User talk:Rhododendrites/2022b
This is an archive of past discussions with User:Rhododendrites, for the period April 2022 - June 2022. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Feedback request: Politics, government, and law request for comment
Your feedback is requested at Talk:Bucha massacre on a "Politics, government, and law" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 21:30, 3 April 2022 (UTC)
Featured picture scheduled for POTD
Hi Rhododendrites,
This is to let you know that File:California sea lion in La Jolla (70568).jpg, a featured picture you uploaded or nominated, has been selected as the English Wikipedia's picture of the day (POTD) for April 7, 2022. A preview of the POTD is displayed below and can be edited at Template:POTD/2022-04-07. If you have any concerns, please place a message at Wikipedia talk:Picture of the day. Thank you! Cwmhiraeth (talk) 10:02, 5 April 2022 (UTC)
The California sea lion (Zalophus californianus) is a coastal species of eared seal native to western North America. It is one of six species of sea lion. Its natural habitat ranges from southeast Alaska to central Mexico, including the Gulf of California. This female sea lion was photographed next to a western gull in Scripps Park in the neighborhood of La Jolla in San Diego, California. Photograph credit: Rhododendrites
Recently featured:
|
Feedback request: Society, sports, and culture request for comment
Your feedback is requested at Talk:Charlie Moore (basketball) on a "Society, sports, and culture" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 05:31, 7 April 2022 (UTC)
Feedback request: Wikipedia policies and guidelines request for comment
Your feedback is requested at Wikipedia talk:Redirect on a "Wikipedia policies and guidelines" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 16:31, 7 April 2022 (UTC)
RFA
Ah, I didn't notice the actual support move. Perhaps bold that part of your comments in the Neutral section. Thanks, and sorry for the confusion! ···日本穣 · 投稿 · Talk to Nihonjoe · Join WP Japan! 21:40, 7 April 2022 (UTC)
Earth Day 2022 Edit-a-thon - April 22nd - 2PM EST
You're invited! NYC Earth Day 2022 Edit-a-thon! April 22nd! | |
---|---|
Sure We Can and the Environment of New York City Task Force invite you to join us for:
This Edit-a-Thon is part of a larger Earth Day celebration, hosted by Brooklyn based recycling and community center Sure We Can, that runs from 1PM-7PM and is open to the public! See this flyer for more information: https://www.instagram.com/p/CcGr4FyuqEa/?utm_source=ig_web_copy_link |
This Month in GLAM: March 2022
|
Apr 24: Wiki-Picnic and WikiSeder in Brooklyn
April 24, 2-5pm: Wiki-Picnic and WikiSeder in Brooklyn | |
---|---|
You are invited to join us for a planned outdoor gathering with the local Wikimedia NYC community at the barbecue area of Brooklyn's Fort Greene Park. All attendees are subject to Wikimedia NYC's Code of Conduct. In addition, to participate in person you should be vaccinated and also be sure to respect others' personal space, and we may limit overall attendance size if appropriate.
|
(You can subscribe/unsubscribe from future notifications for NYC-area events by adding or removing your name from this list.)
--Wikimedia New York City Team MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:49, 14 April 2022 (UTC)
question re wikimedia nyc membership
hi. I think I already joined a while back as a member of Wikimedia NYC, at the web page https://nyc.wikimedia.org/wiki/Membership Could you please tell me how I might check on my membership status? please ping me if you reply. thanks. --Sm8900 (talk) 16:07, 14 April 2022 (UTC)
- by the way, I would be interested in getting more involved in the chapter, and possibly taking on some role. so perhaps we could discuss that sometime. I would look forward to working together and helping out. thanks! --Sm8900 (talk) 16:08, 14 April 2022 (UTC)
- Hi Sm8900. Regarding membership, I'd have to ping Pharos, who I think is most likely to have our list of members. — Rhododendrites talk \\ 21:02, 16 April 2022 (UTC)
- ok, that sounds terrific. feel free to let me know the status. I'm happy to pay the $5.00, I just want to try to clarify if this has gone through or not. thanks!! --Sm8900 (talk) 13:44, 20 April 2022 (UTC)
- hi. sorry to bother you, but I have not received a reply on this yet. is there anyone who actively replies to inquries on this topic, to provide the data from the memebership page? thanks. --Sm8900 (talk) 13:47, 29 April 2022 (UTC)
- I do not have access (to the best of my knowledge) to our membership lists. May want to reping Pharos. That said, we're currently in the process of trying to reconceptualize the idea of membership in WMNYC, as well as plans to better track/communicate with people to volunteer and/or come to events. That's down the road (later this year maybe?). — Rhododendrites talk \\ 15:19, 29 April 2022 (UTC)
- ok, that sounds terrific. if that is the case, then may I please help out, or join any group you may be developing for volunteers?As I said I would be interested in joing the local NYC chapter, so if that proces is still being developed, I'd be interested in helping out, if possible. so if there is some way for me to get on board, maybe as a volunteer, or maybe to help with technical tasks or items, etc I would be really interested to help out a bit, based on whatever you think might be truly helpful. so feel free to let me know, any time you might wish. thanks! --Sm8900 (talk) 16:12, 29 April 2022 (UTC)
