User talk:Rhododendrites/2018c
 | This is an archive of past discussions about User:Rhododendrites, for the period May 2018 - June 2018. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Your edit to Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/GreenMeansGo
Did you intend to remove my reaffirmed support from the page? If you did, may I ask why? Best, OhKayeSierra (talk) 14:41, 1 May 2018 (UTC)
- @OhKayeSierra: Yikes! Very bizarre that I didn't even get an edit conflict error. Sorry about that. Thanks for fixing it (and also sorry to Javert2113, whose comment I somehow removed at the same time, and thanks to Pawnkingthree for fixing that one). — Rhododendrites talk \\ 14:48, 1 May 2018 (UTC)
- No worries! I thought that it might have been a mistake, but I wanted to be sure.
Stranger things have happened on this site. OhKayeSierra (talk) 14:50, 1 May 2018 (UTC)
- Yes, we even have an article about it, though I haven't seen it yet. :) — Rhododendrites talk \\ 14:51, 1 May 2018 (UTC)
- Eh, things happen. — Javert2113 (talk) 15:00, 1 May 2018 (UTC)
- No worries! I thought that it might have been a mistake, but I wanted to be sure.
N
Sorry that you feel like I was misrepresenting you: that wasn’t the intent. I simply disagree with your view that sourcing is required throughout N separate from the GNG, which I suspect is why we were talking past each other. FWIW, I find the ARS comparison a bit funny, as they are the main reason I hate the GNG and want to move as far as possible away from it. My point is that a merit-based system would work so long as WP:V is met. TonyBallioni (talk) 18:19, 1 May 2018 (UTC)
- @TonyBallioni: Thanks for the message. While you were leaving it, I was removing my last comment there, which doesn't really further the discussion.
I don't know how you can possibly read WP:N that way, without skipping over the nutshell and several of the sections, but hey,(can't help myself) we can resume the discussion when it actually matters. :) — Rhododendrites talk \\ 18:23, 1 May 2018 (UTC)
Wiki Loves Food
Hello! After the successful pilot program by Wikimedia India in 2015, Wiki Loves Food (WLF) is happening again in 2018 and this year, it's going International. To make this event a grand success, your direction is key. Please sign up here as a volunteer to bring all the world's food to Wikimedia. Danidamiobi (talk) 21:40, 6 May 2018 (UTC)
Any input?
Hey, didn't know if this would be something you'd be interested in or not: Wikipedia_talk:Twinkle#Student_welcome. (This is Shalor, btw) ReaderofthePack (｡◕‿◕｡) 20:55, 7 May 2018 (UTC)
- @ReaderofthePack: I agree it needs updating. It has for quite some time, really. Wiki Ed tends to prefer the community edit the education program pages that aren't only relevant to the US/Canada, so I've not felt comfortable doing so. I'd be happy to help on the talk page if someone else wants to rework it, though. — Rhododendrites talk \\ 19:39, 10 May 2018 (UTC)
Please comment on Wikipedia:Village pump (policy)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia:Village pump (policy). Legobot (talk) 04:27, 8 May 2018 (UTC)
This Month in GLAM: April 2018
| ||||||
Data base Horizon pleins textes
I dont understand why you reverted my edit. I was mentionning as an academic database that is also a repository known world wide of a French research institute called IRD-Institut de recherche pour le développement You can verify the existence of the database. http://horizon.documentation.ird.fr/ I am not knowledgeable enough to revert your revert. Rigas — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rigas (talk • contribs) 19:20, 10 May 2018 (UTC)
- @Rigas: Hi there. Thanks for adding to Wikipedia. Most lists on Wikipedia do not aim to be exhaustive, including everything that exists. There are some examples, but they're usually things like "list of states in the United States", "discography of the Rolling Stones," "list of prime ministers of australia," etc. -- lists that can definitively include everything in a set rather than examples of a type. The way we typically restrict inclusion is to include only notable examples. "Notable" is Wikipedia jargon (see WP:N) for a threshold of coverage in reliable sources independent of the subject that would justify having an encyclopedia article on that subject. For simplicity, many lists just say "only include examples with Wikipedia articles" (with the presumption that the article shows notability via its citations, and that if it does not the article will be deleted). That's why I removed what you added here. Note that all the rest of the databases/search engines in that list are blue links, pointing to a Wikipedia article. You may want to consider writing the article about it if it is a notable example. — Rhododendrites talk \\ 19:36, 10 May 2018 (UTC)
Event coordinator granted
After reviewing your request for the "eventcoordinator" permission, I have enabled the flag on your account. Keep in mind these things:
- The event coordinator right removes the limit on the maximum number of new accounts that can be created in a 24-hour period.
