Revdocable
A belated welcome!
edit
Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, Revdocable! I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may still benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:
Need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Try the Task Center.
If you don't already know, you should sign your posts on talk pages by using four tildes (~~~~) to insert your username and the date.
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Again, welcome! Jauerbackdude?/dude. 13:26, 27 January 2022 (UTC)
"You guys"
editYou recent edits mentions this. Does that include every one of the million or so people who have edited Wikipedia? We assume good faith. Edit summaries that insult nearly everyone reflect badly on the person who writes them. Be constructive if you want to encourage other editors to assist you. Victuallers (talk) 22:31, 25 December 2023 (UTC)
- No, that includes only the very small percentage who actually control what's published and what isn't. Revdocable (talk) 03:20, 26 December 2023 (UTC)
- And nothing I wrote insults "nearly everyone." Rather, it justifiably criticizes the comparatively very small number who actually control the content herein. Revdocable (talk) 03:22, 26 December 2023 (UTC)
- "We assume good faith." Does that include every one of the million or so people who have edited Wikipedia? Did you seek permission from every one of them to speak on their behalf, or are you just that arrogant? Perhaps you, like me, were referring only to the small group that actually has editorial control over Wikipedia.
- I would further point out that I did not ask other editors to assist me. Revdocable (talk) 14:32, 26 December 2023 (UTC)
Introduction to contentious topics
edit
You have recently edited a page related to the Arab–Israeli conflict, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.
A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.
Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:
- adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
- comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
- follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
- comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
- refrain from gaming the system.
Additionally, you must be logged-in, have 500 edits and an account age of 30 days, and are not allowed to make more than 1 revert within 24 hours on a page within this topic.
Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.