- At this point, for the most part, there's not a good structure to say "hey, you want to volunteer -- that's great! -- here's a list of ways you can do that." I hope we can get there, but it's not there now. That said, there's one area which comes to mind where the general interest of the chapter exceeds our knowledge: Wikidata. Don't know if you're already involved with Wikidata or if that interests you at all, but that's something that comes to mind. :) — Rhododendrites talk \\ 16:37, 29 April 2022 (UTC)
- Interesting! but no, I'm truly not experienced or even very familiar with Wikidata. I appreciate your helpful note on that, though. I think that right now, the best approach might be simply that I will make myself generally available as things move forward, here and there. If I think of anything I might like to offer, work on, etc, I may drop by to let you know, or to get your ideas, or your feedback in general, etc. it's good to have your replies on this. thanks! --Sm8900 (talk) 17:00, 29 April 2022 (UTC)
- At this point, for the most part, there's not a good structure to say "hey, you want to volunteer -- that's great! -- here's a list of ways you can do that." I hope we can get there, but it's not there now. That said, there's one area which comes to mind where the general interest of the chapter exceeds our knowledge: Wikidata. Don't know if you're already involved with Wikidata or if that interests you at all, but that's something that comes to mind. :) — Rhododendrites talk \\ 16:37, 29 April 2022 (UTC)
- ok, that sounds terrific. if that is the case, then may I please help out, or join any group you may be developing for volunteers?As I said I would be interested in joing the local NYC chapter, so if that proces is still being developed, I'd be interested in helping out, if possible. so if there is some way for me to get on board, maybe as a volunteer, or maybe to help with technical tasks or items, etc I would be really interested to help out a bit, based on whatever you think might be truly helpful. so feel free to let me know, any time you might wish. thanks! --Sm8900 (talk) 16:12, 29 April 2022 (UTC)
- I do not have access (to the best of my knowledge) to our membership lists. May want to reping Pharos. That said, we're currently in the process of trying to reconceptualize the idea of membership in WMNYC, as well as plans to better track/communicate with people to volunteer and/or come to events. That's down the road (later this year maybe?). — Rhododendrites talk \\ 15:19, 29 April 2022 (UTC)
- hi. sorry to bother you, but I have not received a reply on this yet. is there anyone who actively replies to inquries on this topic, to provide the data from the memebership page? thanks. --Sm8900 (talk) 13:47, 29 April 2022 (UTC)
- ok, that sounds terrific. feel free to let me know the status. I'm happy to pay the $5.00, I just want to try to clarify if this has gone through or not. thanks!! --Sm8900 (talk) 13:44, 20 April 2022 (UTC)
Feedback request: Politics, government, and law request for comment
Your feedback is requested at Talk:College of Policing on a "Politics, government, and law" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 22:31, 14 April 2022 (UTC)
Feedback request: WikiProjects and collaborations request for comment
Your feedback is requested at Wikipedia talk:Did you know on a "WikiProjects and collaborations" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 23:30, 15 April 2022 (UTC)
Feedback request: History and geography request for comment
Your feedback is requested at Talk:Hawaii on a "History and geography" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 20:30, 16 April 2022 (UTC)
Feedback request: Wikipedia policies and guidelines request for comment
Your feedback is requested at Wikipedia:Bureaucrats' noticeboard on a "Wikipedia policies and guidelines" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 15:30, 19 April 2022 (UTC)
Misunderstanding on "Fasting from Whiteness" edit on TPUSA
Hello Rhondodendrites, You recently undid an edit that I corrected after the user:BlackKite reverted on the grounds that there was no mention of TPUSA in the sole cited article. I added another article by a different author back in. You undid the edit again with the edit summary":
"this isn't TPUSA receiving criticism, it's fox news amplifying TPUSA outrage, and WP:WEIGHT isn't established by fox news alone here"
The actual edit reads like this:
"In 2022, TPUSA received media attention after criticizing a Chicago-area church (First United Church of Oak Park) in a piece published covering the churches promotion for what they dubbed "Fasting from Whiteness". This is a practice in which the church would not be performing any songs of worship composed by "white people". Turning Point USA's coverage sparked outrage and the church released a press release on their website further explaining their actions along with claims they received "hateful messages" once the information about "Fasting from Whiteness" spread."
