 2012 (UTC)

Thank you for the vote of confidence. Kierzek (talk) 02:30, 13 April 2012 (UTC)

Sorry

Sorry for messing with your protection here. I was using Twinkle to protect the page; it seems you protected it while I was setting the options, so it changed your protection. I've changed the protection back to what you initially set. ItsZippy ^{(talk • contributions)} 20:11, 12 April 2012 (UTC)

It's no problem, and it happens all the time. Reaper Eternal (talk) 20:15, 12 April 2012 (UTC)

Filemover decline

I really don't know what images you're talking about when you say I've had "alot" deleted. It would be news to me if I've had more than 2 or 3 deleted. INeverCry 17:32, 13 April 2012 (UTC)

I don't know either. For some reason, the upload log was showing the several deleted images you uploaded in December 2011 as your last uploads, so I declined your request. Now, however, the log seems to be working properly, showing that you have uploaded a great many images since then, so your request is now  Done. I've never seen that bug before.... Reaper Eternal (talk) 18:56, 13 April 2012 (UTC)

Thanks for taking care of this so quickly. INeverCry 19:59, 13 April 2012 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

The Special Barnstar

Hey Reaper Eternal, thanks so much for hiding some of the feedback abuse on the Mitt Romney page last month! We are now in the process of adapting some of your nice vandalism filters for the article feedback tool (285, 225, 247) and would love to get you in the loop, if you are interested. You can email me directly at fflorin-at-wikimedia-dot-org, and we can set a time to chat. In the meantime, here's some info on how we are extending abuse filters for article feedback. Cheers! Fabrice (BTW, I'm the new product manager for editor engagement at Wikimedia and responsible for the article feedback tool, among other projects.) Fabrice Florin (talk) 02:49, 7 April 2012 (UTC)

Thanks! I kind of got castigated for hiding the feedback though! :P Reaper Eternal (talk) 00:38, 8 April 2012 (UTC)

No worries, we were still in early stages of testing back then, but plan to invite more widespread use of the hiding tools -- as well as the new 'feature this post' and 'mark as resolved' tools when we launch them on April 26th (see feature requirements page). In the meantime, please let us know if you'd be interested in adapting your vandalism filters for article feedback, or if you prefer that we take the first stab and have you review them. Cheers! Fabrice Florin (talk) 17:16, 10 April 2012 (UTC)

I'd be happy to adapt the filters for the new article feedback tool. (And by the way, they really aren't "my" filters. All were created by other users, although I have edited many of them.) Thanks! Reaper Eternal (talk) 19:26, 10 April 2012 (UTC)

Ooh, that would be wonderful! There is one filter in particular that we could use your help on: "247- Adding emails in articles". We recommend 'auto-flagging' posts that contain email addresses, to help oversighters comply with laws that require deletion of posts that include private email addresses (as described in the feedback guidelines). To learn more about our proposal for abuse filters on AFT, check our feature requirements page. Thanks so much for offering to help with this! Fabrice Florin (talk) 18:08, 11 April 2012 (UTC)

Let me know if you need any info regarding AFTv5 internals Rsterbin (talk) 18:23, 11 April 2012 (UTC)

Will the "automatically flag feedback" option appear in the checkbox list on the abusefilter editor page along with the currently-existing options like "disallow", "warn", and "tag"?

That's correct. The new checkbox will say "(Article Feedback) Auto-flag as abuse". Rsterbin (talk) 17:38, 12 April 2012 (UTC)

I would recommend code something like the following:

(user_editcount < 500) &
(action = "feedback") &
(new_wikitext rlike "\b[a-zA-Z0-9_]{2,20}@[a-zA-Z0-9_]{2,20}\.(co\.)?[a-z]{2,3}\b")

ACTION: warn, auto-flag

That should work, if you drop the removed_lines requirement and change added_lines to new_wikitext (AFT only provides new_wikitext and new_size). Rsterbin (talk) 17:38, 12 April 2012 (UTC)

Ah! Thanks! (I should have known that removed_lines would have been pointless!) I'll go implement the filter now if you would like. Reaper Eternal (talk) 19:53, 12 April 2012 (UTC)

That'd be great; thank you! Rsterbin (talk) 05:05, 15 April 2012 (UTC)

 Done Special:AbuseFilter/463. Reaper Eternal (talk) 21:17, 16 April 2012 (UTC)

If I understand correctly, the ability to filter feedback is not currently implemented, so I have not added this filter. Hope this helps! Reaper Eternal (talk) 13:49, 12 April 2012 (UTC)

AFT is currently filtering feedback, but the filters we have so far are only logging. Rsterbin (talk) 17:38, 12 April 2012 (UTC)

