May 2007

edit

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. However, we remind you not to attack other editors. Please comment on the contributions and not the contributors. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you.

Although you may disagree with comments left here on your talk page, it is clear from your edit history that you are occasionally not WP:CIVIL in your edit summaries. Please be more gentle even when you disagree. Remember to comment on content rather than contributors. MKoltnow 19:31, 24 May 2007 (UTC)Reply

My apologies, but it's hard not to comment on vandals who seek only to assert their dominance over actual contributors because they've apparently nothing better to do. Rhenbelz 05:26, 25 May 2007 (UTC)Reply

AfD nomination of New Bright

edit

New Bright, an article you created, has been nominated for deletion. We appreciate your contributions. However, an editor does not feel that New Bright satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in the nomination space (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and the Wikipedia deletion policy). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/New Bright and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of New Bright during the discussion but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. New England Review Me!/Go Red Sox! 20:47, 27 August 2007 (UTC)Reply

Double Dare (Kyosho)

edit
 

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Double Dare (Kyosho), suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}} to the top of Double Dare (Kyosho). User:Ceyockey (talk to me) 15:20, 21 December 2007 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Kyosho Double Dare for deletion

edit
 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kyosho Double Dare is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kyosho Double Dare until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Drewmutt (^ᴥ^) talk 05:45, 21 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of File:KyoshoDoubleDare1.JPG

edit
 

The file File:KyoshoDoubleDare1.JPG has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

orphaned image, no encyclopedic use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

Also:

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 23 April 2020 (UTC)Reply