-I think you may have read it wrong. I didn't accuse Turning Point USA for receiving criticism anywhere in that body of text, as you mentioned in your edit summary, I said that Turning Point USA "recieved" media attention after they themselves critisized First United Church of Oak Park. Can you please revert back as this event was quite notable, and received quite a bit of local and international media attention. I linked an additional reliable green source article according to WP:RSP, just so you can see that Fox news alone isn't the only site establishing WP:WEIGHT.
- [Religion News Service RNS] << on RSP as reliable
- [NY POST article] << corroborating article mentioning TPUSA
- [DailyWire article] << another corroborating article mentioning TPUSA. Eruditess (talk) 22:34, 20 April 2022 (UTC)
The Signpost: 24 April 2022
- News and notes: Double trouble
- In the media: The battlegrounds outside and inside Wikipedia
- Special report: Ukrainian Wikimedians during the war
- Eyewitness Wikimedian, Vinnytsia, Ukraine: War diary (Part 2)
- Technology report: 8-year-old attribution issues in Media Viewer
- Featured content: Wikipedia's best content from March
- Interview: On a war and a map
- Serendipity: Wikipedia loves photographs, but hates photographers
- Traffic report: Justice Jackson, the Smiths, and an invasion
- News from the WMF: How Smart is the SMART Copyright Act?
- Humour: Really huge message boxes
- From the archives: Wales resigned WMF board chair in 2006 reorganization
Mass message sender granted
Hello. Your account has been granted the "massmessage-sender" user right, allowing you to send messages to multiple users at once. A few important things to note:
- Messages should only be sent to groups of users who are likely to be interested in the topic.
- For regular mailings such as those for WikiProjects, localized events, or newsletters, users should be informed of how they can unsubscribe from future mailings.
- The mass messaging tool should never be used for canvassing with the intention of influencing the outcome of discussions.
For more information, refer to the guidance for use. If you do not want mass message sender rights anymore, just let me or any other administrator know and we will remove it. Thank you and happy editing! GeneralNotability (talk) 02:00, 27 April 2022 (UTC)
Apr 27: ONLINE WikiWednesday Salon NYC
April 27, 7pm: ONLINE WikiWednesday Salon NYC | |
---|---|
You are invited to join the Wikimedia NYC community for our monthly "WikiWednesday" evening salon (7-8pm) and knowledge-sharing workshop. To join the meeting from your computer or smartphone, just visit this link. More information about how to connect is available on the meetup page. We look forward to seeing local Wikimedians, but would also like to invite folks from the greater New York metropolitan area (and beyond!) who might not typically be able to join us in person! If there's a project you'd like to share or a question you'd like answered, just let us know by adding it to the agenda or the talk page.
|
(You can subscribe/unsubscribe from future notifications for NYC-area events by adding or removing your name from this list.)
--Wikimedia New York City Team 02:34, 27 April 2022 (UTC)
WikiCup 2022 May newsletter
The second round of the 2022 WikiCup has now finished. It was a high-scoring round and contestants needed 115 points to advance to round 3. There were some very impressive efforts in round 2, with the top seven contestants all scoring more than 500 points. A large number of the points came from the 11 featured articles and the 79 good articles achieved in total by contestants.
Our top scorers in round 2 were:
- Epicgenius, with 1264 points from 2 featured article, 4 good articles and 18 DYKs. Epicgenius was a finalist last year but has now withdrawn from the contest as he pursues a new career path.
- AryKun, with 1172 points from two featured articles, one good article and a substantial number of featured article and good article reviews.
- Bloom6132, with 605 points from 44 in the news items and 4 DYKs.
- Sammi Brie, with 573 points from 8 GAs and 21 DYKs.
- Ealdgyth, with 567 points from 11 GAs and 34 good and featured article reviews.
- Panini!, with 549 points from 1 FA, 4 GAs and several other sources.
- Lee Vilenski, with 545 points from 1 FA, 4 GAs and a number of reviews.
The rules for featured and good article reviews require the review to be of sufficient length; brief quick fails and very short reviews will generally not be awarded points. Remember also that DYKs cannot be claimed until they have appeared on the main page. As we enter the third round, any content promoted after the end of round 2 but before the start of round 3 can be claimed now, and anything you forgot to claim in round 2 cannot! Remember too, that you must claim your points within 14 days of "earning" them. When doing GARs, please make sure that you check that all the GA criteria are fully met.
