Richard Theodor Kusiolek

Welcome!

Hello, Richard Theodor Kusiolek, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as User:Richard Theodor Kusiolek, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's content policies and may not be retained. In short, the topic of an article must be notable and have already been the subject of publication by reliable and independent sources.

Please review Your first article for an overview of the article creation process. The Article Wizard is available to help you create an article, where it will be reviewed and considered for publication. For information on how to request a new article that can be created by someone else, see Requested articles. If you are stuck, come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can help you through the processes.

New to Wikipedia? Please consider taking a look at the our introductory tutorial or reviewing the contributing to Wikipedia page to learn the basics about editing. Below are a few other good pages about article creation.

• Article development
• Standard layout
• Lead section
• How to write a great article
• The perfect article

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions ask me on my talk page or you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! —⁠andrybak (talk) 16:48, 7 September 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Richard Theodor Kusiolek

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on User:Richard Theodor Kusiolek, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. —⁠andrybak (talk) 16:48, 7 September 2020 (UTC)

Contested deletion

This page is not unambiguously promotional, because... (your reason here) --Richard Theodor Kusiolek (talk) 16:54, 7 September 2020 (UTC) THIS IS AN EXACT COPY OF A POSTING MADE BY RICHARD J. KRAMER ...THAT IS ON WIKIPEDIA. WHY ARE YOU PICKING ON ME? I FOLLOWED YOUR OWN PAGES FOR AN EXAMPLE. WHY DO YOU MAKE THIS SO PAINFULLY DIFFICULT???????? rsvp ....i SPENT OVER TWO HOURS PLAYING AROUND WITH THIS............ I AM NOT AN IGNORANT PERSON!!!

I go into a little more detail below, but I wanted to point out that you say your userpage (which was deleted) is a copy of "a posting made by Richard J. Kramer". I would like to point out that our article about Richard J. Kramer was not made by Richard J. Kramer. ~ ONUnicorn^{(Talk|Contribs)}problem solving 17:07, 8 September 2020 (UTC)

September 2020

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions; however, it appears you may have written a Wikipedia article about yourself. Creating an autobiography is strongly discouraged – please see our guideline on writing autobiographies. If you create such an article, it may be deleted. If what you have done in life is genuinely notable and can be verified according to our policy for articles about living people, someone else will probably create an article about you sooner or later (see Wikipedians with articles). If you wish to add to or change an existing article about yourself, you are welcome to propose the changes by visiting the article's talk page. Please understand that this is an encyclopedia and not a personal web space or social networking site. If your article has already been deleted, please see: Why was the page I created deleted?, and if you feel the deletion was an error, please discuss this with the deleting administrator. Thank you. Theroadislong (talk) 18:33, 7 September 2020 (UTC)

Hello.

Hi. I saw your helpdesk post. I'm sorry you've gotten off to a rocky start here.

First off, in your help desk post, you complained about not being able to get help via phone or e-mail, and not knowing how to contact someone. The help desk is the best way to contact volunteers who want to help you. Around here we communicate with each other through "Talk pages". Each user has a talk page, and each article has a talk page. I am posting on your talk page now. User talk pages are for talking to that particular user, and article talk pages are for discussing that particular article with anyone and everyone who is interested in it. If you want to reply to this comment I'm making to you now, you can do so right here, by responding below my comment and prefacing your comment with a colon.

Next, just as each user has a talk page, each user also has a user page.  Your user page is for telling other Wikipedia users about yourself in the context of your editing activities here. So, if you are an expert in HTML, you may want to say so on your user page so that other people know they can get help from you with HTML. If you speak 7 languages fluently, you may want to say so as then people will know they can approach you for help in translations from and to those languages. If you love Pokemon, or 7th century Chinese art, or something, and want to focus on improving Wikipedia's coverage of that topic . . . again, your userpage is for letting people know that.

What you wrote on your userpage appeared to be an attempt to write an article, not an attempt to tell people about yourself in the context of your editing activities here. If you want to write an article, I suggest writing it in draft space. That is the place for unfinished draft articles. You could also write it in your sandbox (there should be a link in the upper right corner of your screen). The sandbox is a place for editing experiments, but it is often used for drafts as well. Another problem with what you wrote is that it appeared to be an autobiography. You have chosen Richard Theodor Kusiolek as your user name and you appear to be writing an article about Richard Theodor Kusiolek. That leads one to assume you are Richard Theodor Kusiolek and are writing about yourself, which is something we strongly discourage. We discourage people from writing about themselves because you have an obvious conflict of interest where you are concerned. It is nearly impossible to write about yourself from a neutral point of view, and neutrality is one of the 5 pillars on which this project (Wikipedia) rests. Also, if you are writing about yourself, it is easy to include things that you know because you know them yourself, things which, if you are not available for consultation are not verifiable, another one of the 5 pillars on which this project rests. All information in Wikipedia must be verifiable, and sourced to previously published sources (such as books, magazines, newspapers, recorded audio and video, etc.) that other people can look up to verify the information. If you're writing about yourself, it's too easy to include information that isn't verifiable.

Lastly, you said in your helpdesk post that you found our entry on Richard J. Kramer and used it as a template for what to write and how to present information. That's actually not a bad idea, but you missed the most important part of the Richard J. Kramer article, and that is that (nearly) every sentence in that article has a little blue footnote pointing to the source where the information in that sentence came from. That's what we mean both by verifiability and by notability. The difference is that a thing is notable if sources exist. An article is verifiable if those sources are cited (the blue footnotes).

I hope this helps. If you have questions about anything, reply here. I'll keep an eye on this page. ~ ONUnicorn^{(Talk|Contribs)}problem solving 16:33, 8 September 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Richard Theodor Kusiolek

A tag has been placed on User:Richard Theodor Kusiolek requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to consist of writings, information, discussions, and/or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that Wikipedia is not a free web hosting service. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Theroadislong (talk) 19:45, 20 September 2020 (UTC)

Please heed this warning

Hello. Please would you be so kind as to read WP:NOTWEBHOST to appreciate why we have for the second time had to delete your user page. You may be a published author and an expert in your field, but I'm afraid we cannot allow you to use Wikipedia as a free hosting site for your essays or papers. Your userpage is solely here for you to say a few words about yourself and your interest in editing this encyclopaedia (see WP:USERPAGE). You may not promote ideas and concepts of your own here, so you will need to use another platform for publishing you paper "Privacy versus Security by Richard Theodor Kusiolek - Mobility Cybersecurity in a Global World of Security Breaches". As interesting as it may be, your Original Research is not appropriate here.

I realise you have been struggling to understand what Wikipedia is about, and how we operate. I admit that it can be a steep learning curve, so trying to create an article about yourself with no understanding of how things work is akin to speeding off in a car without first having learnt to drive. I'm afraid you could have your editing privileges withdrawn if you do not heed this warning, per WP:NOTHERE. Meaning that we are having doubts about your genuine desire to help build an encyclopaedia of notable things, and that you are seem to be here to spam us with your original thoughts. We cannot permit that, sorry. We do have friendly helpers over at at The Teahouse, which is what we call our help forum for new editors. Drop by if you need any further advice from our volunteers. Nick Moyes (talk) 23:09, 20 September 2020 (UTC)