Thanks so much, Reaper Eternal and Rsterbin, this is absolutely wonderful! Our fearless community liaison, Okeyes (WMF), will be working with you and other top filter authors to coordinate our efforts for the wider release of these filters in coming weeks. To that end, he has started a section for this discussion on our article feedback talk page, where I encourage you both to chime in. Thanks again for all that you have done already to get this project under way, much appreciated! Fabrice Florin (talk) 00:04, 13 April 2012 (UTC)

Edit filter false positive

Can you please take a look at this false positive for edit filter 31? It seems to be the result of this change which you did. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 05:29, 16 April 2012 (UTC)

I've updated the filter so this shouldn't happen in the future. It seems most of the ASCII dicks are not of that form anyway. Reaper Eternal (talk) 19:10, 16 April 2012 (UTC)

Sri Lanka

Hi. I've been getting lots of technical failures trying to remove "Distributor108" nonsense from Sri Lanka, and it looks like we have had an edit clash over it. If you can edit it without getting errors, I'm happy to leave it to you to judge. -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 20:00, 16 April 2012 (UTC)

The Signpost: 16 April 2012

• Arbitration analysis: Inside the Arbitration Committee Mailing List

• Paid editing: Does Wikipedia Pay? The Facilitator: Silver seren

• News and notes: French language outreach, WikiTravel debate, and HighBeam reloaded

• Discussion report: The future of pending changes

• WikiProject report: The Butterflies and Moths of WikiProject Lepidoptera

• Featured content: A few good sports: association football, rugby league, and the Olympics vie for medals

• Arbitration report: Evidence submissions begin in Rich Farmbrough case, proposed decision in R&I Review

• Technology report: MediaWiki 1.20wmf01 hits first WMF wiki, understanding 20% time, and why this report cannot yet be a draft

• Read this Signpost in full
• Single-page
• Unsubscribe
• EdwardsBot (talk) 23:04, 16 April 2012 (UTC)

Sorry

Didn't see that Bencherlite had turned it off.  :( Syrthiss (talk) 17:54, 17 April 2012 (UTC)

That's alright. I just flipped the autoblock on to stop that IP from producing more puppets. Reaper Eternal (talk) 19:31, 17 April 2012 (UTC)

StrongChristianEurope

We also have (all blocked) AndrewBrevikNorway (talk · contribs), 122.11.46.99 (talk · contribs), 98.215.146.75 (talk · contribs), 88.172.167.226 (talk · contribs). Dougweller (talk) 13:01, 21 April 2012 (UTC)

Oh, wonderful! More puppets! Reaper Eternal (talk) 00:50, 23 April 2012 (UTC)

GOCE May copy edit drive

Invitation from the Guild of Copy Editors The Guild of Copy Editors invites you to participate in their May 2012 Backlog elimination drive, a month-long effort to reduce the size of the copy edit backlog. The drive begins on May 1 at 00:00 (UTC) and ends on May 31 at 23:59 (UTC). Our goal for the drive will be to eliminate January, February, and March 2011 from the queue. Barnstars will be awarded to anyone who copy edits more than 4,000 words, and special awards will be given to the top 5 in the following categories: "Number of articles", "Number of words", and "Number of articles of over 5,000 words". We hope to see you there! – Your drive coordinators: Dank, Diannaa, and Stfg. >>> Sign up now <<< To discontinue receiving GOCE newsletters, please remove your name from our mailing list. EdwardsBot (talk) 18:48, 22 April 2012 (UTC)

Online?

Reaper, if you're on here at the second, is it possible you could take a look at the thread I just started at ANI? Not sure how far to go with it. Calabe1992 18:37, 23 April 2012 (UTC)

I really don't know what to make of it. (However, I'll hazard a guess that the account will get indeffed in a couple minutes for vandalism.) Reaper Eternal (talk) 18:40, 23 April 2012 (UTC)

Yeah, I'm not seeing anything right now, but, guess I'll watch it. Calabe1992 18:42, 23 April 2012 (UTC)

MSU Research Questions

Hello, I am involved with a research project for Michigan State University and am wondering if you would be able to answer a few questions regarding tool sets on Wikipedia. What were the tools you mainly used prior to becoming an admin, and after becoming an admin? Here is a link to the project if you are interested Wikipedia:United States Education Program/Courses/Wiki-Project Management (Jonathan Obar) , and if you have any questions please let me know. Thanks! Ltezl (talk) 22:28, 19 April 2012 (UTC)

I'm willing. Reaper Eternal (talk) 23:01, 19 April 2012 (UTC)

Sorry for the delayed response, still getting used to when people reply, where the notifications pop up etc. But I am interested in the toolsets you used before becoming an admin, if any, and after you became an admin. Things like basic editing, blocking, reporting etc. Thanks! Ltezl (talk) 03:18, 24 April 2012 (UTC)

Well, I had the rollback usergroup for about nine months prior to becoming an admin, and I used it extensively to revert vandalism to various articles. I also commonly used antivandalism scripts and programs that depended on having rollback, such as igloo and huggle. After several months, I became an edit filter manager to help prevent gross abuse of Wikipedia and its editors by several banned trolls. After several more months, HJ Mitchell nominated me to be an administrator, which passed unopposed, as can be seen here. Reaper Eternal (talk) 12:58, 24 April 2012 (UTC)

Thank you so much for your time and answers. This will work perfectly. Ltezl (talk) 14:23, 24 April 2012 (UTC)

Thanks!