If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article nominations, a featured process, or anything else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed (remember to remove your listing when no longer required). Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Sturmvogel 66 (talk) and Cwmhiraeth Cwmhiraeth (talk) 10:39, 1 May 2020 (UTC)
Bird photos
What camera do you recommend for someone who is starting to take an interest in photography? Your photos of birds are rather high-quality and I'm thinking about finding a second hobby. — Mhawk10 (talk) 02:38, 4 May 2022 (UTC)
- @Mhawk10: That's great! I got started uploading my cell phone pics to Commons. I'm not up on all of the features/specs built into phone cameras these days, so can't really advise on that, but even if the megapixel count is going through the roof, phone cameras are limited by a tiny lens that just can't let as much light through as something physically bigger. It was a desire to contribute better images for Wikipedia that led me to buy a camera. If that's where you are, there are a few considerations: budget is the big one, of course, but also what kind of things you'd want to take pictures of? Wildlife, buildings, sports, landscapes, portraits, etc. I just went through these decisions when Wikimedia New York City was deciding on a camera to buy for our members to use. We settled on a nice Panasonic point-and-shoot (as opposed to an interchangeable lens format). For most things, it works great, but if you want a really wide angle for a giant building or a really long zoom for a distant bird, it doesn't have as much flexibility. — Rhododendrites talk \\ 13:56, 4 May 2022 (UTC)
Feedback request: Politics, government, and law request for comment
Your feedback is requested at Talk:Anti-Armenian sentiment in Azerbaijan on a "Politics, government, and law" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 04:31, 4 May 2022 (UTC)
Feedback request: Society, sports, and culture request for comment
Your feedback is requested at Talk:Anti-Armenian sentiment in Azerbaijan on a "Society, sports, and culture" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 06:30, 4 May 2022 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Death's Door game art.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Death's Door game art.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:10, 8 May 2022 (UTC)
Feedback request: Society, sports, and culture request for comment
Your feedback is requested at Talk:Rajput on a "Society, sports, and culture" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 00:30, 9 May 2022 (UTC)
An image created by you has been promoted to featured picture status Your image, File:Mockingbird in Bay Ridge (85082).jpg, was nominated on Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate an image, please do so at Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates. Thank you for your contribution! Armbrust The Homunculus 07:10, 9 May 2022 (UTC)
|
Feedback request: Media, the arts, and architecture request for comment
Your feedback is requested at Talk:Once Upon a Time in Hollywood on a "Media, the arts, and architecture" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 07:30, 9 May 2022 (UTC)
This Month in GLAM: April 2022
|
Feedback request: Biographies request for comment
Your feedback is requested at Talk:The Beach Boys on a "Biographies" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 18:30, 13 May 2022 (UTC)
May 22: Wiki-Picnic and Hackathon in Brooklyn
May 22, 12-5pm: Wiki-Picnic and Hackathon in Brooklyn | |
---|---|
You are invited to join us for a planned outdoor "Hacknic" gathering with the local Wikimedia NYC community at the 10th Avenue Lawn of Brooklyn's Prospect Park. All attendees are subject to Wikimedia NYC's Code of Conduct. In addition, to participate in person you should be vaccinated and also be sure to respect others' personal space, and we may limit overall attendance size if appropriate.
|
(You can subscribe/unsubscribe from future notifications for NYC-area events by adding or removing your name from this list.)
--Wikimedia New York City Team 02:19, 19 May 2022 (UTC)
May 25: ONLINE WikiWednesday Salon NYC
May 25, 7pm: ONLINE WikiWednesday Salon NYC | |
---|---|
You are invited to join the Wikimedia NYC community for our monthly "WikiWednesday" evening salon (7-8pm) and knowledge-sharing workshop. To join the meeting from your computer or smartphone, just visit this link. More information about how to connect is available on the meetup page. We look forward to seeing local Wikimedians, but would also like to invite folks from the greater New York metropolitan area (and beyond!) who might not typically be able to join us in person! If there's a project you'd like to share or a question you'd like answered, just let us know by adding it to the agenda or the talk page.
|
(You can subscribe/unsubscribe from future notifications for NYC-area events by adding or removing your name from this list.)
--Wikimedia New York City Team 00:46, 25 May 2022 (UTC)
The Signpost: 29 May 2022
- From the team: A changing of the guard
- News and notes: 2022 Wikimedia Board elections
- Community view: Have your say in the 2022 Wikimedia Foundation Board elections
- In the media: Putin, Jimbo, Musk and more
- Special report: Three stories of Ukrainian Wikimedians during the war
- Discussion report: Portals, April Fools, admin activity requirements and more
- WikiProject report: WikiProject COVID-19 revisited
- Technology report: A new video player for Wikimedia wikis
- Featured content: Featured content of April
- Interview: Wikipedia's pride
- Serendipity: Those thieving image farms
- Recent research: 35 million Twitter links analysed
- Tips and tricks: The reference desks of Wikipedia
- Traffic report: Strange highs and strange lows
- News from Diff: Winners of the Human rights and Environment special nomination by Wiki Loves Earth announced
- News from the WMF: The EU Digital Services Act: What’s the Deal with the Deal?
