Archive

edit

Final systems

edit

Thanks for your question. Reply at [1].Lindsay658 (talk) 03:54, 8 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

Further reply at the same place. BTW, we are on the same team, you know. Lindsay658 (talk) 06:29, 9 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
Still more on same stuff at same place. Thanks for your advice.Lindsay658 (talk) 02:17, 10 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
I'm still at the agreed task; however it is taking a little longer than I thought to get from 1897 to the present day, whilst simultaneously doing some other relevant stuff to each article -- maybe another week (I'm at home nursing a badly sprained ankle), and I'll be finished. I have already done 1897 all the way to 1926. Lindsay658 (talk) 00:13, 19 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

edit

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

Stubs
Best and Fairest
Adam Houlihan
Box Hill Hawks
John Cahill
Geelong Falcons
Craig Burrows
All-Australian Team
TAC Cup
Ballarat Football League
AFL Players Association
North Albany Football Club
Eastlake Football Club
Stephen Silvagni
Nigel Lappin
Bruce Doull
Stan Alves
Auskick
Michael Theoklitos
Coburg Tigers
Cleanup
Whitehawk F.C.
Condon Committee
Rex Hunt
Merge
List of nicknames used in Australian rules
Ferranti Thistle F.C.
Home and away season
Add Sources
Leigh Matthews
Chris Tarrant (footballer)
Alastair Lynch
Wikify
Fraternal Order of Police
Threave Rovers F.C.
Dawlish Town F.C.
Expand
Nick Dal Santo
Alan Didak
Robert Harvey (footballer)

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.

P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot (talk) 20:58, 10 March 2008 (UTC)Reply


Fair use rationale for Image:Arf kickatgoal.png

edit

Thanks for uploading Image:Arf kickatgoal.png. You've indicated that the image meets Wikipedia's criteria for non-free content, but there is no explanation of why it meets those criteria. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have any questions, please post them at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

Thank you for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 07:29, 21 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

Fair use rationale for File:Arf oobotf.png

edit
 

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Arf oobotf.png. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 09:29, 2 May 2010 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of 2006 AFL pre-season

edit
 

The article 2006 AFL pre-season has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Miscellaneous list of items that either belong in the 2005 AFL season or 2006 AFL season or other articles. No other preseason has a dedicated article

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. The-Pope (talk) 07:06, 11 June 2012 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom elections are now open!

edit

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:14, 30 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

Nomination for deletion of Template:Australia at the Commonwealth Games

edit

 Template:Australia at the Commonwealth Games has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Primefac (talk) 16:32, 23 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of File:JPD finals template.PNG

edit
 

The file File:JPD finals template.PNG has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unused, unclear use/purpose

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Zinclithium (talk) 01:33, 24 April 2018 (UTC)Reply