- The event coordinator right allows you to temporarily add the "confirmed" permission to newly created accounts. You should not grant this for more than 10 days.
- The event coordinator right is not a status symbol. If it remains unused, it is likely to be removed. Abuse of the event coordinator right will result in its removal by an administrator.
- Please note, if you were previously a member of the "account creator" group, your flag may have been converted to this new group.
If you no longer require the right, let me know, or ask any other administrator. Drop a note on my talk page if you run into troubles or have any questions about appropriate/inappropriate use of the event coordinator right. Happy editing! — xaosflux Talk 21:55, 14 May 2018 (UTC)
Please comment on Wikipedia talk:IP block exemption
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:IP block exemption. Legobot (talk) 04:28, 18 May 2018 (UTC)
| Wednesday May 23, 7pm: WikiWednesday Salon and Skill-Share NYC | |
|---|---|
  You are invited to join the Wikimedia NYC community for our monthly "WikiWednesday" evening salon (7-9pm) and knowledge-sharing workshop at Babycastles gallery by 14th Street / Union Square in Manhattan. We will include a look at the organization and planning for our chapter, and expanding volunteer roles for both regular Wikipedia editors and new participants. We will also follow up on plans for recent and upcoming edit-a-thons, museum and library projects, education initiatives, and other outreach activities. We welcome the participation of our friends from the Free Culture movement and from all educational and cultural institutions interested in developing free knowledge projects. After the main meeting, pizza/chicken/vegetables and refreshments and video games in the gallery!
We especially encourage folks to add your 5-minute lightning talks to our roster, and otherwise join in the "open space" experience! Newcomers are very welcome! Bring your friends and colleagues! --Pharos (talk) 03:12, 23 May 2018 (UTC) P.S. You are also invited to Action = History: Wikipedia Edit-a-thon for Asian American Literature on Sunday May 27! | |
(You can subscribe/unsubscribe from future notifications for NYC-area events by adding or removing your name from this list.)
The Signpost: 24 May 2018
- From the editor: Another issue meets the deadline
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Portals
- Discussion report: User rights, infoboxes, and more discussion on portals
- Featured content: Featured content selected by the community
- Arbitration report: Managing difficult topics
- News and notes: Lots of Wikimedia
- Traffic report: We love our superheroes
- Technology report: A trove of contributor and developer goodies
- Recent research: Why people don't contribute to Wikipedia; using Wikipedia to teach statistics, technical writing, and controversial issues
- Humour: Play with your food
- Gallery: Wine not?
- From the archives: The Signpost scoops The Signpost
Is there...
...a tutorial on using AWB? I saw you were a user and it has been very difficult for me to figure out how to use it. Is there a youtube video or something? Best Regards, Barbara ✐ ✉ 23:34, 25 May 2018 (UTC)
- @Barbara (WVS): I'm not sure about a tutorial, but there is a user manual.
- I remember being a little overwhelmed by it myself -- it's a surprisingly powerful tool. If there's something specific you want to use it for, I may be able to help with steps. That's presuming nothing major has changed in the last few years (I used it a lot a few years ago, but not much since).