- From the archives: The Onion and Wikipedia
- Humour: A new crossword
ICYMI or didn't read it
I remember your views on "being first" and creating articles right away. Well, if you do, you apparently end up in The Signpost (scroll down to "A profile of Wikipedians and breaking news") and CNN. cart-Talk 10:23, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
Editing newsletter 2022 – #1
Read this in another language • Subscription list for the multilingual newsletter • Local subscription list
The New topic tool helps editors create new ==Sections== on discussion pages. New editors are more successful with this new tool. You can read the report. Soon, the Editing team will offer this to all editors at most WMF-hosted wikis. You can join the discussion about this tool for the English Wikipedia is at Wikipedia:Village pump (proposals)#Enabling the New Topic Tool by default. You will be able to turn it off in the tool or at Special:Preferences#mw-prefsection-editing-discussion.
The Editing team plans to change the appearance of talk pages. These are separate from the changes made by the mw:Desktop improvements project and will appear in both Vector 2010 and Vector 2022. The goal is to add some information and make discussions look visibly different from encyclopedia articles. You can see some ideas at Wikipedia talk:Talk pages project#Prototype Ready for Feedback.
23:15, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
Feedback request: Wikipedia style and naming request for comment
Your feedback is requested at Wikipedia:Australian Wikipedians' notice board on a "Wikipedia style and naming" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 17:30, 31 May 2022 (UTC)
Featured picture scheduled for POTD
Hi Rhododendrites,
This is to let you know that File:Fulton Center skylight (91420).jpg, a featured picture you uploaded, has been selected as the English Wikipedia's picture of the day (POTD) for October 9, 2022. A preview of the POTD is displayed below and can be edited at Template:POTD/2022-10-09. If you have any concerns, please place a message at Wikipedia talk:Picture of the day. Thank you! Adam Cuerden (talk)Has about 7.9% of all FPs 11:24, 1 June 2022 (UTC)
The Sky Reflector-Net at Fulton Center, a subway and retail complex centered at the intersection of Fulton Street and Broadway in Lower Manhattan, New York City. The Sky Reflector-Net, which was commissioned by the MTA Arts & Design (the art program of the MTA), was installed in 2014 in the Fulton Center transit hub. Located at the center of the oculus, the Sky Reflector-Net uses hundreds of aluminum mirrors to provide natural sunlight from a 53 ft (16 m) skylight to an underground area as much as four stories deep. Photograph credit: User:Rhododendrites
Recently featured:
|
Books & Bytes – Issue 50
Books & Bytes
Issue 50, March – April 2022
- New library partner - SPIE
- 1Lib1Ref May 2022 underway
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --12:52, 1 June 2022 (UTC) (UTC)
Wednesday June 8, 11am-5pm: New York Botanical Garden - Environment of the Bronx - Editing Wikipedia for Beginners | |
---|---|
The LuEsther T. Mertz Library of the New York Botanical Garden and the Environment of New York City Task Force invite the general public of all experience levels to come to the Mertz Library in person and learn how to use Wikipedia! All skill levels welcome at the event! Experienced Wikipedia editors from the Wikimedia New York City chapter will be in attendance and available to help. A one hour training session will be offered at the start of this event covering introductory topics. Attendees familiar with editing Wikipedia can edit off of a worklist focused on the environment of New York City; as well as, a sub-list focused on the environment of the Bronx. The Mertz Library will pull topical media from their collection to assist the editing. --Wikimedia New York City Team via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:05, 1 June 2022 (UTC) (You can subscribe/unsubscribe from future notifications for NYC-area events by adding or removing your name from this list.) |
Feedback request: Media, the arts, and architecture request for comment
Your feedback is requested at Talk:Rebel News on a "Media, the arts, and architecture" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 18:30, 1 June 2022 (UTC)
An image created by you has been promoted to featured picture status Your image, File:Male northern cardinal in Central Park (52612).jpg, was nominated on Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate an image, please do so at Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates. Thank you for your contribution! Armbrust The Homunculus 21:48, 1 June 2022 (UTC)
|
An image created by you has been promoted to featured picture status Your image, File:Northern cardinal female in CP (02035).jpg, was nominated on Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate an image, please do so at Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates. Thank you for your contribution! Armbrust The Homunculus 21:48, 1 June 2022 (UTC)
|
Would you consider becoming a New Page Reviewer?
