Rachel pkv

Welcome!

Hello, Reviewbah, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as User:Reviewbah/sandbox, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's content policies and may not be retained. In short, the topic of an article must be notable and have already been the subject of publication by reliable and independent sources.

Please review Your first article for an overview of the article creation process. The Article Wizard is available to help you create an article, where it will be reviewed and considered for publication. For information on how to request a new article that can be created by someone else, see Requested articles. If you are stuck, come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can help you through the processes.

New to Wikipedia? Please consider taking a look at our introductory tutorial or reviewing the contributing to Wikipedia page to learn the basics about editing. Below are a few other good pages about article creation.

• Article development
• Standard layout
• Lead section
• The perfect article
• Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, ask me on my talk page. You can also type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! Vanderwaalforces (talk) 07:23, 18 June 2024 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Reviewbah/sandbox

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on User:Reviewbah/sandbox, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

• It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.
• It appears to consist of writings, information, discussions, and/or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that Wikipedia is not a free Web hosting service. (See section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion.)

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 07:23, 18 June 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (June 18)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Vanderwaalforces were: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Reviewbah/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Vanderwaalforces (talk) 07:23, 18 June 2024 (UTC)

Hello, Reviewbah! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Vanderwaalforces (talk) 07:23, 18 June 2024 (UTC)

June 2024

Your account has been indefinitely blocked from editing because it has been used for advertising or promotion, which is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia. Also, your username gives the impression that the account represents a business, organisation, group, or web site, which is against the username policy.

If you intend to make useful contributions instead of promoting your business or organization, you may request unblock and a username change. In your reasons, you must:

• Disclose any compensation you may receive for your contributions in accordance with the paid-contribution disclosure requirement; and
• Convince us that you understand the reason for your block and that you will not repeat the kind of edits for which you were blocked; and
• Describe in general terms the contributions that you intend to make if you are unblocked; and
• Provide a new username.

To do this, post the text {{unblock-spamun|Your proposed new username|Your reason here}} at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your proposed new username" with your new username and replace the text "Your reason here" with your reasons to be unblocked.

Please note that the new username you choose cannot already be taken and in use by another account. You can search to see if the username you'd like to choose is available. If the search returns that no global account with that username exists, that means it is still available.

Appeals: If, after reviewing the guide to appealing blocks, you believe this block was made in error, you may appeal it by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your reason here" with the reasons you believe the block was an error, and publish the page. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 07:35, 18 June 2024 (UTC)

This user's request to be unblocked to request a change in username has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without a good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Rachel pkv (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Requested username:

rachel_pkv (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Request reason:

I understand that my previous edits were promotional and that my username gave the impression of representing a business, which is against Wikipedia's guidelines. I apologize for this and will not repeat these actions. I intend to contribute by improving and editing articles in a neutral and verifiable manner, ensuring they are supported by reliable sources. I did not receive any compensation for my contributions. In the future, I will adhere strictly to Wikipedia’s content policies and guidelines to help maintain the integrity of the community.

Decline reason:

You don't say what edits you will make if unblocked. Note that paid editing does not require specific payment for contributions(otherwise every paid editor would deny being specifically paid to contribute); any form of compensation(such as employment) triggers the disclosure requirement. If you work for the company that produces this app, you must make the paid editing disclosure. You won't be unblocked to, in the short term, edit about anything for which you have a conflict of interest, so please tell what edits you will make instead. If you have no other interest here, this is the end of the road. 331dot (talk) 08:44, 9 July 2024 (UTC)

This user's request to be unblocked to request a change in username has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

Rachel pkv (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Requested username:

rachel_pkv (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Request reason:

I understand that my previous edits were promotional and that my username gave the impression of representing a business, which is against Wikipedia's guidelines. I apologize for this and will not repeat these actions. I did not receive specific payment for my contributions, but I work for the company that produces the app I edited about, so I acknowledge the conflict of interest and will make the required paid editing disclosure. If unblocked, I plan to contribute to Wikipedia by editing and improving articles unrelated to my employer or any area where I have a conflict of interest. Specifically, I intend to focus on expanding and improving articles on local history, cultural heritage, and general interest topics, ensuring that all edits are neutral and backed by reliable sources. I will adhere strictly to Wikipedia’s content policies and guidelines to help maintain the integrity of the community.

Accept reason:

I have renamed and unblocked your account. Welcome back. PhilKnight (talk) 23:24, 10 July 2024 (UTC)

Reviewbah (talk) 10:28, 10 July 2024 (UTC)

@Extraordinary Writ: - what are your thoughts about a possible unblock? PhilKnight (talk) 15:01, 10 July 2024 (UTC)

PhilKnight, the request seems AI-written to me ([1] gives it a 98% chance), but I'm not averse to an unblock since it's easy to reblock if the promise to avoid any area where I have a conflict of interest isn't kept. Your call. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 21:30, 10 July 2024 (UTC)