- Once you get permission to use it, install it, and log in, the first step is to make a list of articles in the bottom-left panel. I usually just use my user contributions, but you could use anything. Use the "source" drop-down. One of the most common people use is a category. The "recurse" options are how many subdirectories to look in. "Category" is just that category. "Category (recurse 1 level)" is that category and its subcategories. If you select "Category (recurse user defined levels)" it will prompt you for a number. Each number adds all of the subdirectories of all of the subdirectories (adds up quickly). For the sake of example, let's try Category:American women film producers with recurse 1 level. That yields a list of 191 pages.
- Once you have a list, click "filter". Select "sort alphabetically" and "remove duplicates". Make sure nothing is checked in the first two columns aside from "Main/Article" (AWB works in any namespace, but you should get used to articles before messing with talk pages IMO). Then click "apply". That brings the list down to 186 pages for me.
- Next step are those tabs in the bottom-middle panel.
- Options tab: Auto changes are a big reason people use AWB. I tend to keep auto tag, apply general fixes, and unicodify whole page checked. I also check regex typo fixing. Find and replace is powerful, and I have a bunch of things that I keep stored in there (remember to save your settings btw), but I'd skip it while you're learning the program.
- To keep it simple, I'd skip the "more" tab. In the "disambig" tab, again, to keep it simple at first I'd turn off "enable disambiguation".
- "Skip" tab: the only things I have checked here are to skip if the "page is in use", "no changes are made", "only whitespace", "only casing", "only minor genfixes". A pet peeve for a lot of people is AWB use to make changes that don't really do anything. If you don't pay attention to what it's doing, it'll make an edit just to remove an extra space at the end of a paragraph (i.e. a space that nobody can see because there's no text after it) and all sorts of other pointless edits. If you're making a bunch of other edits that are more substantial, then it doesn't hurt to do that too, but you want to make sure there's some noticeable improvement. "genfixes" are those sorts of minor details. It'll reorder references, add or remove line breaks, make formatting changes, etc. of various significance. I automatically skip it if it only changes whitespace, only changes casing (this isn't just article text but templates, etc. casing that nobody can see unless you edit the page), and only minor genfixes.
- Finally, under the start tab, you can change the edit summary you use, and mark it as a minor edit, which is a good idea. When you're ready, click "start".
- Once you start, it'll show you a diff of the proposed changes. It doesn't save automatically. You need to decide whether to "skip" or "save" in that start panel. If it looks like a useful edit, save it. If it doesn't look useful, skip it. If it's partially useful, you can either save and then go back manually, or you can use the bottom-right "edit box" to edit manually through AWB. The different tabs of that panel show you different aspects of what it has noticed and/or wants to change about that page in particular.
- If you used my example category above, Category:American women film producers, the first one to pop up is probably Angela Robinson, where AWB wants to change "award winning" to "award-winning". That seems like a useful enough change to me, so I'd save it (I'm skipping for now so you can use that as an example if you want). It also noticed multiple wikilinks (look in the start tab towards the bottom). Since each link should only be linked in its first instance, you can remove the others (as with anything AWB-related, though, it requires some care, since it's ok to link to something more than once if doing so in the lead, caption, infobox, tables, lists, etc.).
- The next one is Adriadne Getty. It wants to make several changes. Whether changing "September 30th" to "September 30" is a significant change is debatable, but it also moves a comma from after to before a reference, which is useful, so I'd save that one too.