Hi Rhododendrites, I've recently been looking for editors to invite to join the new page reviewing team, and after reviewing your editing history, I think you would be a good candidate. Reviewing/patrolling a page doesn't take much time but it requires a good understanding of Wikipedia policies and guidelines; the new page reviewing team needs help from experienced users like yourself. Would you please consider becoming a New Page Reviewer? Kindly read the tutorial before making your decision (if it looks daunting, don't worry, most pages are easy to review, and habits are quick to develop). If this looks like something that you can do, please consider joining us. If you choose to apply, you can drop an application over at WP:PERM/NPR. If you have questions, please feel free to drop a message on my talk page or at the reviewer's discussion board. Cheers, and hope to see you around, (t · c) buidhe 00:18, 2 June 2022 (UTC) |
Featured picture scheduled for POTD
Hi Rhododendrites,
This is to let you know that File:Male northern cardinal in Central Park (52612).jpg, a featured picture you uploaded, has been selected as the English Wikipedia's picture of the day (POTD) for December 25, 2023. A preview of the POTD is displayed below and can be edited at Template:POTD/2023-12-25. If you have any concerns, please place a message at Wikipedia talk:Picture of the day. Thank you! Adam Cuerden (talk)Has about 7.9% of all FPs 11:55, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
The Adoration of the Shepherds is an episode in the story of the Nativity of Jesus in which shepherds are near witnesses to Jesus's birth in Bethlehem. It is based on the account in the Gospel of Luke and follows the Annunciation to the Shepherds, in which the shepherds are summoned by an angel to the scene of the birth. Like the episode preceding it, the Adoration of the Shepherds is a common subject in art, where it is often combined with the Adoration of the Magi. Depictions of the shepherds' adoration of the Christ Child as a subject distinct from that of the biblical Magi began to appear around the 15th century in artworks and altarpieces in the western Christian world. The shepherds are sometimes shown presenting simpler gifts than those of the Magi, such as lambs. This Adoration of the Shepherds is an oil-on-canvas painting by Bartolomé Esteban Murillo, a Spanish Baroque artist. Painted around 1650, the work is now in the Museo del Prado in Madrid. Painting credit: Bartolomé Esteban Murillo
Recently featured:
|
NYC Wiknic, June 26
Hold the date. Meetup/NYC Wiknic in Crotona Park, Sunday June 26.
Watch Wikipedia:Meetup/NYC/Wiknic June 2022 for further details as they become available.
Feedback request: Language and linguistics request for comment
Your feedback is requested at Talk:Turkish language on a "Language and linguistics" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 21:30, 5 June 2022 (UTC)
Feedback request: Biographies request for comment
Your feedback is requested at Talk:Camille Vasquez on a "Biographies" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 16:31, 6 June 2022 (UTC)
request group call
hi there! would it be possible to please schedule another group call? it could be the whole chapter if you want. or alternately, just the NYC Meetup board. or alternately, you, me, plus any other people you might wish. nothing major, but a few substantive updates, on a few different things. I hope that's ok? feel free to let me know. thanks!!! --Sm8900 (talk) 23:44, 7 June 2022 (UTC)
- Hello. By another group call, what do you mean? Another WikiWednesday? If there's something on your mind that may be of interest to others in the chapter, you're always welcome to post to the WMNYC talk page to see if there's interest, or post to Discord, etc. Sorry if I'm misinterpreting what you mean. — Rhododendrites talk \\ 02:50, 8 June 2022 (UTC)
- ok, that's helpful. actually, I meant an internal call, with members of the chapter organizing body or committee for NYC Meetup, if possible. thanks. --Sm8900 (talk) 13:31, 8 June 2022 (UTC)
Feedback request: WikiProjects and collaborations request for comment
Your feedback is requested at Wikipedia:WikiProject Council/Proposals/Liberalism on a "WikiProjects and collaborations" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 11:30, 10 June 2022 (UTC)
Feedback request: Wikipedia proposals request for comment
Your feedback is requested at Wikipedia:Village pump (proposals) on a "Wikipedia proposals" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 10:30, 11 June 2022 (UTC)
Seriously? You seriously need to bring this up in a discussion that's already splintering in a million directions? I get you have a personal bugbear against En-wiki FPC. This was not the time to bring it up. Adam Cuerden (talk)Has about 7.9% of all FPs 19:58, 12 June 2022 (UTC)
- What is the time to bring it up, if not when people are talking (implicitly or otherwise) about the selection of POTD and the relationship of that process to FPC? If I raise it when there's no active issue, nobody will care.
