RedBullWarrior

Welcome!

Hello, RedBullWarrior, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Tutorial
• How to edit a page and How to develop articles
• How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! Ian.thomson (talk) 12:25, 23 July 2012 (UTC)

A summary of cite policies and guidelines you may find useful

• Always cite a source for any new information. When adding this information to articles, using <ref>reference tags like this</ref>, containing the name of the source, the author, page number, publisher or web address (if applicable).
• "Truth" is not the criteria for inclusion, verifiability is.
• We do not publish original thought nor original research.
• A subject is considered notable if it has received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject.
• Reliable sources typically include: articles from magazines or newspapers (particularly scholarly journals), or books by recognized authors (basically, books by respected publishers). Online versions of these are usually accepted, provided they're held to the same standards. User generated sources (like Wikipedia) are to be avoided. Self-published sources should be avoided except for information by and about the subject that is not self-serving (for example, citing a company's website to establish something like year of establishment).
• Articles are to be written from a neutral point of view. Wikipedia is not concerned with facts or opinions, it just summarizes reliable sources. Real scholarship actually does not say what understanding of the world is "true," but only with what there is evidence for.

Ian.thomson (talk) 12:25, 23 July 2012 (UTC)

• Hi, the simplest way to add sources is to put them inside ref tags like this: <ref>URL goes here</ref>. Alternatively you can click on the cite button which appears above the box you type into. then click the button that comes up called "Templates", then click the right template, website, newspaper, journal etc. IRWolfie- (talk) 13:23, 23 July 2012 (UTC)

Thanks for the help, greatly appreciated and I look forward to contributing more to the site. :)--RedBullWarrior (talk) 13:26, 23 July 2012 (UTC)

No worries :). Just a small note on using the talkback template, to have it form properly you write it like this: {{talkback|RedBullWarrior}}, happy editing, IRWolfie- (talk) 13:29, 23 July 2012 (UTC)

• You may also find WP:REFB useful, it provides a basic introduction to the mechanics of actually adding references. Monty₈₄₅ 14:41, 23 July 2012 (UTC)

Cheers for that, looks useful enough and I'm starting to get into the swing of it all.--RedBullWarrior (talk) 15:03, 23 July 2012 (UTC)

Alberto Junior Rodríguez

Hi there from Portugal,

as you can see from the refs i added to the player's page, he has not moved to Deportivo de La Coruña, has returned to Sporting and probably will not play at least this season. Please don't add it again.

"Whistle" if you need anything, happy editing --AL (talk) 13:42, 23 July 2012 (UTC)

• The Goal.com ref is also good, we'll add it to the article as it is in English. Thanks, nice teamwork! --AL (talk) 14:21, 23 July 2012 (UTC)

Yeah my pleasure. Goal.com is one of my favourite football references for European transfers (a lot of the other ones are in other languages). But yeah, hopefully we'll work together on various other pages. Peace be with you.--RedBullWarrior (talk) 15:02, 23 July 2012 (UTC)

Edits

Please avoid making edits that inject personal opinion without sources, as you've done on B3ta and The Elder Scrolls IV: Oblivion. I have reverted both edits.

You should also preview your edits to ensure they do not cause formatting issues, as is the case at 2012–13 Villarreal CF season. I have not reverted this, please make an effort to correct. When using the ref tag, you should place <ref> before the reference, and </ref> after the reference. In this case you seem to have placed just <ref>.

-- ferret (talk) 14:23, 23 July 2012 (UTC)

Got it now, cheers for the help. :)--RedBullWarrior (talk) 16:51, 23 July 2012 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia: check out the Teahouse!

Hello! RedBullWarrior, you are invited to the Teahouse, a forum on Wikipedia for new editors to ask questions about editing Wikipedia, and get support from peers and experienced editors. Please join us! NtheP (talk) 16:36, 23 July 2012 (UTC)

RedBullWarrior, you are invited to the Teahouse

Hi RedBullWarrior! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! I hope to see you there! Jtmorgan (I'm a Teahouse host) Visit the Teahouse We hope to see you there! Delivered HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

2012–13 Manchester United F.C. season

I don't see why the Valencia number change has to be in the article at all, but if you're absolutely intent on including it, it could easily go in the "Transfers" section in relation to Michael Owen's departure. – PeeJay 23:11, 24 July 2012 (UTC)

That's a fair enough point, but the number 7 shirt has been worn by various club legends. And you're missing the point a little here, he isn't transferring to the number 7, he is more inheriting it. The transfers section is for players moving in/out.--RedBullWarrior (talk) 23:14, 24 July 2012 (UTC)

I'm not saying he is "transferring" to the number 7, I'm just saying it makes far more sense to say that he's taking over from the departing Michael Owen (who is mentioned in the Transfers section) than to shove a non-sequitur statement into the Pre-season section cack-handedly. – PeeJay 23:28, 24 July 2012 (UTC)

ah i see, sorry my mistake :)--RedBullWarrior (talk) 23:33, 24 July 2012 (UTC)

AFD responses

Hi Redbull,

When commenting on an AFD, make sure to only leave one bolded response. You can comment on other responses but should only have one bolded comment for the outcome. If you change your vote (As you did from Delete to Redirect for Ghost), go back and do a strikethrough on your original vote. You shouldn't delete it, but the strikethrough will let people know you changed your option. To do this, surround your original bolded choice with <strike></strike>

Thanks! -- ferret (talk) 14:43, 26 July 2012 (UTC)

Ok, will remember that for future, hopefully this will all soon fall into place for me..--RedBullWarrior (talk) 20:12, 26 July 2012 (UTC)

Don't sweat it, there's a lot to learn. -- ferret (talk) 20:26, 26 July 2012 (UTC)

Yeah I know, it looks like there's more to this place than I thought. Good thing I'm heading in the right direction on this place, unlike my stupid cousin who got banned.--RedBullWarrior (talk) 21:12, 26 July 2012 (UTC)

Just a message for people

Im back from my wiki-break, which happened to be a little longer than planned. But just so you all know im back and will begin contributing again as usual.--RedBullWarrior (talk) 11:36, 2 August 2012 (UTC)

Blocked

Max Semenik (talk) 15:20, 6 August 2012 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

RedBullWarrior (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I was merely returning under good faith, I wasn't intending to slip back into vandalism. I tried to get Doughnuthead banned so I don't have to worry about him anymore and focus on Wikipedia itself. Look at my contribs for this account, you'll see none of them are vandalism, thereby proving I am able to conduct myself in a responsible fashion.--RedBullWarrior (talk) 15:31, 6 August 2012 (UTC)

Decline reason:

Trying to get yourself banned was a bit silly, wasn't it? That would get you, the person, banned, not just your Doughnuthead account, and it would make it impossible for any individual admin to unblock any other accounts of yours, including this one. I'm revoking Talk page access now - you need to follow the appropriate procedure from your Doughnuthead account, and if editing is disabled, that means following WP:BASC -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 15:56, 6 August 2012 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Also note that the block template above states that having multiple accounts is allowed if they are used for legitimate purposes, which I was doing.--RedBullWarrior (talk) 15:40, 6 August 2012 (UTC)

(Non-administrator comment) But you're using this account to evade your current indefblock on Doughnuthead, which makes it not legitimate. Blocks are on the person, not the account. The right way to return would be to follow the criteria you were given and request an unblock on the Doughnuthead account. Writ Keeper ⚇♔ 15:46, 6 August 2012 (UTC)

Talk page access on Doughnuthead is revoked.--RedBullWarrior (talk) 15:50, 6 August 2012 (UTC)