Welcome!

edit
Hello, Reyandilawar, and Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by using four tildes (~~~~) or by clicking   if shown; this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field with your edits. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement, and you may wish to read our newspaper The Signpost. Happy editing! XLinkBot (talk) 08:36, 30 May 2018 (UTC)Reply
Getting started
Getting help
Policies and guidelines

The community

Writing articles
Miscellaneous

May 2018

edit

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Dhruggi Rajgan has been reverted.
Your edit here to Dhruggi Rajgan was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (http://bhubharchakwal.blogspot.com/2017/06/dharuggi-rajgan-village-pics-article.html, http://bhubharchakwal.blogspot.com/search/label/Mulhal%20Mughlan, http://bhubharchakwal.blogspot.com/search/label/Mulhal%20Mughlan, http://bhubharchakwal.blogspot.com/2017/09/dharrugi-rajgan-manka-dam-2017-pics.html) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If the external link you inserted or changed was to a blog, forum, free web hosting service, fansite, or similar site (see 'Links to avoid', #11), then please check the information on the external site thoroughly. Note that such sites should probably not be linked to if they contain information that is in violation of the creator's copyright (see Linking to copyrighted works), or they are not written by a recognised, reliable source. Linking to sites that you are involved with is also strongly discouraged (see conflict of interest).
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 08:36, 30 May 2018 (UTC)Reply

July 2018

edit

  Hello, I'm Abelmoschus Esculentus. I wanted to let you know that I removed one or more external links you added to Chakwal because they seemed inappropriate for an encyclopedia. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page or take a look at our guidelines about links. Thanks. ~ Abelmoschus Esculentus (talk to me) 03:16, 15 July 2018 (UTC)Reply

  Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to Mulhal Mughlan. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include, but are not limited to, links to personal websites, links to websites with which you are affiliated (whether as a link in article text, or a citation in an article), and links that attract visitors to a website or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Because Wikipedia uses the nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by most search engines. If you feel the link should be added to the page, please discuss it on the associated talk page rather than re-adding it.  
Your edit here to Mulhal Mughlan was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (http://bhubharchakwal.blogspot.com/2017/07/mulhal-mughlan-new-hd-pics-2017-mulhal.html, http://bhubharchakwal.blogspot.com/search/label/Chakwal%20Pakistan, http://bhubharchakwal.blogspot.com/2017/08/sohawa-chakwal-highway-road.html, http://bhubharchakwal.blogspot.com/2017/07/mulhal-mughlan-new-hd-pics-2017-mulhal.html, http://bhubharchakwal.blogspot.com/2017/07/mulhal-mughlan-new-hd-pics-2017-mulhal.html, http://bhubharchakwal.blogspot.com/2017/07/mulhal-mughlan-new-hd-pics-2017-mulhal.html) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If the external link you inserted or changed was to a blog, forum, free web hosting service, fansite, or similar site (see 'Links to avoid', #11), then please check the information on the external site thoroughly. Note that such sites should probably not be linked to if they contain information that is in violation of the creator's copyright (see Linking to copyrighted works), or they are not written by a recognised, reliable source. Linking to sites that you are involved with is also strongly discouraged (see conflict of interest).
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 03:28, 15 July 2018 (UTC)Reply

Concern regarding Draft:Bhubhar

edit

  Hello, Reyandilawar. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Bhubhar, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 20:13, 4 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:Bhubhar

edit
 

Hello, Reyandilawar. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Bhubhar".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 19:56, 4 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Bhubhar (August 31)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Qcne was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Qcne (talk) 10:15, 31 August 2023 (UTC)Reply
 
Hello, Reyandilawar! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Qcne (talk) 10:15, 31 August 2023 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Bhubhar (September 4)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Dan arndt were:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Dan arndt (talk) 05:56, 4 September 2023 (UTC)Reply

October 2023

edit

  Hello, I'm NoNAja. I noticed that in this edit to Punjdehra, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. NoNAja (talk) 20:22, 19 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

this is a duplicate article for Punjdhera check that article okay. reyandilawar (talk) 20:25, 19 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Reyan Dilawar

edit
 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Reyan Dilawar requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, images, a rephrasing of the title, a question that should have been asked at the help or reference desks, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 05:55, 3 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

About your edits to Bhubhar

edit

Hey Reyan Dilawar, please don't use the __INDEX__ magic word on pages; articles are automatically approved for indexing by search engines once an article is reviewed by a new page patroller. There are next to no situations in which you have to enable indexing manually. That being said, I've gone ahead and removed it again. Let me know if you have any questions! TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 06:24, 3 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

go away reyandilawar (talk) 06:26, 3 November 2023 (UTC)Reply
That's not how this works. Communication is required to collaboratively build an encyclopedia, and you have to explain the changes you make. TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 06:31, 3 November 2023 (UTC)Reply
don't reply me i am angry on you okay, don't reply me again. don't seek me how to use wikipedia i am content creator i better know all about these things articles, websites etc etc reyandilawar (talk) 06:37, 3 November 2023 (UTC)Reply
Okay TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 06:38, 3 November 2023 (UTC)Reply