- That said, I get that the current thread(s) involve a lot of stuff being thrown in your direction. While I don't agree with you that it's inappropriate to bring up, in an effort not to exacerbate what I'm sure is a stressful thread, I'll replace it with a pointer here if anyone wants to follow up. Fair? — Rhododendrites talk \\ 20:16, 12 June 2022 (UTC)
- Hmm. could've sworn the reply link automatically generated a ping. Oh well. Here it is: @Adam Cuerden: — Rhododendrites talk \\ 20:18, 12 June 2022 (UTC)
- You suggested we throw out the whole process literally immediately after I had spent two weeks or so setting up the next six months of POTD. Back when POTD had less than a week of images queued up? Great time. After someone had just spent literal hundreds of hours making a massive backlog? Really terrible time Adam Cuerden (talk)Has about 7.9% of all FPs 20:22, 12 June 2022 (UTC)
- First, I think it's great you've set up a POTD buffer. Thanks for that. In no scenario would I support getting rid of that. Even if, against the odds, enough people agree that we should start using Commons FPs, that's no reason to delist current enwp FPs, and it's no reason to toss out the current POTD queue. The ideal would be to keep everything we have and just stop promoting new ones. Mark enwp FPC as historical, keep the current FPs as-is, and just start allowing Commons FPs. IMO. But we can talk about it another time, too. — Rhododendrites talk \\ 20:33, 12 June 2022 (UTC)
- You suggested we throw out the whole process literally immediately after I had spent two weeks or so setting up the next six months of POTD. Back when POTD had less than a week of images queued up? Great time. After someone had just spent literal hundreds of hours making a massive backlog? Really terrible time Adam Cuerden (talk)Has about 7.9% of all FPs 20:22, 12 June 2022 (UTC)
FPC
(Moved from Talk:Main page — Rhododendrites talk \\ 20:19, 12 June 2022 (UTC))
Periodic reminder that one of the main reasons (if not the main reason) we maintain a parallel FPC process, rather than phase it out when Commons centralized it, is to select images for our POTD. Participation has been a bit better over the last year than in the past several (kudos to participants for that, indeed -- and apologies for otherwise being a naysayer in the face of some improvement), but it still almost never promotes at the rate of 1/day. The awkward rules about use of images in articles (is it used? is it still used? where on the page is it used? is it discussed in the text? is the article otherwise decent quality?) plus slim participation means idiosyncratic opinions get more weight than they do on Commons. The Commons process gets far more people participating and promotes about 3/day vs. <1/day, and includes much of what gets promote here (as well as a bunch of stuff that isn't used in articles, granted, but a lot that could be but isn't yet). Instead of going through a separate FPC process where a few people select what should be in the pool of POTDs, then having a separate process to choose POTDs, and then having a discussion when the broader community sees what the FPC community promoted, we could take advantage of the process that already gets more participation and provides more options, and can just focus on a process which selects POTDs from those. — Rhododendrites talk \\ 19:52, 12 June 2022 (UTC)
- I agree with marking enwiki FPC historical and just having one FP process at Commons. Enwiki could then still have a POTD process, which chooses from among Commons FPs. I also agree that we should take a look at POTD guidelines (e.g., used in an article, as you mentioned) to see if they're still helpful. Levivich 20:41, 12 June 2022 (UTC)
- The only exception(s) I can think of is/are any image that is considered free on Wikipedia but cannot be on Commons (such as anything with {{PD-US-expired-abroad}}). WP:FPCR only says that it must be freely-licensed and thus not fair use. -BRAINULATOR9 (TALK) 17:15, 14 June 2022 (UTC)
- I'm always on board with merging redundant processes. This seems like a prime candidate. Best, {{u|Sdkb}} talk 03:09, 13 June 2022 (UTC)
- I opposed killing off en-FPC the last time I saw it come around, but I'm shifting towards the point of view that it's not a useful process. It's supposed to have different standards from commons, focusing more on being informative than on being pretty and unblemished, but in practice that's not what most of the regular participants care most about, so it ends up just being a smaller-participation copy of commons. What's the point of that? —David Eppstein (talk) 04:02, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
- From my experience, informative images that aren't sufficiently "pretty" really do do badly on Commons. Just looking at things I've had promoted recently, these four passed here easily, but not on Commons:
- Comparing the discussions here and there could well be informative. Since you tend to get more of what you encourage, I could certainly see a switch to Commons eliminating large categories of images from getting brought to Wikipedia at all. Also, there's a LOT of things that pass Commons with basically no use cases. Adam Cuerden (talk)Has about 7.9% of all FPs 21:32, 18 June 2022 (UTC)
This Month in GLAM: May 2022
|
Feedback request: Religion and philosophy request for comment
Your feedback is requested at Talk:Astrology on a "Religion and philosophy" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 13:30, 14 June 2022 (UTC)
Feedback request: Biographies request for comment
Your feedback is requested at Talk:Depp v. Heard on a "Biographies" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 20:30, 16 June 2022 (UTC)
Feedback request: Politics, government, and law request for comment
Your feedback is requested at Talk:Depp v. Heard on a "Politics, government, and law" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 21:31, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
Arbitration case opened
You recently offered a statement in a request for arbitration. The Arbitration Committee has accepted that request for arbitration and an arbitration case has been opened at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Conduct_in_deletion-related_editing. Evidence that you wish the arbitrators to consider should be added to the evidence subpage, at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Conduct_in_deletion-related_editing/Evidence. Please add your evidence by July 9, 2022, which is when the evidence phase closes. You can also contribute to the case workshop subpage, Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Conduct_in_deletion-related_editing/Workshop. For a guide to the arbitration process, see Wikipedia:Arbitration/Guide to arbitration. For the Arbitration Committee, firefly ( t · c ) 11:20, 18 June 2022 (UTC)
June 22: ONLINE WikiWednesday Salon NYC
June 22, 7pm: ONLINE WikiWednesday Salon NYC | |
---|---|
You are invited to join the Wikimedia NYC community for our monthly "WikiWednesday" evening salon (7-8pm) and knowledge-sharing workshop. To join the meeting from your computer or smartphone, just visit the Zoom link on the meetup page. We look forward to seeing local Wikimedians, but would also like to invite folks from the greater New York metropolitan area (and beyond!) who might not typically be able to join us in person! If there's a project you'd like to share or a question you'd like answered, just let us know by adding it to the agenda or the talk page.