- And so on. This is perhaps more than you asked for. Let me know if it's not the sort of help you were looking for. :) — Rhododendrites talk \\ 14:41, 26 May 2018 (UTC)
- Thank you so much! You put in a lot of time to explain this to me and you didn't have to do it. You cut right through the parts I didn't understand in the users manual. Thank you. Aren't you supposed be studying or writing or something? Best Regards, Barbara ✐ ✉ 19:07, 26 May 2018 (UTC)
Sorry for the late response. I think it's worth renominating after the fix. Tomer T (talk) 12:24, 26 May 2018 (UTC)
- @Tomer T: Thanks. Not sure if I'll renominate sooner or later, but at some point. :) — Rhododendrites talk \\ 14:42, 26 May 2018 (UTC)
Possible AfD
Hello. I see you posted the AfD for Ideological bias on Wikipedia and I wonder whether you think that this article, Metropolitan bias, should also be deleted. To me it looks like POV OR cobbled together with some SYNTH misappropriation of unrelated sources that are not addressing the topic stated in the lede. What do you think? SPECIFICO talk 13:41, 26 May 2018 (UTC)
- @SPECIFICO: I'm not sure. It does seem like it pulls together a few different topics nominally related to "urban areas are different from rural areas". Would probably require some additional research before I felt comfortable opining in any "official" capacity. To the extent it's about media bias, it would likely make a sensible addition to the media bias article. It's the media bias plus the other elements of the article that makes it possibly problematic in pulling together various things that are just, again, differences in statistics, coverage, etc. of urban vs. rural areas. Not sure. I'll watch the article, but won't be nominating it for deletion. I'd want to do more research first. — Rhododendrites talk \\ 15:08, 26 May 2018 (UTC)
- Thanks. I commented on the WP bias AfD talk page with some of my concern. I think it's cherrypicking statements about "bias" in diverse meanings to support a narrative of political or ideological bias. I started to do an AfD but got confused with all the templates and gave up. SPECIFICO talk 15:43, 26 May 2018 (UTC)
- @SPECIFICO: FYI WP:TW makes XfD really really easy. Just use the XfD tab, type in the reason, and it takes care of the rest. That's not an endorsement of deletion of this page, necessarily, but technical reasons shouldn't be cause not to. :) — Rhododendrites talk \\ 16:01, 26 May 2018 (UTC)
- Thanks for that. SPECIFICO talk 16:25, 26 May 2018 (UTC)
- @SPECIFICO: FYI WP:TW makes XfD really really easy. Just use the XfD tab, type in the reason, and it takes care of the rest. That's not an endorsement of deletion of this page, necessarily, but technical reasons shouldn't be cause not to. :) — Rhododendrites talk \\ 16:01, 26 May 2018 (UTC)
- Thanks. I commented on the WP bias AfD talk page with some of my concern. I think it's cherrypicking statements about "bias" in diverse meanings to support a narrative of political or ideological bias. I started to do an AfD but got confused with all the templates and gave up. SPECIFICO talk 15:43, 26 May 2018 (UTC)
Please comment on Wikipedia talk:Appealing a block
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Appealing a block. Legobot (talk) 04:31, 29 May 2018 (UTC)
Book Expo
|
The Photographer's Barnstar | |
| Thank you for braving the crowds at Javits/BookCon to take author photos for Wikimedia Commons! The pictures of John Kerry and Sally Fields are my favorites. Jaldous1 (talk) 14:50, 5 June 2018 (UTC) |
- @Jaldous1: Thanks! Just finished uploading/adding the last batch of them. — Rhododendrites talk \\ 17:08, 5 June 2018 (UTC)
Invitation to join WP:RRTF
|
|
.jpg){kind=link}
- @2ReinreB2: Thanks for the invite, and I'm glad you you found the pic useful. I confess I've not read anything by Riordan, though. :) I'm familiar enough with his work that he was on my shortlist of people I wanted to get a picture of at the BookExpo this past weekend (other pics here), but a task force about his work is not a particularly good fit for me. :) — Rhododendrites talk \\ 00:23, 6 June 2018 (UTC)
- I understand, thanks for replying. We've been trying to branch out and recruit members with interests outside the books (technical editors, copyeditors, etc.) but with very little success. I appreciate you taking the time to read our message! -- 2ReinreB2 (talk) 00:36, 6 June 2018 (UTC)
This Month in GLAM: May 2018
| ||||||
Please comment on Wikipedia talk:Criteria for speedy deletion
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Criteria for speedy deletion. Legobot (talk) 04:27, 9 June 2018 (UTC)
June 20: WikiWednesday Salon and Skill-Share NYC (and Pratt Women Wikipedia Design this Saturday June 16)
| Wednesday June 20, 7pm: WikiWednesday Salon and Skill-Share NYC | |
|---|---|
|
You are invited to join the Wikimedia NYC community for our monthly "WikiWednesday" evening salon (7-9pm) and knowledge-sharing workshop at Babycastles gallery by 14th Street / Union Square in Manhattan. Is there a project you'd like to share? A question you'd like answered? A Wiki* skill you'd like to learn? Let us know by adding it to the agenda. We will also follow up on plans for recent and upcoming edit-a-thons, museum and library projects, education initiatives, and other outreach activities.