Thanks for deleting my mistakes.  :) -- ТимофейЛееСуда. 20:27, 23 April 2012 (UTC)

You're welcome! Reaper Eternal (talk) 12:59, 24 April 2012 (UTC)

The Signpost: 23 April 2012

• Investigative report: Spin doctors spin Jimmy's "bright line"

• News and notes: Help-space revamp, WikiTravel RfC, and Justin Knapp scores a million edits

• WikiProject report: Skeptics and Believers: WikiProject The X-Files

• Featured content: A mirror (or seventeen) on this week's featured content

• Arbitration report: Evidence submissions close in Rich Farmbrough case, vote on proposed decision in R&I Review

• Technology report: Wikimedia Labs: soon to be at the cutting edge of MediaWiki development?

• Read this Signpost in full
• Single-page
• Unsubscribe
• EdwardsBot (talk) 12:00, 24 April 2012 (UTC)

Please comment on Wikipedia talk:Deletion policy

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Deletion policy. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot (talk) 09:16, 25 April 2012 (UTC)

E-Mail

Hello, Reaper Eternal. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.

--Breawycker (talk to me!) 01:17, 27 April 2012 (UTC)

Mentoring

I'm going to be incredibly busy soon so I'm ready to do some AfD analysis whenever your ready.—cyberpower ^Chat_Online 19:21, 9 April 2012 (UTC)

OK! Reaper Eternal (talk) 16:57, 11 April 2012 (UTC)

Are you ready?—cyberpower ^Chat_Online 13:35, 15 April 2012 (UTC)

 Done I have completed the four AfD analysis. I know I did something wrong somewhere so I appreciate any input.—cyberpower ^Chat_Online 22:09, 16 April 2012 (UTC)

 Done again.—cyberpower ^Chat_Online 20:13, 19 April 2012 (UTC)

Hello Reaper, I am online today for a little bit and would love to go over my answers to the AfDs.—cyberpower ^Chat_{Temporarily Online} 19:26, 23 April 2012 (UTC)

As I understand, you told me to message you when the mentor page falls out of the watchlist. I don't know how long your watchlist is but it's not visible in mine anymore.—cyberpower ^Chat_Absent 23:32, 26 April 2012 (UTC)

Just so you know. I violated WP:3RR on an article so you may block me if you like.—cyberpower ^Chat_Absent 00:26, 27 April 2012 (UTC)

For what purpose would I block? Try not edit warring next time. Reaper Eternal (talk) 12:38, 27 April 2012 (UTC)

Because according to policy, violating WP:3RR results in 24 hour blocks which escalates for repeated offenses. So I decided to admit my wrong-doings to my mentor.—cyberpower ^Chat_Absent 13:05, 27 April 2012 (UTC)

As an uninvolved editor in this failing RfA, I am asking you if I am allowed to perform a non-admin closure?—cyberpower ^Chat_{Temporarily Online} 22:37, 27 April 2012 (UTC)

No. The bureaucrats have made it pretty clear that they want only bureaucrats to force-close RFAs. (Regular editors can still "close" an RFA after the candidate has withdrawn and when he does not know how to stop it.) I probably pushed the limits by snow-closing the previous RFA, but I am an administrator in decently good standing and the RFA was rapidly degenerating into a dramafest with plenty of insulting. Reaper Eternal (talk) 02:05, 28 April 2012 (UTC)

Ok. Thanks. BTW, I left a question for you on my mentor page.—cyberpower ^Chat_Absent 12:28, 28 April 2012 (UTC)

Indef vote

Hey Reaper, that vote from indef-blocked InToronto on Calabe's RfA, why can't that be struck? It kind of mars the RfA a bit. Thanks, Drmies (talk) 21:14, 26 April 2012 (UTC)

I agree that the vote is stupid, but votes are really only stricken when they are from sockpuppets, when users accidentally double-vote, or when the general consensus is that the vote is purely disruptive (which may be true in this case). Additionally, since the nominator struck it, it would likely reflect poorly on the candidate. Reaper Eternal (talk) 12:35, 27 April 2012 (UTC)