|
(You can subscribe/unsubscribe from future notifications for NYC-area events by adding or removing your name from this list.)
--Wikimedia New York City Team 14:51, 21 June 2022 (UTC)
event today in Bronx
Hi. It was great to see you yesterday at the zoom call. Thanks for all your ideas!
Look at this. Here is a wikipedia meetup event, which will be today in the Bronx!! I will post the text below.
https://mobile.twitter.com/wikicari/status/1539369817647755264
Thurs, June 23, 1-4PM join us and WikiCari in #OldSanJuan and the Bronx as Wikimedia expert hosts a Wikipedia meetup/photo walk focused on #PuertoRico. Both events are at @ChocobarCortes locations in PR and NYC. More info at link below. Sm8900 (talk) 09:24, 23 June 2022 (UTC)
Here is the link for the actual events. Thanks.
https://m.wikidata.org/wiki/Wikidata:Events/San_Juan/2022-06-23 Sm8900 (talk) 09:28, 23 June 2022 (UTC)
- @Sm8900: Thanks for the heads up. I won't be able to attend, but it sounds like a great event. I'm surprised I haven't seen anything about this before now, but that's likely because it's primarily organized in Puerto Rico. Not sure who's organizing locally. — Rhododendrites talk \\ 13:57, 23 June 2022 (UTC)
Interesting group item
I just found this interesting item in your talk page archives: Discussion on Growth team "add an image" idea, which also led me to this interesting team and project. mw:Growth. I may add this to the navbox that I showed you. thanks!! Sm8900 (talk) 14:20, 23 June 2022 (UTC)
Sun June 26: Bronx Wiki-Picnic
June 26, 3-6pm: Bronx Wiki-Picnic | |
---|---|
You are invited to join us for a planned outdoor gathering with the local Wikimedia NYC community at the Charlotte Street barbecue area of the Bronx's Crotona Park. All attendees are subject to Wikimedia NYC's Code of Conduct. In addition, to participate in person you should be vaccinated and also be sure to respect others' personal space, and we may limit overall attendance size if appropriate.
|
(You can subscribe/unsubscribe from future notifications for NYC-area events by adding or removing your name from this list.)
--Wikimedia New York City Team via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:47, 23 June 2022 (UTC)
note re items
hi. it was great to see you on the zoom call for the nyc meetup chapter. would it be ok if I send you an invite via email, to join the forums site for "movement strategy" i.e. the site that hists the threads run by Discourse? I hope that's ok. we could really use your input there. feel free to let me know. thanks! Sm8900 (talk) 13:40, 24 June 2022 (UTC)
Feedback request: Society, sports, and culture request for comment
Your feedback is requested at Talk:Rock balancing on a "Society, sports, and culture" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 16:30, 25 June 2022 (UTC)
The Signpost: 26 June 2022
- News and notes: WMF inks new rules on government-ordered takedowns, blasts Russian feds' censor demands, spends big bucks
- In the media: Editor given three-year sentence, big RfA makes news, Guy Standing takes it sitting down
- Special report: "Wikipedia's independence" or "Wikimedia's pile of dosh"?
- Featured content: Articles on Scots' clash, Yank's tux, Austrian's action flick deemed brilliant prose
- Recent research: Wikipedia versus academia (again), tables' "immortality" probed
- Serendipity: Was she really a Swiss lesbian automobile racer?
- News from the WMF: Wikimedia Enterprise signs first deals
- Gallery: Celebration of summer, winter