We especially encourage folks to add your 5-minute lightning talks to our roster, and otherwise join in the "open space" experience! Newcomers are very welcome! Bring your friends and colleagues! --Pharos (talk) 19:12, 14 June 2018 (UTC) P.S. You are also invited to Wikiproject Women Wikipedia Design @ Pratt Institute School of Architecture, Saturday, June 16! | |
(You can subscribe/unsubscribe from future notifications for NYC-area events by adding or removing your name from this list.)
c.jpg) |
An image created by you has been promoted to featured picture status Your image, File:Dark purple Trichoglottis (70213s)c.jpg, was nominated on Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate an image, please do so at Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates. Thank you for your contribution! Armbrust The Homunculus 23:21, 16 June 2018 (UTC)
|
Please comment on Wikipedia talk:Did you know
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Did you know. Legobot (talk) 04:27, 19 June 2018 (UTC)
29 June 2018
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be repeatedly reverting or undoing other editors' contributions at Rape in Germany. Although this may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is known as "edit warring" and is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, as it often creates animosity between editors. Instead of reverting, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.
If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to be blocked from editing Wikipedia. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a block.
Please observe you have reverted the same content twice already in less than 24 hours, which, should you persist, could lead to the consequences outlined on the previous paragraph.
Thank you. — XavierItzm (talk) 20:27, 19 June 2018 (UTC)
Books & Bytes – Issue 28
The Wikipedia Library
Books & Bytes
Issue 28, April – May 2018
- #1Bib1Ref
- New partners
- User Group update
- Global branches update
- Wikipedia Library global coordinators' meeting
- Spotlight: What are the ten most cited sources on Wikipedia? Let's ask the data
- Bytes in brief
Arabic, Chinese, Hindi, Italian and French versions of Books & Bytes are now available in meta!
Read the full newsletter
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:33, 20 June 2018 (UTC)
A beer for you!
|
Thanks for voting! Heathart (talk) 12:52, 21 June 2018 (UTC) |
Malayalam Britannica listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Malayalam Britannica. Since you had some involvement with the Malayalam Britannica redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Gotitbro (talk) 01:46, 27 June 2018 (UTC)
The Signpost: 29 June 2018
- Special report: NPR and AfC – The Marshall Plan: an engagement and a marriage?
- Op-ed: What do admins do?
- News and notes: Money, milestones, and Wikimania
- In the media: Much wikilove from the Mayor of London, less from Paekākāriki or a certain candidate for U.S. Congress
- Discussion report: Deletion, page moves, and an update to the main page
- Featured content: New promotions
- Arbitration report: WWII, UK politics, and a user deCrat'ed
- Traffic report: Endgame
- Technology report: Improvements piled on more improvements
- Gallery: Wiki Loves Africa
- Recent research: How censorship can backfire and conversations can go awry
- Humour: Television plot lines
- Wikipedia essays: This month's pick by The Signpost editors
- From the archives: Wolves nip at Wikipedia's heels: A perspective on the cost of paid editing
Please comment on Talk:Madonna (entertainer)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Madonna (entertainer). Legobot (talk) 04:26, 30 June 2018 (UTC)